Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Electric-field-induced colour switching in colloidal quantum dot molecules at room temperature

Nature Materials volume 22, pages 1210–1217 (2023)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Colloidal semiconductor quantum dots are robust emitters implemented in numerous prototype and commercial optoelectronic devices. However, active fluorescence colour tuning, achieved so far by electric-field-induced Stark effect, has been limited to a small spectral range, and accompanied by intensity reduction due to the electron–hole charge separation effect. Utilizing quantum dot molecules that manifest two coupled emission centres, we present a unique electric-field-induced instantaneous colour-switching effect. Reversible emission colour switching without intensity loss is achieved on a single-particle level, as corroborated by correlated electron microscopy imaging. Simulations establish that this is due to the electron wavefunction toggling between the two centres, induced by the electric field, and affected by the coupling strength. Quantum dot molecules manifesting two coupled emission centres may be tailored to emit distinct colours, opening the path for sensitive field sensing and colour-switchable devices such as a novel pixel design for displays or an electric-field-induced colour-tunable single-photon source.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: EF modulation of fluorescence in CQDM versus mono-QD.
Fig. 2: EF-induced colour switching at 10 Hz modulation rate.
Fig. 3: Effective mass calculations of electron and hole states under applied EF.
Fig. 4: Correlation between g2(0) and colour switching.
Fig. 5: Calculations of colour switching for different band offsets and different neck widths (fusion).
Fig. 6: Broadband colour switching in hetero-sized CQDMs.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available within the Article and its Supplementary Information. Source data are provided with this paper. Any additional data are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Code availability

The home-written MATLAB code used for the analysis of the measurements performed is not deemed central to the conclusions, and follows spectral analysis standards of the field (and previous works). It is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. de Arquer, F. P. G. et al. Semiconductor quantum dots: technological progress and future challenges. Science 373, eaaz8541 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kagan, C. R., Lifshitz, E., Sargent, E. H. & Talapin, D. V. Building devices from colloidal quantum dots. Science 353, aac5523 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pietryga, J. M. et al. Spectroscopic and device aspects of nanocrystal quantum dots. Chem. Rev. 116, 10513–10622 (2016).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Medintz, I. L., Uyeda, H. T., Goldman, E. R. & Mattoussi, H. Quantum dot bioconjugates for imaging, labelling and sensing. Nat. Mater. 4, 435–446 (2005).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Andrásfalvy, B. et al. Quantum dot–based multiphoton fluorescent pipettes for targeted neuronal electrophysiology. Nat. Methods 11, 1237–1241 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Efros, A. L. et al. Evaluating the potential of using quantum dots for monitoring electrical signals in neurons. Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 278–288 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Won, Y. H. et al. Highly efficient and stable InP/ZnSe/ZnS quantum dot light-emitting diodes. Nature 575, 634–638 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Park, Y. S., Roh, J., Diroll, B. T., Schaller, R. D. & Klimov, V. I. Colloidal quantum dot lasers. Nat. Rev. Mater. 6, 382–401 (2021).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Shang, C. et al. Perspectives on advances in quantum dot lasers and integration with Si photonic integrated circuits. ACS Photon. 8, 2555–2566 (2021).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Schweickert, L. et al. On-demand generation of background-free single photons from a solid-state source. Appl. Phys. Lett. 112, 093106 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gazzano, O. et al. Bright solid-state sources of indistinguishable single photons. Nat. Commun. 4, 1425 (2013).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Thomas, S. & Senellart, P. The race for the ideal single-photon source is on. Nat. Nanotechnol. 16, 367–368 (2021).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhai, L. et al. Quantum interference of identical photons from remote GaAs quantum dots. Nat. Nanotechnol. 17, 829–833 (2022).

  14. Miller, D. A. B. et al. Band-edge electroabsorption in quantum well structures: the quantum-confined Stark effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 2173–2176 (1984).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Empedocles, S. A. & Bawendi, M. G. Quantum-confined Stark effect in single CdSe nanocrystallite quantum dots. Science 278, 2114–2117 (1997).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Park, K., Deutsch, Z., Li, J. J., Oron, D. & Weiss, S. Single molecule quantum-confined Stark effect measurements of semiconductor nanoparticles at room temperature. ACS Nano 6, 10013–10023 (2012).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Scavuzzo, A. et al. Electrically tunable quantum emitters in an ultrathin graphene-hexagonal boron nitride van der Waals heterostructure. Appl. Phys. Lett. 114, 062104 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rothenberg, E., Kazes, M., Shaviv, E. & Banin, U. Electric field induced switching of the fluorescence of single semiconductor quantum rods. Nano Lett. 5, 1581–1586 (2005).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Rowland, C. E. et al. Electric field modulation of semiconductor quantum dot photoluminescence: insights into the design of robust voltage-sensitive cellular imaging probes. Nano Lett. 15, 6848–6854 (2015).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Scott, R. et al. Time-resolved Stark spectroscopy in CdSe nanoplatelets: exciton binding energy, polarizability, and field-dependent radiative rates. Nano Lett. 16, 6576–6583 (2016).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Cui, J. et al. Colloidal quantum dot molecules manifesting quantum coupling at room temperature. Nat. Commun. 10, 5401 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Stinaff, E. A. et al. Optical signatures of coupled quantum dots. Science 311, 636–639 (2006).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Jennings, C. et al. Self‐assembled InAs/GaAs coupled quantum dots for photonic quantum technologies. Adv. Quantum Technol. 3, 1900085 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Scheibner, M. et al. Optically mapping the electronic structure of coupled quantum dots. Nat. Phys. 4, 291–295 (2008).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Müller, K. et al. Excited state quantum couplings and optical switching of an artificial molecule. Phys. Rev. B 84, 081302 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wang, L., Rastelli, A., Kiravittaya, S., Benyoucef, M. & Schmidt, O. G. Self-assembled quantum dot molecules. Adv. Mater. 21, 2601–2618 (2009).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Panfil, Y. E., Shamalia, D., Cui, J., Koley, S. & Banin, U. Electronic coupling in colloidal quantum dot molecules; the case of CdSe/CdS core/shell homodimers. J. Chem. Phys. 151, 224501 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kim, D., Carter, S. G., Greilich, A., Bracker, A. S. & Gammon, D. Ultrafast optical control of entanglement between two quantum-dot spins. Nat. Phys. 7, 223–229 (2011).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Krenner, H. J. et al. Direct observation of controlled coupling in an individual quantum dot molecule. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 057402 (2005).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Cui, J. et al. Neck barrier engineering in quantum dot dimer molecules via intraparticle ripening. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 19816–19823 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Koley, S. et al. Photon correlations in colloidal quantum dot molecules controlled by the neck barrier. Matter 5, 3997–4014 (2022).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Ghosh, Y. et al. New insights into the complexities of shell growth and the strong influence of particle volume in nonblinking ‘giant’ core/shell nanocrystal quantum dots. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 9634–9643 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Pu, C. & Peng, X. To battle surface traps on CdSe/CdS core/shell nanocrystals: shell isolation versus surface treatment. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 8134–8142 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Zang, H. et al. Charge trapping and de-trapping in isolated CdSe/ZnS nanocrystals under an external electric field: indirect evidence for a permanent dipole moment. Nanoscale 7, 14897–14905 (2015).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Frantsuzov, P., Kuno, M., Jankó, B. & Marcus, R. A. Universal emission intermittency in quantum dots, nanorods and nanowires. Nat. Phys. 4, 519–522 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Galland, C. et al. Two types of luminescence blinking revealed by spectroelectrochemistry of single quantum dots. Nature 479, 203–207 (2011).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Efros, A. L. & Nesbitt, D. J. Origin and control of blinking in quantum dots. Nat. Nanotechnol. 11, 661–671 (2016).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Panfil, Y. E., Cui, J., Koley, S. & Banin, U. Complete mapping of interacting charging states in single coupled colloidal quantum dot molecules. ACS Nano 16, 5566–5576 (2022).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Madelung, O. Semiconductors: Data Handbook 3rd edn (Springer, 2004).

  40. Muller, J. et al. Wave function engineering in elongated semiconductor nanocrystals with heterogeneous carrier confinement. Nano Lett. 5, 2043–2049 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Nair, G., Zhao, J. & Bawendi, M. G. Biexciton quantum yield of single semiconductor nanocrystals from photon statistics. Nano Lett. 11, 1136–1140 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Fisher, B., Caruge, J. M., Zehnder, D. & Bawendi, M. Room-temperature ordered photon emission from multiexciton states in single CdSe core-shell nanocrystals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 087403 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Hou, X. et al. Engineering Auger recombination in colloidal quantum dots via dielectric screening. Nat. Commun. 10, 1750 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Rabouw, F. T. et al. Reduced Auger recombination in single CdSe/CdS nanorods by one-dimensional electron delocalization. Nano Lett. 13, 4884–4892 (2013).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Zhang, L. et al. Quantum-confined Stark effect in the ensemble of phase-pure CdSe/CdS quantum dots. Nanoscale 11, 12619–12625 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Steiner, D. et al. Determination of band offsets in heterostructured colloidal nanorods using scanning tunneling spectroscopy. Nano Lett. 8, 2954–2958 (2008).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Grivas, C. et al. Single-mode tunable laser emission in the single-exciton regime from colloidal nanocrystals. Nat. Commun. 4, 1750 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Zhou, L., Jiang, Y. & Chu, D. Synthesis and dielectric properties of printable strontium titanate/polyvinylpyrrolidone nanocomposites. Mater. Res. Express 6, 0950c6 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Lethiec, C. et al. Measurement of three-dimensional dipole orientation of a single fluorescent nanoemitter by emission polarization analysis. Phys. Rev. X 4, 021037 (2014).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Chen, O. et al. Compact high-quality CdSe-CdS core-shell nanocrystals with narrow emission linewidths and suppressed blinking. Nat. Mater. 12, 445–451 (2013).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Klimov, V. I., McBranch, D. W., Leatherdale, C. A. & Bawendi, M. G. Electron and hole relaxation pathways in semiconductor quantum dots. Phys. Rev. B 60, 13740 (1999).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Pandey, A. & Guyot-Sionnest, P. Slow electron cooling in colloidal quantum dots. Science 322, 929–932 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Maity, P., Debnath, T. & Ghosh, H. N. Ultrafast charge carrier delocalization in CdSe/CdS quasi-type II and CdS/CdSe inverted type I core-shell: a structural analysis through carrier-quenching study. J. Phys. Chem. C 119, 26202–26211 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Wang, L. W., Califano, M., Zunger, A. & Franceschetti, A. Pseudopotential theory of Auger processes in CdSe quantum dots. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 056404 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Yin, W. et al. Efficient heterotransfer between visible quantum dots. J. Phys. Chem. C 121, 4799–4805 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study has received financial support from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (project CoupledNC, grant agreement no. [741767]; project CQDplay, grant agreement no. [101069322]) (U.B., Y.O., A.L., Y.E.P., E.S., N.C. and S.K.). Y.O. and E.S. acknowledge support from the Hebrew University Center for Nanoscience and Technology. Y.E.P. acknowledges support from the Ministry of Science and Technology and the National Foundation for Applied and Engineering Sciences, Israel. S.K. acknowledges support from the Planning and Budgeting Committee of the higher board of education in Israel through a fellowship. U.B. thanks the Alfred & Erica Larisch memorial chair. We thank G. Chechelinsky, M. Saidian, I. Shweki and S. Eliav from the Unit for Nano Characterization (UNC) of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Center for Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, for assistance in the electrode device fabrication. We thank S. Gigi for helpful discussions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Chemistry, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel

    Yonatan Ossia, Adar Levi, Yossef E. Panfil, Somnath Koley, Einav Scharf, Nadav Chefetz & Uri Banin

  2. The Center for Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel

    Yonatan Ossia, Adar Levi, Yossef E. Panfil, Somnath Koley, Einav Scharf, Sergei Remennik, Atzmon Vakahi & Uri Banin

Authors
  1. Yonatan Ossia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Adar Levi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yossef E. Panfil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Somnath Koley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Einav Scharf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Nadav Chefetz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Sergei Remennik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Atzmon Vakahi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Uri Banin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

U.B., Y.E.P. and Y.O. conceived this study. A.L. developed and synthesized all the CQDM samples for this study. Y.O. fabricated the electrode devices with assistance from N.C.; conducted the optical experiments with assistance from S.K., E.S. and N.C.; and performed the numerical simulations in consultation with Y.E.P. The idea for the FIB lift-out-assisted optical electron microscopy–single-particle correlations was conceived and realized by A.V. and Y.O. A.V. operated the FIB and developed the sample preparation technique for STEM imaging. S.R. conducted the electron microscopy characterization of single CQDMs. Y.O. analysed the experimental data and simulations with inputs from all other authors. U.B. and Y.O. wrote the paper in consultation with all authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Uri Banin.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Materials thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–31, Text 1 (on self-consistent effective mass calculations), Table 1 and captions for Videos 1–3.

Supplementary Video 1

Step-by-step lift out and TEM grid preparation (using the SEM–dual-beam FIB system).

Supplementary Video 2

Raw measurement of PL emission wavelength on the EMCCD of the CQDM (Figs. 1c and 2), with periodic EF modulation from +180 to 0 V at 10 Hz rate.

Supplementary Video 3

Measurement of PL emission wavelength on the EMCCD of the CQDM (Fig. 6a and Supplementary Fig. 26) with periodic EF modulation between +180 and −180 V at 10 Hz rate.

Source data

Source Data Figs. 1–6

Experimental and analysis data for Figs. 1–6.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ossia, Y., Levi, A., Panfil, Y.E. et al. Electric-field-induced colour switching in colloidal quantum dot molecules at room temperature. Nat. Mater. 22, 1210–1217 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-023-01606-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-023-01606-0

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing