Article | Published:

Non-invasive, transdermal, path-selective and specific glucose monitoring via a graphene-based platform

Nature Nanotechnologyvolume 13pages504511 (2018) | Download Citation


Currently, there is no available needle-free approach for diabetics to monitor glucose levels in the interstitial fluid. Here, we report a path-selective, non-invasive, transdermal glucose monitoring system based on a miniaturized pixel array platform (realized either by graphene-based thin-film technology, or screen-printing). The system samples glucose from the interstitial fluid via electroosmotic extraction through individual, privileged, follicular pathways in the skin, accessible via the pixels of the array. A proof of principle using mammalian skin ex vivo is demonstrated for specific and ‘quantized’ glucose extraction/detection via follicular pathways, and across the hypo- to hyper-glycaemic range in humans. Furthermore, the quantification of follicular and non-follicular glucose extraction fluxes is clearly shown. In vivo continuous monitoring of interstitial fluid-borne glucose with the pixel array was able to track blood sugar in healthy human subjects. This approach paves the way to clinically relevant glucose detection in diabetics without the need for invasive, finger-stick blood sampling.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


  1. 1.

    Wild, S., Roglic, G., Green, A., Sicree, R. & King, H. Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes Care 27, 1047–1053 (2004).

  2. 2.

    McGarraugh, G., Brazg, R. & Weinstein, R. Freestyle Navigator continuous glucose monitoring system with Trustart algorithm, a 1-hour warm-up time. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 5, 99–106 (2011).

  3. 3.

    Mamkin, I., Ten, S., Bhandari, S. & Ramchandani, N. Real-time continuous glucose monitoring in the clinical setting: the good, the bad, and the practical. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 2, 882–889 (2008).

  4. 4.

    Torjman, M. C., Dalal, N. & Goldberg, M. E. Glucose monitoring in acute care: technologies on the horizon. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 2, 178–181 (2008).

  5. 5.

    Burge, M. R., Mitchell, S., Sawyer, A. & Schade, D. S. Continuous glucose monitoring: the future of diabetes management. Diabetes Spectr. 21, 112–119 (2008).

  6. 6.

    Olarte, O., Chilo, J., Pelegri-Sebastia, J., Barbe, K. & Van Moer, W. Glucose detection in human sweat using an electronic nose. Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 2013, 1462–1465 (2013).

  7. 7.

    Lee, H. et al. A graphene-based electrochemical device with thermoresponsive microneedles for diabetes monitoring and therapy. Nat. Nanotech. 11, 566–572 (2016).

  8. 8.

    Heikenfeld, J. Non-invasive analyte access and sensing through eccrine sweat: challenges and outlook circa 2016. Electroanalysis 28, 1242–1249 (2016).

  9. 9.

    Yan, Q. et al. Measurement of tear glucose levels with amperometric glucose biosensor/capillary tube configuration. Anal. Chem. 83, 8341–8346 (2011).

  10. 10.

    Yao, H., Shum, A. J., Cowan, M., Lähdesmäki, I. & Parviz, B. A. A contact lens with embedded sensor for monitoring tear glucose level. Biosens. Bioelectron. 26, 3290–3296 (2011).

  11. 11.

    Zhang, W., Du, Y. & Wang, M. L. Noninvasive glucose monitoring using saliva nano-biosensor. Sens. Biosens. Res. 4, 23–29 (2015).

  12. 12.

    Yeh, S.-J., Hanna, C. F. & Khalil, O. S. Monitoring blood glucose changes in cutaneous tissue by temperature-modulated localized reflectance measurements. Clin. Chem. 49, 924–934 (2003).

  13. 13.

    Weinzimer, S. A. Analysis. Pendra: the once and future noninvasive continuous glucose monitoring device? Diabetes Technol. Ther. 6, 442–444 (2004).

  14. 14.

    Yu, S. et al. In vitro glucose measurement using tunable mid-infrared laser spectroscopy combined with fiber-optic sensor. Biomed. Opt. Express 5, 275–286 (2014).

  15. 15.

    Potts, R. O., Tamada, J. A. & Tierney, M. J. Glucose monitoring by reverse iontophoresis. Diabetes Metab. Res. Rev. 18, S49–S53 (2002).

  16. 16.

    Tierney, M. J. Electrochemical sensor with dual purpose electrode. US patent 5,954,685 (1999).

  17. 17.

    Sage, B. H. Jr. FDA panel approves Cygnus’s noninvasive GlucoWatch. Diabetes Technol. Ther. 2, 115–116 (2000).

  18. 18.

    Marro, D., Kalia, Y. N., Delgado-Charro, M. B. & Guy, R. H. Contributions of electromigration and electroosmosis to iontophoretic drug delivery. Pharm. Res. 18, 1701–1708 (2001).

  19. 19.

    Boyne, M. S., Silver, D. M., Kaplan, J. & Saudek, C. D. Timing of changes in interstitial and venous blood glucose measured with a continuous subcutaneous glucose sensor. Diabetes 52, 2790–2794 (2003).

  20. 20.

    Garg, S. K. et al. Correlation of fingerstick blood glucose measurements with GlucoWatch Biographer glucose results in young subjects with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 22, 1708–1714 (1999).

  21. 21.

    Basu, A. et al. Time lag of glucose from intravascular to interstitial compartment in humans. Diabetes 62, 4083–4087 (2013).

  22. 22.

    Rebrin, K. & Steil, G. M. Can interstitial glucose assessment replace blood glucose measurements? Diabetes Technol. Ther. 2, 461–472 (2000).

  23. 23.

    Wang, P. M., Cornwell, M. & Prausnitz, M. R. Minimally invasive extraction of dermal interstitial fluid for glucose monitoring using microneedles. Diabetes Technol. Ther. 7, 131–141 (2005).

  24. 24.

    Sieg, A., Guy, R. H. & Delgado-Charro, M. B. Electroosmosis in transdermal iontophoresis: implications for noninvasive and calibration-free glucose monitoring. Biophys. J. 87, 3344–3350 (2004).

  25. 25.

    Turner, N. G. & Guy, R. H. Visualization and quantitation of iontophoretic pathways using confocal microscopy. J. Invest. Dermatol. Sympos. Proc. 3, 136–142 (1998).

  26. 26.

    Bath, B. D., White, H. S. & Scott, E. R. Visualization and analysis of electroosmotic flow in hairless mouse skin. Pharm. Res. 17, 471–475 (2000).

  27. 27.

    Otberg, N. et al. Variations of hair follicle size and distribution in different body sites. J. Invest. Dermatol. 122, 14–19 (2004).

  28. 28.

    Bandodkar, A. J. et al. Tattoo-based noninvasive glucose monitoring: a proof-of-concept study. Anal. Chem. 87, 394–398 (2015).

  29. 29.

    Alshammari, A. et al. A modular bioplatform based on a versatile supramolecular multienzyme complex directly attached to graphene. Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8, 21077–21088 (2016).

  30. 30.

    Bae, S. et al. Roll-to-roll production of 30-inch graphene films for transparent electrodes. Nat. Nanotech. 5, 574–578 (2010).

  31. 31.

    Spasenovic, M. The price of graphene, (Graphenea, 2013).

  32. 32.

    Schmook, F. P., Meingassner, J. G. & Billich, A. Comparison of human skin or epidermis models with human and animal skin in in-vitro percutaneous absorption. Int. J. Pharm. 215, 51–56 (2001).

  33. 33.

    Sekkat, N. & Guy, R. H. in Pharmacokinetic Optimization in Drug Research (eds Testa, B. et al.) 155–172 (Wiley-VCH, Lausanne, 2007).

  34. 34.

    Diabetes UK. Blood sugar level ranges (Diabetes UK, 2017);

  35. 35.

    Pauli, G. F., Gödecke, T., Jaki, B. U. & Lankin, D. C. Quantitative 1h NMR. Development and potential of an analytical method: an update. J. Nat. Prod. 75, 834–851 (2012).

  36. 36.

    Fabry, P. & Fouletier, J. (eds) Chemical and Biological Microsensors: Applications in Fluid Media (Wiley-ISTE, London, 2009).

  37. 37.

    ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline (ICH, Geneva, 2005).

  38. 38.

    Alegret, S. & Merkoci, A. (eds) Electrochemical Sensor Analysis (Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, 2007).

  39. 39.

    Tamada, J. A. et al. Noninvasive glucose monitoring: comprehensive clinical results. JAMA 282, 1839–1844 (1999).

  40. 40.

    Li, X. et al. Transfer of large-area graphene films for high-performance transparent conductive electrodes. Nano Lett. 9, 4359–4363 (2009).

  41. 41.

    Polk, B. J., Stelzenmuller, A., Mijares, G., MacCrehan, W. & Gaitan, M. Ag/AgCl microelectrodes with improved stability for microfluidics. Sens. Actuat. B 114, 239–247 (2006).

  42. 42.

    Gao, W. et al. Fully integrated wearable sensor arrays for multiplexed in situ perspiration analysis. Nature 529, 509–514 (2016).

  43. 43.

    Shrivastava, A. G. & Vipin, B. Methods for the determination of limit of detection and limit of quantitation of the analytical methods. Chron. Young. Sci. 2, 21–25 (2011).

  44. 44.

    Alkire, R. C. et al. (eds) Bioelectrochemistry: Fundamentals, Applications and Recent Developmentus (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2011).

  45. 45.

    Petrucci, R. H. General Chemistry: Principles & Modern Applications 9th edn (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2007).

  46. 46.

    He, D., Garg, S. & Waite, T. D. H2O2-mediated oxidation of zero-valent silver and resultant interactions among silver nanoparticles, silver ions, and reactive oxygen species. Langmuir 28, 10266–10275 (2012).

Download references


This work was supported by a Science and Innovation Award (EP/G036101/1) from the UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, and a MRC Confidence-in-Concepts grant (MC-PC-14106) from the UK Medical Research Council. L.L. acknowledges a studentship funded by the Sir Halley Stewart Trust, UK. The authors thank T. Woodman (University of Bath) for his assistance with the 1H-qNMR measurements and analysis.

Author information


  1. Department of Physics, University of Bath, Bath, UK

    • Luca Lipani
    • , Bertrand G. R. Dupont
    • , Floriant Doungmene
    •  & Adelina Ilie
  2. Department of Pharmacy & Pharmacology, University of Bath, Bath, UK

    • Luca Lipani
    • , Bertrand G. R. Dupont
    • , Rex M. Tyrrell
    •  & Richard H. Guy
  3. Centre for Graphene Science, University of Bath, Bath, UK

    • Luca Lipani
    • , Bertrand G. R. Dupont
    • , Floriant Doungmene
    • , Richard H. Guy
    •  & Adelina Ilie
  4. Centre for Nanoscience & Nanotechnology, University of Bath, Bath, UK

    • Luca Lipani
    • , Frank Marken
    • , Richard H. Guy
    •  & Adelina Ilie
  5. Department of Chemistry, University of Bath, Bath, UK

    • Frank Marken


  1. Search for Luca Lipani in:

  2. Search for Bertrand G. R. Dupont in:

  3. Search for Floriant Doungmene in:

  4. Search for Frank Marken in:

  5. Search for Rex M. Tyrrell in:

  6. Search for Richard H. Guy in:

  7. Search for Adelina Ilie in:


A.I., R.H.G. and R.M.T. designed the overall work programme. B.G.R.D. performed the work related to the deconstructed pixel device. L.L. and F.D. performed the work related to the planar thin-film/CVD graphene pixel array integrated on a flexible substrate. L.L. performed the work related to the screen-printed arrays, with input from F.D. F.M. provided advice on the implementation of the electrochemistry experiments. A.I. rationalized the array characteristics via simulations, and A.I. and F.D. proposed the detailed pixel array architecture (for both generations, thin-film and screen-printed, of prototypes). A.I., R.H.G. and R.M.T. supervised the deconstructed pixel device research, while A.I. and R.H.G. supervised the pixel array research. A.I. and R.H.G. wrote the paper, and all authors provided comments and agreed with the final form of the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adelina Ilie.

Supplementary information

  1. Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Text, Supplementary Figures 1–18, Supplementary Tables 1–2 and Supplementary References

About this article

Publication history




Issue Date


Further reading