High sensitivity, fast response time and strong light absorption are the most important metrics for infrared sensing and imaging. The trade-off between these characteristics remains the primary challenge in bolometry. Graphene with its unique combination of a record small electronic heat capacity and a weak electron–phonon coupling has emerged as a sensitive bolometric medium that allows for high intrinsic bandwidths13. Moreover, the material’s light absorption can be enhanced to near unity by integration into photonic structures. Here, we introduce an integrated hot-electron bolometer based on Johnson noise readout of electrons in ultra-clean hexagonal-boron-nitride-encapsulated graphene, which is critically coupled to incident radiation through a photonic nanocavity with Q = 900. The device operates at telecom wavelengths and shows an enhanced bolometric response at charge neutrality. At 5 K, we obtain a noise equivalent power of about 10 pW Hz1/2, a record fast thermal relaxation time, <35 ps, and an improved light absorption. However the device can operate even above 300 K with reduced sensitivity. We work out the performance mechanisms and limits of the graphene bolometer and give important insights towards the potential development of practical applications.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


  1. 1.

    Fong, K. C. & Schwab, K. C. Ultrasensitive and wide-bandwidth thermal measurements of graphene at low temperatures. Phys. Rev. X 2, 031006 (2012).

  2. 2.

    McKitterick, C. B., Prober, D. E. & Karasik, B. S. Performance of graphene thermal photon detectors. J. Appl. Phys. 113, 044512 (2013).

  3. 3.

    Yan, J. et al. Dual-gated bilayer graphene hot-electron bolometer. Nat. Nanotech. 7, 472–478 (2012).

  4. 4.

    Balandin, A. A. Thermal properties of graphene and nanostructured carbon materials. Nat. Mater. 10, 569–581 (2011).

  5. 5.

    Fong, K. C. et al. Measurement of the electronic thermal conductance channels and heat capacity of graphene at lowtemperature. Phys. Rev. X 3, 041008 (2013).

  6. 6.

    Crossno, J. et al. Observation of the Dirac fluid and the breakdown of the Wiedemann–Franz law in graphene. Science 351, 1058–1061 (2016).

  7. 7.

    Mak, K. F. et al. Measurement of the optical conductivity of graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 196405 (2008).

  8. 8.

    Walsh, E. D. et al. Graphene-based Josephson-junction single-photon detector. Phys. Rev. Appl. 8, 024022 (2017).

  9. 9.

    Du, X., Prober, D. E., Vora, H. & Mckitterick, C. B. Graphene-based bolometers. Graphene 2D Mater. 1, 1–22 (2014).

  10. 10.

    Vora, H., Kumaravadivel, P., Nielsen, B. & Du, X. Bolometric response in graphene based superconducting tunnel junctions. Appl. Phys. Lett. 100, 153507 (2012).

  11. 11.

    Cai, X. et al. Sensitive room-temperature terahertz detection via the photothermoelectric effect in graphene. Nat. Nanotech. 9, 814–819 (2014).

  12. 12.

    Han, Q. et al. Highly sensitive hot electron bolometer based on disordered graphene. Sci. Rep. 3, 3533 (2013).

  13. 13.

    El Fatimy, A. et al. Epitaxial graphene quantum dots for high-performance terahertz bolometers. Nat. Nanotech. 11, 335–338 (2016).

  14. 14.

    Nair, R. R. et al. Fine structure constant defines visual transparency of graphene. Science 320, 1308 (2008).

  15. 15.

    Li, Z. Q. et al. Dirac charge dynamics in graphene by infrared spectroscopy. Nat. Phys. 4, 532–535 (2008).

  16. 16.

    McKitterick, C. B., Prober, D. E. & Rooks, M. J. Electron-phonon cooling in large monolayer graphene devices. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter 93, 075410 (2016).

  17. 17.

    Dean, C. R. et al. Boron nitride substrates for high-quality graphene electronics. Nat. Nanotech. 5, 722–726 (2010).

  18. 18.

    Gan, X. et al. Strong enhancement of light–matter interaction in graphene coupled to a photonic crystal nanocavity. Nano Lett. 12, 5626–5631 (2012).

  19. 19.

    Bao, Q. & Loh, K. P. Graphene photonics, plasmonics, and broadband optoelectronic devices. ACS Nano 6, 3677–3694 (2012).

  20. 20.

    Gabor, N. M. et al. Hot carrier–assisted intrinsic photoresponse in graphene. Science 334, 648–652 (2011).

  21. 21.

    Gao, Y. et al. High-speed electro-optic modulator integrated with graphene-boron nitride heterostructure and photonic crystal nanocavity. Nano Lett. 15, 2001–2005 (2015).

  22. 22.

    Shiue, R.-J. et al. Enhanced photodetection in graphene-integrated photonic crystal cavity. Appl. Phys. Lett. 103, 241109 (2013).

  23. 23.

    Takano, H., Song, B. S., Asano, T. & Noda, S. Highly efficient multi-channel drop filter in a two-dimensional hetero photonic crystal. Opt. Express 14, 3491–3496 (2006).

  24. 24.

    Zheng, J., Barton, R. A. & Englund, D. Broadband coherent absorption in chirped-planar-dielectric cavities for 2D-material-based photovoltaics and photodetectors. ACS Photonics 1, 768–774 (2014).

  25. 25.

    Piper, J. R. & Fan, S. Total absorption in a graphene monolayer in the optical regime by critical coupling with a photonic crystal guided resonance. ACS Photonics 1, 347–353 (2014).

  26. 26.

    Marini, A., Cox, J. D. & de Abajo, F. J. G. Theory of graphene saturable absorption. Phys. Rev. B 95, 125408 (2017).

  27. 27.

    Tielrooij, K. J. et al. Generation of photovoltage in graphene on a femtosecond timescale through efficient carrier heating. Nat. Nanotech. 10, 437–443 (2015).

  28. 28.

    Graham, M. W., Shi, S.-F., Ralph, D. C., Park, J. & McEuen, P. L. Photocurrent measurements of supercollision cooling in graphene. Nat. Phys. 9, 103–108 (2012).

  29. 29.

    Shiue, R.-J. et al. High-responsivity graphene–boron nitride photodetector and autocorrelator in a silicon photonic integrated circuit. Nano Lett. 15, 7288–7293 (2015).

  30. 30.

    Tielrooij, K. J. et al. Out-of-plane heat transfer in van der Waals stacks: electron–hyperbolic phonon coupling. Nat. Nanotech. 13, 41–46 (2018).

  31. 31.

    Sun, D. et al. Ultrafast hot-carrier-dominated photocurrent in graphene. Nat. Nanotech. 7, 114–118 (2012).

  32. 32.

    Tielrooij, K.-J. et al. Out-of-plane heat transfer in van der Waals stacks through electron–hyperbolic phonon coupling. Nat. Nanotech. 13, 41–46 (2018).

  33. 33.

    Dicke, R. H. The measurement of thermal radiation at microwave frequencies. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 17, 268–275 (1946).

Download references


We thank L. Levitov, D. Prober, P. Kim and F. Koppens for fruitful discussions. D.K.E. acknowledges support from the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness of Spain through the Severo Ochoa programme for Centres of Excellence in R&D (SEV-2015-0522), Fundació Privada Cellex, Fundació Privada Mir-Puig, the Generalitat de Catalunya through the CERCA program and the La Caixa Foundation. D.E. acknowledges support from the Office of Naval Research under grant no. N00014-14-1-0349. Y.G., C.T. and J.H. acknowledge support from the US Office of Naval Research, grant N00014-13-1-0662. K.C.F. acknowledges support from Raytheon BBN Technologies. B.S. was supported as part of the MIT Center for Excitonics, an Energy Frontier Research Center funded by the US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences under award no. DE-SC0001088. J.Z. carried out research in part at the Center for Functional Nanomaterials, Brookhaven National Laboratory, which is supported by the US Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, under contract no. DE-SC0012704. This work is supported in part by the Semiconductor Research Corporation’s NRI Center for Institute for Nanoelectronics Discovery and Exploration (INDEX).

Author information


  1. ICFO - Institut de Ciencies Fotoniques, The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Barcelona, Spain

    • Dmitri K. Efetov
  2. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA

    • Ren-Jye Shiue
    • , Evan D. Walsh
    • , Hyeongrak Choi
    • , Jiabao Zheng
    • , Gabriele Grosso
    • , Cheng Peng
    •  & Dirk Englund
  3. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA

    • Yuanda Gao
    • , Cheng Tan
    •  & James Hone
  4. Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA

    • Brian Skinner
  5. Raytheon BBN Technologies, Quantum Information Processing Group, Cambridge, MA, USA

    • Kin Chung Fong


  1. Search for Dmitri K. Efetov in:

  2. Search for Ren-Jye Shiue in:

  3. Search for Yuanda Gao in:

  4. Search for Brian Skinner in:

  5. Search for Evan D. Walsh in:

  6. Search for Hyeongrak Choi in:

  7. Search for Jiabao Zheng in:

  8. Search for Cheng Tan in:

  9. Search for Gabriele Grosso in:

  10. Search for Cheng Peng in:

  11. Search for James Hone in:

  12. Search for Kin Chung Fong in:

  13. Search for Dirk Englund in:


D.K.E., K.C.F. and D.E. conceived and designed the experiments. D.K.E. and R.-J.S. performed the experiments. D.K.E. analysed the data. B.S. performed the theoretical modelling of the data. Y.G., C.T., C.P., H.C., E.D.W., J.Z. and G.G. contributed materials/analysis tools. J.H., K.C.F. and D.E. supported the experiments. D.K.E. wrote the paper.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dmitri K. Efetov.

Supplementary information

  1. Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Figures 1–4

About this article

Publication history






Further reading