Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Fusarium fruiting body microbiome member Pantoea agglomerans inhibits fungal pathogenesis by targeting lipid rafts

Nature Microbiology volume 7, pages 831–843 (2022)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Plant-pathogenic fungi form intimate interactions with their associated bacterial microbiota during their entire life cycle. However, little is known about the structure, functions and interaction mechanisms of bacterial communities associated with fungal fruiting bodies (perithecia). Here we examined the bacterial microbiome of perithecia formed by Fusarium graminearum, the major pathogenic fungus causing Fusarium head blight in cereals. A total of 111 shared bacterial taxa were identified in the microbiome of 65 perithecium samples collected from 13 geographic locations. Within a representative culture collection, 113 isolates exhibited antagonistic activity against F. graminearum, with Pantoea agglomerans ZJU23 being the most efficient in reducing fungal growth and infectivity. Herbicolin A was identified as the key antifungal compound secreted by ZJU23. Genetic and chemical approaches led to the discovery of its biosynthetic gene cluster. Herbicolin A showed potent in vitro and in planta efficacy towards various fungal pathogens and fungicide-resistant isolates, and exerted a fungus-specific mode of action by directly binding and disrupting ergosterol-containing lipid rafts. Furthermore, herbicolin A exhibited substantially higher activity (between 5- and 141-fold higher) against the human opportunistic fungal pathogens Aspergillus fumigatus and Candida albicans in comparison with the clinically used fungicides amphotericin B and fluconazole. Its mode of action, which is distinct from that of other antifungal drugs, and its efficacy make herbicolin A a promising antifungal drug to combat devastating fungal pathogens, both in agricultural and clinical settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Assessment of perithecium-associated bacterial communities.
Fig. 2: Isolation and identification of the F. graminearum antagonist ZJU23.
Fig. 3: Herbicolin A is the major antifungal compound produced by ZJU23.
Fig. 4: Ergosterol biosynthesis is involved in the fungal susceptibility to HA.
Fig. 5: HA interacts with ergosterol and targets fungal lipid rafts.
Fig. 6: HA exhibits broad-spectrum antifungal activity.

Data availability

The genome sequence of ZJU23, Pa58 has been deposited in the NCBI BioProject database with accession codes PRJNA707237 and PRJNA795028. Raw data of amplicon sequencing, genome sequences of herbicolin A-resistant S. cerevisiae mutants and transposon mutants of P. agglomeans ZJU23 are deposited in the Genome Sequence Archive of the Beijing Institute of Genomics (BIG) Data Center with accession numbers CRA003916, CRA006594 and CRA006602 in bioproject PRJCA003858 (https://bigd.big.ac.cn/gsa). Other data supporting the findings of the present study are available within this article, in Extended Data and the Supplementary Information. Source data are provided with this paper.

Code availability

Scripts employed in the microbiome analysis are available at https://github.com/YongxinLiu/WheatFHB.

References

  1. Cordovez, V., Dini-Andreote, F., Carrion, V. J. & Raaijmakers, J. M. Ecology and evolution of plant microbiomes. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 73, 69–88 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. The Human Microbiome Project Consortium. Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome. Nature 486, 207–214 (2012).

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Trivedi, P., Leach, J. E., Tringe, S. G., Sa, T. & Singh, B. K. Plant-microbiome interactions: from community assembly to plant health. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 18, 607–621 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Duran, P. et al. Microbial interkingdom interactions in roots promote Arabidopsis survival. Cell 175, 973–983.e14 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Rodrigues, J. L. et al. Conversion of the Amazon rainforest to agriculture results in biotic homogenization of soil bacterial communities. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 988–993 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lauber, C. L., Ramirez, K. S., Aanderud, Z., Lennon, J. & Fierer, N. Temporal variability in soil microbial communities across land-use types. ISME J. 7, 1641–1650 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Lundberg, D. S. et al. Defining the core Arabidopsis thaliana root microbiome. Nature 488, 86–90 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen, T. et al. A plant genetic network for preventing dysbiosis in the phyllosphere. Nature 580, 653–657 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Vorholt, J. A., Vogel, C., Carlstrom, C. I. & Muller, D. B. Establishing causality: opportunities of synthetic communities for plant microbiome research. Cell Host Microbe 22, 142–155 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wei, Z. et al. Initial soil microbiome composition and functioning predetermine future plant health. Sci. Adv. 5, eaaw0759 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Bahram, M. et al. Structure and function of the global topsoil microbiome. Nature 560, 233–237 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Frey-Klett, P. et al. Bacterial-fungal interactions: hyphens between agricultural, clinical, environmental, and food microbiologists. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 75, 583–609 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen, Y. et al. Wheat microbiome bacteria can reduce virulence of a plant pathogenic fungus by altering histone acetylation. Nat. Commun. 9, 3429 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Berg, G. Plant-microbe interactions promoting plant growth and health: perspectives for controlled use of microorganisms in agriculture. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 84, 11–18 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pal, K. K. & Gardener, B. M. Biological control of plant pathogens. The Plant Health Instructor https://doi.org/10.1094/PHI-A-2006-1117-02 (2006).

  16. Winkelmann, G., Lupp, R. & Jung, G. Herbicolins - new peptide antibiotics from Erwinia herbicola. J. Antibiot. 33, 353–358 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Aydin, M. et al. Structure elucidation of the peptide antibiotics herbicolin A and herbicolin B. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 11, 2285–2300 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tenning, P., Vanrijsbergen, R., Zhao, Y. & Joos, H. Cloning and transfer of genes for antifungal compounds from Erwinia herbicola to Escherichia coli. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 6, 474–480 (1993).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kempf, H. J., Bauer, P. H. & Schroth, M. N. Herbicolin A associated with crown and roots of wheat after seed treatment with Erwinia herbicola B247. Phytopathology 83, 213–216 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kempf, H. J. & Wolf, G. Erwinia herbicola as a biocontrol agent of Fusarium culmorum and Puccinia recondita f. sp. tritici on wheat. Phytopathology 79, 990–994 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Freundt, E. A. & Winkelmann, G. Activity of herbicolin Aa against Mycoplasma, Acholeplasma, Ureaplasma, and Spiroplasma species. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 26, 112–114 (1984).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Dean, R. et al. The top 10 fungal pathogens in molecular plant pathology. Mol. Plant Pathol. 13, 414–430 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Trail, F. For blighted waves of grain: Fusarium graminearum in the postgenomics era. Plant Physiol. 149, 103–110 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Chen, Y., Kistler, H. C. & Ma, Z. Fusarium graminearum trichothecene mycotoxins: biosynthesis, regulation, and management. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 57, 15–39 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mendes, R. et al. Deciphering the rhizosphere microbiome for disease-suppressive bacteria. Science 332, 1097–1100 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Carrion, V. J. et al. Pathogen-induced activation of disease-suppressive functions in the endophytic root microbiome. Science 366, 606–612 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kusstatscher, P. et al. Microbiome-driven identification of microbial indicators for postharvest diseases of sugar beets. Microbiome 7, 112 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Zachow, C., Grosch, R. & Berg, G. Impact of biotic and a-biotic parameters on structure and function of microbial communities living on sclerotia of the soil-borne pathogenic fungus Rhizoctonia solani. Appl. Soil Ecol. 48, 193–200 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Mulner, P. et al. Microbiota associated with sclerotia of soilborne fungal pathogens – a novel source of biocontrol agents producing bioactive volatiles. Phytobiomes J. 3, 125–136 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhang, J. Y. et al. High-throughput cultivation and identification of bacteria from the plant root microbiota. Nat. Protoc. 16, 988–1012 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Tang, G., Chen, Y., Xu, J. R., Kistler, H. C. & Ma, Z. The fungal myosin I is essential for Fusarium toxisome formation. PLoS Pathog. 14, e1006827 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhang, C. & Seyedsayamdost, M. R. Discovery of a cryptic depsipeptide from Streptomyces ghanaensis via MALDI-MS-guided high-throughput elicitor screening. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59, 23005–23009 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Liu, X., Jiang, J. H., Yin, Y. N. & Ma, Z. H. Involvement of FgERG4 in ergosterol biosynthesis, vegetative differentiation and virulence in Fusarium graminearum. Mol. Plant Pathol. 14, 71–83 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Liu, Z. et al. A phosphorylated transcription factor regulates sterol biosynthesis in Fusarium graminearum. Nat. Commun. 10, 1228 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Rautenbach, M., Troskie, A. M. & Vosloo, J. A. Antifungal peptides: to be or not to be membrane active. Biochimie 130, 132–145 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Song, D. et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa quorum-sensing metabolite induces host immune cell death through cell surface lipid domain dissolution. Nat. Microbiol. 4, 97–111 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Klymchenko, A. S. & Kreder, R. Fluorescent probes for lipid rafts: from model membranes to living cells. Chem. Biol. 21, 97–113 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Takeshita, N., Diallinas, G. & Fischer, R. The role of flotillin FloA and stomatin StoA in the maintenance of apical sterol-rich membrane domains and polarity in the filamentous fungus Aspergillus nidulans. Mol. Microbiol. 83, 1136–1152 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Schulz-Bohm, K. et al. Fungus-associated bacteriome in charge of their host behavior. Fungal Genet. Biol. 102, 38–48 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Brown, S. P., Grillo, M. A., Podowski, J. C. & Heath, K. D. Soil origin and plant genotype structure distinct microbiome compartments in the model legume Medicago truncatula. Microbiome 8, 139 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Wagner, M. R. et al. Host genotype and age shape the leaf and root microbiomes of a wild perennial plant. Nat. Commun. 7, 12151 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Rosenberg, E. & Zilber-Rosenberg, I. Microbes drive evolution of animals and plants: the hologenome concept. mBio 7, e01395 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Schlaeppi, K., Dombrowski, N., Oter, R. G., Ver Loren van Themaat, E. & Schulze-Lefert, P. Quantitative divergence of the bacterial root microbiota in Arabidopsis thaliana relatives. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 585–592 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Spor, A., Koren, O. & Ley, R. Unravelling the effects of the environment and host genotype on the gut microbiome. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 9, 279–290 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Schmidt, R., Ulanova, D., Wick, L. Y., Bode, H. B. & Garbeva, P. Microbe-driven chemical ecology: past, present and future. ISME J. 13, 2656–2663 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Straight, P. D. & Kolter, R. Interspecies chemical communication in bacterial development. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 63, 99–118 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Mentges, M. et al. Infection cushions of Fusarium graminearum are fungal arsenals for wheat infection. Mol. Plant Pathol. 21, 1070–1087 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Sieber, C. M. et al. The Fusarium graminearum genome reveals more secondary metabolite gene clusters and hints of horizontal gene transfer. PLoS ONE 9, e110311 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Kim, J. E. et al. Putative polyketide synthase and laccase genes for biosynthesis of aurofusarin in Gibberella zeae. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71, 1701–1708 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Pent, M., Bahram, M. & Poldmaa, K. Fruitbody chemistry underlies the structure of endofungal bacterial communities across fungal guilds and phylogenetic groups. ISME J. 14, 2131–2141 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Shade, A. Diversity is the question, not the answer. ISME J. 11, 1–6 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Konopka, A., Lindemann, S. & Fredrickson, J. Dynamics in microbial communities: unraveling mechanisms to identify principles. ISME J. 9, 1488–1495 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Nemergut, D. R. et al. Patterns and processes of microbial community assembly. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 77, 342–356 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Grosskopf, T. & Soyer, O. S. Synthetic microbial communities. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 18, 72–77 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Winkelmann, G., Lupp, R. & Jung, G. Herbicolins–new peptide antibiotics from Erwinia herbicola. J. Antibiot. (Tokyo) 33, 353–358 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Buda De Cesare, G., Cristy, S. A., Garsin, D. A. & Lorenz, M. C. Antimicrobial peptides: a new frontier in antifungal therapy. mBio 11, e02123-20 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Song, B., Rong, Y. J., Zhao, M. X. & Chi, Z. M. Antifungal activity of the lipopeptides produced by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens anti-CA against Candida albicans isolated from clinic. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 97, 7141–7150 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Tao, Y., Bie, X. M., Lv, F. X., Zhao, H. Z. & Lu, Z. X. Antifungal activity and mechanism of fengycin in the presence and absence of commercial surfactin against Rhizopus stolonifer. J. Microbiol. 49, 146–150 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Liu, Y. et al. C16-fengycin A affect the growth of Candida albicans by destroying its cell wall and accumulating reactive oxygen species. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 103, 8963–8975 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Sur, S., Romo, T. D. & Grossfield, A. Selectivity and mechanism of fengycin, an antimicrobial lipopeptide, from molecular dynamics. J. Phys. Chem. B 122, 2219–2226 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Maget-Dana, R. & Peypoux, F. Iturins, a special class of pore-forming lipopeptides: biological and physicochemical properties. Toxicology 87, 151–174 (1994).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Denning, D. W. Echinocandin antifungal drugs. Lancet 362, 1142–1151 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Zhang, J. Y. et al. NRT1.1B is associated with root microbiota composition and nitrogen use in field-grown rice. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 676–684 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Liu, Y. X. et al. A practical guide to amplicon and metagenomic analysis of microbiome data. Protein Cell 12, 315–330 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Caporaso, J. G. et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat. Methods 7, 335–336 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Bolyen, E. et al. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 852–857 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Edgar, R. C. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 26, 2460–2461 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Edgar, R. C. UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads. Nat. Methods 10, 996–998 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Quast, C. et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D590–D596 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Edgar, R. C., Haas, B. J., Clemente, J. C., Quince, C. & Knight, R. UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection. Bioinformatics 27, 2194–2200 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Cole, J. R. et al. Ribosomal database project: data and tools for high throughput rRNA analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, D633–D642 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Chen, T. et al. ImageGP: an easy-to-use data visualization web server for scientific researchers. iMeta 1, e5 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Knights, D. et al. Bayesian community-wide culture-independent microbial source tracking. Nat. Methods 8, 761–763 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Hu, W. A. et al. Potential of Pseudomonas chlororaphis subsp. aurantiaca strain Pcho10 as a biocontrol agent against Fusarium graminearum. Phytopathology 104, 1289–1297 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Qiu, J. G. et al. Biodegradation of picolinic acid by a newly isolated bacterium Alcaligenes faecalis strain JQ135. Curr. Microbiol. 74, 508–514 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Zhao, Y. F., Wang, D. P., Nakka, S., Sundin, G. W. & Korban, S. S. Systems level analysis of two-component signal transduction systems in Erwinia amylovora: role in virulence, regulation of amylovoran biosynthesis and swarming motility. BMC Genomics 10, 245 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Steinberg, G. et al. A lipophilic cation protects crops against fungal pathogens by multiple modes of action. Nat. Commun. 11, 1608 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. Collins, M. D. & Gordon, S. E. Giant liposome preparation for imaging and patch-clamp electrophysiology. J. Vis. Exp. 76, 50227 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  79. Pott, T., Bouvrais, H. & Meleard, P. Giant unilamellar vesicle formation under physiologically relevant conditions. Chem. Phys. Lipids 154, 115–119 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank J. Blodgett (Washington University, St. Louis, USA) and C. Liu (Zhejiang University, China) for herbicolin A biosynthetic gene cluster analysis; Y. Xiao (Chinese Academy of Sciences, China) and F. Xu (Zhejiang University, China) for structural identification of compounds; Q. Wang (Northwest A&F University, China) for analysing transposon insertion sites in the ZJU23 and mutated sites in yeast; and W. Fu (Zhejiang University, China) for the molecular docking analysis. This work was supported by grants from: the Key Technology R&D Program of Zhejiang Province (grant no. 2019C02034) to Z.M.; the National Science Fund for Excellent Young Scholars (grant no. 31922074) to Y.C.; the China Agriculture Research System (grant no. CARS-3-29) to Z.M.; the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) (grant no. XDA24020104) to Y.B.; and the Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS (grant no. 2021092) to Y.-X.L.

Author information

Author notes

  1. These authors contributed equally: Sunde Xu, Yong-Xin Liu, Tomislav Cernava.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Rice Biology, Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology of Crop Pathogens and Insects, Department of Plant Protection, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China

    Sunde Xu, Hongkai Wang, Yaqi Zhou, Xing-Xing Shen, Ziyue Wen, Xueping Zhou, Zhonghua Ma, Yunlong Yu & Yun Chen

  2. State Key Laboratory of Plant Genomics, CAS-JIC Centre of Excellence for Plant and Microbial Science, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Innovation Academy for Seed Design, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

    Yong-Xin Liu, Baoyuan Qu & Yang Bai

  3. Institute of Environmental Biotechnology, Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria

    Tomislav Cernava & Gabriele Berg

  4. Institute for Immunology, Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Center for Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China

    Tie Xia, Hefei Ruan & Yan Shi

  5. Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Hawaii, Hilo, HI, USA

    Shugeng Cao & Chunshun Li

  6. Department of Biology, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA

    Yunrong Chai

Authors
  1. Sunde Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yong-Xin Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tomislav Cernava
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hongkai Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yaqi Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Tie Xia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Shugeng Cao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Gabriele Berg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Xing-Xing Shen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Ziyue Wen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Chunshun Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Baoyuan Qu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Hefei Ruan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Yunrong Chai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Xueping Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Zhonghua Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Yan Shi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Yunlong Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  19. Yang Bai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  20. Yun Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Y. Chen and Z.M. initiated, coordinated and supervised the project. S.X., H.W., Y.Z. and Z.W. collected samples and isolated bacterial strains. Y.-X.L., B.Q. and Y.B. performed bacterial community profiling. S.X. and H.W. performed gene knockout experiments. S.X., C.L. and S.C. identified compounds. S.X., T.X., H.R. and Y.S. performed lipid raft experiments. X-X.S. phylogenetically analysed the HA biosynthetic gene cluster. Y. Chen, S.X., Z.M., Y.-X.L. and Y.B. collected and analysed the data. Y. Chen, Z.M., S.X., Y.B., T.C. and Y.Y. wrote the manuscript. Y. Chen, Y. Chai, G.B. and X.Z. revised the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yunlong Yu, Yang Bai or Yun Chen.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Microbiology thanks Marcio Rodrigues and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Experimental procedure for assessing perithecia-associated bacterial communities.

a, Collection of perithecia and microscopic visualization of bacteria on the surface of perithecia using a scanning electron microscope. The experiment was repeated five times with similar results. b, c, Experimental procedure used to analyse the detailed analysis of the perithecium-associated microbiome and the corresponding cultivable bacterial isolates. Bacterial identification procedure was modified from Zhang et al., 201963.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Diversity and differential abundance of OTUs in the perithecium, stubble and soil samples.

a, Rarefaction curves of detected bacterial OTUs in microbiomes from each compartment. The saturation stage with increasing numbers of sequencing reads indicates that bacterial diversity was sufficiently covered by the implemented approach. The richness index of perithecium, stubble and soil samples is shown separately (mean ± s.e.m.). b, Constrained principal coordinate analysis (CPCoA) of Bray-Curtis dissimilarity showing compartment effects on the microbial community structure. Ellipses cover 68% of the samples for each compartment. c, Manhattan plot showing OTUs that were enriched or depleted in perithecium versus soil and stubble. Each dot or triangle represents a single OTU. OTUs enriched or depleted in perithecium samples are represented by filled or empty triangles, respectively (FDR adjusted P < 0.001, Wilcoxon rank-sum test). OTUs are arranged in taxonomic order and colored according to their phylum and the proteobacteria class. CPM, counts per million. Numbers of replicated samples for each compartment, n = 65 biologically independent samples. d, Source analysis of average perithecium compartment attribution using SourceTracker trained on the stubble and soil microbiome datasets. Replicates for each compartment, n = 65 biologically independent samples.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 3 ZJU23 inhibitory effects on the formation of Fg perithecia on rice straws and the length of wheat seedlings in each treatment with or without conidial of Fg.

a, Fg perithecium formation in different treatments on rice straws. Images were taken after 14 days post-inoculation (dpi) from n = 6 biologically independent samples (mean ± s.e.m.). Different letters indicate significantly different groups (P < 0.05, ANOVA, Tukey HSD). The non-antagonistic P. agglomerans Pa58 strain was used as a control. The experiment was repeated three times with similar results. b, The length of wheat seedlings with or without F. graminearum (Fg) inoculation in each treatment are shown at 7 dpi. The length of the wheat seedlings at 7 dpi was measured and statistically analyzed (n = 10 biologically independent seedlings for each treatment, mean ± s.e.m.). Different letters indicate significantly different groups (P < 0.05, ANOVA, Tukey HSD). Representative wheat seedlings without Fg inoculation in each treatment are shown. The experiment was repeated three times with similar results.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 4 Purification and identification of herbicolin A.

a, Comparative total ion flow diagram profile between ZJU23 and deletion mutants in the HA biosynthetic gene cluster. b, High-resolution mass spectra (HRMS) of herbicolin A showing a peak at m/z 1300.7378, which corresponds to the [M+H] + ion and another at m/z 650.8722, which corresponds to the [M+2H]2+ ion. c, 1H NMR spectrum of HA. d, NOESY NMR spectrum. e, TOCSY NMR spectrum. f, 1H-13C HSQC NMR spectrum. g, 1H-13C HMBC NMR spectrum.

Extended Data Fig. 5 Stereochemistry of Thr (a), N-Methy-Thr (b), Glu (c), Leu (d), allo-Thr (e) and Arg (f) residues in herbicolin A determined by Marfey’s method.

Shown are extracted ion chromatograms of amino acid-FDAA adducts detected by HPLC-Qtof-MS of hydrolyzed, FDAA-derivatized herbicolin A and the amino acid standards. (i) herbicolin A-L-FDAA; (ii) L-AA-L-FDAA; (iii) D-AA-L-FDAA. FDAA, 1-fluoro-2-4-dinitrophenyl-5-L-alanine amide.

Extended Data Fig. 6 Structures of intermediates in the herbicolin A biosynthesis.

a, Electrospray ionization spectra of herbicolin A, herbicolin B, intermediate 1–4. b, Structures of herbicolin A, herbicolin B, intermediate 1–4.

Extended Data Fig. 7 Growth inhibition of HA in various concentrations towards Fg mycelia in agar plates.

a, Live/dead staining of F. graminearum cells expressing the plasma membrane marker GFP-StoA, after treatment with HA. Dead cells are indicated by either yellow or red staining. Scale bar, 5 µm. The experiment was repeated five times with similar results. b, Survival curves of F. graminearum cells grown in liquid medium supplemented or not (Control) with the indicated concentrations of HA. Data presented the mean ± s.e.m.. The experiment was repeated five times with similar results.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 8 Origin of the herbicolin A biosynthetic cluster in ZJU23.

a, Heatmap representation of the amino acid identities (%) of individual HA biosynthetic proteins shared between ZJU23 and other tested strains. b, Phylogenies of the 10 genes in the cluster correspond to six different patterns. Specific genes supporting each of the patterns are listed on top. c, Microsynteny and amino acid sequence conservation between the HA biosynthesis cluster in ZJU23 and a predicted gene cluster in Ca. Fukatsuia symbiotica. The hits between the two clusters are indicated with different shades of yellow, and the identity scale (45–100%) is included. d, Phylogenetic tree of tested bacterial species. γ-Protebacteria, β-Proteobacteria and other proteobacteria are indicated with red, green and black lines.

Extended Data Fig. 9 Synergistic effects between herbicolin A and two tested fungicides, polyoxin B and carbendazim.

Two-dimensional matrix of dose–response for relative mycelial growth inhibition of F. graminearum in the combinations of herbicolin A and polyoxin B (a), and herbicolin A and carbendazim (c). Synergyfinder was used to generate a topographic two-dimensional map of synergy scores for the combination of herbicolin A and polyoxin B (b), herbicolin A and carbendazim (d), respectively. Synergistic and antagonistic dosage zones are highlighted in red and green on the synergy map, respectively. The area with the greatest synergy score is indicated by a white box.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 10 Proposed model for the mode of action of herbicolin A, which is secreted by ZJU23 in the perithecium microbiome, on Fusarium graminearum.

The biocontrol bacterium P. agglomerans ZJU23 was isolated from F. graminearum perithecium microbiome. ZJU23 showed strong in vitro and in situ antagonism, which was later attributed to the secreted antifungal compound herbicolin A (HA). The HA biosynthetic gene cluster AcbA-J was obtained via horizontal gene transfer from Candidatus Fukatsuia symbiotica. HA binds ergosterol and disrupts the integrity of ergosterol-containing fungal lipid rafts, which subsequently suppresses fungal growth, substantially reducing perithecium formation and virulence of F. graminearum.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–10 and Methods.

Reporting Summary

Peer Review File

Supplementary Data 1

Supplementary Data 1–9.

Supplementary Video 1

Interaction patterns between herbicolin A and membranes without ergosterol in an in silico model.

Supplementary Video 2

Interaction patterns between herbicolin A and membranes with ergosterol in an in silico model.

Source Data for Fig. S2

Statistical source data.

Source Data for Fig. S3

Statistical source data.

Source data

Source Data Fig. 1

Statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 2

Statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 3

Statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 4

Statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 5

Statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 6

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 2

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 3

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 7

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 9

Statistical source data.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, S., Liu, YX., Cernava, T. et al. Fusarium fruiting body microbiome member Pantoea agglomerans inhibits fungal pathogenesis by targeting lipid rafts. Nat Microbiol 7, 831–843 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-022-01131-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-022-01131-x

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing