Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Mating pair stabilization mediates bacterial conjugation species specificity


Bacterial conjugation mediates contact-dependent transfer of DNA from donor to recipient bacteria, thus facilitating the spread of virulence and resistance plasmids. Here we describe how variants of the plasmid-encoded donor outer membrane (OM) protein TraN cooperate with distinct OM receptors in recipients to mediate mating pair stabilization and efficient DNA transfer. We show that TraN from the plasmid pKpQIL (Klebsiella pneumoniae) interacts with OmpK36, plasmids from R100-1 (Shigella flexneri) and pSLT (Salmonella Typhimurium) interact with OmpW, and the prototypical F plasmid (Escherichia coli) interacts with OmpA. Cryo-EM analysis revealed that TraNpKpQIL interacts with OmpK36 through the insertion of a β-hairpin in the tip of TraN into a monomer of the OmpK36 porin trimer. Combining bioinformatic analysis with AlphaFold structural predictions, we identified a fourth TraN structural variant that mediates mating pair stabilization by binding OmpF. Accordingly, we devised a classification scheme for TraN homologues on the basis of structural similarity and their associated receptors: TraNα (OmpW), TraNβ (OmpK36), TraNγ (OmpA), TraNδ (OmpF). These TraN-OM receptor pairings have real-world implications as they reflect the distribution of resistance plasmids within clinical Enterobacteriaceae isolates, demonstrating the importance of mating pair stabilization in mediating conjugation species specificity. These findings will allow us to predict the distribution of emerging resistance plasmids in high-risk bacterial pathogens.


Conjugative transfer of DNA involves a type IV secretion system (T4SS), the relaxosome and a conjugative pilus1. In the prevailing model of conjugation, the pilus extends off the surface of the donor and establishes contact with a recipient2. It then retracts3, drawing the recipient towards the donor leading to the formation of a tight mating junction through a process termed ‘mating pair stabilization’ (MPS)4. Recently, important advancements have been made in elucidating the structure of the T4SS and conjugative pilus from several incompatibility group F (IncF) plasmids5,6,7. However, the mechanism underpinning MPS remains relatively unclear.

IncF plasmids are restricted to the Enterobacteriaceae family8, and include the resistance plasmid R100 (Shigella flexneri) and the virulence plasmids pMAR7 (enteropathogenic Escherichia coli) and pSLT (Salmonella Typhimurium)9,10,11,12. Conjugation studies performed in the 1970s focused on the prototypical F plasmid. Through the isolation of E. coli ‘Con mutants’ defective in F plasmid uptake, the outer membrane (OM) protein OmpA and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) were identified as recipient conjugation factors13,14,15. Notably, mutations in ompA affected conjugation of the F plasmid but not R100-1, a derepressed derivative of R10013.

OmpA dependency was associated with the plasmid-encoded donor subunit TraN as substitution of traN from the F plasmid with traN from R100-1 abrogated the conjugation deficiency16. TraN is an OM protein containing 22 conserved cysteine residues and is involved in the formation of mating aggregates during MPS2,17,18. The N-terminal domain, specifically, mediates specificity for recipient OmpA. Despite compelling genetic evidence that TraN cooperates with OmpA to mediate MPS, attempts to isolate a TraN-OmpA complex were unsuccessful17.

While IncF plasmid conjugation has been extensively studied in E. coli K12, few studies have investigated conjugation of contemporary antibiotic resistance plasmids found in clinically relevant pathogens. Klebsiella pneumoniae is a Gram-negative pathogen frequently associated with antimicrobial resistance19. Carbapenem resistant K. pneumoniae (CRKP) isolates often carry carbapenemase-encoding plasmids, including the K. pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-encoding plasmid pKpQIL, which expresses conjugation machinery similar to that found on F and R100-120,21. pKpQIL is particularly closely associated with clinical isolates of the globally pervasive K. pneumoniae sequence type ST25822,23. While temperature and mating substrate moderately affect conjugative transfer24, the role of recipient cells during pKpQIL conjugation is unclear.

In addition to resistance plasmids, mutations affecting the K. pneumoniae OM trimeric channel-forming porins OmpK35 and OmpK36 (homologues of OmpF and OmpC in E. coli, respectively) also contribute to reduced carbapenem susceptibility25. The selectivity of the porins is conferred by loop 3 (L3) which extends into the barrel of the porin, forming a constriction point within the channel26. In ST258 CRKP isolates, the introduction of a premature stop codon in ompK35 is ubiquitous, leading to loss of functional OmpK3527. Moreover, many ST258 isolates express OmpK36 variants containing L3 insertions that are not present in OmpK36 from the reference laboratory strain ATCC 43816, a derivative of which serves as the wild type (WT) strain in this work28. We showed that a glycine-aspartic acid (GD) ST258-associated L3 insertion constricts the channel by 26%, reducing antibiotic diffusion across the OM29.

pKpQIL conjugation is dependent on recipient OmpK36

The aim of this study was to determine whether ST258-associated porins affect pKpQIL conjugation. As ompK35 is a pseudogene in these isolates, we assessed the role of OmpK36 in the absence of OmpK35 expression (Supplementary Table 1). We generated a reporter pKpQIL called pKpGFP (Fig. 1a), which expresses superfolder green fluorescent protein (sfGFP) under control of a lac promoter (Plac), allowing for quantification of conjugation frequency by selective plating or fluorescence assays. We then engineered a K. pneumoniae donor that constitutively expresses LacI for repression of sfGFP expression. pKpGFP was transferred into this strain, which we named GFP donor (GFP-D) (Supplementary Table 1). Upon conjugative transfer of pKpGFP from GFP-D into a K. pneumoniae recipient that does not constitutively express LacI, sfGFP is expressed (Fig. 1b).

Fig. 1: pKpGFP conjugation is dependent on OmpK36 and is disrupted by the L3 GD insertion.
figure 1

a,b, Schematic (a) showing the strategy used to generate the Plac-sfGFP pKpQIL reporter, pKpGFP. pKpGFP is carried in a donor that constitutively expresses lacI, resulting in sfGFP repression. Upon conjugative transfer into recipients that do not carry the synthetic lacI, sfGFP is expressed in transconjugant cells (b). c, Conjugation of pKpGFP into recipients expressing 36ST258 or ΔompK36 were compared to recipients expressing 36WT. log conjugation frequency data are presented as mean ± s.d. of three biological repeats, analysed by repeated measures one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test. d, Diagram of the FinOP fertility inhibition system of IncF conjugative plasmids. e, The donor strain GFP-DD carrying the derepressed plasmid pKpGFP-D is piliated (magenta, bottom). FM4-64 (yellow) was used to stain the bacterial cell membrane. Piliation was not observed on GFP-D cells carrying pKpGFP (top). Scale bar, 2 μm. f, The effect of the GD insertion on pKpGFP-D conjugation was assessed by measuring GFP emission from transconjugants over time. Measurements were recorded every 10 min and a representative graph of fluorescence over time is shown for plasmid uptake in receivers expressing 36WT or 36ST258. g, RTCS data, shown as a.f.u., are presented as mean ± s.d. of three biological repeats, analysed by repeated measures one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparison test comparing to the OmpK36ST258-expressing recipient. NS, not significant.

Source data

We compared the conjugation efficiency of pKpGFP from GFP-D into recipients expressing WT OmpK36 (36WT), ST258 OmpK36 containing the L3 GD insertion (36ST258) or missing ompK36ompK36). A similar reduction in pKpGFP conjugation frequency into 36ST258 and ΔompK36 recipients was observed compared with a recipient expressing 36WT (Fig. 1c). Next we determined whether the impact of 36ST258 on pKpGFP conjugation is restricted to the recipient by comparing plasmid transfer between GFP-D expressing either 36WT or 36ST258. Both donors exhibited similar conjugation frequencies (Extended Data Fig. 1a), suggesting that 36ST258 impairs conjugation when expressed specifically in the recipient.

We next determined the mechanism by which 36ST258 reduces conjugative uptake of pKpGFP. K. pneumoniae expressing 36ST258 are less susceptible to carbapenems compared with those expressing 36WT25,29. To overcome this, we used pKpGFP to develop a high throughput, real-time conjugation system (RTCS) assay, to quantify conjugation frequency in the absence of selective pressure by measuring temporal fluorescence emission from conjugation mixtures. However, using the GFP-D reporter in RTCS, we did not detect an increase in fluorescence even with K. pneumoniae recipients expressing OmpK36WT. This suggested that RTCS was not sensitive enough to detect transfer of pKpGFP (Fig. 1c). To increase conjugation efficiency, we deleted the conjugation inhibitor gene finO from pKpGFP to generate a derepressed variant of pKpGFP, pKpGFP-D (Fig. 1d)30. pKpGFP-D was transferred into the strain overexpressing LacI to generate the GFP-derepressed donor (GFP-DD).

We stained GFP-D and GFP-DD with rat polyclonal antiserum raised against the intact conjugation pilus. Only GFP-DD bacteria were piliated, which confirmed that deleting finO results in derepression of transfer genes (Fig. 1e). Transfer of pKpGFP-D into recipients was also observed by live microscopy (Supplementary Video). Comparing the conjugation frequency of pKpGFP and pKpGFP-D revealed an overall 2-log-fold increase in transfer of pKpGFP-D (Extended Data Fig. 1b). Importantly, the relative difference in conjugation frequency into recipients expressing 36WT and 36ST258 seen using GFP-D was maintained using GFP-DD. When total fluorescence outputs from conjugation mixtures containing GFP-DD were measured in RTCS, an increase in fluorescence was detected as early as 150 min for recipients expressing 36WT but not 36ST258 (Fig. 1f).

We used RTCS to determine whether the L3 GD insertion present in 36ST258 affects conjugative uptake of pKpGFP. Deleting the GD insertion (36ST258ΔGD) led to a significant increase in a.f.u. compared with those expressing 36ST258 (Fig. 1g). This effect could be reconstituted by introducing the GD insertion into OmpK36WT (36WT+GD) and was validated by selective plating (Extended Data Fig. 1c). These results suggest that the GD insertion reduces conjugative uptake of pKpGFP-D, potentially due to pore constriction29.

TraN homologues cooperate with distinct recipient OM proteins

As E. coli OmpA dependency in F plasmid conjugation could be circumvented by substituting its traN with traN from R100-116, we hypothesized that OmpK36 dependency seen in pKpQIL is similarly mediated by TraN. We first investigated whether R100-1 conjugation is OmpK36 dependent and observed no significant difference into K. pneumoniae recipients expressing either 36WT or 36WT+GD (Extended Data Fig. 2a). We then substituted traN from both pKpGFP and pKpGFP-D with traN of R100-1 (traNR100-1); immunofluorescence staining showed that donor cells carrying pKpGFP-DtraNR100-1 (GFP-DDtraNR100-1) are piliated (Fig. 2a). Using GFP-DDtraNR100-1 in RTCS revealed that conjugation was no longer affected by the GD insertion in OmpK36 (Fig. 2b and Extended Data Fig. 3a). This was validated by selective plating (Extended Data Fig. 2b). These results show that OmpK36-dependency during conjugation is plasmid specific and mediated by TraN.

Fig. 2: Structural differences in TraN mediate specificity for recipient OM receptors.
figure 2

a, Substitution of pKpQIL traN with traN from R100-1 does not affect piliation (magenta) as seen by immunofluorescence microscopy of donor cells carrying pKpGFP-DtraNR100-1 (GFP-DDtraNR100-1). Scale bar, 2 μm. b, RTCS was used to assess the effect of the L3 GD insertion on pKpGFP-DtraNR100-1 conjugation. c, pKpGFP-DtraNR100-1 conjugation into a panel of isogenic recipients was assessed using RTCS. A.f.u. data are presented as mean ± s.d. of three biological repeats, analysed by repeated measures one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparison test comparing to the OmpK36ST258-expressing recipient in (b) and to the ΔompK36 recipient in (c). d, Donor cells carrying pKpGFP-DtraNCh1 are piliated. Scale bar, 2 μm. e, Recipient OM protein dependency during pKpGFP-DtraNCh1 conjugation was determined with RTCS. A.f.u. data are presented as mean ± s.d. of three biological repeats, analysed by a two-sided paired t-test. f, The GFP-DtraNF donor is piliated. Scale bar, 2 μm. g,h, The log conjugation frequency of pKpGFP into WT K. pneumoniae (g) and E. coli MG1655 (h) recipients as a function of different TraN homologues was measured. i, log conjugation frequency of GFP-DtraNF into WT and ΔompA recipients was compared. log conjugation frequency data are presented as mean ± s.d. of three biological repeats, analysed by repeated measures ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison test in g and h, and by a two-sided paired t-test in i. j, Zoomed in cartoon representation of the tip region from each TraN variant showing a predicted β-hairpin structure that is unique to TraNpKpQIL (circled).

Source data

We hypothesized that TraNR100-1 cooperates with another OM protein in K. pneumoniae and identified PhoE31 and OmpW32, which are conserved in Enterobacteriaceae species, as candidates and generated ΔphoE and ΔompW mutants. Using RTCS to assess plasmid transfer into ΔphoE and ΔompW alongside ΔompK36 and ΔompA recipients revealed significantly lower conjugation frequency specifically into the ΔompW recipient (Fig. 2c and Extended Data Fig. 3b). To determine which domain of TraN mediates specificity, we generated a chimaeric traN (traNCh1) by substituting amino acid residues from the variable N-terminal domain of TraNpKpQIL with corresponding residues from TraNR100-1 (Extended Data Fig. 4a). Donor cells expressing traNCh1 (GFP-DDtraNCh1) were piliated (Fig. 2d) and facilitated efficient conjugation into the ΔompK36 but not ΔompW recipients (Fig. 2e and Extended Data Figs. 3c and 4b). These results show that TraN mediates efficient conjugation via specific pairings of TraNR100-1 with OmpW and TraNpKpQIL with OmpK36, with specificity conferred by the variable N-terminal domain.

We next sought to validate that TraN from F mediates dependency on OmpA. We substituted traN from pKpGFP and pKpGFP-D with traN from F (traNF) to generate pKpGFPtraNF and pKpGFP-DtraNF, respectively. Donors carrying pKpGFP-DtraNF (GFP-DDtraNF) were piliated (Fig. 2f); however, we observed no increase in fluorescence with the WT recipient compared with the GFP-DD donor (Extended Data Fig. 3d). Nevertheless, using donors carrying pKpGFPtraNF (GFP-DtraNF) in selection-based assays (which are more sensitive than RTCS) with WT K. pneumoniae recipients, we detected transconjugants, confirming the expression of functional conjugation machinery (Fig. 2g). However, compared with donor strains expressing either TraNpKpQIL or TraNR100-1, the conjugation frequency associated with the TraNF-expressing donor was significantly lower. As OmpA was first proposed as a receptor for TraNF in E. coli, we hypothesized that the K. pneumoniae homologue of OmpA is not recognized by TraNF. Therefore, we repeated the experiment using E. coli MG1655 recipients. We observed that conjugation of pKpGFP expressing either TraNF or TraNR100-1 was significantly higher than that of the TraNpKpQIL-expressing plasmid (Fig. 2h). This suggests that TraNF, but not TraNpKpQIL, cooperates with an E. coli OM protein. In contrast, TraNR100-1 facilitates efficient conjugation into both K. pneumoniae and E. coli, which suggests that it recognizes OmpW in both bacterial species32. TraNF was confirmed to cooperate with E. coli OmpA as we observed a significant decrease in conjugation frequency of pKpGFPtraNF into an MG1655ΔompA compared with the WT recipient (Fig. 2i and Extended Data Fig. 3e).

To understand how the different TraN variants mediate OM receptor specificity, we used AlphaFold33 to generate predicted structures for TraNpKpQIL, TraNR100-1 and TraNF (Extended Data Fig. 5a). The predicted models show a high overall predicted local-distance difference test (pLDDT) score, providing confidence in the structural variation seen between the different alleles. Each variant appears to contain an amphipathic alpha-helix that can potentially anchor it to the outer leaflet of the OM. The overall structure contains an extended N-terminal domain consisting mostly of β-sheets linked to a β-sandwich domain that we refer to as the ‘tip’, while the C-terminal domain is a mix of α-helices and β-sheets that fold back and form intradomain contacts with the N-terminal domain. From the predicted structures, all cysteine residues in each TraN variant could be engaged in intramolecular disulfide bonds (Extended Data Fig. 5b and Supplementary Table 7). Interestingly, structural differences are mainly seen in the ‘tip’ region of the protein, which corresponds to the variable region of the TraN sequences, consistent with their OM specificity observed during functional conjugation assays (Fig. 2j).

TraNpKpQIL forms a complex with OmpK36

To determine the molecular basis of TraNpKpQIL-mediated conjugation dependency on OmpK36, we purified TraNpKpQIL (68 kDa) and OmpK36WT (~120 kDa (trimer)) and tested their ability to form a complex by size exclusion chromatography (SEC). A clear shift in the retention volume of the TraN-OmpK36 sample (12.8 ml) was observed compared with the individual retention volumes of TraNpKpQIL (14.5 ml) and OmpK36 (14.9 ml), which indicates the formation of a stable TraN-OmpK36 complex (Extended Data Fig. 6a). Complex formation was confirmed by SDS–PAGE analysis (Extended Data Fig. 6b). In contrast, no shift was observed when TraN was mixed with OmpK36WT+GD (Extended Data Fig. 6c), suggesting that the GD insertion impairs complex formation.

The structural basis of the TraN-OmpK36 interaction was assessed by cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM), which showed discrete TraN-OmpK36 complexes. However, TraN was mainly disordered and exhibited an occupancy of less than one molecule for each OmpK36 trimer. A three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction for the complex with an overall resolution of 2.6 Å using the map:map approach was generated with density for both the OmpK36 trimer and TraN (Fig. 3a and Extended Data Fig. 7). The crystal structure of the trimeric OmpK36 (PDB 6RD3)29 was placed inside the density with minimal rebuilding, mostly amino acid rotamers and correcting for Ramachandran outliers on the basis of electron density and bond strains; the OmpK36 crystal and cryo-EM structures display a root-mean-square deviation (rmsd) of 0.6 Å over 480 Cα atoms. The additional density below OmpK36 was assigned to TraN (Fig. 3a and Extended Data Fig. 7) and it extends into the channel of one subunit of the trimeric porin. The TraN density is weak, present at a low threshold and featureless. Therefore, we decided not to build the TraN model in this density. The density inside the pore is better defined, showing a loop-shaped appearance with side chains; using the AlphaFold model for TraNpKpQIL, that density corresponds to the predicted β-hairpin of the TraNpKpQIL ‘tip’ (Figs. 2j and 3a). Further evidence that the density inside the pore corresponds to the TraN ‘tip’ was provided by generating an ab initio complex, which predicted a nearly identical OmpK36-TraN complex as the cryo-EM structure, with an rmsd of 0.45 Å over 480 Cα OmpK36 atoms and an rmsd of 1.2 Å for the 9 Cα β-hairpin atoms (Fig. 3b).

Fig. 3: Cryo-EM structure of the TraN-OmpK36WT complex.
figure 3

a, Cryo-EM reconstruction of the complex at 2.6 Å resolution. The reconstruction (left) shows Coulomb potential density for the OmpK36 trimer (transparent grey density) and TraN (green density). The front view of the reconstruction perpendicular to the OM has been omitted to reveal the TraN density within the channel. The OmpK36 and TraN atomic models have been fitted inside the reconstruction. The predicted AlphaFold structure of TraN is shown as cartoons (right). The TraN density accounts for the β-hairpin and β-sandwich domains; however, density is missing for the remainder of the predicted AlphaFold structure. Close-up view of the TraN β-hairpin model fitted inside the density (red box and bottom right). b, AlphaFold predicted a very similar complex formation with the β-hairpin inserting inside the OmpK36 pore. The cryo-EM complex (OmpK36 in blue/TraN in green) and AlphaFold model (OmpK36 in grey/TraN in pink) can be superimposed without any major deviations. c, Top view of OmpK36 (blue) interaction with the β-hairpin of TraN (green) (left). TraN inserts halfway inside the OmpK36 channel to interact with L3 (right); the front face of the OmpK36 barrel has been omitted for clarity. d, The conformation of the OmpK36WT L3 can accommodate the TraN β-hairpin (left), whereas the L3 GD insertion results in steric clashes (right) that prevent complex formation.

TraN inserts into the OmpK36 pore from its extracellular side and reaches halfway through the channel to L3 (Fig. 3c). The binding/recognition of the TraN β-hairpin is mostly mediated by interactions with L3 of OmpK36. Structural comparison was performed to investigate the disruption in complex formation caused by the L3 GD insertion (Fig. 3d). Using the TraN-OmpK36WT model as a reference, the structure for OmpK36WT+GD (PDB 6RCK)29 was superimposed onto the complex (Fig. 3d). This showed a clash between Gly115 and Asp114 from L3 of OmpK36, and Ser243’ and Gly244’ of the TraN β-hairpin (Fig. 3d). These clashes are anticipated to destabilize the OmpK36 and TraN interaction, lowering the affinity of TraN for OmpK36WT+GD.

TraN-OMP interactions influence plasmid host distribution

We next investigated the real-world implications of TraN-mediated species-specific transfer of plasmids by analysing TraN sequences from a dataset of plasmids retrieved from GenBank in 201834. Using the Plascad tool for plasmid classification34 and the NCBI Taxonomy database to determine the bacterial host family, we identified 824 predicted conjugative IncF plasmids from Enterobacteriaceae isolates (Supplementary Table 2). Using tBLASTn35, we found that of these plasmids, 265 (32.2%), 166 (20.1%) and 178 (21.6%) contained traN genes encoding proteins with ≥90% amino acid similarity to those found in pKpQIL, R100-1 and F, respectively. In total, these variants account for 74% of the 824 plasmids examined. Importantly, plasmids carrying a similar traN were found in a small number of species, including one single dominant species. Notably, 89.1% of traNpKpQIL plasmids are from K. pneumoniae, while 92.1% of traNF plasmids were found in E. coli (Extended Data Fig. 8a). These findings align with our in vitro data and suggest that TraN-mediated species specificity during conjugation may influence plasmid host range. Finally, while 72.9% of traNR100-1 plasmids were found in E. coli, a substantial proportion (16.9%) were recovered from K. pneumoniae isolates, supporting our findings that this TraN variant facilitates MPS in both bacterial species.

Phylogenetic trees were constructed using the different traN nucleotide sequences and are available to view on Microreact: TraNpKpQIL, TraNR100-1, TraNF. Among those with the same gene type, there was no correlation between the phylogeny and the plasmid host, suggesting that the plasmids were largely acquired via horizontal gene transfer as opposed to clonal expansion within a species following an initial conjugative event.

We analysed the remaining 215 plasmids for annotated traN sequences and identified 4 other variants found in at least 10 sequenced plasmids (Extended Data Fig. 8b). One variant, which aligned with traN from the S. Typhimurium virulence plasmid, pSLT (accession ID: AE006471.2), was found exclusively in Salmonella enterica, with varied distribution within serovars of this species. The 3 remaining variants were not associated with well-known plasmids. Thus, we assigned these plasmids to 1 of 3 ‘minor variant’ groups (MV1–3) represented by traN sequences from NZ_CP016763.1 (MV1), AP014954.1 (MV2) and NZ_CP023348.1 (MV3). MV1 and MV2 plasmids did not appear to associate with a single dominant species, while MV3 plasmids were predominantly associated with E. coli hosts.

We used AlphaFold to generate predicted structures for TraN encoded by pLST and the MV1–3 reference plasmids (Extended Data Fig. 9a). Despite sharing less than 90% sequence similarity, the tip structures of TraNR100-1 and TraNpSLT, TraNpKpQIL and TraNMV2, and TraNMV1 and TraNMV3 are superimposable (Extended Data Fig. 9b). On the basis of these observations, we hypothesized that structurally similar tips recognize the same recipient OM proteins. Thus, we generated a chimaeric TraN containing the TraNpSLT tip (TraNCh2), with functional studies revealing that it mediates OmpW dependency (Extended Data Fig. 10a,b). We next generated a third TraN chimaera (TraNCh3) expressing the tip region from TraNMV1. Donors carrying pKpGFP-DtraNCh3 were piliated (Extended Data Fig. 10c). Testing conjugation of pKpGFP-DtraNCh3 into a panel of E. coli MG1655 recipients lacking OmpA, OmpC or OmpF revealed that TraNMV1 cooperates with OmpF (Extended Data Fig. 10d,e).

These findings suggest that tip structure, rather than sequence similarity, determines TraN specificity for recipient OM proteins. Accordingly, we classified the 7 identified variants on the basis of structural similarity into 4 groups denoted TraNα, TraNβ, TraNγ and TraNδ (Fig. 4a). Phylogenetic analysis of the TraN sequences showed clustering, which aligns with our classification system (Fig. 4b).

Fig. 4: Plasmids encoding structurally similar TraN variants display host species specificity.
figure 4

a, TraN sequence variants were classified according to structural similarity of the tip region as follows: TraNα (TraNR100-1 and TraNpSLT), TraNβ (TraNpKpQIL and TraNMV2), TraNγ (TraNF), TraNδ (TraNMV1 and TraNMV3). Receptors for each group are indicated. The pie charts illustrate the host distribution of plasmids expressing each of the structural variants. Where only one plasmid was associated with a species, it was categorized as ‘Other’. The serovar breakdown for S. enterica strains carrying TraNα is shown in the outer ring, with the colours corresponding to the insert in Extended Data Fig. 8. b, Phylogenetic tree of TraN sequence variants from the seven reference plasmids. Dashed boxes indicate variants assigned to TraN groups determined through structural comparison and receptor specificity.

Conjugation facilitated by representative TraNs from each group into WT K. pneumoniae, E. coli, S. Typhimurium and E. cloacae recipients was assessed using RTCS (Fig. 5a). In alignment with the plasmid host distribution, TraNα mediated efficient transfer into all recipients tested, while TraNβ and TraNγ were associated with species-specific conjugation. In contrast, while plasmids with TraNδ showed a broad host range distribution, species-specific transfer was observed in vitro. This suggests that MPS-mediated conjugative transfer influences host distribution, although this effect may not be as apparent where the sample size of plasmids is small (that is, TraNδ). Phylogenetic analysis of the OM protein receptors from each species revealed clustering of homologues which appear to interact with TraN on the basis of the functional assays, except for homologues of OmpK36 which interact with TraNβ (Fig. 5b).

Fig. 5: TraN structural variants mediate conjugation species specifity.
figure 5

a, RTCS endpoint measurements were taken from conjugation mixtures containing donors expressing different TraN tip structural variants and WT K. pneumoniae, S. Typhimurium, E. coli and E. cloacae recipients. A negative control was included for each recipient using a donor carrying the derepressed but untagged pKpQIL (-GFP). Fluorescence readings are presented as mean ± s.d. of three biological repeats analysed by one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparison test comparing to the negative control. ****P < 0.0001. b, Phylogenetic tree of TraN receptors from the four bacterial species used as recipients in conjugation assays: KP, K. pneumoniae; EC, E. coli; ST, S. Typhimurium; Ecl, E. cloacae. Homologues that participate in MPS with a corresponding TraN are highlighted in the dashed boxes.

Source data


Although TraN has previously been implicated in MPS, we have now elucidated the mechanism by which it mediates intimate contacts between conjugating bacteria. To the best of our knowledge, this is presumably the first example of OM proteins in opposing cells cooperating to mediate bacterial–bacterial interactions.

While MPS facilitates efficient conjugation, low-frequency transfer occurs in the absence of a suitable receptor and can be increased following transfer gene derepression. On the basis of this, we propose a model in which the pilus mediates a baseline level of conjugation in the absence of MPS (Fig. 6a). This form of transfer is dependent on the expression level of donor transfer genes and is probably less efficient as cells are not intimately attached. Several observations of conjugation occurring in the absence of intimate cell–cell attachment indeed support the idea that the pilus can serve as a conduit for relaxase-bound DNA entry into the recipient36,37. Where recipients expressing the appropriate OMPs are present, low-efficiency transfer is supplemented by high-efficiency transfer mediated by MPS following pilus retraction. In addition to ensuring that mating pairs stay intimately attached throughout DNA transfer, the interaction of TraN with a suitable receptor may also provide a signal to the core machinery that increases transfer efficiency (Fig. 6b). Our model builds upon the ‘shoot and pump’ model first proposed by Llosa et al.38, where recipients cannot avoid conjugation. Ultimately, conjugation will always occur where there is the expression of functional transfer machinery to impart the sheer push force required to deliver DNA into the recipient cell, while MPS serves to improve the efficiency of this process.

Fig. 6: Proposed model of conjugation.
figure 6

a, Low-efficiency DNA transfer occurs in the absence of MPS. Where a suitable TraN receptor is not present in the recipient, conjugation occurs without intimate attachment, resulting in a baseline conjugation frequency. b, High-efficiency transfer occurs when MPS is successful, potentially through the intimate attachment of cells and the transmission of a signal to the core machinery. The conduit for DNA transfer across the recipient membranes remains unknown and is represented by the dashed box. IM, inner membrane.

Analysis of TraN sequences found on fully sequenced plasmids revealed a clear correlation of several homologues with a single dominant species, the molecular basis of which is reflected in our in vitro findings of TraN pairing with specific OM proteins in the recipient. One feature of the dataset that should be acknowledged is the bias towards bacterial species that are highly associated with antimicrobial resistance and nosocomial infections in developed countries. Therefore, while our analysis may be useful in highlighting TraN variants that facilitate conjugation of high-risk plasmids in pathogens of interest, it may not reflect the entire range of receptive host species. Some epidemic plasmids associated with resistance or virulence may also be overrepresented. Of note, pKpQIL-like plasmids are found extensively within clinical ST258 isolates39. However, these plasmids have also been detected in other sequence types of K. pneumoniae and other bacterial species, suggesting that conjugation still plays a prominent role in its dissemination20,39.

In summary, our findings highlight the importance of TraN-mediated MPS in driving high-efficiency transfer of IncF plasmids and its role in shaping plasmid host range. Our findings suggest that targeted strategies could be developed to interrupt MPS for high-risk IncF plasmids. Notably, despite great diversity in TraN sequence variants, many are structurally conserved and, therefore, mediate conjugation via the same receptors. Accordingly, we have now classified approximately 90% of the plasmids in our curated dataset into one of four groups (TraNα–δ) on the basis of the TraN structural variant expressed and suggest that conjugation-blocking strategies be prioritized for these four known structures. We envision that a combination of traN sequencing with rapid structure prediction could form the basis of future surveillance strategies for emergent high-risk plasmids as a means of predicting dissemination into important pathogens.


Bacterial strains and plasmids

The bacterial strains, conjugative IncF plasmids and mutagenesis vectors used are listed in Supplementary Tables 1, 3 and 4, respectively. Unless otherwise stated, bacteria were cultured in Lysogeny Broth (LB) at 37 °C, 200 r.p.m. When needed, antibiotics were used at the following concentrations: ertapenem (0.5 μg ml−1), streptomycin (50 μg ml−1), kanamycin (50 μg ml−1), gentamicin (10 μg ml−1).

Generation of mutants

All genomic mutations were made in ICC8001, a rifampicin-resistant derivative of K. pneumoniae ATCC 43816 using a two-step recombination methodology. Mutagenesis vectors were mobilized from E. coli CC118λpir into pACBSR-carrying strains through a tri-parental conjugation using the E. coli 1047 pRK2013 helper strain. Merodiploid colonies were selected on LB agar containing gentamicin and streptomycin. Selected colonies were grown for at least 4 h in LB supplemented with streptomycin and 0.4% l-arabinose to induce expression of the I-SceI endonuclease from the pACBSR plasmid. Cultures were streaked onto LB agar containing streptomycin and screened for the intended mutations. Mutations in pKpQIL were introduced using the same methodology.

Mutagenesis vectors were generated by Gibson Assembly (New England Biolabs, E2611L) on the pSEVA612S backbone and were maintained in CC118λpir cells. Site-directed mutagenesis on previously generated vectors was performed according to the Q5 Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit protocol (New England Biolabs, M0554S). Primers used to generate the mutagenesis vectors and for screening are listed in Supplementary Table 5. All mutations were confirmed by sequencing (Eurofins). The R100-1 plasmid was provided by Fernando de la Cruz and transformed into chemically competent DH5α, which served as the donor strain in conjugation assays. GeneArt Gene Synthesis (ThermoFisher) was used to synthesize a nucleotide string encoding the tip region of TraNMV1.

Selection-based conjugation assays

For experiments using donors carrying pKpGFP and its derivatives, recipients were transformed with pSEVA471, a low-copy-number plasmid encoding streptomycin resistance. For quantification of R100-1 conjugation, DH5α carrying R100-1 was used as the donor and recipients were transformed with pUltra-sfGFP, which confers gentamicin resistance. For all experiments, overnight cultures of donor and recipient bacteria were washed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Donor and recipient cells were mixed at a ratio of 8:1, which was previously determined to result in the highest conjugation frequency for pKpQIL40, and diluted in PBS (1 in 25 v/v). A volume of 40 μl of the final conjugation mixture was spotted onto LB agar and incubated for 6 h at 37 °C. The spots were collected and resuspended in 1 ml of sterile PBS for serial dilution. Recipient colonies were selected on streptomycin- or gentamicin-containing LB agar plates. Transconjugants were selected on plates supplemented with streptomycin and ertapenem for pKpGFP experiments, and streptomycin and gentamicin for R100-1 conjugation experiments. Plates were visualized on a Safe Imager 2.0 Blue Light Transilluminator (ThermoFisher) to confirm plasmid uptake in transconjugant colonies by GFP fluorescence. Conjugation frequency was calculated as the ratio of the colony forming units (c.f.u.) per ml of transconjugants to the c.f.u. per ml of recipients and the data were log10 transformed before statistical analysis.

RTCS assays

Conjugation mixtures were prepared by mixing PBS-washed overnight cultures of donors carrying derepressed reporter plasmids and recipient bacteria. It was determined that maximal fluorescence emission was obtained when donor and recipient bacteria were mixed at a 1:1 ratio without dilution. The conjugation mixture (8 µl) was spotted onto 270 µl LB agar in a 96-well black microtitre plate in technical triplicate. The plates were incubated for 6 h at 37 °C, with fluorescence readings taken at 10 min intervals on a FLUOstar Omega (BMG Labtech). Fluorescence data at each timepoint were calculated by normalizing the raw GFP emission at that timepoint to the minimum GFP emission recorded for each sample over the 6 h time course. Arbitrary fluorescence units (a.f.u.) were determined by calculating the log fold change of fluorescence at t = 300 min for each mutant recipient strain (X) against the WT recipient, that is, a.f.u. = log10(fluorescenceX/fluorescenceWT).

Purification of conjugative pili and generation of anti-pili antibodies

GFP-DD overnight cultures (2 l) were collected by centrifugation at 7,000 × g for 20 min and resuspended in 40 ml of cold 1X PBS. The resuspended cells were passed through a 25 G needle 30 times. ‘Shaved’ bacteria were centrifuged at 50,000 × g for 1 h. The supernatant was mixed with 5% PEG 6000, with constant stirring for 1 h at 4 °C. Conjugative pili were precipitated by centrifugation at 50,000 × g for 30 min. The pellet was resuspended in a buffer containing 50 mM Tris pH8, 1 M NaCl and dialysed overnight against the same buffer. The purified pili were visualized by negative stain electron microscopy to assess for pilus integrity and purity. Rat polyclonal antibodies were raised against the purified pili (ThermoFisher). Polyclonal antibodies were adsorbed against paraformaldehyde-fixed wild type K. pneumoniae to isolate antibodies specific to the conjugative pilus.

Immunofluorescence microscopy

Overnight cultures were diluted 1 in 20 (v/v) in fresh LB and 300 ml was added to glass coverslips placed in a 24-well plate before incubation at 37 °C for 1.5 h to allow bacteria to adhere to the surface of the coverslips. Excess medium was removed and the coverslips were washed with PBS before fixation in 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 min at room temperature. Fixed samples were washed in PBS and blocked in 2% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in PBS (w/v). Samples were washed three times before incubation with anti-pili antibodies (1:100 in 2% BSA/PBS) for 1 h at room temperature. Samples were washed three times in PBS and incubated with Alexa Fluor 488 conjugated Donkey anti-rat IgG antibodies (Jackson Immunoresearch, 712-546-150; 1:1,000 in 2% BSA/PBS) for 1 h at room temperature. Coverslips were washed three times in PBS and incubated with FM4-64 (Invitrogen, T13320; 1:100 in water) for 5 min at room temperature. Following this, coverslips were dried and mounted onto glass slides using VECTASHIELD Hardset Antifade mounting medium with DAPI (Vector Laboratories, H-1500-10) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. Slides were analysed using a ×100 objective lens on a Zeiss Axio Observer 7 microscope and images were processed on Zen 2.3 (Blue Version, Zeiss). Images shown are representative of at least three biological repeats.

Agarose pad live microscopy

Bacterial conjugation was visualized over time on a Celldiscoverer 7 live cell imaging microscope (Zeiss). For these experiments, the GFP-DD donor strain was mixed with 36WT-expressing recipients that constitutively express dTomato. Overnight cultures of donor and recipient bacteria were washed in PBS, mixed in a 1:1 ratio and 8 μl was spotted onto a 1 cm2 2% agarose (w/v) pad supplemented with M9 salts and 0.4% glucose (w/v). The pad was inverted into a μ-Slide 2-well chambered coverslip (Ibidi, 80286). The sample was maintained at 37 °C throughout live imaging. Images were acquired every 10 min for 3.5 h and processed using Zen 2.3 (Blue Version, Zeiss).

Generation of TraN AlphaFold models

In the absence of homologous TraN structures, ab initio models were generated by AlphaFold v2.033. TraN sequences were submitted to the AlphaFold Colab server with the default settings; the signal peptide was removed from all sequences before modelling. Each structural model was validated by analysing the confidence score as generated by the pLDDT. Molecular graphics and superimposition analysis were performed in UCSF ChimeraΧ-1.2.541.

Overexpression and purification of TraN and OmpK36

Recombinant OmpK36 was extracted from E. coli outer membranes using 1% n-Dodecyl-N,N-Dimethylamine-N-Oxide (LDAO; Anatrace) and was further purified by affinity chromatography and anion exchange29. The final OmpK36 buffer was 50 mM NaCl, 10 mM HEPES pH 7.0 and 0.03% n-dodecyl-β-d-maltoside (DDM; Anatrace). The mature TraN gene (D28 to Q651) from pKpQIL was subcloned into the pTAMAHISTEV vector with an N-terminal His7-tag and a tobacco etch virus (TEV) cleavage site using the NcoI and XhoI restriction enzyme sites. The construct was transformed into E. coli C43 (DE3) competent cells (F ompT hsdSB (rB mB −) gal dcm (DE3))42 and expressed in Terrific Broth (TB) medium (Formedium) supplemented with 100 µg ml−1 ampicillin. Cultures were grown to an OD600 of 0.6–0.8 at 37 °C, then induced with 0.5 mM isopropyl β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) and maintained for 16 h at 25 °C. Outer membranes were produced as previously described43, then solubilized overnight in 1% DDM in 1X PBS. Insoluble material was pelleted at 131,000 × g for 1 h, and the supernatant was supplemented with 30 mM imidazole and loaded onto an Econo-Column (Biorad) containing 5 ml Ni-NTA resin (Qiagen). The column was washed with 5 column volumes of wash buffer (1X PBS, 30 mM imidazole and 0.1% DDM). TraN-His7 eluted from the resin in wash buffer containing 100–250 mM imidazole. TraN-His7 was dialysed against 50 mM NaCl, 10 mM HEPES pH 7.0 and 0.03% DDM (buffer A) while undergoing incubation with His6-tagged TEV protease for 16–18 h at 4 °C. The dialysed sample was passed over a 5 ml His-Trap column (Cytiva) and the cleaved protein was collected in the flowthrough. Fractions containing TraN were combined and further purified using anion-exchange chromatography (Mono Q 5/10 GL column; Cytiva) using an ÄKTA pure system (Cytiva). The column was equilibrated with buffer A and eluted using a linear gradient with 500 mM NaCl, 10 mM HEPES pH 7.0 and 0.03% DDM (buffer B) over 20 column volumes. TraN eluted in 18% buffer B and was concentrated to 1 mg ml−1 for SEC analysis.

SEC analysis of TraN-OmpK36

TraN and OmpK36 were dialysed against buffer A (16–18 h at 4 °C) and then were combined at a 1:2 molar ratio respectively at 1 mg ml−1 and incubated for 16 h at room temperature. The sample was injected onto a Superose 6 10/300 GL column (Cytiva), equilibrated in buffer A and eluted at a flow rate of 0.3 ml min−1 while monitoring the absorbance at 280 nm. This was followed by separate injections of TraN and OmpK36 onto the column at the same molar concentrations as previously described for the comparison of retention volumes. Data were collected on UNICORN 7.5. Fractions were collected and analysed by SDS–PAGE.

Cryo-EM sample preparation and data collection

Sample containing OmpK36-TraN at a concentration of 0.33 mg ml−1 was diluted 1:6 in buffer A. In brief, a 4 μl aliquot of sample was applied to a plasma-cleaned (Gatan Solarus) graphene oxide-coated Cu 300 mesh 1.2/1.3 holey carbon grid (Quantifoil), blotted with force 6 for 4.5 s at 90% humidity and flash frozen in liquid ethane using a Vitrobot Mark IV (FEI). The dataset used for structure determination was collected at the Molecular Electron Microscopy Core at the University of Virginia on a Titan Krios EM operated at 300 keV, equipped with an energy filter and K3 direct electron detector (Gatan). An energy filter slit width of 10 eV was used during data collection and was aligned automatically every hour. All 13,668 movies were collected in counting mode at a magnification of 81 K, pixel size of 1.08 Å, and a defocus range from −2.2 to −1.2 μm. Data collection was performed using a total dose of 50 e Å−2 across 40 frames at a rate of 4.78 s per movie.

Data processing

Unless otherwise stated, all data processing was completed using cryoSPARC v3.2.044. Movies were corrected for full-frame motion using Patch Motion Correction followed by Gctf contrast transfer function estimation. After contrast transfer function estimation, micrographs were sorted and selected on the basis of estimated resolution (better than 4 Å), defocus (−1 to −2.5 μm), ice thickness and total full-frame motion. Initial particles were automatically picked using ‘Blob picker’ with minimum and maximum particle diameters of 200 and 256 Å, respectively. Particles were extracted at a box size of 256 pixels, followed by two-dimensional (2D) classification. Class averages of trimeric OmpK36 alone and OmpK36 with TraN were selected for template-based particle picking. A total of 13,780,567 particles were extracted using a box diameter of 256 Å. These particles were sorted using 3 iterative rounds of 2D classification with 50 classes each, the number of online-EM iterations being set to 100 and the batch size to 1,000 per class. The final iteration of 2D classification yielded a subset of 3,412,946 particles.

To differentiate particles containing only OmpK36 or OmpK36 + TraN, multiple 3D maps were generated using ‘Ab initio reconstruction’, with class size set to 4. Output 3D maps were inspected for the presence of TraN. Particles were further refined using two iterations of heterogeneous refinement with input volumes created by multi-class ab initio. The highest resolution class from the second iteration of heterogeneous refinement contained 359,314 particles, which allowed for a ~2.6 Å map to be reconstructed using ‘non-uniform refinement’ (Extended Data Fig. 7 and Supplementary Table 6).

Model building and refinement

The density for the trimeric OmpK36 allowed us to trace the entire backbone and build most side chains throughout the structure. The OmpK36 crystal structure (PDB ID: 6RD3)29 was used for building the cryo-EM model, which only had small differences relative to the starting model. The predicted TraN AlphaFold model was used for initial interpretation of the loop-shaped density found within the lumen of one porin channel. The loop and the two β-strands on either side of the hairpin of the AlphaFold model could be fit into the density. Two cysteines at either side of the hairpin fit into the TraN density and were used as a starting point for matching larger side chains within the density. Model building, including adjusting side chains, was performed in Coot45. The model was refined in Phenix v1.15.2-3472, using real-space refinement with ‘ignoring symmetry conflicts’ turned on46. Refinement included global minimization, B-factor optimization, and applied secondary structure and Ramachandran restraints. The final model had a MolProbity score of 1.39, with 96% and 0.1% in the Ramachandran favoured and outlier regions, respectively (Supplementary Table 6). The OmpK36-TraN complex coordinates have been deposited to the Protein Data Bank ( with PDB ID 7SZI. The EM map has been submitted to Electron Microscopy Data Bank ( with ID EMD 25567.

Bioinformatic analysis of TraN variants

We analysed a previously described dataset of 14,029 sequenced plasmids deposited in GenBank for predicted conjugative plasmids using the Plascad tool for plasmid characterization34. Briefly, Plascad predicts and distinguishes conjugative plasmids from mobilizable and non-mobilizable plasmids on the basis of the presence of relaxase, T4CP and T4SS genes. It further characterizes conjugative plasmids into the four archetypal mating pair formation (MPF) groups. Putative MPFF conjugative plasmids were extracted from the dataset. Next, the bacterial host family associated with each plasmid was determined by querying the NCBI Taxonomy database via the ‘ncbi_taxonomy’ module in the Python toolkit ‘ETE’ (v3.0) and manually curating the results. Finally, PlasmidFinder was used to define the plasmid replicons for the purpose of selecting plasmids carrying an IncF replicon. A curated dataset of 824 putative conjugative IncF plasmids found in an Enterobacteriaceae host was screened for traN variants (Supplementary Table 1). A tBLASTn35 was performed and required sequences to share ≥90% amino acid similarity with a reference and possess ≥75% of the reference length to categorize them as the same traN type. Phylogenetic trees were constructed with RAxML v8.2.847 using the traN nucleotide sequences from plasmids carrying variants of the pKpQIL, R100-1 and F traN genes, midpoint-rooted and visualized with metadata using Microreact48 (version TBC). Further verification of annotated traN sequences was performed by analysing open reading frames in the reference plasmids for cysteine residue abundance on the basis that TraN is known to contain at least 20 cysteine residues (Supplementary Table 8).

Multiple sequence alignments of TraN and OM proteins

Multiple sequence alignments were generated in Clustal Omega 1.2.4. TraN sequences were obtained from the following reference plasmids: pKpQIL (accession ID: KY798507.1), R100-1 (accession ID: DQ364638.1), F (accession ID: NC_002483.1), pSLT (accession ID: AE006471.2), MV1 (accession ID: NZ_CP016763.1), MV2 (accession ID: AP014954.1), MV3 (accession ID: NZ_CP023348.1). OM protein sequences were obtained from the following published genomes: K. pneumoniae ATCC 43816 (accession ID: CP009208), E. coli MG1655 (accession ID: U00096.3), S. Typhimurium LT2 (accession ID: AE006468), E. cloacae ATCC 13047 (accession ID: CP001918). Phylogenetic trees were calculated using the neighbour joining method and visualized in Jalview

Statistics and reproducibility

All data are representative of at least three biological repeats. All attempts at replication were successful. Statistical analyses were performed on Prism 9 (GraphPad software). Conjugation data were analysed by repeated measures one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s or Dunnett’s multiple comparison test, as appropriate. Where only two recipient strains were being compared, a two-sided paired t-test was used. A multiple t-test with Holm-Šídák correction was used to assess the effect of OmpK36 mutations in the donor. P values less than 0.05 were considered significant.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

The data supporting the findings in this study are provided within the Article and its Supplementary Information. Accession IDs of published sequences for reference plasmids and genomes are listed in the Methods. The coordinates and structure factors of the TraN-OmpK36 complex have been deposited to the Protein Data Bank and Electron Microscopy Data Bank with ID codes 7SZI and 25567, respectively. Source data are provided with this paper.


  1. Waksman, G. From conjugation to T4S systems in Gram‐negative bacteria: a mechanistic biology perspective. EMBO Rep. 20, e47012 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Achtman, M., Morelli, G. & Schwuchow, S. Cell-cell interactions in conjugating Escherichia coli: role of F pili and fate of mating aggregates. J. Bacteriol. 135, 1053–1061 (1978).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Clarke, M., Maddera, L., Harris, R. L. & Silverman, P. M. F-pili dynamics by live-cell imaging. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 17978–197981 (2008).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Achtman, M. Mating aggregates in Escherichia coli conjugation. J. Bacteriol. 123, 505–515 (1975).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Costa, T. R. D. et al. Structure of the bacterial sex F pilus reveals an assembly of a stoichiometric protein-phospholipid complex. Cell 166, 1436–1444.e10 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Hu, B., Khara, P. & Christie, P. J. Structural bases for F plasmid conjugation and F pilus biogenesis in Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116, 14222–14227 (2019).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Zheng, W. et al. Cryoelectron-microscopic structure of the pKpQIL conjugative pili from carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae. Structure 28, 1321–1328.e2 (2020).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Fernandez-Lopez, R., de Toro, M., Moncalian, G., Garcillan-Barcia, M. P. & de la Cruz, F. Comparative genomics of the conjugation region of F-like plasmids: five shades of F. Front. Mol. Biosci. 3, 71 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Villa, L., García-Fernández, A., Fortini, D. & Carattoli, A. Replicon sequence typing of IncF plasmids carrying virulence and resistance determinants. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 65, 2518–2529 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nakaya, R., Nakamura, A. & Murata, Y. Resistance transfer agents in Shigella. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 3, 654–659 (1960).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Brinkley, C. et al. Nucleotide sequence analysis of the enteropathogenic Escherichia coli adherence factor plasmid pMAR7. Infect. Immun. 74, 5408–5413 (2006).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Ahmer, B. M. M., Tran, M. & Heffron, F. The virulence plasmid of Salmonella typhimurium is self-transmissible. J. Bacteriol. 181, 1364–1368 (1999).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Skurray, R. A., Hancock, R. E. W. & Reeves, P. Con mutants: class of mutants in Escherichia coli K-12 lacking a major cell wall protein and defective in conjugation and adsorption of a bacteriophage. J. Bacteriol. 119, 726–735 (1974).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Havekes, L. M. & Hoekstra, W. P. M. Characterization of an Escherichia coli K-12 F-Con-mutant. J. Bacteriol. 126, 593–600 (1976).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Manoil, C. & Rosenbusch, J. P. Conjugation-deficient mutants of Escherichia coli distinguish classes of functions of the outer membrane OmpA protein. Mol. Gen. Genet. 187, 148–156 (1982).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Klimke, W. A. & Frost, L. S. Genetic analysis of the role of the transfer gene, traN, of the F and R100-1 plasmids in mating pair stabilization during conjugation. J. Bacteriol. 180, 4036–4043 (1998).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Klimke, W. A. et al. The mating pair stabilization protein, TraN, of the F plasmid is an outer-membrane protein with two regions that are important for its function in conjugation. Microbiology 151, 3527–3540 (2005).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Achtman, M., Schwuchow, S., Helmuth, R., Morelli, G. & Manning, P. A. Cell-cell interactions in conjugating Escherichia coli: Con mutants and stabilization of mating aggregates. Mol. Gen. Genet. 164, 171–183 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Podschun, R. & Ullmann, U. Klebsiella spp. as nosocomial pathogens: epidemiology, taxonomy, typing methods, and pathogenicity factors. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 11, 589–603 (1998).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Doumith, M. et al. Major role of pKpQIL-like plasmids in the early dissemination of KPC-type carbapenemases in the UK. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 72, 2241–2248 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Navon-Venezia, S., Kondratyeva, K. & Carattoli, A. Klebsiella pneumoniae: a major worldwide source and shuttle for antibiotic resistance. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 41, 252–275 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Chen, L. et al. Complete sequence of a blaKPC-2-harboring IncFIIK1 plasmid from a Klebsiella pneumoniae sequence type 258 strain. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 57, 1542–1545 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. David, S. et al. Integrated chromosomal and plasmid sequence analyses reveal diverse modes of carbapenemase gene spread among Klebsiella pneumoniae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117, 25043–25054 (2020).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Hardiman, C. A. et al. Horizontal transfer of carbapenemase-encoding plasmids and comparison with hospital epidemiology data. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 60, 4910–4919 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Tsai, Y.-K. et al. Klebsiella pneumoniae outer membrane porins OmpK35 and OmpK36 play roles in both antimicrobial resistance and virulence. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 55, 1485–1493 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Acosta-Gutiérrez, S. et al. Getting drugs into Gram-negative bacteria: rational rules for permeation through general porins. ACS Infect. Dis. 4, 1487–1498 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Rocker, A. et al. Global trends in proteome remodeling of the outer membrane modulate antimicrobial permeability in Klebsiella pneumoniae. mBio 11, e00603–e00620 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Fajardo-Lubián, A., Ben Zakour, N. L., Agyekum, A., Qi, Q. & Iredell, J. R. Host adaptation and convergent evolution increases antibiotic resistance without loss of virulence in a major human pathogen. PLoS Pathog. 15, e1007218 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Wong, J. L. C. et al. OmpK36-mediated Carbapenem resistance attenuates ST258 Klebsiella pneumoniae in vivo. Nat. Commun. 10, 3957 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Finnegan, D. & Willetts, N. The nature of the transfer inhibitor of several F-like plasmids. Mol. Gen. Genet. 119, 57–66 (1972).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Van der Ley, P., Bekkers, A., Van Meersbergen, J. & Tommassen, J. A comparative study on the phoE genes of three enterobacterial species: implications for structure‐function relationships in a pore‐forming protein of the outer membrane. Eur. J. Biochem. 164, 469–475 (1987).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Xiao, M., Lai, Y., Sun, J., Chen, G. & Yan, A. Transcriptional regulation of the outer membrane porin gene ompW reveals its physiological role during the transition from the aerobic to the anaerobic lifestyle of Escherichia coli. Front. Microbiol. 7, 799 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Jumper, J. et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596, 583–589 (2021).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Che, Y. et al. Conjugative plasmids interact with insertion sequences to shape the horizontal transfer of antimicrobial resistance genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2008731118 (2021).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Gerts, E. M., Yu, Y. K., Agarwala, R., Schäffer, A. A. & Altschul, S. F. Composition-based statistics and translated nucleotide searches: improving the TBLASTN module of BLAST. BMC Biol. 4, 41 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Harrington, L. C. & Rogerson, A. C. The F pilus of Escherichia coli appears to support stable DNA transfer in the absence of wall-to-wall contact between cells. J. Bacteriol. 172, 7263–7264 (1990).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Babić, A., Lindner, A. B., Vulić, M., Stewart, E. J. & Radman, M. Direct visualization of horizontal gene transfer. Science 319, 1533–1536 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Llosa, M., Gomis-Rüth, F. X., Coll, M. & de la Cruz, F.Bacterial conjugation: a two-step mechanism for DNA transport. Mol. Microbiol. 45, 1–8 (2002).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Chen, L. et al. Comparative genomic analysis of KPC-encoding pKpQIL-like plasmids and their distribution in New Jersey and New York hospitals. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 58, 2871–2877 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Buckner, M. M. C. et al. Clinically relevant plasmid-host interactions indicate that transcriptional and not genomic modifications ameliorate fitness costs of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-carrying plasmids. mBio 9, e02303–e02317 (2018).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Goddard, T. D. et al. UCSF ChimeraX: meeting modern challenges in visualization and analysis. Protein Sci. 27, 14–25 (2018).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Miroux, B. & Walker, J. E. Overproduction of proteins in Escherichia coli: mutant hosts that allow synthesis of some membrane proteins and globular proteins at high levels. J. Mol. Biol. 260, 289–298 (1996).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Beis, K., Whitfield, C., Booth, I. & Naismith, J. H. Two-step purification of outer membrane proteins. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 39, 10–14 (2006).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Punjani, A., Rubinstein, J. L., Fleet, D. J. & Brubaker, M. A. cryoSPARC: algorithms for rapid unsupervised cryo-EM structure determination. Nat. Methods 14, 290–296 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Emsley, P. & Cowtan, K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D 60, 2126–2132 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Afonine, P. V. et al. Real-space refinement in PHENIX for cryo-EM and crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D. 74, 531–544 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Stamatakis, A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30, 1312–1313 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Argimón, S. et al. Microreact: visualizing and sharing data for genomic epidemiology and phylogeography. Microb. Genom. 2, e000093 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank F. de la Cruz for providing us with the R100-1 plasmid, J. Casadesus for providing the S. Typhimurium SV3081 strain, A. Shenoy for providing the E. cloacae ATCC 13047 strain and J. Rowley for technical assistance in setting up the live microscopy. This work was supported by an MRC CMBI Studentship award to J.L.C.W. (MR/R502376/1), Imperial College London BBSRC Doctoral Training Partnership to C.S. (BB/M011178/1), MRC grant to K.B. (MR/N020103/1) and Wellcome Trust Investigator grant to G.F. (107057/Z/15/Z). Cryo-EM was done at the University of Virginia Molecular Electron Microscopy Core facility, which is supported in part by the School of Medicine and built with NIH grant G20-RR31199. The Titan Krios (S10-RR025067) and K3/GIF (U24-GM116790) were purchased in part or in full with the designated NIH grants.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



W.W.L. generated strains and plasmids, and performed and analysed conjugation experiments. J.L.C.W. and T.B. generated plasmids and strains. L.C.B. and F.W. performed cryo-EM analysis. C.S. and H.-S.K. purified MPS proteins and performed size exclusion chromatography analysis. S.D. performed bioinformatic analysis. A.P. generated reagents. B.P. performed porin physiology experiments. T.R.D.C., E.H.E., K.B., M.C. and G.F. participated in supervision. W.W.L., J.L.C.W., L.C.B., S.D., K.B. and G.F. wrote the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gad Frankel.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Microbiology thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Characterisation of OmpK36-dependence and pKpGFP derepression.

a The effect of the OmpK36 mutations on conjugation is specific to the recipient. b Deletion of finO increases transfer of pKpGFPΔfinO compared to pKpGFP; the difference in log conjugation frequency due to the ST258 mutations in recipients is maintained. c Conjugation frequency of pKpGFP into strains expressing different OmpK36 isoforms. Log conjugation frequency is presented as the mean ± SD of three biological repeats analyzed by multiple paired t tests with Holm-Šídák correction in (a) and by repeated measures one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparison test in (c). ns, not significant.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 2 OmpK36-dependency in R100-1 conjugation.

a R100-1 conjugates similarly into recipients expressing OmpK36WT or OmpK36WT+GD. b Conjugation frequency of pKpGFP expressing TraNR100-1 into strains expressing different OmpK36 isoforms. Log conjugation frequency is presented as the mean ± SD of three biological repeats analyzed by a two-sided paired t test in (a) and by a repeated measures one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparison test in (b). ns, not significant.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 3 Temporal, real-time measurement of conjugation using the RTCS.

a Substitution of traN in pKpGFP-D with traN from R100-1 abrogates the effect of the L3 GD insertion in OmpK36 on conjugation. b pKpGFP-DtraNR100-1 conjugation is dependent on OmpW in the recipient. c A chimeric TraN (TraNCh1) which contains the variable domain from TraNR100-1 and the N- and C-termini from TraNpKpQIL confers OmpW dependency during conjugation. d pKpGFP-D expressing traN from F does not conjugate efficiently into K. pneumoniae recipients. e pKpGFP-DtraNF conjugation is dependent on OmpA expressed in E. coli recipients. Fluorescence emission was measured every 10 m and normalized to the minimum emission recorded from each conjugation mixture over the 6 h incubation period. Graphs are representative of three biological replicates.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 4 The variable domain of TraN determines recipient OM protein dependency.

a The domain which was substituted to generate the chimeric TraN (TraNCh1) is highlighted in red. Alignment was generated using Clustal Omega and visualized with Jalview b Conjugation frequency of pKpGFP expressing TraNCh1 into WT and ΔompW recipients. Log conjugation frequency is presented as the mean ± SD of three biological repeats analyzed by a two-sided paired t test.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 5 Comparison of predicted TraN structures.

a The structures of TraN from pKpQIL, R100-1 and F were predicted using AlphaFold. TraN is shown in ribbon and coloured by pLDDT score: red (very low, <50 %), yellow (low, 60 %), green (OK, 70 %), light blue (confident, 80 %) and dark blue (very high, >90 %). The predicted structures showed a high degree of structural similarity in the core of the protein whereas the ‘tip’ (highlighted in dashed boxes) is variable. b Cysteines in the predicted structures of TraNpKpQIL, TraNR100-1 and TraNF are highlighted. Distance measurements between cysteine residues were performed in ChimeraX and residues which can form disulphide bonds are listed in Supplementary Table 7.

Extended Data Fig. 6 Size exclusion chromatography of TraNpKpQIL and OmpK36WT.

a Incubation of TraN with OmpK36WT results in the formation of a stable complex as shown by SEC. Comparison of the chromatograms indicates the clear shift for the TraN-OmpK36 complex (black) compared to free TraN (red) and OmpK36WT (blue). b The complex formation was further verified by SDS-PAGE and it shows that the peak at 12.8 mL contains both TraN and OmpK36WT. SDS-PAGE analysis includes samples before and after SEC with label colors corresponding to the chromatogram peaks; Lane M, marker in kDa. c Incubation of TraN with OmpK36WT+GD results in no complex formation. Comparison of the chromatograms indicates that there is no shift in the retention volume for the TraN-OmpK36WT+GD sample (grey) compared to free TraN (red) and OmpK36WT+GD (blue).

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 7 Cryo-EM and single-particle analysis of OmpK36-TraN.

a Overview of the image processing workflow done in cryoSPARC v3.2.0. 13,056 movies were selected based on estimated resolution, defocus, ice thickness, and full-frame motion. Accepted micrographs were subjected to automated particle picking ‘blob picking’ and 2x 2D classification to obtain template references. Template-based picking followed by 3x 2D classification was completed, resulting in 508, 537 particles. Particles were then used for Ab initio reconstruction; the best output reconstruction generated by Ab initio reconstruction was further refined using Nonuniform Refinement. The results of Non-uniform refinement yielded a reconstruction with an estimated resolution of 2.6 Å. b Coulomb potential density for the OmpK36 trimer (blue density) and TraN (green density). c Close up view of the density for the OmpK36 and TraN ‘tip’ side chains.

Extended Data Fig. 8 Plasmid host species distribution for TraN sequence variants.

a tBlastn was used to identify IncF conjugative plasmids which express TraN sharing at least 90% amino acid similarity to TraN expressed from pKpQIL, R100-1 or F. The host species distribution is shown for plasmids carrying these TraN variants. Where only one plasmid was associated with a species, it was categorized as ‘Others’. b Host species distribution of other TraN variants in at least 10 plasmids are shown. For plasmids carrying a TraN sharing at least 90% similarity to TraN from the S. Typhimurium virulence plasmid, pSLT, the associated S. enterica serovars are shown in the insert.

Extended Data Fig. 9 Structural comparison of additional TraN variants.

a The structures of the additional TraN variants were predicted using AlphaFold. TraN is shown in ribbon and coloured by pLDDT score: red (very low, <50 %), yellow (low, 60 %), green (OK, 70 %), light blue (confident, 80 %) and dark blue (very high, >90 %). The ‘tip’ regions have been highlighted in the dashed box. b Predicted tip structures of TraNR100-1 and TraNpSLT, TraNpKpQIL and TraNMV2, and TraNMV1 and TraNMV3 were superimposed in ChimeraX.

Extended Data Fig. 10 TraNpSLT and TraNMV1 receptor specificity.

a Representative graph showing fluorescence emission over time from pKpGFP-DtraNCh2 into WT and ΔompW recipients. b Arbitrary fluorescence units (AFU) were calculated for the ΔompW recipient as log10 (fluorescenceΔompW/fluorescenceWT). c GFP-DDtraNCh3 cells are piliated. The bacterial cell membrane is shown in yellow and conjugative pili are shown in magenta. Scale bar = 2 μm. d Representative graph of fluorescence emission over time from pKpGFP-DtraNCh3 into E. coli MG1655 WT and ΔompF recipients. e Arbitrary fluorescence units (AFU) were calculated for the ΔompF, ΔompC and ΔompA recipients as log10 (fluorescenceX/fluorescenceWT) where X is each recipient strain. AFU data in (b) and (e) is presented as the mean ± SD of three biological repeats.

Source data

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Tables 1, 3–7.

Reporting Summary

Supplementary Table 1

Supplementary Table 2. List of IncF conjugative plasmids. Plasmids were grouped and coloured according to traN variant. The percentage identity of each traN to the reference traN as determined by tBLASTn is listed. Supplementary Table 8. Cysteine residues in plasmid ORFs. The table lists all annotated open reading frames in plasmids containing the reference traN genes and the corresponding number of cysteine residues encoded.

Supplementary Video 1

Live microscopy of pKpGFP-D conjugation. Donor cells carrying pKpGFP-D (GFP-DD) were mixed at a 1:1 ratio with WT recipients expressing dTomato (red) and observed by live microscopy. Transconjugant cells that have acquired the plasmid appear green. Each frame was captured 10 min apart. The video plays at ×2,400 actual speed.

Source data

Source Data Fig. 1

Statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 2

Statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 5

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 1

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 2

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 3

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 4

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 6

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 6

Unprocessed Coomassie-stained SDS–PAGE gel.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 10

Statistical source data.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Low, W.W., Wong, J.L.C., Beltran, L.C. et al. Mating pair stabilization mediates bacterial conjugation species specificity. Nat Microbiol (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing