Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Electrorefining for direct decarburization of molten iron


Recycling iron and steel is critical for environmental sustainability and essential to close material loops in circular economics. A major challenge is to produce high-value products and to control impurities like carbon in the face of stringent consumer requirements and volatile markets. Here, we develop an electrorefining process that directly decarburizes molten iron by imposing an electromotive force between it and a slag electrolyte. Upon anodic polarization, oxide anions from the slag discharge directly on carbon dissolved in molten iron, evolving gaseous carbon monoxide. In a striking departure from conventional practice that highly relies on reaction with solubilized oxygen, here electrorefining achieves decarburization by direct interfacial reaction. We demonstrate that this technique produces ultra-low-carbon steels and recovers silicon as a by-product at the cathode, requiring a low energy input and no reagents. We expect this process to be scalable and integrable with secondary steel mills.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Experiments demonstrate electrorefining for direct decarburization of molten iron containing 3.78 wt% carbon at 1,600 °C.
Fig. 2: Electrochemical techniques elucidate the decarburization pathway of molten iron at 1,600 °C.
Fig. 3: Schematic showing the direct decarburization mechanism during electrorefining of molten iron.
Fig. 4: Performance and benchmarking of the electrorefining process across different ranges of carbon concentration.

Data availability

The data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and its Supplementary Information files and from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Charge-transfer resistances, interfacial capacitances, exchange currents, Tafel slopes, rate constants and data from electrorefining trials are given in the Supplementary Information files.


  1. Olivetti, E. A. & Cullen, J. M. Toward a sustainable materials system. Science 360, 1396–1398 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Raabe, D., Tasan, C. C. & Olivetti, E. A. Strategies for improving the sustainability of structural metals. Nature 575, 64–74 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Stahel, W. R. The circular economy. Nature 531, 435–438 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Steel Statistical Yearbook (World Steel Association, Brussels, 2021).

  5. Energy Technology Perspectives 2017: Catalysing Energy Technology Transformations (International Energy Agency, 2017).

  6. Strezov, V., Evans, A. & Evans, T. Defining sustainability indicators of iron and steel production. J. Clean. Prod. 51, 66–70 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hasanbeigi, A., Arens, M., Cardenas, J. C. R., Price, L. & Triolo, R. Comparison of carbon dioxide emissions intensity of steel production in China, Germany, Mexico, and the United States. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 113, 127–139 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pauliuk, S., Milford, R. L., Müller, D. B. & Allwood, J. M. The steel scrap age. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 3448–3454 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bouaziz, O., Allain, S., Scott, C. P., Cugy, P. & Barbier, D. High manganese austenitic twinning induced plasticity steels: a review of the microstructure properties relationships. Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 15, 141–168 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rana, R. & Singh, S. B. Automotive Steels: Design, Metallurgy, Processing and Applications (Woodhead Publishing, 2016).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jalkanen, H. & Holappa, L. in Treatise on Process Metallurgy Vol. 3 (eds Seetharaman, S. et al.) 223–270 (Elsevier, 2014).

  12. Battlea, T., Srivastavaa, U., Kopfleb, J., Hunterb, R. & McClellanda, J. in Treatise on Process Metallurgy Vol. 3 (eds Seetharaman, S. et al.) 89–176 (Elsevier, 2013).

  13. Islam, M. S., Rhamdhani, M. A. & Brooks, G. A. Electrically enhanced boron removal from silicon using slag. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 45, 1–5 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Pal, U. B., MacDonald, S. A., Woolley, D. W. & Powell, A. C. Results demonstrating techniques for enhancing electrochemical reactions involving iron oxide in slags and C in liquid iron. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 36, 209–218 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kim, D. H., Kim, W. & Kang, Y. B. Electrochemical transfer of S between molten steel and molten slag. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 49, 1311–1321 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim, D. H., Kim, W. & Kang, Y. B. Electrochemical desulfurization of molten steel with molten slag: reaction rate and current efficiency. J. Electrochem. Soc. 165, E816–E825 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Novikov, V. K., Toporishchev, G. A. & Grebnev, S. A. Anodic polarisation of cast iron in a slag melt. Russ. Metall. 35–38 (1979).

  18. Bockris, J. O. M. Kinetics of activation controlled consecutive electrochemical reactions: anodic evolution of oxygen. J. Chem. Phys. 24, 817–827 (1956).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Conway, B. E. & Salomon, M. Electrochemical reaction orders: applications to the hydrogen- and oxygen-evolution reactions. Electrochim. Acta 9, 1599–1615 (1964).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Buler, P. I., Esin, O. A. & Nikitin, Yu. P. Influence of composition on the anodic polarization of alloys of iron with carbon and nickel. Sov. Electrochem. 3, 249–253 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sotnikov, A. I., Fugman, G. I. & Barmin, L. N. Anodic polarization of iron saturated with carbon in oxide melts. Fiz. Khim. Issled. Met. Protsessov 60–65 (1973).

  22. Woolley, D. E. & Pal, U. B. Experimental evidence for electrochemical nature of the reaction between iron oxide in calcia-silica-alumina slag and carbon in liquid iron. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 30, 877–889 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Min, D. J. & Fruehan, R. J. Rate of reduction of FeO in slag by Fe-C drops. Metall. Trans. B 23, 29–37 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Seo, J.-D. & Kim, S.-H. Reaction mechanism of FeO reduction by solid and dissolved carbon. Steel Res. 69, 307–311 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Chen, E. & Coley, K. S. Kinetic study of droplet swelling in BOF steelmaking. Ironmak. Steelmak. 37, 541–545 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Conway, B. E. & Conway, B. E. in Electrochemical Supercapacitors 221–257 (Springer, 1999).

  27. Kisza, A. The capacitance of the electric double layer of electrodes in molten salts. J. Electroanal. Chem. 534, 99–106 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Erdey-Grúz, T. Kinetics of Electrode Processes 34–35, 73–76 (Adam Hilger, 1972).

  29. Shercliff, J. A. Fluid motions due to an electric current source. J. Fluid Mech. 40, 241–250 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kelley, D. H. & Sadoway, D. R. Mixing in a liquid metal electrode. Phys. Fluids 26, 57102 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Jakse, N. et al. Interplay between non-bridging oxygen, triclusters, and fivefold Al coordination in low silica content calcium aluminosilicate melts. Appl. Phys. Lett. 101, 201903 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Franks, E. & Mukherjee, A. Anion distribution in alkaline silicates. J. Appl. Electrochem. 3, 179–184 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Strel’tsov, A. K., Esin, O. A. & Toporishchev, G. A. Investigation of reduction kinetics of silicon from molten oxides by potentiostatic method. Sov. Electrochem. 5, 145–150 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Richardson, F. D. Physical Chemistry of Melts in Metallurgy 495–497, 504–505 (Academic Press, 1974).

  35. Judge, W. D., Allanore, A., Sadoway, D. R. & Azimi, G. E-logpO2 diagrams for ironmaking by molten oxide electrolysis. Electrochim. Acta 247, 1088–1094 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Baucke, F. G. K. in Handbook of Reference Electrodes 229–241 (eds Inzelt, G., Lewenstam, A., Scholz, F.) (Springer, 2013).

  37. Boukamp, B. A. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy in solid state ionics: recent advances. Solid State Ion. 169, 65–73 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Boukamp, B. A. A linear Kronig-Kramers transform test for immittance data validation. J. Electrochem. Soc. 142, 1885–1894 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


G.A. gratefully acknowledges financial support from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (grant no. 503603), Ontario Centres of Excellence (grant no. 503616) and Tenova Goodfellow (grant no. 503604). We sincerely thank V. Scipolo and E. Malfa (Tenova Goodfellow) for their collaboration and invaluable feedback throughout the project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



G.A. conceived and supervised the research. W.D.J. and G.A. designed the electrochemical cell and electrochemical testing approach. W.D.J. and J.P. performed the experiments and characterization. W.D.J. analysed the results and draughted the manuscript. All authors contributed to discussing and revising the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gisele Azimi.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Materials thanks Geoffrey Brooks, Uday Pal, Umapada Pal and the other, anonymous, reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Plot of the interfacial capacitance determined by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy against carbon concentration in the alloy.

The strong correlation suggests carbon is associated with adsorbed species on the surface of molten iron.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Anodic polarization curves and exchange currents for Fe–0.45 wt% C at 1600, 1650, and 1700 °C.

Results show a the slope of the fitted lines become steeper with temperature as predicted by Tafel’s equation and b the activation energy for the Tafel exchange current is high (273 kJ mol–1) and consistent with activation control.

Extended Data Fig. 3 Interfacial capacitance of Fe–0.45 wt% C measured by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy as a function of temperature and anodic polarization.

a, Interfacial capacitance at the rest potential strongly increases with temperature which is consistent with pseudo-capacitance caused by adsorbed species on the surface of the electrodes. Double-layer capacitance should hardly change over a small interval of 100 °C. On the other hand, specific adsorption, which causes pseudo-capacitance, requires activation energy and explains the strong effect of temperature. b, Differential capacitance curves of Fe–0.45 wt% C at different temperatures show capacitance values diminish to low values on anodic polarization. As pseudo-capacitance caused by adsorbed intermediates depends on their surface coverage, the results are consistent with the proposed mechanism involving surface coverage of an intermediate approaching zero.

Extended Data Fig. 4 Electrochemical investigation of the cathodic half-cell corresponding to silicon reduction.

a, Schematic illustration of the electrochemical setup (to scale) for investigation of the silicon reduction reaction on a molybdenum electrode in the same slag used for electrorefining. b, Cyclic voltammogram at 1600 °C showing redox reactions for silicon and molybdenum (20 mV s–1, 95% iR compensation, 4th cycle, net charge passed was –0.71 C). c, Steady-state cathodic polarization curves reveal Tafel behaviour for silicon reduction at 1600, 1650, and 1700 °C (curves fully corrected for ohmic drop). d, Arrhenius plot of the Tafel exchange current reveals the activation energy (415 kJ mol–1) for the silicon reduction reaction. e, Diagnostic criteria derived for possible rate-determining steps and surface coverages (θ) of silicon reduction. See Supplementary Note 8 for more discussion.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–34, Tables 1–22, Notes 1–14 and video description.

Supplementary Video

Compilation of three parts showing submersion of counter electrodes in slag, gas evolution during operation of the electrorefining cell and raising of the electrodes after electrorefining. The video was filmed from a bird’s-eye view and is presented in real time.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Judge, W.D., Paeng, J. & Azimi, G. Electrorefining for direct decarburization of molten iron. Nat. Mater. 21, 1130–1136 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing