Graphene bilayers with a twist


Near a magic twist angle, bilayer graphene transforms from a weakly correlated Fermi liquid to a strongly correlated two-dimensional electron system with properties that are extraordinarily sensitive to carrier density and to controllable environmental factors such as the proximity of nearby gates and twist-angle variation. Among other phenomena, magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene hosts superconductivity, interaction-induced insulating states, magnetism, electronic nematicity, linear-in-temperature low-temperature resistivity and quantized anomalous Hall states. We highlight some key research results in this field, point to important questions that remain open and comment on the place of magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene in the strongly correlated quantum matter world.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Structure of monolayer graphene and TBG.
Fig. 2: Electronic properties of TBG.
Fig. 3: Comparison of MATBG and high-temperature superconductors.
Fig. 4: Flat-band MATBG observed with local probes.
Fig. 5: Nematicity and multiple superconducting domes in MATBG.
Fig. 6: Moiré bands and Fermi surface.
Fig. 7: Beyond MATBG.


  1. 1.

    Novoselov, K. S. et al. Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science 306, 666–669 (2004).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Geim, A. K. & Grigorieva, I. V. Van der Waals heterostructures. Nature 499, 419–425 (2013).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Mounet, N. et al. Two-dimensional materials from high-throughput computational exfoliation of experimentally known compounds. Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 246–252 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Levy, N. et al. Strain-induced pseudo-magnetic fields greater than 300 tesla in graphene nanobubbles. Science 329, 544–547 (2010).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Reserbat-Plantey, A. et al. Strain superlattices and macroscale suspension of graphene induced by corrugated substrates. Nano Lett. 14, 5044–5051 (2014).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Carrillo-Bastos, R. et al. Strained fold-assisted transport in graphene systems. Phys. Rev. B 94, 125422 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Jiang, Y. et al. Visualizing strain-induced pseudomagnetic fields in graphene through an hBN magnifying glass. Nano Lett. 17, 2839–2843 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Nigge, P. et al. Room temperature strain-induced Landau levels in graphene on a wafer-scale platform. Sci. Adv. 5, eaaw5593 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Zhang, Y., Kim, Y., Gilbert, M. J. & Mason, N. Magnetotransport in a strain superlattice of graphene. Appl. Phys. Lett. 115, 143508 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Mao, J. et al. Evidence of flat bands and correlated states in buckled graphene superlattices. Nature 584, 215–220 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Banerjee, R. et al. Strain modulated superlattices in graphene. Nano Lett. 20, 3113–3121 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Ugeda, M. M., Brihuega, I., Guinea, F. & Gomez-Rodriguez, J. M. Missing atom as a source of carbon magnetism. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 096804 (2010).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Jiang, Y. et al. Inducing Kondo screening of vacancy magnetic moments in graphene with gating and local curvature. Nat. Commun. 9, 2349 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    May, D. et al. Modeling of the gate-controlled Kondo effect at carbon point defects in graphene. Phys. Rev. B 97, 155419 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Li, G. et al. Observation of Van Hove singularities in twisted graphene layers. Nat. Phys. 6, 109–113 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Kim, K. et al. Van der Waals heterostructures with high accuracy rotational alignment. Nano Lett. 16, 1989–1995 (2016).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Luican, A. et al. Single-layer behavior and its breakdown in twisted graphene layers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 126802 (2011).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Lopes dos Santos, J. M. B., Peres, N. M. R. & Castro Neto, A. H. Graphene bilayer with a twist: electronic structure. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 256802 (2007).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Bistritzer, R. & MacDonald, A. H. Transport between twisted graphene layers. Phys. Rev. B 81, 245412 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Suárez Morell, E., Correa, J. D., Vargas, P., Pacheco, M. & Barticevic, Z. Flat bands in slightly twisted bilayer graphene: tight-binding calculations. Phys. Rev. B 82, 121407 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Cao, Y. et al. Correlated insulator behaviour at half-filling in magic-angle graphene superlattices. Nature 556, 80–84 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Cao, Y. et al. Unconventional superconductivity in magic-angle graphene superlattices. Nature 556, 43–50 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Lu, X. et al. Superconductors, orbital magnets and correlated states in magic-angle bilayer graphene. Nature 574, 653–657 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Kerelsky, A. et al. Maximized electron interactions at the magic angle in twisted bilayer graphene. Nature 572, 95–100 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Jiang, Y. et al. Charge order and broken rotational symmetry in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene. Nature 573, 91–95 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Xie, Y. et al. Spectroscopic signatures of many-body correlations in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene. Nature 572, 101–105 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Choi, Y. et al. Electronic correlations in twisted bilayer graphene near the magic angle. Nat. Phys. 15, 1174–1180 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Liu, X. et al. Tunable spin-polarized correlated states in twisted double bilayer graphene. Nature 583, 221–225 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Cao, Y. et al. Tunable correlated states and spin-polarized phases in twisted bilayer–bilayer graphene. Nature 583, 215–220 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Chen, G. et al. Signatures of tunable superconductivity in a trilayer graphene moiré superlattice. Nature 572, 215–219 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Shen, C. et al. Correlated states in twisted double bilayer graphene. Nat. Phys. 16, 520–525 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Regan, E. C. et al. Mott and generalized Wigner crystal states in WSe2/WS2 moiré superlattices. Nature 579, 359–363 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Wang, L. et al. Correlated electronic phases in twisted bilayer transition metal dichalcogenides. Nat. Mater. 19, 861–866 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Tang, Y. et al. Simulation of Hubbard model physics in WSe2/WS2 moiré superlattices. Nature 579, 353–358 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Castro Neto, A. H., Guinea, F., Peres, N. M. R., Novoselov, K. S. & Geim, A. K. The electronic properties of graphene. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 109 (2009).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Andrei, E. Y., Li, G. H. & Du, X. Electronic properties of graphene: a perspective from scanning tunneling microscopy and magnetotransport. Rep. Prog. Phys. 75, 056501 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Abergel, D. S. L., Apalkov, V., Berashevich, J., Ziegler, K. & Chakraborty, T. Properties of graphene: a theoretical perspective. Adv. Phys. 59, 261–482 (2010).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Mañes, J. L., Guinea, F. & Vozmediano, M. A. H. Existence and topological stability of Fermi points in multilayered graphene. Phys. Rev. B 75, 155424 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Gomes, K. K., Mar, W., Ko, W., Guinea, F. & Manoharan, H. C. Designer Dirac fermions and topological phases in molecular graphene. Nature 483, 306–310 (2012).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Tarruell, L., Greif, D., Uehlinger, T., Jotzu, G. & Esslinger, T. Creating, moving and merging Dirac points with a Fermi gas in a tunable honeycomb lattice. Nature 483, 302–305 (2012).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Balendhran, S., Walia, S., Nili, H., Sriram, S. & Bhaskaran, M. Elemental analogues of graphene: silicene, germanene, stanene, and phosphorene. Small 11, 640–652 (2015).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Albrecht, T. R., Mizes, H. A., Nogami, J., Park, S. & Quate, C. F. Observation of tilt boundaries in graphite by scanning tunneling microscopy and associated multiple tip effects. Appl. Phys. Lett. 52, 362 (1988).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Tarnopolsky, G., Kruchkov, A. J. & Vishwanath, A. Origin of magic angles in twisted bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 106405 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Liu, J., Liu, J. & Dai, X. Pseudo Landau level representation of twisted bilayer graphene: band topology and implications on the correlated insulating phase. Phys. Rev. B 99, 155415 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Carr, S., Fang, S., Zhu, Z. & Kaxiras, E. Exact continuum model for low-energy electronic states of twisted bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. Res. 1, 013001 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Lu, C.-P. et al. Local, global, and nonlinear screening in twisted double-layer graphene. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 6623–6628 (2016).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Martin, J. et al. Observation of electron–hole puddles in graphene using a scanning single-electron transistor. Nat. Phys. 4, 144–148 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Bistritzer, R. & MacDonald, A. H. Moire bands in twisted double-layer graphene. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 12233–12237 (2011).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Mele, E. J. Commensuration and interlayer coherence in twisted bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. B 81, 161405 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Shallcross, S., Sharma, S., Kandelaki, E. & Pankratov, O. A. Electronic structure of turbostratic graphene. Phys. Rev. B 81, 165105 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    MacDonald, A. H. & Bistritzer, R. Graphene moiré mystery solved? Nature 474, 453–454 (2011).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Bistritzer, R. & MacDonald, A. H. Moiré butterflies in twisted bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. B 84, 035440 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    de Gail, R., Goerbig, M. O., Guinea, F., Montambaux, G. & Castro Neto, A. H. Topologically protected zero modes in twisted bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. B 84, 045436 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Mele, E. J. Band symmetries and singularities in twisted multilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. B 84, 235439 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Ohta, T. et al. Evidence for interlayer coupling and moiré periodic potentials in twisted bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 186807 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Kim, K. et al. Raman spectroscopy study of rotated double-layer graphene: misorientation-angle dependence of electronic structure. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 246103 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Moon, P. & Koshino, M. Optical absorption in twisted bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. B 87, 205404 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Ren, Y., Gao, Q., MacDonald, A. H. & Niu, Q. WKB estimate of bilayer graphene’s magic twist angles. Preprint at (2020).

  59. 59.

    Fang, S. & Kaxiras, E. Electronic structure theory of weakly interacting bilayers. Phys. Rev. B 93, 235153 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Carr, S. et al. Relaxation and domain formation in incommensurate two-dimensional heterostructures. Phys. Rev. B 98, 224102 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Fang, S., Carr, S., Zhu, Z., Massatt, D. & Kaxiras, E. Angle-dependent ab initio low-energy Hamiltonians for a relaxed twisted bilayer graphene heterostructure. Preprint at (2019).

  62. 62.

    Carr, S. et al. Twistronics: manipulating the electronic properties of two-dimensional layered structures through their twist angle. Phys. Rev. B 95, 075420 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Peltonen, T. J., Ojajärvi, R. & Heikkilä, T. T. Mean-field theory for superconductivity in twisted bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. B 98, 220504 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Song, Z. et al. All magic angles in twisted bilayer graphene are topological. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 036401 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Sharpe, A. L. et al. Emergent ferromagnetism near three-quarters filling in twisted bilayer graphene. Science 365, 605–608 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Serlin, M. et al. Intrinsic quantized anomalous Hall effect in a moiré heterostructure. Science 367, 900–903 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Wu, S., Zhang, Z., Watanabe, K., Taniguchi, T. & Andrei, E. Y. Chern insulators and topological flat-bands in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene. Preprint at (2020).

  68. 68.

    Nuckolls, K. P. et al. Strongly correlated Chern insulators in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene. Preprint at (2020).

  69. 69.

    Saito, Y. et al. Hofstadter subband ferromagnetism and symmetry broken Chern insulators in twisted bilayer graphene. Preprint at (2020).

  70. 70.

    Zondiner, U. et al. Cascade of phase transitions and Dirac revivals in magic-angle graphene. Nature 582, 203–208 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Wong, D. et al. Cascade of electronic transitions in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene. Nature 582, 198–202 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Guinea, F. & Walet, N. R. Electrostatic effects, band distortions, and superconductivity in twisted graphene bilayers. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 13174–13179 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Xie, M. & MacDonald, A. H. Nature of the correlated insulator states in twisted bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 097601 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Haule, M., Andrei, E. Y. & Haule, K. The Mott-semiconducting state in the magic angle bilayer graphene. Preprint at (2019).

  75. 75.

    Dean, C. R. et al. Boron nitride substrates for high-quality graphene electronics. Nat. Nanotechnol. 5, 722–726 (2010).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Mayorov, A. S. et al. Micrometer-scale ballistic transport in encapsulated graphene at room temperature. Nano Lett. 11, 2396–2399 (2011).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Koshino, M. et al. Maximally localized Wannier orbitals and the extended Hubbard model for twisted bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. X 8, 031087 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Po, H. C., Zou, L., Vishwanath, A. & Senthil, T. Origin of Mott insulating behavior and superconductivity in twisted bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. X 8, 031089 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Yuan, N. F. Q. & Fu, L. Model for the metal–insulator transition in graphene superlattices and beyond. Phys. Rev. B 98, 045103 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Xu, C. & Balents, L. Topological superconductivity in twisted multilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 087001 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Kang, J. & Vafek, O. Symmetry, maximally localized Wannier states, and a low-energy model for twisted bilayer graphene narrow bands. Phys. Rev. X 8, 031088 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Dodaro, J. F., Kivelson, S. A., Schattner, Y., Sun, X. Q. & Wang, C. Phases of a phenomenological model of twisted bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. B 98, 075154 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Padhi, B., Setty, C. & Phillips, P. W. Doped twisted bilayer graphene near magic angles: proximity to Wigner crystallization, not Mott insulation. Nano Lett. 18, 6175–6180 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Xu, X. Y., Law, K. T. & Lee, P. A. Kekulé valence bond order in an extended Hubbard model on the honeycomb lattice with possible applications to twisted bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. B 98, 121406 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Wu, F., MacDonald, A. H. & Martin, I. Theory of phonon-mediated superconductivity in twisted bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 257001 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Guinea, F. & Walet, N. R. Continuum models for twisted bilayer graphene: effect of lattice deformation and hopping parameters. Phys. Rev. B 99, 205134 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Shaginyan, V. R., Msezane, A. Z., Stephanovich, V. A., Japaridze, G. S. & Kirichenko, E. V. Flat bands and strongly correlated Fermi systems. Phys. Scripta 94, 065801 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Beechem, T. E., Ohta, T., Diaconescu, B. & Robinson, J. T. Rotational disorder in twisted bilayer graphene. ACS Nano 8, 1655–1663 (2014).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Yankowitz, M. et al. Tuning superconductivity in twisted bilayer graphene. Science 263, 1059–1064 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Carr, S., Fang, S., Jarillo-Herrero, P. & Kaxiras, E. Pressure dependence of the magic twist angle in graphene superlattices. Phys. Rev. B 98, 085144 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Uri, A. et al. Mapping the twist-angle disorder and Landau levels in magic-angle graphene. Nature 581, 47–52 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Purdie, D. G. et al. Cleaning interfaces in layered materials heterostructures. Nat. Commun. 9, 5387 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Li, G. & Andrei, E. Y. Observation of Landau levels of Dirac fermions in graphite. Nat. Phys. 3, 623–627 (2007).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Luican, A., Li, G. & Andrei, E. Y. Scanning tunneling microscopy and spectroscopy of graphene layers on graphite. Solid State Commun. 149, 1151–1156 (2009).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Meyer, J. C. et al. Direct imaging of lattice atoms and topological defects in graphene membranes. Nano Lett. 8, 3582–3586 (2008).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Ugeda, M. M., Brihuega, I., Guinea, F. & Gómez-Rodríguez, J. M. Missing atom as a source of carbon magnetism. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 096804 (2010).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Mao, J. et al. Realization of a tunable artificial atom at a charged vacancy in graphene. Nat. Phys. 12, 545–549 (2016).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Luican, A., Li, G. & Andrei, E. Y. Quantized Landau level spectrum and its density dependence in graphene. Phys. Rev. B 83, 041405 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    Li, G., Luican, A. & Andrei, E. Y. Self-navigation of a scanning tunneling microscope tip toward a micron-sized graphene sample. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 82, 073701 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  100. 100.

    Trambly de Laissardière, G., Mayou, D. & Magaud, L. Localization of Dirac electrons in rotated graphene bilayers. Nano Lett. 10, 804–808 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  101. 101.

    Yin, L.-J., Qiao, J.-B., Zuo, W.-J., Li, W.-T. & He, L. Experimental evidence for non-Abelian gauge potentials in twisted graphene bilayers. Phys. Rev. B 92, 081406 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  102. 102.

    Wilson, J. H., Fu, Y., Das Sarma, S. & Pixley, J. H. Disorder in twisted bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 023325 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  103. 103.

    Cao, Y. et al. Strange metal in magic-angle graphene with near Planckian dissipation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 076801 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  104. 104.

    Lee, P. A., Nagaosa, N. & Wen, X.-G. Doping a Mott insulator: physics of high-temperature superconductivity. Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 17–85 (2006).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  105. 105.

    Keimer, B., Kivelson, S. A., Norman, M. R., Uchida, S. & Zaanen, J. From quantum matter to high-temperature superconductivity in copper oxides. Nature 518, 179–186 (2015).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  106. 106.

    Proust, C. & Taillefer, L. The remarkable underlying ground states of cuprate superconductors. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 10, 409–429 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  107. 107.

    Mukhopadhyay, S. et al. Evidence for a vestigial nematic state in the cuprate pseudogap phase. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 13249 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  108. 108.

    Chubukov, A. Pairing mechanism in Fe-based superconductors. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 3, 57–92 (2012).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  109. 109.

    Fernandes, R. M., Chubukov, A. V. & Schmalian, J. What drives nematic order in iron-based superconductors? Nat. Phys. 10, 97–104 (2014).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  110. 110.

    Renner, C., Revaz, B., Genoud, J. Y., Kadowaki, K. & Fischer, Ø. Pseudogap precursor of the superconducting gap in under- and overdoped Bi2SrCaCu2O8. Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 149–152 (1998).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  111. 111.

    Kanigel, A. et al. Evolution of the pseudogap from Fermi arcs to the nodal liquid. Nat. Phys. 2, 447–451 (2006).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  112. 112.

    Shimojima, T. et al. Pseudogap formation above the superconducting dome in iron pnictides. Phys. Rev. B 89, 045101 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  113. 113.

    Löhneysen, Hv., Rosch, A., Vojta, M. & Wölfle, P. Fermi-liquid instabilities at magnetic quantum phase transitions. Rev. Mod. Phys. 79, 1015–1075 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  114. 114.

    Takagi, H. et al. Systematic evolution of temperature-dependent resistivity in LaCuO. Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2975–2978 (1992).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  115. 115.

    Giraldo-Gallo, P. et al. Scale-invariant magnetoresistance in a cuprate superconductor. Science 361, 479–481 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  116. 116.

    Bruin, J. A. N., Sakai, H., Perry, R. S. & Mackenzie, A. P. Similarity of scattering rates in metals showing T-linear resistivity. Science 339, 804–807 (2013).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  117. 117.

    Legros, A. et al. Universal T-linear resistivity and Planckian dissipation in overdoped cuprates. Nat. Phys. 15, 142–147 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  118. 118.

    Zaanen, J. Why the temperature is high. Nature 430, 512–513 (2004).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  119. 119.

    Polshyn, H. et al. Large linear-in-temperature resistivity in twisted bilayer graphene. Nat. Phys. 15, 1011–1016 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  120. 120.

    Cao, Y. et al. Nematicity and competing orders in superconducting magic-angle graphene. Preprint at (2020).

  121. 121.

    Giovannetti, G., Khomyakov, P. A., Brocks, G., Kelly, P. J. & van den Brink, J. Substrate-induced band gap in graphene on hexagonal boron nitride: ab initio density functional calculations. Phys. Rev. B 76, 073103 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  122. 122.

    Pixley, J. H. & Andrei, E. Y. Ferromagnetism in magic-angle graphene. Science 365, 543 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  123. 123.

    Zhu, J., Su, J. & MacDonald, A. H. The curious magnetic properties of orbital Chern insulators. Preprint at (2020).

  124. 124.

    Bultinck, N., Chatterjee, S. & Zaletel, M. P. Mechanism for anomalous Hall ferromagnetism in twisted bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 166601 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  125. 125.

    Zou, L., Po, H. C., Vishwanath, A. & Senthil, T. Band structure of twisted bilayer graphene: emergent symmetries, commensurate approximants, and Wannier obstructions. Phys. Rev. B 98, 085435 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  126. 126.

    Peotta, S. & Törmä, P. Superfluidity in topologically nontrivial flat bands. Nat. Commun. 6, 8944 (2015).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  127. 127.

    Liang, L. et al. Band geometry, Berry curvature, and superfluid weight. Phys. Rev. B 95, 024515 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  128. 128.

    Zhang, Y.-H., Mao, D. & Senthil, T. Twisted bilayer graphene aligned with hexagonal boron nitride: anomalous Hall effect and a lattice model. Phys. Rev. Res. 1, 033126 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  129. 129.

    Huertas-Hernando, D., Guinea, F. & Brataas, A. Spin–orbit coupling in curved graphene, fullerenes, nanotubes, and nanotube caps. Phys. Rev. B 74, 155426 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  130. 130.

    Min, H. et al. Intrinsic and Rashba spin–orbit interactions in graphene sheets. Phys. Rev. B 74, 165310 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  131. 131.

    Khalaf, E., Chatterjee, S., Bultinck, N., Zaletel, M. P. & Vishwanath, A. Charged skyrmions and topological origin of superconductivity in magic angle graphene. Preprint at (2020).

  132. 132.

    Po, H. C., Zou, L., Senthil, T. & Vishwanath, A. Faithful tight-binding models and fragile topology of magic-angle bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. B 99, 195455 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  133. 133.

    Hu, X., Hyart, T., Pikulin, D. I. & Rossi, E. Geometric and conventional contribution to the superfluid weight in twisted bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 237002 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  134. 134.

    Xie, F., Song, Z., Lian, B. & Bernevig, B. A. Topology-bounded superfluid weight in twisted bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 167002 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  135. 135.

    Julku, A., Peltonen, T. J., Liang, L., Heikkilä, T. T. & Törmä, P. Superfluid weight and Berezinskii–Kosterlitz–Thouless transition temperature of twisted bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. B 101, 060505 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  136. 136.

    Rademaker, L. & Mellado, P. Charge-transfer insulation in twisted bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. B 98, 235158 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  137. 137.

    Xie, M. & MacDonald, A. H. Weak-field Hall resistivity and spin/valley flavor symmetry breaking in MAtBG. Preprint at (2010).

  138. 138.

    Utama, M. I. B. et al. Visualization of the flat electronic band in twisted bilayer graphene near the magic angle twist. Nat. Phys. (2020).

  139. 139.

    Wu, F., Hwang, E. & Das Sarma, S. Phonon-induced giant linear-in-T resistivity in magic angle twisted bilayer graphene: ordinary strangeness and exotic superconductivity. Phys. Rev. B 99, 165112 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  140. 140.

    Choi, Y. W. & Choi, H. J. Strong electron–phonon coupling, electron–hole asymmetry, and nonadiabaticity in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. B 98, 241412 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  141. 141.

    Lian, B., Wang, Z. & Bernevig, B. A. Twisted bilayer graphene: a phonon-driven superconductor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 257002 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  142. 142.

    Liu, C.-C., Zhang, L.-D., Chen, W.-Q. & Yang, F. Chiral spin density wave and d + id superconductivity in the magic-angle-twisted bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 217001 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  143. 143.

    Isobe, H., Yuan, N. F. Q. & Fu, L. Unconventional superconductivity and density waves in twisted bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. X 8, 041041 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  144. 144.

    González, J. & Stauber, T. Kohn–Luttinger superconductivity in twisted bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 026801 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  145. 145.

    Stepanov, P. et al. The interplay of insulating and superconducting orders in magic-angle graphene bilayers. Preprint at (2019).

  146. 146.

    Kauppila, V. J., Aikebaier, F. & Heikkilä, T. T. Flat-band superconductivity in strained Dirac materials. Phys. Rev. B 93, 214505 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  147. 147.

    McGilly, L. J. et al. Visualization of moiré superlattices. Nat. Nanotechnol. 15, 580–584 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  148. 148.

    Rickhaus, P. et al. Transport through a network of topological channels in twisted bilayer graphene. Nano Lett. 18, 6725–6730 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  149. 149.

    Huang, S. et al. Topologically protected helical states in minimally twisted bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 037702 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  150. 150.

    Kim, K. et al. Tunable moiré bands and strong correlations in small-twist-angle bilayer graphene. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 3364–3369 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  151. 151.

    Yoo, H. et al. Atomic and electronic reconstruction at the van der Waals interface in twisted bilayer graphene. Nat. Mater. 18, 448–453 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


E.Y.A. acknowledges support from DOE (DOE-FG02-99ER45742) and the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation (GBMF9453). A.H.M. acknowledges support from DOE BES grant DE- FG02-02ER45958 and from Welch Foundation grant TBF1473.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eva Y. Andrei.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Andrei, E.Y., MacDonald, A.H. Graphene bilayers with a twist. Nat. Mater. 19, 1265–1275 (2020).

Download citation


Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing