Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Recognizing the reagent microbiome

A noticeable part of the microbiome literature, especially that working with low-biomass samples, is plagued by reagent contamination. Here we describe visual, statistical, methodical and ecological techniques to facilitate recognition of signals that represent contamination.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Reagent contamination recognition strategies.

References

  1. 1.

    Salter, S. J. et al. BMC Biol. 12, 87 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Kim, D. et al. Microbiome 5, 52 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Jervis-Bardy, J. et al. Microbiome 5, 19 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Davis, N. M., Proctor, D., Holmes, S. P., Relman, D. A. & Callahan, B. J. Preprint at biorXiv https://doi.org/10.1101/221499 (2017).

  5. 5.

    Laurence, M., Hatzis, C. & Brash, D. E. PLoS ONE 9, e97876 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Minich, J. J. et al. mSystems 3, e00218-17 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Jost, T., Lacroix, C., Braegger, C. & Chassard, C. Br. J. Nutr. 110, 1253–1262 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Branton, W. G. et al. Sci. Rep. 6, 37344 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Hain, T. et al. J. Bacteriol. 188, 7405–7415 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Urbaniak, C. et al. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 80, 3007–3014 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Grice, E. A. et al. Science 324, 1190–1192 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    de Goffau, M. C. et al. Environ. Microbiol. 11, 809–822 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Aagaard, K. et al. Sci. Transl. Med. 6, 237ra65 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Heida, F. H. et al. Clin. Infect. Dis. 62, 863–870 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Sadaghian Sadabad, M. et al. Gut 64, 1546–1552 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Price, L. B. et al. PLoS ONE 5, e8422 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Liu, C. M. et al. mBio 4, e00076-13 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Eren, A. M. et al. Methods Ecol. Evol. 4, 1111–1119 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Olm, M. R. et al. mBio 8, e01969-16 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work was supported by the Medical Research Council (UK; G1100221) and the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Cambridge Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre (Women’s Health theme).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julian Parkhill.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de Goffau, M.C., Lager, S., Salter, S.J. et al. Recognizing the reagent microbiome. Nat Microbiol 3, 851–853 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-018-0202-y

Download citation

Further reading

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing