Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

On the elusive nature of the public

Discussions on agricultural nanotechnology are pervaded with conflicting accounts of public opinion. A pragmatist concept may help to explain why this is so difficult to identify.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type



Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout


  1. Conti, J., Satterfield, T. & Harthorn, B. H. Risk Anal. 31, 1734–1748 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Vandermoere, F., Blanchemanche, S., Bieberstein, A., Marette, S. & Roosen, J. Public Underst. Sci. 20, 195–206 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen, H. & Yada, R. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 22, 585–594 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Parisi, C., Vigani, M. & Rodríguez-Cerezo, E. Nano Today 10, 124–127 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Yawson, R. M. & Kuzma, J. J. Consum. Policy 33, 299–322 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gupta, N., Fischer, A. R. H., van der Lans, I. A. & Frewer, L. J. J. Nanopart. Res. 14, 857 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Landry, M. P. & Mitter, N. Nat. Nanotechnol. (2019).

  8. Rip, A. Sci. Cult. 15, 349–365 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Beumer, K. Nanotechnology and Development: Styles of Governance in India, South Africa, and Kenya. PhD thesis, Maastricht Univ. (2016).

  10. Felt, U. & Fochler, M. Minerva 48, 219–238 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Laurent, B. Sci. Eng. Ethics 17, 649–666 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mitzschke, A. Elusive Publics: Understanding Techno-Scientific Controversy and Democratic Governance in the GM Crops Debate. PhD thesis, Maastricht Univ. (2018).

  13. Beumer, K. & Bhattacharya, S. Sci. Public Policy 40, 628–643 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Agriculture & rural development. The World Bank (2019).

  15. Indian vice president inaugurates the “Bangalore Nano 2008”. AzoNano (2008).

  16. India ranks number one in Google search volume on topics related to nanotechnology. Newswire Today (2006).

  17. Romig, A. D. Jr et al. Technol. Forecast Soc. Change 74, 1634–1642 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wickson, F., Delgado, A. & Kjølberg, K. L. Nat. Nanotechnol. 5, 757–758 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Irwin, A. Soc. Stud. Sci. 36, 299–320 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Dewey, J. The Public and its Problems (Swallow, 1927).

  21. Marres, N. S. No Issue, No Public: Democratic Deficits after the Displacement of Politics. PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam (2005).

  22. Capon, A., Gillespie, J., Rolfe, M. & Smith, W. BMC Public Health 15, 424 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Priest, S. H., Bonfadelli, H. & Rusanen, M. Risk Anal. 23, 751–766 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Macoubrie, J. Public Underst. Sci. 15, 221–241 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Koen Beumer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Beumer, K. On the elusive nature of the public. Nat. Nanotechnol. 14, 510–512 (2019).

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


Quick links

Find nanotechnology articles, nanomaterial data and patents all in one place. Visit Nano by Nature Research