Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Visualization of dynamic polaronic strain fields in hybrid lead halide perovskites

Nature Materials volume 20, pages 618–623 (2021)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Excitation localization involving dynamic nanoscale distortions is a central aspect of photocatalysis1, quantum materials2 and molecular optoelectronics3. Experimental characterization of such distortions requires techniques sensitive to the formation of point-defect-like local structural rearrangements in real time. Here, we visualize excitation-induced strain fields in a prototypical member of the lead halide perovskites4 via femtosecond resolution diffuse X-ray scattering measurements. This enables momentum-resolved phonon spectroscopy of the locally distorted structure and reveals radially expanding nanometre-scale strain fields associated with the formation and relaxation of polarons in photoexcited perovskites. Quantitative estimates of the magnitude and shape of this polaronic distortion are obtained, providing direct insights into the dynamic structural distortions that occur in these materials5,6,7,8,9. Optical pump–probe reflection spectroscopy corroborates these results and shows how these large polaronic distortions transiently modify the carrier effective mass, providing a unified picture of the coupled structural and electronic dynamics that underlie the optoelectronic functionality of the hybrid perovskites.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it

$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Experimental setup and observation of temporally delayed transient structural responses.
Fig. 2: Phonon-momentum-resolved time scans for selected Bragg peaks.
Fig. 3: Analytical model for diffuse scattering from expanding polaronic strains.
Fig. 4: Ultrafast transient reflectivity studies and effects of polaron formation on optoelectronic properties.

Data availability

The data represented in Figs. 1, 2, 3 and 4 are provided with the paper as source data. Other datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available from A.M.L. upon reasonable request. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. Carneiro, L. M. et al. Excitation-wavelength-dependent small polaron trapping of photoexcited carriers in α-Fe2O3. Nat. Mater. 16, 819–825 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Koepsell, J. et al. Imaging magnetic polarons in the doped Fermi–Hubbard model. Nature 572, 358–362 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Fratini, S., Ciuchi, S., Mayou, D., Trambly de Laissardière, G. & Troisi, A. A map of high-mobility molecular semiconductors. Nat. Mater. 16, 998–1002 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Brenner, T. M., Egger, D. A., Kronik, L., Hodes, G. & Cahen, D. Hybrid organic–inorganic perovskites: low-cost semiconductors with intriguing charge-transport properties. Nat. Rev. Mater. 1, 15007 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Zheng, F. & Wang, L.-w Large polaron formation and its effect on electron transport in hybrid perovskites. Energy Environ. Sci. 12, 1219–1230 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Miyata, K. et al. Large polarons in lead halide perovskites. Sci. Adv. 3, e1701217 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ghosh, D., Welch, E., Neukirch, A. J., Zakhidov, A. & Tretiak, S. Polarons in halide perovskites: a perspective. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 11, 3271–3286 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lan, Y. et al. Ultrafast correlated charge and lattice motion in a hybrid metal halide perovskite. Sci. Adv. 5, eaaw5558 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Guzelturk, B. et al. Terahertz emission from hybrid perovskites driven by ultrafast charge separation and strong electron–phonon coupling. Adv. Mater. 30, 1704737 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Stranks, S. D. & Plochocka, P. The influence of the Rashba effect. Nat. Mater. 17, 381–382 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Frost, J. M. et al. Atomistic origins of high-performance in hybrid halide perovskite solar cells. Nano Lett. 14, 2584–2590 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wu, X. et al. Light-induced picosecond rotational disordering of the inorganic sublattice in hybrid perovskites. Sci. Adv. 3, e1602388 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cinquanta, E. et al. Ultrafast THz probe of photoinduced polarons in lead-halide perovskites. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 166601 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Thouin, F. et al. Phonon coherences reveal the polaronic character of excitons in two-dimensional lead halide perovskites. Nat. Mater. 18, 349–356 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Miyata, K. & Zhu, X.-Y. Ferroelectric large polarons. Nat. Mater. 17, 379–381 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Guo, Y. et al. Dynamic emission Stokes shift and liquid-like dielectric solvation of band edge carriers in lead-halide perovskites. Nat. Commun. 10, 1175 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Anusca, I. et al. Dielectric response: answer to many questions in the methylammonium lead halide solar cell absorbers. Adv. Energy Mater. 7, 1700600 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chollet, M. et al. The X-ray pump–probe instrument at the Linac Coherent Light Source. J. Synchrotron Rad. 22, 503–507 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Peisl, H. Defect properties from X-ray scattering experiments. J. Phys. Colloq. 37, C7–C47 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lindenberg, A. M. et al. Time-resolved X-ray diffraction from coherent phonons during a laser-induced phase transition. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 111–114 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Larsson, J. et al. Picosecond X-ray diffraction studies of laser-excited acoustic phonons in InSb. Appl. Phys. A 75, 467–478 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Fultz, B. & Howe, J. M. Transmission Electron Microscopy and Diffractometry of Materials (Springer-Verlag, 2013).

  23. Sendner, M. et al. Optical phonons in methylammonium lead halide perovskites and implications for charge transport. Mater. Horiz. 3, 613–620 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Jani, H. & Duan, L. Time-frequency spectroscopy of GaAs transient dispersion using few-cycle pump-probe reflectometry. Phys. Rev. Appl. 13, 054010 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Shcherbakov, M. R. et al. Ultrafast all-optical tuning of direct-gap semiconductor metasurfaces. Nat. Commun. 8, 17 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bennett, B. R., Soref, R. A. & Del Alamo, J. A. Carrier-induced change in refractive index of InP, GaAs and InGaAsP. IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 26, 113–122 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Walsh, A., Da Silva, J. L. F. & Wei, S.-H. Origins of band-gap renormalization in degenerately doped semiconductors. Phys. Rev. B 78, 075211 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Berggren, K. F. & Sernelius, B. E. Band-gap narrowing in heavily doped many-valley semiconductors. Phys. Rev. B 24, 1971–1986 (1981).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Smart, T. J., Pham, T. A., Ping, Y. & Ogitsu, T. Optical absorption induced by small polaron formation in transition metal oxides: the case of Co3O4. Phys. Rev. Mater. 3, 102401 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. van Mechelen, J. L. M. et al. Electron-phonon interaction and charge carrier mass enhancement in SrTiO3. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 226403 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the US Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Materials Sciences and Engineering, under contract no. DE-AC02-76SF00515 (B.G., M.T., S.T., G.A.D.L.P., H.I.K. and A.M.L.). Use of the Linac Coherent Light Source (LCLS), SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, is supported by the US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences under contract no. DE-AC02-76SF00515. M.D.S. is supported by a graduate fellowship from the Center for Molecular Analysis and Design (CMAD) at Stanford University. T.W. and F.D. acknowledge funding from an EPSRC NI grant (EP/R044481/1). S.F. acknowledges funding from the EPSRC and the Studienstiftung des deutschen Volkes. T.J.W.V.D.G. acknowledges support from the EPSRC Cambridge NanoDTC, EP/L015978/1 and the Schiff Foundation. S.A.B. acknowledges support from the EPSRC Centre for Doctoral Training in Graphene Technology (EP/L016087/1). F.D. acknowledges support from the DFG Emmy Noether Programme (project no. 387651688) and the Winton Programme for the Physics of Sustainability. T.W. received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement no. 838772. M.F.T. and H.-G.S. acknowledge support from the Center for Hybrid Organic Inorganic Semiconductors for Energy (CHOISE), an Energy Frontier Research Center funded by the Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Office of Science within the US Department of Energy through contract no. DE-AC36-08G028308 for assistance with the LCLS experiments and interpretation. We thank Y. Rakita for support with single crystal growth.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Stanford Institute for Materials and Energy Sciences, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, CA, USA

    Burak Guzelturk, Mariano Trigo, Samuel W. Teitelbaum, Gilberto A. de la Pena, Hemamala I. Karunadasa & Aaron M. Lindenberg

  2. Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA

    Burak Guzelturk & Aaron M. Lindenberg

  3. X-ray Science Division, Advanced Photon Source, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL, USA

    Burak Guzelturk

  4. Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

    Thomas Winkler, Tim W. J. Van de Goor, Sean A. Bourelle, Sascha Feldmann & Felix Deschler

  5. Department of Physics and Astronomy, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark

    Thomas Winkler

  6. Department of Chemistry, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA

    Matthew D. Smith & Hemamala I. Karunadasa

  7. Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory Lightsource, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, CA, USA

    Hans-Georg Steinrück & Michael F. Toney

  8. Department of Chemistry, Paderborn University, Paderborn, Germany

    Hans-Georg Steinrück

  9. Linac Coherent Light Source, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, CA, USA

    Roberto Alonso-Mori, Diling Zhu & Takahiro Sato

  10. Walter Schottky Institute, Department of Physics, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany

    Felix Deschler

  11. PULSE Institute, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, CA, USA

    Aaron M. Lindenberg

Authors
  1. Burak Guzelturk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Thomas Winkler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tim W. J. Van de Goor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Matthew D. Smith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sean A. Bourelle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Sascha Feldmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Mariano Trigo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Samuel W. Teitelbaum
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Hans-Georg Steinrück
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Gilberto A. de la Pena
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Roberto Alonso-Mori
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Diling Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Takahiro Sato
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Hemamala I. Karunadasa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Michael F. Toney
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Felix Deschler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Aaron M. Lindenberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

A.M.L., B.G. and M.D.S. conceived the experiment; B.G. led the LCLS experimental team consisting of B.G., T.J.W.V.D.G., M.D.S., M.T., S.T., H.-G.S., G.A.D.L.P., R.A.-M., T.S. and A.M.L. Data analysis of the time-resolved X-ray scattering measurements was performed by B.G. with contributions from T.J.W.V.D.G., M.T. and S.T. The data were interpreted by B.G. and A.M.L. with contributions from T.J.W.V.D.G., H.-G.S., M.T., S.T., M.F.T. and F.D. Perovskite single crystal samples were synthesized by M.D.S. who also performed their static characterizations. A.M.L. performed the polaron model calculations. T.W., S.A.B., S.F. and F.D. performed the transient reflectivity measurements. S.F. performed the transient grating photoluminescence measurements and static optical characterization. T.W. and F.D. analysed and interpreted the transient reflectivity data. A.M.L., F.D., M.F.T., H.I.K. and D.Z. supervised the research. B.G., A.M.L., T.W. and F.D. wrote the paper with contributions from all authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aaron M. Lindenberg.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Materials thanks Paul Beaud, Elbert Chia and Sergei Tretiak for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–17, Sections 1–11 and refs. 1–29.

Source data

Source Data Fig. 1

Source data for Fig. 1 with each panel given as different tab.

Source Data Fig. 2

Source data for Figure 2 with each panel given as different tab.

Source Data Fig. 3

Source data for Figure 3 with each panel given as different tab.

Source Data Fig. 4

Source data for Figure 4 with each panel given as different tab.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guzelturk, B., Winkler, T., Van de Goor, T.W.J. et al. Visualization of dynamic polaronic strain fields in hybrid lead halide perovskites. Nat. Mater. 20, 618–623 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-020-00865-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-020-00865-5

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing