Letter | Published:

Neofunctionalization of the secreted Tin2 effector in the fungal pathogen Ustilago maydis


Plant-pathogenic fungi hijack their hosts by secreting effector proteins. Effectors serve to suppress plant immune responses and modulate the host metabolism to benefit the pathogen. Smut fungi are biotrophic pathogens that also parasitize important cereals, including maize1. Symptom development is usually restricted to the plant inflorescences. Ustilago maydis is an exception in its ability to cause tumours in both inflorescences and leaves of maize, and in inducing anthocyanin biosynthesis through the secreted Tin2 effector2,3. How the unique lifestyle of U. maydis has evolved remains to be elucidated. Here we show that Tin2 in U. maydis has been neofunctionalized. We functionally compared Tin2 effectors of U. maydis and the related smut Sporisorium reilianum, which results in symptoms only in the inflorescences of maize and fails to induce anthocyanin. We show that Tin2 effectors from both fungi target distinct paralogues of a maize protein kinase, leading to stabilization and inhibition, respectively. An ancestral Tin2 effector functionally replaced the virulence function of S. reilianum Tin2 but failed to induce anthocyanin, and was unable to substitute for Tin2 in U. maydis. This shows that Tin2 in U. maydis has acquired a specialized function, probably connected to the distinct pathogenic lifestyle of this fungus.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Data availability

U. maydis and S. reilianum genes and encoding protein sequences are available at NCBI under the following accession numbers: Umtin2 (UMAG_05302), XP_011392015; Umppi (UMAG_03726), XP_011390187; Srtin2 (Sr10057), CBQ70078; Srppi (Sr11196), CBQ68333; Patin2 (PSAN_05779), XP_014654584; Pbtin2 (PSEUBRA_SCAF21g03481), XP_016292238; Ssctin2 (SSCI_00084), CDS81902; Srrtin2 (Srs_10057), SJX65729. For Z. mays genes, sequence data can be found at MaizeSequence.org (http://www.maizesequence.org) under the following accession numbers: ZmGAPDH, GRMZM2G046804; ZmTTK1, GRMZM2G448633; ZmTTK2, GRMZM2G068192; ZmTTK3, GRMZM2G088409. The two kinases used as the outgroup in Supplementary Fig. 4a are GRMZM2G015073 and GRMZM2G181002. Remaining data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.


  1. 1.

    Stoll, M., Begerow, D. & Oberwinkler, F. Molecular phylogeny of Ustilago, Sporisorium, and related taxa based on combined analyses of rDNA sequences. Mycol. Res. 109, 342–356 (2005).

  2. 2.

    Brefort, T. et al. Characterization of the largest effector gene cluster of Ustilago maydis. PLoS Pathog. 10, e1003866 (2014).

  3. 3.

    Tanaka, S. et al. A secreted Ustilago maydis effector promotes virulence by targeting anthocyanin biosynthesis in maize. eLife 3, e01355 (2014).

  4. 4.

    Lanver, D. et al. Ustilago maydis effectors and their impact on virulence. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 15, 409–421 (2017).

  5. 5.

    Schirawski, J. et al. Pathogenicity determinants in smut fungi revealed by genome comparison. Science 330, 1546–1548 (2010).

  6. 6.

    Stromberg, E. L. et al. Smut expression and resistance of corn to Sphacelotheca reiliana in Minnesota. Plant Disease 68, 880–884 (1984).

  7. 7.

    Ghareeb, H., Zhao, Y. & Schirawski, J. Sporisorium reilianum possesses a pool of effector proteins that modulate virulence on maize. Mol. Plant Pathol. https://doi.org/10.1111/mpp.12744 (2018).

  8. 8.

    Poloni, A. & Schirawski, J. Host specificity in Sporisorium reilianum is determined by distinct mechanisms in maize and sorghum. Mol. Plant Pathol. 17, 741–754 (2016).

  9. 9.

    Brefort, T. et al. Ustilago maydis as a pathogen. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 47, 423–445 (2009).

  10. 10.

    Schnable, P. S. et al. The B73 maize genome: complexity, diversity, and dynamics. Science 326, 1112–1115 (2009).

  11. 11.

    Lanver, D. et al. The biotrophic development of Ustilago maydis studied by RNA-Seq analysis. Plant Cell 30, 300–323 (2018).

  12. 12.

    Mei, Y., Zhang, C., Kernodle, B. M., Hill, J. H. & Whitham, S. A. A Foxtail mosaic virus vector for virus-induced gene silencing in maize. Plant Physiol. 171, 760–772 (2016).

  13. 13.

    Liu, N. et al. Foxtail mosaic virus-induced gene silencing in monocot plants. Plant Physiol. 171, 1801–1807 (2016).

  14. 14.

    Ashkenazy, H. et al. FastML: a web server for probabilistic reconstruction of ancestral sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, W580–W584 (2012).

  15. 15.

    Thornton, J. W. Resurrecting ancient genes: experimental analysis of extinct molecules. Nat. Rev. Genet. 5, 366–375 (2004).

  16. 16.

    Schweizer, G. et al. Positively selected effector genes and their contribution to virulence in the smut fungus Sporisorium reilianum. Genome Biol. Evol. 10, 629–645 (2018).

  17. 17.

    Munkacsi, A. B., Stoxen, S. & May, G. Domestication of maize, sorghum, and sugarcane did not drive the divergence of their smut pathogens. Evolution 61, 388–403 (2007).

  18. 18.

    Freeling, M., Scanlon, M. J. & Fowler, J. E. Fractionation and subfunctionalization following genome duplications: mechanisms that drive gene content and their consequences. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 35, 110–118 (2015).

  19. 19.

    Fouche, S., Plissonneau, C. & Croll, D. The birth and death of effectors in rapidly evolving filamentous pathogen genomes. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 46, 34–42 (2018).

  20. 20.

    Dong, S. et al. Effector specialization in a lineage of the Irish potato famine pathogen. Science 343, 552–555 (2014).

  21. 21.

    Liao, J. et al. Pathogen effectors and plant immunity determine specialization of the blast fungus to rice subspecies. Elife 5, e19377 (2016).

  22. 22.

    Kamper, J. et al. Insights from the genome of the biotrophic fungal plant pathogen Ustilago maydis. Nature 444, 97–101 (2006).

  23. 23.

    Ghareeb, H., Becker, A., Iven, T., Feussner, I. & Schirawski, J. Sporisorium reilianum infection changes inflorescence and branching architectures of maize. Plant Physiol. 156, 2037–2052 (2011).

  24. 24.

    Loubradou, G., Brachmann, A., Feldbrugge, M. & Kahmann, R. A homologue of the transcriptional repressor Ssn6p antagonizes cAMP signalling in Ustilago maydis. Mol. Microbiol. 40, 719–730 (2001).

  25. 25.

    Tollot, M. et al. The WOPR protein Ros1 is a master regulator of sporogenesis and late effector gene expression in the maize pathogen Ustilago maydis. PLoS Pathog. 12, e1005697 (2016).

  26. 26.

    Sievers, F. et al. Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega. Mol. Syst. Biol. 7, 539 (2011).

  27. 27.

    Kumar, S., Stecher, G. & Tamura, K. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 33, 1870–1874 (2016).

  28. 28.

    Bar-Rogovsky, H. et al. Assessing the prediction fidelity of ancestral reconstruction by a library approach. Protein Eng. Des. Sel. 28, 507–518 (2015).

  29. 29.

    Nielsen, H. Predicting secretory proteins with SignalP. Methods Mol. Biol. 1611, 59–73 (2017).

Download references


We are very grateful to S. Reissmann and E. Stukenbrock for critical reading and constructive comments on the manuscript, to the entire group in Marburg for helpful discussions, to K. Münch for help with plant infections and to D.K. Gupta and R. Sharma for bioinformatics support. Our work was supported by generous funds from the Max Planck Society and by the LOEWE initiative of the government of Hesse in the framework of the Centre for Translational Biodiversity Genomics (TBG).

Author information

S.T. designed the concept of the study and performed experiments. G.S. contributed to the bioinformatic analysis including protein sequence alignment, phylogenetic analysis and ancestral sequence reconstruction. N.R. and F.F. generated strains of U. maydis and S. reilianum and performed virulence assays. M.T. provided information on tin2 orthologues in smut fungi. R.K. directed the project. S.T. and R.K. wrote the manuscript with input from all co-authors.

Correspondence to Regine Kahmann.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figures 1–17, Supplementary Tables 1–4.

Reporting Summary

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Further reading

Fig. 1: S. reilianum encodes a Tin2-related virulence-promoting effector.
Fig. 2: Expression of U. maydis tin2 in S. reilianum and vice versa.
Fig. 3: Interaction of SrTin2 and UmTin2 with ZmTTK1, ZmTTK2 and ZmTTK3.
Fig. 4: Resurrected ancestral Tin2 protein functions like SrTin2.