Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Global diversity and biogeography of bacterial communities in wastewater treatment plants

Nature Microbiology volume 4, pages 1183–1195 (2019)Cite this article

Subjects

An Author Correction to this article was published on 14 November 2019

This article has been updated

Abstract

Microorganisms in wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) are essential for water purification to protect public and environmental health. However, the diversity of microorganisms and the factors that control it are poorly understood. Using a systematic global-sampling effort, we analysed the 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequences from ~1,200 activated sludge samples taken from 269 WWTPs in 23 countries on 6 continents. Our analyses revealed that the global activated sludge bacterial communities contain ~1 billion bacterial phylotypes with a Poisson lognormal diversity distribution. Despite this high diversity, activated sludge has a small, global core bacterial community (n = 28 operational taxonomic units) that is strongly linked to activated sludge performance. Meta-analyses with global datasets associate the activated sludge microbiomes most closely to freshwater populations. In contrast to macroorganism diversity, activated sludge bacterial communities show no latitudinal gradient. Furthermore, their spatial turnover is scale-dependent and appears to be largely driven by stochastic processes (dispersal and drift), although deterministic factors (temperature and organic input) are also important. Our findings enhance our mechanistic understanding of the global diversity and biogeography of activated sludge bacterial communities within a theoretical ecology framework and have important implications for microbial ecology and wastewater treatment processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: The GWMC captures microbial diversity of globally distributed WWTPs.
Fig. 2: Abundance, composition and functional importance of the global core OTUs in activated sludge.
Fig. 3: Comparing bacterial community compositions across continents and with other habitats.
Fig. 4: Spatial turnover of the activated sludge bacterial communities.
Fig. 5: Environmental drivers of the activated sludge community composition.

Data availability

The sample metadata are available in Supplementary Table 1. Sequences are available from the NCBI Sequence Read Archive with accession number PRJNA509305. OTU tables and representative sequences of the OTUs are available on the GWMC website (http://gwmc.ou.edu/data-disclose.html).

Code availability

R codes on the statistical analyses are available at https://github.com/Linwei-Wu/Global-bacterial-diversity-in-WWTPs.

Change history

  • 14 November 2019

    An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper.

References

  1. Torsvik, V., Øvreås, L. & Thingstad, T. F. Prokaryotic diversity—magnitude, dynamics, and controlling factors. Science 296, 1064–1066 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chase, J. M. & Myers, J. A. Disentangling the importance of ecological niches from stochastic processes across scales. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 366, 2351–2363 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Ofiţeru, I. D. et al. Combined niche and neutral effects in a microbial wastewater treatment community. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 15345–15350 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhou, J. et al. High-throughput metagenomic technologies for complex microbial community analysis: open and closed formats. mBio 6, e02288-14 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Thompson, L. R. et al. A communal catalogue reveals Earth’s multiscale microbial diversity. Nature 551, 457–463 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Fierer, N. & Jackson, R. B. The diversity and biogeography of soil bacterial communities. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 626–631 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Sunagawa, S. et al. Structure and function of the global ocean microbiome. Science 348, 1261359 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Microbiomes of the Built Environment: A Research Agenda for Indoor Microbiology, Human Health, and Buildings (National Academies Press, 2017).

  9. Mateo-Sagasta, J., Raschid-Sally, L. & Thebo, A. in Wastewater (eds Drechsel, P., Qadir, M. & Wichelns, D.) 15–38 (Springer, 2015).

  10. Gleick, P. H. in Encyclopedia of Climate and Weather (ed. Schneider, S. H.) 817–823 (Oxford Univ. Press, 1996).

  11. van Loosdrecht, M. C. & Brdjanovic, D. Anticipating the next century of wastewater treatment. Science 344, 1452–1453 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Xia, S. et al. Bacterial community structure in geographically distributed biological wastewater treatment reactors. Environ. Sci. Technol. 44, 7391–7396 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Grant, S. B. et al. Taking the ‘waste’ out of ‘wastewater’ for human water security and ecosystem sustainability. Science 337, 681–686 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Saunders, A. M., Albertsen, M., Vollertsen, J. & Nielsen, P. H. The activated sludge ecosystem contains a core community of abundant organisms. ISME J. 10, 11 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang, T., Shao, M.-F. & Ye, L. 454 Pyrosequencing reveals bacterial diversity of activated sludge from 14 sewage treatment plants. ISME J. 6, 1137–1147 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wagner, M. & Loy, A. Bacterial community composition and function in sewage treatment systems. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 13, 218–227 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Morlon, H. et al. Spatial patterns of phylogenetic diversity. Ecol. Lett. 14, 141–149 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Shoemaker, W. R., Locey, K. J. & Lennon, J. T. A macroecological theory of microbial biodiversity. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 107 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Locey, K. J. & Lennon, J. T. Scaling laws predict global microbial diversity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 5970–5975 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Curtis, T. P., Sloan, W. T. & Scannell, J. W. Estimating prokaryotic diversity and its limits. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 10494–10499 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Ter Steege, H. et al. Hyperdominance in the Amazonian tree flora. Science 342, 1243092 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. De Vargas, C. et al. Eukaryotic plankton diversity in the sunlit ocean. Science 348, 1261605 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Li, Y. et al. Dokdonella kunshanensis sp. nov., isolated from activated sludge, and emended description of the genus Dokdonella. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 63, 1519–1523 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rosselló-Mora, R. A., Wagner, M., Amann, R. & Schleifer, K.-H. The abundance of Zoogloea ramigera in sewage treatment plants. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61, 702–707 (1995).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Daims, H. et al. Complete nitrification by Nitrospira bacteria. Nature 528, 504 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Daims, H., Nielsen, J. L., Nielsen, P. H., Schleifer, K.-H. & Wagner, M. In situ characterization of Nitrospira-like nitrite-oxidizing bacteria active in wastewater treatment plants. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67, 5273–5284 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Fisher, J. C., Levican, A., Figueras, M. J. & McLellan, S. L. Population dynamics and ecology of Arcobacter in sewage. Front. Microbiol. 5, 525 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Collado, L. & Figueras, M. J. Taxonomy, epidemiology, and clinical relevance of the genus Arcobacter. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 24, 174–192 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Nielsen, P. H., Saunders, A. M., Hansen, A. A., Larsen, P. & Nielsen, J. L. Microbial communities involved in enhanced biological phosphorus removal from wastewater—a model system in environmental biotechnology. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 23, 452–459 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lawson, C. E. et al. Rare taxa have potential to make metabolic contributions in enhanced biological phosphorus removal ecosystems. Environ. Microbiol. 17, 4979–4993 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Stokholm-Bjerregaard, M. et al. A critical assessment of the microorganisms proposed to be important to enhanced biological phosphorus removal in full-scale wastewater treatment systems. Front. Microbiol. 8, 718 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Hillebrand, H. On the generality of the latitudinal diversity gradient. Am. Nat. 163, 192–211 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Martiny, J. B. H. et al. Microbial biogeography: putting microorganisms on the map. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 4, 102–112 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Fuhrman, J. A. et al. A latitudinal diversity gradient in planktonic marine bacteria. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 7774–7778 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhou, J. et al. Temperature mediates continental-scale diversity of microbes in forest soils. Nat. Commun. 7, 1208 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Brown, J. H., Gillooly, J. F., Allen, A. P., Savage, V. M. & West, G. B. Toward a metabolic theory of ecology. Ecology 85, 1771–1789 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Martiny, J. B., Eisen, J. A., Penn, K., Allison, S. D. & Horner-Devine, M. C. Drivers of bacterial beta-diversity depend on spatial scale. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 7850–7854 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Zhou, J. et al. Stochastic assembly leads to alternative communities with distinct functions in a bioreactor microbial community. mBio 4, e00584-12 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Knights, D. et al. Bayesian community-wide culture-independent microbial source tracking. Nat. Methods 8, 761–763 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Zhou, J. & Ning, D. Stochastic community assembly: does it matter in microbial ecology? Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 81, e00002–e00017 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Zhou, J. et al. Stochasticity, succession, and environmental perturbations in a fluidic ecosystem. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, E836–E845 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Hooper, D. U. et al. A global synthesis reveals biodiversity loss as a major driver of ecosystem change. Nature 486, 105 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Krause, S. et al. Trait-based approaches for understanding microbial biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Front. Microbiol. 5, 251 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Bier, R. L. et al. Linking microbial community structure and microbial processes: an empirical and conceptual overview. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 91, fiv113 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Wells, G. F. et al. Ammonia-oxidizing communities in a highly aerated full-scale activated sludge bioreactor: betaproteobacterial dynamics and low relative abundance of Crenarchaea. Environ. Microbiol. 11, 2310–2328 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Karkman, A., Mattila, K., Tamminen, M. & Virta, M. Cold temperature decreases bacterial species richness in nitrogen-removing bioreactors treating inorganic mine waters. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 108, 2876–2883 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Griffin, J. S. & Wells, G. F. Regional synchrony in full-scale activated sludge bioreactors due to deterministic microbial community assembly. ISME J. 11, 500–511 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Tilman, D. Resource Competition and Community Structure (Princeton Univ. Press, 1982).

  49. Wu, L. et al. Microbial functional trait of rRNA operon copy numbers increases with organic levels in anaerobic digesters. ISME J. 11, 2874–2878 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Pedrós-Alió, C. & Manrubia, S. The vast unknown microbial biosphere. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 6585–6587 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Zhou, J. et al. Random sampling process leads to overestimation of β-diversity of microbial communities. mBio 4, e00324 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Zhou, J. et al. Reproducibility and quantitation of amplicon sequencing-based detection. ISME J. 5, 1303–1313 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Sinha, R. et al. Assessment of variation in microbial community amplicon sequencing by the Microbiome Quality Control (MBQC) project consortium. Nat. Biotechnol. 35, 1077 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Ju, F. & Zhang, T. Bacterial assembly and temporal dynamics in activated sludge of a full-scale municipal wastewater treatment plant. ISME J. 9, 683–695 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Xia, Yu. Diversity and Temporal Assembly Patterns of Microbial Communities in Municipal Wastewater Treatment Systems. PhD thesis, Univ. Tsinghua, Beijing, China (2016).

  56. Buttigieg, P. L., Morrison, N., Smith, B., Mungall, C. J. & Lewis, S. E. The environment ontology: contextualising biological and biomedical entities. J. Biomed. Semantics 4, 43 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Yilmaz, P. et al. Minimum information about a marker gene sequence (MIMARKS) and minimum information about any (x) sequence (MIxS) specifications. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 415–420 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Peel, M. C., Finlayson, B. L. & McMahon, T. A. Updated world map of the Köppen–Geiger climate classification. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sc. 4, 439–473 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Berube, A., Leal Trujillo, J., Ran, T. & Parilla, J. Global Metro Monitor (Brookings, 2015); https://www.brookings.edu/research/global-metro-monitor/

  60. Wu, L. et al. Phasing amplicon sequencing on Illumina Miseq for robust environmental microbial community analysis. BMC Microbiol. 15, 125 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Caporaso, J. G. et al. Global patterns of 16S rRNA diversity at a depth of millions of sequences per sample. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 4516–4522 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Klindworth, A. et al. Evaluation of general 16S ribosomal RNA gene PCR primers for classical and next-generation sequencing-based diversity studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, e1 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Wen, C. et al. Evaluation of the reproducibility of amplicon sequencing with Illumina MiSeq platform. PLoS ONE 12, e0176716 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Edgar, R. C. UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads. Nat. Methods 10, 996–998 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. McLaren, M. R. & Callahan, B. J. In nature, there is only diversity. mBio 9, e02149-17 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Sievers, F. et al. Fast, scalable generation of high‐quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega. Mol. Syst. Biol. 7, 539 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Price, M. N., Dehal, P. S. & Arkin, A. P. FastTree 2—approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS ONE 5, e9490 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Wang, Q., Garrity, G. M., Tiedje, J. M. & Cole, J. R. Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73, 5261–5267 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. McIlroy, S. J. et al. MiDAS 2.0: an ecosystem-specific taxonomy and online database for the organisms of wastewater treatment systems expanded for anaerobic digester groups. Database 2017, bax016 (2017).

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Delgado-Baquerizo, M. et al. A global atlas of the dominant bacteria found in soil. Science 359, 320–325 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Stoddard, S. F., Smith, B. J., Hein, R., Roller, B. R. & Schmidt, T. M. rrnDB: improved tools for interpreting rRNA gene abundance in bacteria and archaea and a new foundation for future development. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, D593–D598 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  72. McDonald, D. et al. An improved Greengenes taxonomy with explicit ranks for ecological and evolutionary analyses of bacteria and archaea. ISME J. 6, 610 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Quast, C. et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D590–D596 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Edgar, R. C. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 26, 2460–2461 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. AQUASTAT. FAO Gobal Information System on Water and Agriculture. Wastewater Section (FAO, 2014); http://www.fao.org/nr/water/aquastat/wastewater/index.stm

  76. Sato, T., Qadir, M., Yamamoto, S., Endo, T. & Zahoor, A. Global, regional, and country level need for data on wastewater generation, treatment, and use. Agri. Water Manag. 130, 1–13 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Foladori, P., Bruni, L., Tamburini, S. & Ziglio, G. Direct quantification of bacterial biomass in influent, effluent and activated sludge of wastewater treatment plants by using flow cytometry. Water Res. 44, 3807–3818 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. The Sources and Solutions: Wastewater (United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2018).

  79. Chan, W. Wastewater: Good To The Last Drop (China Water Risk, 2017); http://chinawaterrisk.org/resources/analysis-reviews/wastewater-good-to-the-last-drop/

  80. Hanski, I. Dynamics of regional distribution: the core and satellite species hypothesis. Oikos 38, 210–221 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Galand, P. E., Casamayor, E. O., Kirchman, D. L. & Lovejoy, C. Ecology of the rare microbial biosphere of the Arctic Ocean. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 22427–22432 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Székely, A. J. & Langenheder, S. The importance of species sorting differs between habitat generalists and specialists in bacterial communities. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 87, 102–112 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Cheng, J. et al. Discordant temporal development of bacterial phyla and the emergence of core in the fecal microbiota of young children. ISME J. 10, 1002 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Ju, F. & Zhang, T. Bacterial assembly and temporal dynamics in activated sludge of a full-scale municipal wastewater treatment plant. ISME J. 9, 683–695 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Kembel, S. W. et al. Picante: R tools for integrating phylogenies and ecology. Bioinformatics 26, 1463–1464 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Oksanen, J. et al. vegan: Community Ecology Package. R version 2 (2013).

  87. Lozupone, C. & Knight, R. UniFrac: a new phylogenetic method for comparing microbial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71, 8228–8235 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. Chen, J. GUniFrac: Generalized UniFrac distances. R version 1 (2012).

  89. Guo, X. et al. Climate warming leads to divergent succession of grassland microbial communities. Nat. Clim. Change 8, 813 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Chase, J. M., Kraft, N. J., Smith, K. G., Vellend, M. & Inouye, B. D. Using null models to disentangle variation in community dissimilarity from variation in α-diversity. Ecosphere 2, art24 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Stegen, J. C. et al. Quantifying community assembly processes and identifying features that impose them. ISME J. 7, 2069–2079 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. Kembel, S. W. Disentangling niche and neutral influences on community assembly: assessing the performance of community phylogenetic structure tests. Ecol. Lett. 12, 949–960 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Legendre, P., Lapointe, F. J. & Casgrain, P. Modeling brain evolution from behavior: a permutational regression approach. Evolution 48, 1487–1499 (1994).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Grace, J. B. & Bollen, K. A. Representing general theoretical concepts in structural equation models: the role of composite variables. Environ. Ecol. Stat. 15, 191–213 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Rosseel, Y. Lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling and more. Version 0.5–12 (BETA). J. Stat. Soft. 48, 1–36 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Liaw, A. & Wiener, M. Classification and regression by randomForest. R News 2, 18–22 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank T. Allen, A. Al-Omari, R. Bart, D. Crowley, G. Harwood, T. Hensley, S.-J. Huitric, M. M. L. Martins, A. Mena, B. Pathak, S. Pereira, D. E. Sauble, M. Taylor, P. Truong, D. VanderSchuur, A. Vieira and D. Zambrano for helping with sampling and metadata collection. This work was supported by the Tsinghua University Initiative Scientific Research Program (No. 20161080112), the National Scientific Foundation in China (51678335), the State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control (18L02ESPC) in China, and the Office of the Vice President for Research at the University of Oklahoma. Lin.W. and B.Z. were generously supported by the China Scholarship Council (CSC). J.Z. (jzhou@ou.edu) and D.N. (ningdaliang@ou.edu) serve as GWMC contacts.

Author information

Author notes

  1. These authors contributed equally: Linwei Wu, Daliang Ning, Bing Zhang.

  2. A full list of Global Water Microbiome Consortium members appears at the end of the paper.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control, School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China

    Linwei Wu, Daliang Ning, Bing Zhang, Xiaoyu Shan, Qiuting Zhang, Yunfeng Yang, Daliang Ning, Xiaoyu Shan, Linwei Wu, Yunfeng Yang, Haowei Yue, Bing Zhang, Qiuting Zhang, Jizhong Zhou, Xianghua Wen, Xianghua Wen & Jizhong Zhou

  2. Institute for Environmental Genomics, Department of Microbiology and Plant Biology, and School of Civil Engineering and Environmental Sciences, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA

    Linwei Wu, Daliang Ning, Bing Zhang, Ping Zhang, Joy D. Van Nostrand, Naijia Xiao, Ya Zhang, Lauren Hale, Daliang Ning, Renmao Tian, Joy D. Van Nostrand, Linwei Wu, Liyou Wu, Naijia Xiao, Bing Zhang, Ping Zhang, Ya Zhang, Jizhong Zhou & Jizhong Zhou

  3. Consolidated Core Laboratory, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA

    Daliang Ning, Naijia Xiao, Daliang Ning & Naijia Xiao

  4. College of Resource and Environment Southwest University, Chongqing, China

    Yong Li & Yong Li

  5. Alkek Center for Metagenomics and Microbiome Research, Department of Molecular Virology and Microbiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA

    Ping Zhang & Ping Zhang

  6. School of Engineering, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK

    Mathew Robert Brown, Mathew Robert Brown & Thomas P. Curtis

  7. School of Environment, Northeastern Normal University, Changchun, China

    Zhenxin Li & Zhenxin Li

  8. Department of Energy, Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA

    Fangqiong Ling

  9. Department of Microbiology and Ecosystem Science, Division of Microbial Ecology, Research Network ‘Chemistry meets Microbiology’, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

    Julia Vierheilig, Julia Vierheilig, Michael Wagner & Michael Wagner

  10. Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Division of Water Quality and Health, Krems, Austria and Interuniversity Cooperation Centre for Water and Health, Krems, Austria

    Julia Vierheilig & Julia Vierheilig

  11. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA

    George F. Wells & George F. Wells

  12. Institute for Marine Science and Technology, Shandong University, Qingdao, China

    Ye Deng, Qichao Tu, Ye Deng & Qichao Tu

  13. Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

    Ye Deng, Aijie Wang & Aijie Wang

  14. Environmental Biotechnology Laboratory, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China

    Tong Zhang & Tong Zhang

  15. Environmental Microbiomics Research Center, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China

    Zhili He & Zhili He

  16. Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution Control and Remediation Technology, Guangzhou, China

    Zhili He & Zhili He

  17. Advanced Water Management Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

    Miriam Agullo-Barcelo, Philip Bond, Jurg Keller & Jurg Keller

  18. Department of Chemistry and Bioscience, Center for Microbial Communities, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark

    Per H. Nielsen & Per H. Nielsen

  19. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Rice University, Houston, TX, USA

    Pedro J. J. Alvarez, Mengyan Li & Pedro J. J. Alvarez

  20. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA

    Craig S. Criddle, Richard G. Luthy, Sung-Geun Woo & Craig S. Criddle

  21. Center for Microbial Ecology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA

    James M. Tiedje & James M. Tiedje

  22. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA

    Si Chen, Qiang He & Qiang He

  23. Institute for a Secure and Sustainable Environment, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA

    Qiang He & Qiang He

  24. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

    David A. Stahl & David A. Stahl

  25. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA

    Lisa Alvarez-Cohen & Lisa Alvarez-Cohen

  26. Earth and Environmental Sciences, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA

    Lisa Alvarez-Cohen, Lisa Alvarez-Cohen & Jizhong Zhou

  27. Biodesign Swette Center for Environmental Biotechnology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA

    Prathap Parameswaran, Bruce E. Rittmann, Michelle Young & Bruce E. Rittmann

  28. Environmental Microbiology and Biotechnology Laboratory, Engineering School of Environmental and Natural Resources, Engineering Faculty, Universidad del Valle–Sede Meléndez, Cali, Colombia

    Dany Acevedo & Janeth Sanabria

  29. Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA

    Gary L. Andersen

  30. Environmental Genomics and Systems Biology Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA

    Gary L. Andersen

  31. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Departamento de Engenharia Sanitária e Ambiental, Belo Horizonte, Brazil

    Juliana Calabria de Araujo, Cintia Dutra Leal & Jizhong Zhou

  32. Department of Environmental Health Sciences, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

    Kevin F. Boehnke, Rebecca K. Brewster & Chuanwu Xi

  33. Hampton Roads Sanitation District (HRSD), Virginia Beach, VA, USA

    Charles B. Bott & Amanda Ford

  34. Microbial Ecology Laboratory, Microbial Biochemistry and Genomics Department, Biological Research Institute “Clemente Estable”, Montevideo, Uruguay

    Patricia Bovio, Angela Cabezas, Claudia Etchebehere & Thomas P. Curtis

  35. Institute of Water and Wastewater Technology, Durban University of Technology, Durban, South Africa

    Faizal Bux & Sheena Kumari

  36. Aix-Marseille University CNRS IRD, MIO UM110 Mediterranean Institute of Oceanography, Marseille, France

    Léa Cabrol

  37. Escuela de Ingenieria Bioquimica, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, Chile

    Léa Cabrol

  38. Microbial Community Engineering Laboratory, Department of Civil Engineering and Applied Mechanics, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada

    Dominic Frigon & Shameem Jauffur

  39. Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA

    James S. Griffin

  40. School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA

    April Z. Gu

  41. Vatten and Miljö i Väst AB (VIVAB), Falkenberg, Sweden

    Moshe Habagil & Alexander Keucken

  42. Norman Water Reclamation Facility, Norman, OK, USA

    Steven D. Hardeman

  43. Golden Heart Utilities, Fairbanks, AK, USA

    Marc Harmon

  44. Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Engler-Bunte-Institut, Water Chemistry and Water Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany

    Harald Horn & Stephanie West

  45. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA

    Zhiqiang Hu

  46. Department of Building, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Concordia University, Montreal, Québec, Canada

    Shameem Jauffur

  47. Department of Environmental Microbiology, Eawag, Dübendorf, Switzerland

    David R. Johnson & Deborah Patsch

  48. Water Resources Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Lund University, Lund, Sweden

    Alexander Keucken

  49. Luxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine, University of Luxembourg, Belvaux, Luxembourg

    Laura A. Lebrun & Paul Wilmes

  50. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea

    Jangho Lee, Minjoo Lee & Joonhong Park

  51. Advanced Environmental Biotechnology Centre, Nanyang Environment and Water Research Institute, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore

    Zarraz M. P. Lee & Yu Liu

  52. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE, USA

    Xu Li & Amin Mohebbi

  53. Infrastructure and Environment Research Division, School of Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK

    Fangqiong Ling & William T. Sloan

  54. School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore

    Yu Liu

  55. Plant Biotechnology Program, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

    Leda C. Mendonça-Hagler

  56. Federal University of Ceará, UFC, Ceará, Brazil

    Francisca Gleire Rodriguez de Menezes & Oscarina Viana de Sousa

  57. University of Tennessee, Center for Environmental Biotechnology, Knoxville, TN, USA

    Arthur J. Meyers

  58. Department of Civil Engineering, Construction Management and Environmental Engineering, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA

    Amin Mohebbi

  59. UCIBIO, REQUIMTE, Departamento de Química, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Caparica, Portugal

    Adrian Oehmen

  60. CSIRO Land and Water, Ecosciences Precinct, Dutton Park, Queensland, Australia

    Andrew Palmer, Jatinder Sidhu & Kylie Smith

  61. Departamento de Química, Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Filosofia Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto—FFCLRP, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil

    Valeria Reginatto

  62. Department of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA

    Francis L. de los Reyes III & Joseph E. Weaver

  63. Grupo de Investigación en Procesos Anaerobios, Instituto de Ingeniería, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México, Mexico

    Adalberto Noyola & Daniel De los Cobos Vasconcelos

  64. CNR-IRSA, National Research Council, Water Research Institute, Rome, Italy

    Simona Rossetti

  65. Tryon Creek and Columbia Blvd Wastewater Treatment Plants, Bureau of Environmental Services, City of Portland, OR, USA

    Kyle Stephens

  66. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA

    Nicholas B. Tooker

  67. Scion Research, Christchurch, New Zealand

    Steve Wakelin

  68. School of Engineering, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada

    Bei Wang & Hongde Zhou

  69. Department of Environmental Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan City, China

    Jer-Horng Wu

  70. State Key Laboratory of Applied Microbiology Southern China, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Microbial Culture Collection and Application, Guangdong Institute of Microbiology, Guangzhou, China

    Meiying Xu

  71. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI, USA

    Tao Yan & Qian Zhang

  72. State Key Laboratory of Environmental Aquatic Chemistry, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

    Min Yang & Yu Zhang

  73. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA

    Wen Zhang

Authors
  1. Linwei Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Daliang Ning
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bing Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yong Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ping Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Xiaoyu Shan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Qiuting Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Mathew Robert Brown
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Zhenxin Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Joy D. Van Nostrand
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Fangqiong Ling
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Naijia Xiao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Ya Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Julia Vierheilig
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. George F. Wells
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Yunfeng Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Ye Deng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Qichao Tu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  19. Aijie Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  20. Tong Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  21. Zhili He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  22. Jurg Keller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  23. Per H. Nielsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  24. Pedro J. J. Alvarez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  25. Craig S. Criddle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  26. Michael Wagner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  27. James M. Tiedje
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  28. Qiang He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  29. Thomas P. Curtis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  30. David A. Stahl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  31. Lisa Alvarez-Cohen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  32. Bruce E. Rittmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  33. Xianghua Wen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  34. Jizhong Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Consortia

Global Water Microbiome Consortium

  • Dany Acevedo
  • , Miriam Agullo-Barcelo
  • , Pedro J. J. Alvarez
  • , Lisa Alvarez-Cohen
  • , Gary L. Andersen
  • , Juliana Calabria de Araujo
  • , Kevin F. Boehnke
  • , Philip Bond
  • , Charles B. Bott
  • , Patricia Bovio
  • , Rebecca K. Brewster
  • , Faizal Bux
  • , Angela Cabezas
  • , Léa Cabrol
  • , Si Chen
  • , Craig S. Criddle
  • , Ye Deng
  • , Claudia Etchebehere
  • , Amanda Ford
  • , Dominic Frigon
  • , Janeth Sanabria
  • , James S. Griffin
  • , April Z. Gu
  • , Moshe Habagil
  • , Lauren Hale
  • , Steven D. Hardeman
  • , Marc Harmon
  • , Harald Horn
  • , Zhiqiang Hu
  • , Shameem Jauffur
  • , David R. Johnson
  • , Jurg Keller
  • , Alexander Keucken
  • , Sheena Kumari
  • , Cintia Dutra Leal
  • , Laura A. Lebrun
  • , Jangho Lee
  • , Minjoo Lee
  • , Zarraz M. P. Lee
  • , Yong Li
  • , Zhenxin Li
  • , Mengyan Li
  • , Xu Li
  • , Fangqiong Ling
  • , Yu Liu
  • , Richard G. Luthy
  • , Leda C. Mendonça-Hagler
  • , Francisca Gleire Rodriguez de Menezes
  • , Arthur J. Meyers
  • , Amin Mohebbi
  • , Per H. Nielsen
  • , Daliang Ning
  • , Adrian Oehmen
  • , Andrew Palmer
  • , Prathap Parameswaran
  • , Joonhong Park
  • , Deborah Patsch
  • , Valeria Reginatto
  • , Francis L. de los Reyes III
  • , Bruce E. Rittmann
  • , Adalberto Noyola
  • , Simona Rossetti
  • , Xiaoyu Shan
  • , Jatinder Sidhu
  • , William T. Sloan
  • , Kylie Smith
  • , Oscarina Viana de Sousa
  • , David A. Stahl
  • , Kyle Stephens
  • , Renmao Tian
  • , James M. Tiedje
  • , Nicholas B. Tooker
  • , Qichao Tu
  • , Joy D. Van Nostrand
  • , Daniel De los Cobos Vasconcelos
  • , Julia Vierheilig
  • , Michael Wagner
  • , Steve Wakelin
  • , Aijie Wang
  • , Bei Wang
  • , Joseph E. Weaver
  • , George F. Wells
  • , Stephanie West
  • , Paul Wilmes
  • , Sung-Geun Woo
  • , Linwei Wu
  • , Jer-Horng Wu
  • , Liyou Wu
  • , Chuanwu Xi
  • , Naijia Xiao
  • , Meiying Xu
  • , Tao Yan
  • , Yunfeng Yang
  • , Min Yang
  • , Michelle Young
  • , Haowei Yue
  • , Bing Zhang
  • , Ping Zhang
  • , Qiuting Zhang
  • , Ya Zhang
  • , Tong Zhang
  • , Qian Zhang
  • , Wen Zhang
  • , Yu Zhang
  • , Hongde Zhou
  • , Jizhong Zhou
  • , Xianghua Wen
  • , Thomas P. Curtis
  • , Qiang He
  • , Zhili He
  •  & Mathew Robert Brown

Contributions

All authors contributed experimental assistance and intellectual input to this study. The original concept was conceived by J.Z. Experimental strategies and sampling design were developed by J.Z., X.W., T.P.C., Q.H., Z. He. and D.N. Sample collections were coordinated by Q.H., D.N., X.W., T.P.C., B.Z., M.R.B., G.F.W., J.Z. and other GWMC members. J.D.V.N and D.N. managed shipping. Y. Li., B.Z., ZX.L., D.N. and some GWMC members (F.B., S.K., J.V., A.N., D.D.C.V., C.E., L.C., J.C.A., C.D.L., L.C.M-H., A.C., P. Bovio. and D.A.) did DNA extraction. P.Z. performed DNA sequencing with the help from Liy.W. Data analyses were performed by Lin.W., D.N., J.Z., B.Z., X.S., Q.Z., F.L., N.X. and R.T. with help from Y.D., Q.T., T.Z., Ya.Z and A.W. The manuscript was written by Lin.W., J.Z. and D.N. with the help from B.E.R., L.A.-C., M.W., C.S.C., D.A.S., G.F.W., J.M.T., P.J.J.A., J.K., J.V., P.H.N., R.G.L., X.W., Z. He. and Y.Y.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Qiang He, Thomas P. Curtis, Xianghua Wen or Jizhong Zhou.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figures 1–7, Supplementary Table 2, Supplementary Tables 4–10, Supplementary Table 13 and Supplementary References.

Reporting Summary

Supplementary Table 1

Summary of metadata.

Supplementary Table 3

OTUs identified as core community at the global scale or within each continent.

Supplementary Table 11

Diversity of Nitrosomonas species across WWTPs.

Supplementary Table 12

The diversity of Candidatus Accumulimonas, Candidatus Accumulibacter and Tetrasphaera species across WWTPs.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, L., Ning, D., Zhang, B. et al. Global diversity and biogeography of bacterial communities in wastewater treatment plants. Nat Microbiol 4, 1183–1195 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-019-0426-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-019-0426-5

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing