Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Combination of fucoidan-based magnetic nanoparticles and immunomodulators enhances tumour-localized immunotherapy

Abstract

Checkpoint immunotherapy that inhibits tumour immune evasion has demonstrated significant clinical success. However, the therapeutic response is limited to certain patient populations, and immunotoxicity as well as autoimmunity have compromised the therapeutic benefits. Here, we report on an inherently therapeutic fucoidan–dextran-based magnetic nanomedicine (IO@FuDex3) conjugated with a checkpoint inhibitor (anti-PD-L1) and T-cell activators (anti-CD3 and anti-CD28). IO@FuDex3 can repair the immunosuppressive tumour microenvironment by reinvigorating tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes, while targeting the nanomedicine via magnetic navigation to the tumour to minimize off-target effects. Treatment that combines IO@FuDex3 and magnetic navigation reduces the occurrence of adverse events and extends the median survival from 32 to 63 days with less than 1 per cent dose compared with soluble anti-PD-L1. Thus, we demonstrate the potential of integrating anti-PD-L1 and T-cell activators as a form of inherently therapeutic nanomedicine to augment the therapeutic index of combination checkpoint immunotherapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Characterization of IO@FuDex.
Fig. 2: Targeting ability and cell association behaviour of various IO@FuDex formulations to either 4T1 cells or CD8+ T cells.
Fig. 3: Magnetic navigation amplifies nanomedicine accumulation in the tumour.
Fig. 4: Tumour inhibition and anti-metastatic capacity of various IO@FuDex formulations in 4T1 and CT-26 tumour model.
Fig. 5: Changes in TILs and cytokines at four weeks after tumour inoculation.
Fig. 6: Systemic effects and irAEs assessments.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hude, I., Sasse, S., Engert, A. & Bröckelmann, P. J. The emerging role of immune checkpoint inhibition in malignant lymphoma. Haematologica 102, 30–42 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen, L. & Han, X. Anti–PD-1/PD-L1 therapy of human cancer: past, present, and future. J. Clin. Invest. 125, 3384–3391 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sharma, P. & Allison, J. P. The future of immune checkpoint therapy. Science 348, 56–61 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Tang, H. et al. Facilitating T cell infiltration in tumor microenvironment overcomes resistance to PD-L1 blockade. Cancer Cell 29, 285–296 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Tumeh, P. C. et al. PD-1 blockade induces responses by inhibiting adaptive immune resistance. Nature 515, 568–571 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Byun, D. J., Wolchok, J. D., Rosenberg, L. M. & Girotra, M. Cancer immunotherapy — immune checkpoint blockade and associated endocrinopathies. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 13, 195–207 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. June, C. H., Warshauer, J. T., & Bluestone, J. A. Is autoimmunity the Achilles' heel of cancer immunotherapy? Nat. Med. 23, 540–547 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mahoney, K. M., Rennert, P. D. & Freeman, G. J. Combination cancer immunotherapy and new immunomodulatory targets. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 14, 561–584 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Carlo, M. I., Voss, M. H. & Motzer, R. J. Checkpoint inhibitors and other novel immunotherapies for advanced renal cell carcinoma. Nat. Rev. Urol. 13, 420–431 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Larkin, J. et al. Combined nivolumab and ipilimumab or monotherapy in untreated melanoma. New Engl. J. Med. 373, 23–34 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sun, T. et al. Engineered nanoparticles for drug delivery in cancer therapy. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 12320–12364 (2014).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Blanco, E., Shen, H. & Ferrari, M. Principles of nanoparticle design for overcoming biological barriers to drug delivery. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 941–951 (2015).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Fan, Y. & Moon, J. Nanoparticle drug delivery systems designed to improve cancer vaccines and immunotherapy. Vaccines 3, 662–685 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Allen, T. M. & Cullis, P. R. Drug delivery systems: entering the mainstream. Science 303, 1818–1822 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Chung, J. E. et al. Self-assembled micellar nanocomplexes comprising green tea catechin derivatives and protein drugs for cancer therapy. Nat. Nanotech 9, 907–912 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kwak, J.-Y. Fucoidan as a marine anticancer agent in preclinical development. Mar. Drugs 12, 851–870 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hsu, H.-Y. et al. Fucoidan induces changes in the epithelial to mesenchymal transition and decreases metastasis by enhancing ubiquitin-dependent TGFβ receptor degradation in breast cancer. Carcinogenesis 34, 874–884 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Fitton, J., Stringer, D. & Karpiniec, S. Therapies from fucoidan: an update. Mar. Drugs 13, 5920–5946 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Jin, J.-O. et al. Fucoidan can function as an adjuvant in vivo to enhance dendritic cell maturation and function and promote antigen-specific t cell immune responses. PLoS ONE 9, e99396 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hermanson, G. T in Bioconjugate Techniques 3rd edn, Ch. 3, 229–258 (Academic Press, Boston, 2013).

  21. Li, Y. & Kurlander, R. J. Comparison of anti-CD3 and anti-CD28-coated beads with soluble anti-CD3 for expanding human T cells: Differing impact on CD8 T cell phenotype and responsiveness to restimulation. J. Transl. Med. 8, 1–15 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang, X. & Rivière, I. Clinical manufacturing of CAR T cells: foundation of a promising therapy. Mol. Ther. Oncolyt. 3, 16015 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang, H. & Li, X. Interface-mediated fabrication of bowl-like and deflated ballon-like hollow carbon nanospheres. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 452, 141–147 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Blanco, E., Shen, H. & Ferrari, M. Principles of nanoparticle design for overcoming biological barriers to drug delivery. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 941 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Chiang, C.-S. et al. Synergistic combination of multistage magnetic guidance and optimized ligand density in targeting a nanoplatform for enhanced cancer therapy. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 5, 2131–2141 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Johnston, A. P. R. et al. Targeting cancer cells: controlling the binding and internalization of antibody-functionalized capsules. ACS Nano 6, 6667–6674 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Sagiv-Barfi, I. et al. Therapeutic antitumor immunity by checkpoint blockade is enhanced by ibrutinib, an inhibitor of both BTK and ITK. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, E966–E972 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Voltairas, P. A., Fotiadis, D. I. & Michalis, L. K. Hydrodynamics of magnetic drug targeting. J. Biomech. 35, 813–821 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Herbst, R. S. et al. Predictive correlates of response to the anti-PD-L1 antibody MPDL3280A in cancer patients. Nature 515, 563–567 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Villadolid, J. SpringerAmpamp; Amin, A. Immune checkpoint inhibitors in clinical practice: update on management of immune-related toxicities. Transl. Lung Cancer Res. 4, 560–575 (2015).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Corsello, S. M. et al. Endocrine side effects induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 98, 1361–1375 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Nanda, R. et al. Pembrolizumab in patients with advanced triple-negative breast cancer: phase Ib KEYNOTE-012 Study. J. Clin. Oncol. 34, 2460–2467 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Goldinger, S. M. et al. Cytotoxic cutaneous adverse drug reactions during anti-PD-1 therapy. Clin. Cancer Res. 22, 4023–4029 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Francisco, L. M. et al. PD-L1 regulates the development, maintenance, and function of induced regulatory T cells. J. Exp. Med. 206, 3015–3029 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Facciabene, A., Motz, G. T. & Coukos, G. T-regulatory cells: key players in tumor immune escape and angiogenesis. Cancer Res. 72, 2162–2171 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Sun, J. et al. Fucoidan inhibits CCL22 production through NF-κB pathway in M2 macrophages: a potential therapeutic strategy for cancer. Sci. Rep. 6, 35855 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Adeegbe, D. & Nishikawa, H. Natural and induced T regulatory cells in cancer. Front. Immunol. 4, 190 (2013).

  38. Liu, J. et al. Tumor-associated macrophages recruit CCR6+ regulatory T cells and promote the development of colorectal cancer via enhancing CCL20 production in mice. PLoS ONE 6, e19495 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Schlecker, E. et al. Tumor-infiltrating monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells mediate CCR5-dependent recruitment of regulatory T cells favoring tumor growth. J. Immunol. 189, 5602–5611 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Tai, C. C. et al. Deep-magnetic-field generator using flexible laminated copper for thermotherapy applications. IEEE Trans. Magn. 50, 1–4 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Shapiro, B. et al. Shaping magnetic fields to direct therapy to ears and eyes. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 16, 455–481 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Lin, R. L. et al. Interpole-type magnetic navigation system for actuation of magnetic drug. Trans. Emerg. Sel. Top. Power Electron. 4, 252–262 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Sun, Q. et al. Immunotherapy using slow-cycling tumor cells prolonged overall survival of tumor-bearing mice. BMC Med. 10, 172 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Lübbe, A. S. et al. Clinical experiences with magnetic drug targeting: a phase I study with 4′-epidoxorubicin in 14 patients with advanced solid tumors. Cancer Res. 56, 4686–4693 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Bain, C. C. et al. Resident and pro-inflammatory macrophages in the colon represent alternative context-dependent fates of the same Ly6Chi monocyte precursors. Mucosal. Immunol. 6, 498–510 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Yasuhara, T. et al. Intravenous grafts recapitulate the neurorestoration afforded by intracerebrally delivered multipotent adult progenitor cells in neonatal hypoxic-ischemic rats. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab.​ 8, 1804–1810 (2008).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Taiwan’s Ministry of Science and Technology for research grants from: MOST105-2314-B-009-001-MY3; MOST105-2221-E-009-024-MY3; MOST106-2221-E-009-065-MY3; MOST105-2314-B-039-011-MY3; MOST2628-B-039-009-MY3; and China Medical University Hospital (CMU104-S-10, CMU104-S-15-03 and DMR-104-054, DMR-106-070). The authors would like to thank N.-T. Tsou and S.-S. Chien for computer simulation support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

C.-S.C. conceived the idea and designed the materials. S.-Y.C. designed the project and directed the research. W.-C.S., C.-H.H. and Y.-J.L. contributed to the design of the in vivo studies. Y.-H.L and H.-W.C. performed the materials analysis. C.-S.C., Y.-J.L., C.-H.H., W.-C.S. and R.L. interpreted the data. C.-S.C. wrote the manuscript with the help of S.-Y.C., C.-H.H., W.-C.S. and R.L. All authors discussed the results.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Chia-Hung Hsieh, Woei-Cherng Shyu or San-Yuan Chen.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Methods, Supplementary Figures 1–25, Supplementary Table 1, Supplementary References

Reporting Summary

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chiang, CS., Lin, YJ., Lee, R. et al. Combination of fucoidan-based magnetic nanoparticles and immunomodulators enhances tumour-localized immunotherapy. Nature Nanotech 13, 746–754 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-018-0146-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-018-0146-7

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing: Translational Research

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Translational Research newsletter — top stories in biotechnology, drug discovery and pharma.

Get what matters in translational research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Translational Research