The heat capacity of a material is a fundamental property of great practical importance. For example, in a carbon capture process, the heat required to regenerate a solid sorbent is directly related to the heat capacity of the material. However, for most materials suitable for carbon capture applications, the heat capacity is not known, and thus the standard procedure is to assume the same value for all materials. In this work, we developed a machine learning approach, trained on density functional theory simulations, to accurately predict the heat capacity of these materials, that is, zeolites, metal–organic frameworks and covalent–organic frameworks. The accuracy of our prediction is confirmed with experimental data. Finally, for a temperature swing adsorption process that captures carbon from the flue gas of a coal-fired power plant, we show that for some materials, the heat requirement is reduced by as much as a factor of two using the correct heat capacity.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Subscribe to Nature+
Get immediate online access to Nature and 55 other Nature journal
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $9.92 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Supplementary Information, containing details of the theoretical aspects, machine learning methodology, experimental measurements and process modelling, is available for this paper. In addition, the crystal structures of the training set together with the DFT-optimized geometries and the corresponding calculated thermal properties; tabulated heat capacity of the MOFs in the CoRE-MOF34 and QMOF38 databases, zeolites in IZA36 and COFs in CURATED-COF35 at different temperatures; the data that were used and are needed to reproduce the results of this study, the thermogravimetric analysis, the synthesis protocols, and the powder X-ray diffraction, exported from electronic lab notebooks; and the codes to generate the figures of the paper are deposited on the Materials Cloud51 archive and can be accessed at https://doi.org/10.24435/materialscloud:p1-2y. Correspondence and requests for additional materials should be addressed to the corresponding authors.
The featurization, prediction and trained models are available from https://github.com/SeyedMohamadMoosavi/tools-cp-porousmat.
Furukawa, H., Cordova, K. E., O’Keeffe, M. & Yaghi, O. M. The chemistry and applications of metal-organic frameworks. Science 341, 1230444–1230456 (2013).
Bavykina, A. et al. Metal–organic frameworks in heterogeneous catalysis: recent progress, new trends, and future perspectives. Chem. Rev. 120, 8468–8535 (2020).
Rosen, A. S., Notestein, J. M. & Snurr, R. Q. Realizing the data-driven, computational discovery of metal-organic framework catalysts. Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng. 35, 100760 (2022).
Boyd, P. G. et al. Data-driven design of metal–organic frameworks for wet flue gas CO2 capture. Nature 576, 253–256 (2019).
Chen, Z. et al. Balancing volumetric and gravimetric uptake in highly porous materials for clean energy. Science 368, 297–303 (2020).
Diercks, C. S., Liu, Y., Cordova, K. E. & Yaghi, O. M. The role of reticular chemistry in the design of CO2 reduction catalysts. Nat. Mater. 17, 301–307 (2018).
Farmahini, A. H., Friedrich, D., Brandani, S. & Sarkisov, L. Exploring new sources of efficiency in process-driven materials screening for post-combustion carbon capture. Energy Environ. Sci. 13, 1018–1037 (2020).
Mason, J. A., Sumida, K., Herm, Z. R., Krishna, R. & Long, J. R. Evaluating metal–organic frameworks for post-combustion carbon dioxide capture via temperature swing adsorption. Energy Environ. Sci. 4, 3030–3040 (2011).
Nandy, A., Duan, C. & Kulik, H. J. Using machine learning and data mining to leverage community knowledge for the engineering of stable metal–organic frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 17535–17547 (2021).
Subraveti, S. G., Roussanaly, S., Anantharaman, R., Riboldi, L. & Rajendran, A. How much can novel solid sorbents reduce the cost of post-combustion CO2 capture? A techno-economic investigation on the cost limits of pressure–vacuum swing adsorption. Appl. Energy 306, 117955 (2022).
Huck, J. M. et al. Evaluating different classes of porous materials for carbon capture. Energy Environ. Sci. 7, 4132–4146 (2014).
Farmahini, A. H., Krishnamurthy, S., Friedrich, D., Brandani, S. & Sarkisov, L. Performance-based screening of porous materials for carbon capture. Chem. Rev. 121, 10666–10741 (2021).
Mu, B. & Walton, K. S. Thermal analysis and heat capacity study of metal–organic frameworks. J. Phys. Chem. C 115, 22748–22754 (2011).
Kloutse, F. A., Zacharia, R., Cossement, D. & Chahine, R. Specific heat capacities of MOF-5, Cu-BTC, Fe-BTC, MOF-177 and MIL-53 (Al) over wide temperature ranges: measurements and application of empirical group contribution method. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 217, 1–5 (2015).
Kapil, V. et al. Modeling the structural and thermal properties of loaded metal–organic frameworks. An interplay of quantum and anharmonic fluctuations. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 15, 3237–3249 (2019).
Wieme, J. et al. Thermal engineering of metal–organic frameworks for adsorption applications: a molecular simulation perspective. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11, 38697–38707 (2019).
Caskey, S. R., Wong-Foy, A. G. & Matzger, A. J. Dramatic tuning of carbon dioxide uptake via metal substitution in a coordination polymer with cylindrical pores. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 10870–10871 (2008).
Queen, W. L. et al. Comprehensive study of carbon dioxide adsorption in the metal–organic frameworks M2(dobdc) (M = Mg, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn). Chem. Sci. 5, 4569–4581 (2014).
Boyd, P. G., Moosavi, S. M., Witman, M. & Smit, B. Force-field prediction of materials properties in metal-organic frameworks. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 8, 357–363 (2017).
Moghadam, P. Z. et al. Structure-mechanical stability relations of metal-organic frameworks via machine learning. Matter 1, 219–234 (2019).
Moosavi, S. M., Boyd, P. G., Sarkisov, L. & Smit, B. Improving the mechanical stability of metal–organic frameworks using chemical caryatids. ACS Cent. Sci. 4, 832–839 (2018).
Jablonka, K. M., Ongari, D., Moosavi, S. M. & Smit, B. Big-data science in porous materials: materials genomics and machine learning. Chem. Rev. 120, 8066–8129 (2020).
Rahimi, M., Moosavi, S. M., Smit, B. & Hatton, T. A. Toward smart carbon capture with machine learning. Cell Rep. Phys. Sci. 2, 100396 (2021).
Tawfik, S. A., Isayev, O., Spencer, M. J. S. & Winkler, D. A. Predicting thermal properties of crystals using machine learning. Adv. Theory Simul. 3, 1900208 (2020).
Legrain, F., Carrete, J., van Roekeghem, A., Curtarolo, S. & Mingo, N. How chemical composition alone can predict vibrational free energies and entropies of solids. Chem. Mater. 29, 6220–6227 (2017).
Ducamp, M. & Coudert, F.-X. Prediction of thermal properties of zeolites through machine learning. J. Phys. Chem. C 126, 1651–1660 (2022).
Chen, Z. et al. Direct prediction of phonon density of states with euclidean neural networks. Adv. Sci. 8, 2004214 (2021).
Kauwe, S. K., Graser, J., Vazquez, A. & Sparks, T. D. Machine learning prediction of heat capacity for solid inorganics. Integrating Mater. Manuf. Innov. 7, 43–51 (2018).
Petretto, G. et al. High-throughput density-functional perturbation theory phonons for inorganic materials. Sci. Data 5, 180065 (2018).
Ward, L. et al. Including crystal structure attributes in machine learning models of formation energies via Voronoi tessellations. Phys. Rev. B 96, 024104 (2017).
Jablonka, K. M., Ongari, D., Moosavi, S. M. & Smit, B. Using collective knowledge to assign oxidation states of metal cations in metal–organic frameworks. Nat. Chem. 13, 771–777 (2021).
Behler, J. & Parrinello, M. Generalized neural-network representation of high-dimensional potential-energy surfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 146401 (2007).
Botu, V., Batra, R., Chapman, J. & Ramprasad, R. Machine learning force fields: construction, validation, and outlook. J. Phys. Chem. C 121, 511–522 (2017).
Chung, Y. G. et al. Advances, updates, and analytics for the computation-ready, experimental metal–organic framework database: CoRE MOF 2019. J. Chem. Eng. Data 64, 5985–5998 (2019).
Ongari, D., Yakutovich, A. V., Talirz, L. & Smit, B. Building a consistent and reproducible database for adsorption evaluation in covalent–organic frameworks. ACS Cent. Sci. 5, 1663–1675 (2019).
Baerlocher, C. & McCusker, C. IZA: Database of Zeolite Structures (International Zeolite Association, accessed September 2021); http://www.iza-structure.org/databases/
Ming, Y. et al. Thermophysical properties of MOF-5 powders. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 185, 235–244 (2014).
Rosen, A. S. et al. Machine learning the quantum-chemical properties of metal–organic frameworks for accelerated materials discovery. Matter 4, 1578–1597 (2021).
Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).
Grimme, S., Ehrlich, S. & Goerigk, L. Effect of the damping function in dispersion corrected density functional theory. J. Comput. Chem. 32, 1456–1465 (2011).
Goedecker, S., Teter, M. & Hutter, J. Separable dual-space Gaussian pseudopotentials. Phys. Rev. B 54, 1703–1710 (1996).
Togo, A. & Tanaka, I. First principles phonon calculations in materials science. Scr. Mater. 108, 1–5 (2015).
Hutter, J., Iannuzzi, M., Schiffmann, F. & VandeVondele, J. cp2k: atomistic simulations of condensed matter systems. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Mol. Sci. 4, 15–25 (2014).
Plimpton, S. Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 117, 1–19 (1995).
Carreras, A. phonoLAMMPS: a python interface for LAMMPS phonon calculations using phonopy. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3940626 (2020).
Ward, L. et al. Matminer: an open source toolkit for materials data mining. Comput. Mater. Sci. 152, 60–69 (2018).
Ong, S. P. et al. Python materials genomics (pymatgen): a robust, open-source python library for materials analysis. Comput. Mater. Sci. 68, 314–319 (2013).
Chen, T. & Guestrin, C. XGBoost: a scalable tree boosting system. In Proc. 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939785 (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2016).
Pedregosa, F. et al. Scikit-learn: machine learning in python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12, 2825–2830 (2011).
Ajenifuja, A., Joss, L. & Jobson, M. A new equilibrium shortcut temperature swing adsorption model for fast adsorbent screening. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 59, 3485–3497 (2020).
Talirz, L. et al. Materials cloud, a platform for open computational science. Sci. Data 7, 299 (2020).
We acknowledge support from the Accelerating Carbon Capture and Sequestration Technologies PrISMa Project (no. 299659), which has received funding through the Accelerating Carbon Capture and Storage Technologies programme (Horizon2020 project no. 294766). We gratefully acknowledge financial contributions made from the Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy together with extra funding from the Natural Environment Research Council and Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, United Kingdom; The Research Council of Norway; Swiss Federal Office of Energy; and the United States Department of Energy. We also gratefully acknowledge additional financial support from Total and Equinor. S.M.M. was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation under grant no. P2ELP2_195155. M.A. was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation under grant no. P2ELP2_195134. C.C. was supported by the Industrial Strategy Challenge Fund from UK Research and Innovation Industrial Challenge within the UK Industrial Decarbonisation Research and Innovation Centre award no. EP/V027050/1. F.N. acknowledges funding from the European Commission (ERC CoG 772230), the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (research centre Berlin’s AI competence centre the Berlin Institute for the Foundations of Learning and Data), and the Berlin Mathematics Center MATH+ (AA2-8). The calculations of this work were enabled by the Swiss National Supercomputing Centre under project no. s1019. S.M.M. and B.A.N. thank M. J. Pougin for making the experimental MOF structures computation ready. S.M.M. thanks L. Talirz and M. Sadeghi for fruitful discussions.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review information
Nature Materials thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Moosavi, S.M., Novotny, B.Á., Ongari, D. et al. A data-science approach to predict the heat capacity of nanoporous materials. Nat. Mater. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-022-01374-3
This article is cited by
Nature Materials (2022)