Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Subsecond multichannel magnetic control of select neural circuits in freely moving flies

Nature Materials volume 21, pages 951–958 (2022)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Precisely timed activation of genetically targeted cells is a powerful tool for the study of neural circuits and control of cell-based therapies. Magnetic control of cell activity, or ‘magnetogenetics’, using magnetic nanoparticle heating of temperature-sensitive ion channels enables remote, non-invasive activation of neurons for deep-tissue applications and freely behaving animal studies. However, the in vivo response time of thermal magnetogenetics is currently tens of seconds, which prevents precise temporal modulation of neural activity. Moreover, magnetogenetics has yet to achieve in vivo multiplexed stimulation of different groups of neurons. Here we produce subsecond behavioural responses in Drosophila melanogaster by combining magnetic nanoparticles with a rate-sensitive thermoreceptor (TRPA1-A). Furthermore, by tuning magnetic nanoparticles to respond to different magnetic field strengths and frequencies, we achieve subsecond, multichannel stimulation. These results bring magnetogenetics closer to the temporal resolution and multiplexed stimulation possible with optogenetics while maintaining the minimal invasiveness and deep-tissue stimulation possible only by magnetic control.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Behavioural fly assay.
Fig. 2: Rate response of magnetogenetic stimulation of cells expressing fruitless at subsecond response time.
Fig. 3: Versatility of magnetothermal stimulation in secondary cell type expressing Hb-9.
Fig. 4: Multiplexed magnetothermal heating of nanoparticles.
Fig. 5: Multichannel magnetogenetic stimulation of cells expressing fruitless.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The main data supporting the results of this study are available within the paper and its Supplementary information. The raw videos generated for the study are too large for public sharing, but are available for research purposes from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

Code availability

FlyTracker (Perona Lab, CalTech, v.1.0.5) was used to track the wing angle and position of flies within their respective chambers, and is publicly available online (https://www.vision.caltech.edu/datasets/). DeepLabCut (Mathis Lab, v.2.2.b9) was used to track fly wing angle and position for videos with shadows, and is publicly available online (http://www.mackenziemathislab.org/deeplabcut). Microsoft excel (v.16.54) was used for simple SLP and selectivity calculations. FLIR research studio (v.2.0) was used for thermal imaging.

References

  1. Huang, H., Delikanli, S., Zeng, H., Ferkey, D. M. & Pralle, A. Remote control of ion channels and neurons through magnetic-field heating of nanoparticles. Nat. Nanotechnol. 5, 602–606 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Munshi, R. et al. Magnetothermal genetic deep brain stimulation of motor behaviors in awake, freely moving mice. eLife https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.27069 (2017).

  3. Chen, R., Romero, G., Christiansen, M. G., Mohr, A. & Anikeeva, P. Wireless magnetothermal deep brain stimulation. Science 347, 1477–1480 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Duret, G. et al. Magnetic entropy as a proposed gating mechanism for magnetogenetic ion channels. Biophys. J. 116, 454–468 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Stanley, S. A. et al. Radio-wave heating of iron oxide nanoparticles can regulate plasma glucose in mice. Science https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1216753 (2012).

  6. Stanley, S. A., Sauer, J., Kane, R. S., Dordick, J. S. & Friedman, J. M. Remote regulation of glucose homeostasis in mice using genetically encoded nanoparticles. Nat. Med. 21, 92–98 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wheeler, M. A. et al. Genetically targeted magnetic control of the nervous system. Nat. Neurosci. 19, 756–761 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang, G. et al. Revaluation of magnetic properties of Magneto. Nat. Neurosci. 23, 1047–1050 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kole, K. et al. Assessing the utility of Magneto to control neuronal excitability in the somatosensory cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 23, 1044–1046 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Schroll, C. et al. Light-induced activation of distinct modulatory neurons triggers appetitive or aversive learning in Drosophila larvae. Curr. Biol. 16, 1741–1747 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gradinaru, V. et al. Targeting and readout strategies for fast optical neural control in vitro and in vivo. J. Neurosci. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3578-07.2007 (2007).

  12. Liu, Y. et al. Optogenetic study of the response interaction among multi-afferent inputs in the barrel cortex of rats. Sci. Rep. 9, 3917 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Young, J. H. H., Wang, M.-T. T. & Brezovich, I. A. A. Frequency/depth-penetration considerations in hyperthermia by magnetically induced currents. Electron. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1049/el:19800255 (1980).

  14. Gregurec, D. et al. Magnetic vortex nanodiscs enable remote magnetomechanical neural stimulation. ACS Nano 14, 8036–8045 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee, J. et al. Non-contact long-range magnetic stimulation of mechanosensitive ion channels in freely moving animals. Nat. Mater. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-020-00896-y (2021).

  16. Hamada, F. N. et al. An internal thermal sensor controlling temperature preference in Drosophila. Nature 454, 217–220 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Luo, J., Shen, W. L. & Montell, C. TRPA1 mediates sensation of the rate of temperature change in Drosophila larvae. Nat. Neurosci. 20, 34–41 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Panzano, V. C., Kang, K. & Garrity, P. A. Infrared snake eyes: TRPA1 and the thermal sensitivity of the snake pit organ. Sci. Signal. 3, pe22 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Laursen, W. J., Anderson, E. O., Hoffstaetter, L. J., Bagriantsev, S. N. & Gracheva, E. O. Species-specific temperature sensitivity of TRPA1. Temp. Multidiscip. Biomed. J. 2, 214–226 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Luo, L. et al. Navigational decision making in Drosophila thermotaxis. J. Neurosci. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4090-09.2010 (2010).

  21. Rosenzweig, M. et al. The Drosophila ortholog of vertebrate TRPA1 regulates thermotaxis. Genes Dev. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1278205 (2005).

  22. Bullock, T. H. & Diecke, F. P. Properties of an infra-red receptor. J. Physiol. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1956.sp005624 (1956).

  23. Inagaki, H. K. et al. Optogenetic control of Drosophila using a red-shifted channelrhodopsin reveals experience-dependent influences on courtship. Nat. Methods 11, 325–332 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Dawydow, A. et al. Channelrhodopsin-2–XXL, a powerful optogenetic tool for low-light applications. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 13972–13977 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. von Philipsborn, A. C. et al. Neuronal control of Drosophila courtship song. Neuron https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2011.01.011 (2011).

  26. Mathis, A. et al. DeepLabCut: markerless pose estimation of user-defined body parts with deep learning. Nat. Neurosci. 21, 1281–1289 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Eyjolfsdottir, E. et al. In European Conference on Computer Vision https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10605-2_50 (2014).

  28. Wang, B. et al. Multichannel power electronics and magnetic nanoparticles for selective thermal magnetogenetics. J. Neural Eng. 19, 026015 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Tong, S., Ren, B., Zheng, Z., Shen, H. & Bao, G. Tiny grains give huge gains: nanocrystal-based signal amplification for biomolecule detection. ACS Nano https://doi.org/10.1021/nn400733t (2013).

  30. Rosenfeld, D. et al. Transgene-free remote magnetothermal regulation of adrenal hormones. Sci. Adv. 6, eaaz3734 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Kabra, M., Robie, A. A., Rivera-Alba, M., Branson, S. & Branson, K. JAABA: interactive machine learning for automatic annotation of animal behavior. Nat. Methods https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2281 (2013).

  32. Moon, J. et al. Magnetothermal multiplexing for selective remote control of cell signaling. Adv. Funct. Mater. 30, 2000577 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Christiansen, M. G., Senko, A. W., Chen, R., Romero, G. & Anikeeva, P. Magnetically multiplexed heating of single domain nanoparticles. Appl. Phys. Lett. 104, 213103 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Xiao, Z. et al. Libraries of uniform magnetic multicore nanoparticles with tunable dimensions for biomedical and photonic applications. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12, 41932–41941 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Davis, H. C. et al. Nanoscale heat transfer from magnetic nanoparticles and ferritin in an alternating magnetic field. Biophys. J. 118, 1502–1510 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Saito, S. et al. Analysis of transient receptor potential ankyrin 1 (TRPA1) in frogs and lizards illuminates both nociceptive heat and chemical sensitivities and coexpression with TRP vanilloid 1 (TRPV1) in ancestral vertebrates. J. Biol. Chem. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M112.362194 (2012).

  37. Saito, S. et al. Heat and noxious chemical sensor, chicken TRPA1, as a target of bird repellents and identification of its structural determinants by multispecies functional comparison. Mol. Biol. Evol. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msu001 (2014).

  38. Gracheva, E. O. et al. Molecular basis of infrared detection by snakes. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08943 (2010).

  39. Geng, J., Liang, D., Jiang, K. & Zhang, P. Molecular evolution of the infrared sensory gene TRPA1 in snakes and implications for functional studies. PLoS ONE 6, e28644 (2011).

  40. Hanini, A. et al. Evaluation of iron oxide nanoparticle biocompatibility. Int. J. Nanomed. 6, 787–794 (2011).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Tong, S., Quinto, C. A., Zhang, L., Mohindra, P. & Bao, G. Size-dependent heating of magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles. ACS Nano https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.7b01762 (2017).

  42. Tong, S., Hou, S., Ren, B., Zheng, Z. & Bao, G. Self-assembly of phospholipid-PEG coating on nanoparticles through dual solvent exchange. Nano Lett. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl201978c (2011).

  43. Marella, S. et al. Imaging taste responses in the fly brain reveals a functional map of taste category and behavior. Neuron 49, 285–295 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Stockinger, P., Kvitsiani, D., Rotkopf, S., Tirián, L. & Dickson, B. J. Neural circuitry that governs Drosophila male courtship behavior. Cell 121, 795–807 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Kang, K. et al. Modulation of TRPA1 thermal sensitivity enables sensory discrimination in Drosophila. Nature 481, 76–80 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Broihier, H. T. & Skeath, J. B. Drosophila homeodomain protein dHb9 directs neuronal fate via crossrepressive and cell-nonautonomous mechanisms. Neuron 35, 39–50 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Lima, S. Q. & Miesenböck, G. Remote control of behavior through genetically targeted photostimulation of neurons. Cell 121, 141–152 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Dierick, H. A. & Greenspan, R. J. Molecular analysis of flies selected for aggressive behavior. Nat. Genet. 38, 1023–1031 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was developed with funding from the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency of the United States of America (contract no. N66001-19-C-4020, received by J.T.R.). The views, opinions and/or findings expressed are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the official views or policies of the Department of Defense or the US Government. This work was funded in part by the National Science Foundation: Neuronex innovation award no. 1707562 and grant no. C-1963 from the Welch Foundation received by J.T.R., as well as by the National Institutes of Health under award no. RO1MH107474 received by H.A.D. We thank J. Moon and P. Anikeeva (MIT) for useful discussions and guidance with magnetic multiplexing, sharing their design for the ac magnetometer and advising us on its operation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Bioengineering, Rice University, Houston, TX, USA

    Charles Sebesta, Daniel Torres Hinojosa, Kaiyi Jiang, Linlin Zhang, Qingbo Zhang, Gang Bao & Jacob T. Robinson

  2. Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA

    Boshuo Wang, Stefan M. Goetz & Angel V. Peterchev

  3. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rice University, Houston, TX, USA

    Joseph Asfouri, Guillaume Duret & Jacob T. Robinson

  4. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, School of Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA

    Zhongxi Li, Stefan M. Goetz & Angel V. Peterchev

  5. Department of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA

    Kaiyi Jiang

  6. Department of Chemistry, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA

    Zhen Xiao & Vicki L. Colvin

  7. Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA

    Stefan M. Goetz & Angel V. Peterchev

  8. Institute of Brain Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA

    Stefan M. Goetz

  9. Department of Engineering, School of Technology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

    Stefan M. Goetz

  10. Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA

    Angel V. Peterchev

  11. Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA

    Herman A. Dierick

  12. Department of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA

    Herman A. Dierick & Jacob T. Robinson

Authors
  1. Charles Sebesta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Daniel Torres Hinojosa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Boshuo Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Joseph Asfouri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Zhongxi Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Guillaume Duret
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Kaiyi Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Zhen Xiao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Linlin Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Qingbo Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Vicki L. Colvin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Stefan M. Goetz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Angel V. Peterchev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Herman A. Dierick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Gang Bao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Jacob T. Robinson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

C.S. designed, performed and analysed the in vivo behavioural assays for Drosophila. D.T.H. synthesized, coated, functionalized and characterized iron oxide nanoparticles and low-SLP and cobalt-doped nanoparticles. K.J. prepared nanoparticles for testing and L.Z. assisted with heating measurements. Z.X. and Q.Z. synthesized and characterized iron oxide nanoclusters. C.S. and D.T.H. recorded SLP measurements of nanoparticles and nanoclusters. C.S. and H.A.D. designed and performed the nanoparticle injection scheme for adult Drosophila. B.W. and Z.L. designed and built the custom AMF system used for in vivo recordings and the magnetic field driver used for the ac magnetometer. J.A. built the ac magnetometer and recorded dynamic hysteresis loops. C.S. and J.A. performed thermal imaging experiments. J.T.R., H.A.D. and G.D. contributed to the design of the experiments. H.A.D. and J.T.R. supervised behavioural assay design and development. S.M.G. and A.V.P. supervised AMF system design and development. V.L.C. and G.B. supervised nanoparticle synthesis, characterization and functionalization. C.S., D.T.H., B.W., J.A., J.T.R. and H.A.D. prepared the manuscript with input from all authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jacob T. Robinson.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare the following competing interests. S.M.G. has received research funding from Magstim. A.V.P. has received research funding, travel support, patent royalties, consulting fees, equipment loans, hardware donations and/or patent application support from Rogue Research, Tal Medical/Neurex, Magstim, MagVenture, Neuronetics, BTL Industries and Advise Connect Inspire. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Materials thanks Michael Christiansen, Andre Fiala and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–12 and video legends.

Reporting Summary

Supplementary Video 1

Slow thermal ramp of cobalt-injected Drosophila for Fru circuit stimulation.

Supplementary Video 2

Fast thermal ramp of cobalt-injected and uninjected Drosophila for Fru circuit stimulation.

Supplementary Video 3 Drosophila Hb9 circuit stimulation with low-SLP SPION-injected controls.

Supplementary Video 4

Multiplexed Drosophila Fru circuit stimulation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sebesta, C., Torres Hinojosa, D., Wang, B. et al. Subsecond multichannel magnetic control of select neural circuits in freely moving flies. Nat. Mater. 21, 951–958 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-022-01281-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-022-01281-7

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing