Despite progress in solid-state battery engineering, our understanding of the chemo-mechanical phenomena that govern electrochemical behaviour and stability at solid–solid interfaces remains limited compared to at solid–liquid interfaces. Here, we use operando synchrotron X-ray computed microtomography to investigate the evolution of lithium/solid-state electrolyte interfaces during battery cycling, revealing how the complex interplay among void formation, interphase growth and volumetric changes determines cell behaviour. Void formation during lithium stripping is directly visualized in symmetric cells, and the loss of contact that drives current constriction at the interface between lithium and the solid-state electrolyte (Li10SnP2S12) is quantified and found to be the primary cause of cell failure. The interphase is found to be redox-active upon charge, and global volume changes occur owing to partial molar volume mismatches at either electrode. These results provide insight into how chemo-mechanical phenomena can affect cell performance, thus facilitating the development of solid-state batteries.
This is a preview of subscription content
Subscribe to Nature+
Get immediate online access to the entire Nature family of 50+ journals
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $8.25 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Source data are provided with this paper. All other data that support results in this Article are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
MATLAB codes developed for segmentation and analysis of tomographic data in this paper are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Manthiram, A., Yu, X. & Wang, S. Lithium battery chemistries enabled by solid-state electrolytes. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2, 16103 (2017).
Famprikis, T., Canepa, P., Dawson, J. A., Islam, M. S. & Masquelier, C. Fundamentals of inorganic solid-state electrolytes for batteries. Nat. Mater. 18, 1278–1291 (2019).
Tan, D. H. S., Banerjee, A., Chen, Z. & Meng, Y. S. From nanoscale interface characterization to sustainable energy storage using all-solid-state batteries. Nat. Nanotechnol. 15, 170–180 (2020).
Janek, J. & Zeier, W. G. A solid future for battery development. Nat. Energy 1, 16141 (2016).
Zhang, Z. et al. New horizons for inorganic solid state ion conductors. Energy Environ. Sci. 11, 1945–1976 (2018).
Lewis, J. A., Tippens, J., Cortes, F. J. Q. & McDowell, M. T. Chemo-mechanical challenges in solid-state batteries. Trends Chem. 1, 845–857 (2019).
Xiao, Y. et al. Understanding interface stability in solid-state batteries. Nat. Rev. Mater. 5, 105–126 (2020).
Hatzell, K. B. et al. Challenges in lithium metal anodes for solid-state batteries. ACS Energy Lett. 5, 922–934 (2020).
Richards, W. D., Miara, L. J., Wang, Y., Kim, J. C. & Ceder, G. Interface stability in solid-state batteries. Chem. Mater. 28, 266–273 (2016).
Zhu, Y., He, X. & Mo, Y. Origin of outstanding stability in the lithium solid electrolyte materials: insights from thermodynamic analyses based on first-principles calculations. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7, 23685–23693 (2015).
Ong, S. P. et al. Phase stability, electrochemical stability and ionic conductivity of the Li10±1MP2X12 (M = Ge, Si, Sn, Al or P, and X = O, S or Se) family of superionic conductors. Energy Environ. Sci. 6, 148–156 (2013).
Wenzel, S. et al. Direct observation of the interfacial instability of the fast ionic conductor Li10GeP2S12 at the lithium metal anode. Chem. Mater. 28, 2400–2407 (2016).
Lewis, J. A. et al. Interphase morphology between a solid-state electrolyte and lithium controls cell failure. ACS Energy Lett. 4, 591–599 (2019).
Wenzel, S. et al. Interphase formation and degradation of charge transfer kinetics between a lithium metal anode and highly crystalline Li7P3S11 solid electrolyte. Solid State Ion. 286, 24–33 (2016).
Schwietert, T. K. et al. Clarifying the relationship between redox activity and electrochemical stability in solid electrolytes. Nat. Mater. 19, 428–435 (2020).
Cheng, E. J., Sharafi, A. & Sakamoto, J. Intergranular Li metal propagation through polycrystalline Li6.25Al0.25La3Zr2O12 ceramic electrolyte. Electrochim. Acta 223, 85–91 (2017).
Porz, L. et al. Mechanism of lithium metal penetration through inorganic solid electrolytes. Adv. Energy Mater. 7, 1701003 (2017).
Han, F. et al. High electronic conductivity as the origin of lithium dendrite formation within solid electrolytes. Nat. Energy 4, 187–196 (2019).
Kazyak, E. et al. Li penetration in ceramic solid electrolytes: operando microscopy analysis of morphology, propagation, and reversibility. Matter 2, 1025–1048 (2020).
Randau, S. et al. Benchmarking the performance of all-solid-state lithium batteries. Nat. Energy 5, 259–270 (2020).
Zhang, W. et al. (Electro)chemical expansion during cycling: monitoring the pressure changes in operating solid-state lithium batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 5, 9929–9936 (2017).
Koerver, R. et al. Chemo-mechanical expansion of lithium electrode materials – on the route to mechanically optimized all-solid-state batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 11, 2142–2158 (2018).
Tippens, J. et al. Visualizing chemomechanical degradation of a solid-state battery electrolyte. ACS Energy Lett. 4, 1475–1483 (2019).
Kasemchainan, J. et al. Critical stripping current leads to dendrite formation on plating in lithium anode solid electrolyte cells. Nat. Mater. 18, 1105–1111 (2019).
Wang, M. J., Choudhury, R. & Sakamoto, J. Characterizing the Li-solid-electrolyte interface dynamics as a function of stack pressure and current density. Joule 3, 2165–2178 (2019).
Pietsch, P. & Wood, V. X-ray tomography for lithium ion battery research: a practical guide. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 47, 451–479 (2017).
Lin, F. et al. Synchrotron X-ray analytical techniques for studying materials electrochemistry in rechargeable batteries. Chem. Rev. 117, 13123–13186 (2017).
Shen, F., Dixit, M. B., Xiao, X. & Hatzell, K. B. Effect of pore connectivity on Li dendrite propagation within LLZO electrolytes observed with synchrotron X-ray tomography. ACS Energy Lett. 3, 1056–1061 (2018).
Dixit, M. B. et al. Nanoscale mapping of extrinsic interfaces in hybrid solid electrolytes. Joule 4, 207–221 (2020).
Wu, X. et al. Operando visualization of morphological dynamics in all-solid-state batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 9, 1901547 (2019).
Sun, F. et al. Visualizing the morphological and compositional evolution of the interface of InLi-anode|thio-LISION electrolyte in an all-solid-state Li–S cell by in operando synchrotron X-ray tomography and energy dispersive diffraction. J. Mater. Chem. A 6, 22489–22496 (2018).
Kimura, Y. et al. Influence of active material loading on electrochemical reactions in composite solid-state battery electrodes revealed by operando 3D CT-XANES imaging. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 3, 7782–7793 (2020).
Dixit, M. B. et al. Synchrotron imaging of pore formation in Li metal solid-state batteries aided by machine learning. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.0c02053 (2020).
Seitzman, N. et al. Toward all-solid-state lithium batteries: three-dimensional visualization of lithium migration in β-Li3PS4 ceramic electrolyte. J. Electrochem. Soc. 165, A3732 (2018).
Doux, J. M. et al. Stack pressure considerations for room-temperature all-solid-state lithium metal batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 10, 1903253 (2020).
Harry, K. J., Hallinan, D. T., Parkinson, D. Y., MacDowell, A. A. & Balsara, N. P. Detection of subsurface structures underneath dendrites formed on cycled lithium metal electrodes. Nat. Mater. 13, 69–73 (2014).
Madsen, K. et al. Direct observation of interfacial mechanical failure in thiophosphate solid electrolytes with operando X‐ray tomography. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 7, 2000751 (2020).
Dixit, M. et al. In situ investigation of chemomechanical effects in thiophosphate solid electrolytes. Matter https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matt.2020.09.018 (2020).
Jolly, D. S. et al. Sodium/Na β″ alumina interface: effect of pressure on voids. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12, 678–685 (2019).
Neumann, A. et al. Analysis of interfacial effects in all-solid-state batteries with thiophosphate solid electrolytes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12, 9277–9291 (2020).
Bron, P. et al. Li10SnP2S12: an affordable lithium superionic conductor. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 15694–15697 (2013).
Tarhouchi, I., Viallet, V., Vinatier, P. & Ménétrier, M. Electrochemical characterization of Li10SnP2S12: an electrolyte or a negative electrode for solid state Li-ion batteries? Solid State Ion. 296, 18–25 (2016).
Zheng, B. et al. Unraveling (electro)-chemical stability and interfacial reactions of Li10SnP2S12 in all-solid-state Li batteries. Nano Energy 67, 104252 (2020).
Cortes, F. J. Q., Lewis, J. A., Tippens, J., Marchese, T. S. & McDowell, M. T. How metallic protection layers extend the lifetime of NASICON-based solid-state lithium batteries. J. Electrochem. Soc. 167, 050502 (2020).
Han, F., Gao, T., Zhu, Y., Gaskell, K. J. & Wang, C. A battery made from a single material. Adv. Mater. 27, 3473–3483 (2015).
Krauskopf, T., Hartmann, H., Zeier, W. G. & Janek, J. Toward a fundamental understanding of the lithium metal anode in solid-state batteries – an electrochemo-mechanical study on the garnet-type solid electrolyte Li6.25Al0.25La3Zr2O12. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11, 14463–14477 (2019).
Greenwood, J. A. Constriction resistance and the real area of contact. Brit. J. Appl. Phys. 17, 1621–1632 (1966).
Krauskopf, T., Richter, F. H., Zeier, W. G. & Janek, J. Physicochemical concepts of the lithium metal anode in solid-state batteries. Chem. Rev. 120, 7745–7794 (2020).
Ahmad, Z. & Viswanathan, V. Stability of electrodeposition at solid–solid interfaces and implications for metal anodes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 056003 (2017).
Mistry, A. & Mukherjee, P. P. Molar volume mismatch: a malefactor for irregular metallic electrodeposition with solid electrolytes. J. Electrochem. Soc. 167, 082510 (2020).
Gürsoy, D., de Carlo, F., Xiao, X. & Jacobsen, C. TomoPy: a framework for the analysis of synchrotron tomographic data. J. Synch. Radiat. 21, 1188–1193 (2014).
This work is partially supported by the National Science Foundation under Award No. DMR-1652471. M.T.M. acknowledges support from a Sloan Research Fellowship in Chemistry from the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation. J.A.L. acknowledges support from a NASA Space Technology Research Fellowship. F.J.Q.C. acknowledges support from the Colciencias-Fulbright scholarship programme cohort 2016. C.L. and H.L. acknowledge support from the Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy/Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (MOTIE/KETEP) (20194010000100). A portion of this work is supported by the Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR) under Grant FA9550-17-1-0130. P.P.M. acknowledges financial support from a Scialog programme sponsored jointly by the Research Corporation for Science Advancement and the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, which includes a grant to Purdue University by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation. This research used resources of the Advanced Photon Source, a US Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Science User Facility operated for the DOE Office of Science by Argonne National Laboratory under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review information Nature Materials thanks Ying Meng and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Lewis, J.A., Cortes, F.J.Q., Liu, Y. et al. Linking void and interphase evolution to electrochemistry in solid-state batteries using operando X-ray tomography. Nat. Mater. 20, 503–510 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-020-00903-2
Bridging nano- and microscale X-ray tomography for battery research by leveraging artificial intelligence
Nature Nanotechnology (2022)
Science China Chemistry (2021)