Reliable functions of bioelectronic devices require conformal, stable and conductive interfaces with biological tissues. Integrating bioelectronic devices with tissues usually relies on physical attachment or surgical suturing; however, these methods face challenges such as non-conformal contact, unstable fixation, tissue damage, and/or scar formation. Here, we report an electrical bioadhesive (e-bioadhesive) interface, based on a thin layer of a graphene nanocomposite, that can provide rapid (adhesion formation within 5 s), robust (interfacial toughness >400 J m−2) and on-demand detachable integration of bioelectronic devices on diverse wet dynamic tissues. The electrical conductivity (>2.6 S m−1) of the e-bioadhesive interface further allows bidirectional bioelectronic communications. We demonstrate biocompatibility, applicability, mechanical and electrical stability, and recording and stimulation functionalities of the e-bioadhesive interface based on ex vivo porcine and in vivo rat models. These findings offer a promising strategy to improve tissue–device integration and enhance the performance of biointegrated electronic devices.
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $17.42 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
All relevant data that support the findings of this study are available in the article and its supplementary files. Source data of plots are provided with this paper. Source data are provided with this paper.
No custom code is used in this study.
Rogers, J. A., Someya, T. & Huang, Y. Materials and mechanics for stretchable electronics. Science 327, 1603–1607 (2010).
Someya, T., Bao, Z. & Malliaras, G. G. The rise of plastic bioelectronics. Nature 540, 379–385 (2016).
Feiner, R. & Dvir, T. Tissue–electronics interfaces: from implantable devices to engineered tissues. Nat. Rev. Mater. 3, 17076 (2018).
Schiavone, G. & Lacour, S. P. Conformable bioelectronic interfaces: mapping the road ahead. Sci. Transl. Med. 11, eaaw5858 (2019).
Yuk, H., Lu, B. & Zhao, X. Hydrogel bioelectronics. Chem. Soc. Rev. 48, 1642–1667 (2019).
Zhang, Y. et al. Climbing-inspired twining electrodes using shape memory for peripheral nerve stimulation and recording. Sci. Adv. 5, eaaw1066 (2019).
Kim, D.-H. et al. Dissolvable films of silk fibroin for ultrathin conformal bio-integrated electronics. Nat. Mater. 9, 511–517 (2010).
Park, J. et al. Electromechanical cardioplasty using a wrapped elasto-conductive epicardial mesh. Sci. Transl. Med. 8, 344ra386 (2016).
Jeong, J. W. et al. Materials and optimized designs for human–machine interfaces via epidermal electronics. Adv. Mater. 25, 6839–6846 (2013).
Sim, K. et al. Metal oxide semiconductor nanomembrane-based soft unnoticeable multifunctional electronics for wearable human–machine interfaces. Sci. Adv. 5, eaav9653 (2019).
Kim, D.-H. et al. Epidermal electronics. Science 333, 838–843 (2011).
Kaltenbrunner, M. et al. An ultra-lightweight design for imperceptible plastic electronics. Nature 499, 458 (2013).
Lee, S. et al. A strain-absorbing design for tissue–machine interfaces using a tunable adhesive gel. Nat. Commun. 5, 5898 (2014).
Ouyang, H. et al. Symbiotic cardiac pacemaker. Nat. Commun. 10, 1821 (2019).
Boutry, C. M. et al. Biodegradable and flexible arterial-pulse sensor for the wireless monitoring of blood flow. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 3, 47–57 (2019).
Koo, J. et al. Wireless bioresorbable electronic system enables sustained nonpharmacological neuroregenerative therapy. Nat. Med. 24, 1830–1836 (2018).
Boutry, C. M. et al. A stretchable and biodegradable strain and pressure sensor for orthopaedic application. Nat. Electron. 1, 314–321 (2018).
Chang, E. I. et al. Vascular anastomosis using controlled phase transitions in poloxamer gels. Nat. Med. 17, 1147–1152 (2011).
Minev, I. R. et al. Electronic dura mater for long-term multimodal neural interfaces. Science 347, 159–163 (2015).
Formento, E. et al. Electrical spinal cord stimulation must preserve proprioception to enable locomotion in humans with spinal cord injury. Nat. Neurosci. 21, 1728–1741 (2018).
Roche, E. T. et al. Soft robotic sleeve supports heart function. Sci. Transl. Med. 9, eaaf3925 (2017).
Whyte, W. et al. Sustained release of targeted cardiac therapy with a replenishable implanted epicardial reservoir. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2, 416–428 (2018).
Nido, P. D. & Goldman, B. S. Temporary epicardial pacing after open heart surgery: complications and prevention. J. Card. Surg. 4, 99–103 (1989).
Yang, S. et al. “Cut-and-paste” manufacture of multiparametric epidermal sensor systems. Adv. Mater. 27, 6423–6430 (2015).
Koh, A. et al. A soft, wearable microfluidic device for the capture, storage, and colorimetric sensing of sweat. Sci. Transl. Med. 8, 366ra165 (2016).
Liao, M. et al. Wearable, healable, and adhesive epidermal sensors assembled from mussel‐inspired conductive hybrid hydrogel framework. Adv. Funct. Mater. 27, 1703852 (2017).
Liang, S. et al. Paintable and rapidly bondable conductive hydrogels as therapeutic cardiac patches. Adv. Mater. 30, 1704235 (2018).
Sekitani, T. et al. Ultraflexible organic amplifier with biocompatible gel electrodes. Nat. Commun. 7, 11425 (2016).
Yamagishi, K. et al. Tissue-adhesive wirelessly powered optoelectronic device for metronomic photodynamic cancer therapy. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 3, 27–36 (2019).
Keplinger, C. et al. Stretchable, transparent, ionic conductors. Science 341, 984–987 (2013).
Li, J. et al. Tough adhesives for diverse wet surfaces. Science 357, 378–381 (2017).
Rose, S. et al. Nanoparticle solutions as adhesives for gels and biological tissues. Nature 505, 382–385 (2014).
Liu, J. et al. Intrinsically stretchable electrode array enabled in vivo electrophysiological mapping of atrial fibrillation at cellular resolution. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 14769–14778 (2020).
Yuk, H. et al. Dry double-sided tape for adhesion of wet tissues and devices. Nature 575, 169–174 (2019).
Yang, J.-H. & Lee, Y.-D. Highly electrically conductive rGO/PVA composites with a network dispersive nanostructure. J. Mater. Chem. 22, 8512–8517 (2012).
Liu, J. et al. Fatigue-resistant adhesion of hydrogels. Nat. Commun. 11, 1–9 (2020).
Mao, X., Yuk, H. & Zhao, X. Hydration and swelling of dry polymers for wet adhesion. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 137, 103863 (2020).
Liu, J. et al. Triggerable tough hydrogels for gastric resident dosage forms. Nat. Commun. 8, 124 (2017).
Li, W. et al. Tough bonding, on-demand debonding, and facile rebonding between hydrogels and diverse metal surfaces. Adv. Mater. 31, 1904732 (2019).
Chen, X., Yuk, H., Wu, J., Nabzdyk, C. S. & Zhao, X. Instant tough bioadhesive with triggerable benign detachment. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 15497–15503 (2020).
Kashyap, S., Pratihar, S. K. & Behera, S. K. Strong and ductile graphene oxide reinforced PVA nanocomposites. J. Alloy. Compd. 684, 254–260 (2016).
Gabriel, C., Peyman, A. & Grant, E. H. Electrical conductivity of tissue at frequencies below 1 MHz. Phys. Med. Biol. 54, 4863 (2009).
Cogan, S. F. Neural stimulation and recording electrodes. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 10, 275–309 (2008).
Liu, Y. et al. Soft and elastic hydrogel-based microelectronics for localized low-voltage neuromodulation. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 3, 58–68 (2019).
Zheng, H. et al. A shape-memory and spiral light-emitting device for precise multisite stimulation of nerve bundles. Nat. Commun. 10, 2790 (2019).
Gorgieva, S. & Kokol, V. Preparation, characterization, and in vitro enzymatic degradation of chitosan‐gelatine hydrogel scaffolds as potential biomaterials. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 100, 1655–1667 (2012).
Park, S. et al. Self-powered ultra-flexible electronics via nano-grating-patterned organic photovoltaics. Nature 561, 516–521 (2018).
Lee, S. et al. Ultrasoft electronics to monitor dynamically pulsing cardiomyocytes. Nat. Nanotechnol. 14, 156–160 (2019).
Webb, R. C. et al. Ultrathin conformal devices for precise and continuous thermal characterization of human skin. Nat. Mater. 12, 938–944 (2013).
Xu, L. et al. 3D multifunctional integumentary membranes for spatiotemporal cardiac measurements and stimulation across the entire epicardium. Nat. Commun. 5, 3329 (2014).
Kim, D.-H. et al. Materials for multifunctional balloon catheters with capabilities in cardiac electrophysiological mapping and ablation therapy. Nat. Mater. 10, 316–323 (2011).
Gutruf, P. et al. Wireless, battery-free, fully implantable multimodal and multisite pacemakers for applications in small animal models. Nat. Commun. 10, 5742 (2019).
We thank C.S. Nabzdyk at Mayo Clinic for the insightful discussions and suggestions, R. Bronson at Harvard Medical School for the histological analyses and D. Yang at MIT for help with the charge injection capacity tests. This work is supported by Centers for Mechanical Engineering Research and Education at MIT and SUSTech (MechERE Centers at MIT and SUSTech), the Innovation Committee of Shenzhen Municipality (JCYJ20170817111714314, C.F.G.), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (numbers U1613204 and 51771089, C.F.G.), the Science Technology the Shenzhen Sci-Tech Fund (KYTDPT20181011104007, C.F.G.) and the Guangdong Innovative and Entrepreneurial Research Team Program (2016ZT06G587, C.F.G.). H.Y. acknowledges financial support from a Samsung Scholarship.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Extended Data Fig. 1 Rapid and robust adhesion of a device on wet tissue surface by the e-bioadhesive interface.
a, Overall process of applying a device with the e-bioadhesive interface to an ex vivo porcine heart. b, Robust integration of the device to the wet heart surface.
a, Schematic illustration of covalent coupling of fluorescein with the e-bioadhesive interface by reaction between NHS ester groups in the e-bioadhesive interface and the primary amine groups in 6-amino fluorescein. b, c, Fluorescence microscopic images of the e-bioadhesive interface with (b) and without (c) NHS ester. 3 independent experiments were conducted with similar results.
a, Schematic illustration for primary amine functionalization of silicon and PDMS. b, Schematic illustration for primary amine functionalization of gold. c, Schematic illustration for primary amine functionalization of polyimide. d, Schematic illustration for primary amine functionalization of polycarbonate.
Extended Data Fig. 4 Schematic illustrations for the overall application process and mechanism of the e-bioadhesive interface.
The e-bioadhesive interface is assembled with bioelectronic devices to endow the ability to adhere to and electrically communicate with wet tissue surfaces. Upon contact with the wet tissue surface, the e-bioadhesive interface quickly absorbs the interfacial water and dry the tissue surface. The carboxylic acid groups in the e-bioadhesive interface form temporary physical crosslinks by hydrogen bonds and/or electrostatic interactions. The NHS ester groups in the e-bioadhesive interface subsequently form covalent crosslinks with the primary amine groups on the tissue surface and provide stable long-term tissue-device integration.
a, Schematic illustrations for on-demand detachment of the e-bioadhesive interface by the triggering solution. b, Schematic illustrations for chemistry of the on-demand cleaving of hydrogen bonds between the e-bioadhesive interface and the tissue surface. c, Schematic illustrations for the on-demand cleaving of covalent disulfide bonds between the e-bioadhesive interface and the tissue surface.
Extended Data Fig. 6 Evaluation of compressive narrowing of carotid artery and sciatic nerve by the e-bioadhesive interface.
a, Schematic illustrations of a measurement setup for the potential compressive narrowing of tissues by the e-bioadhesive interface. b, Outer diameter of bare carotid artery, carotid artery with the dry and fully swollen e-bioadhesive interfaces. c, Outer diameter of bare sciatic nerve, sciatic nerve with the dry and fully swollen e-bioadhesive interfaces. Values in b,c represent the mean and the standard deviation (n = 4 independent samples). Statistical significance and P values are determined by two-sided Student t-test; ns, not significant. Source data
Extended Data Fig. 7 Adhesion performance of device integration to wet tissues by physical attachment.
a, Interfacial toughness between various tissues and polyimide substrates adhered by the e-bioadhesive interface and physical attachment. b, Shear strength between various tissues and polyimide substrates adhered by the e-bioadhesive interface and physical attachment. Values in a, b represent the mean and the standard deviation (n = 3 independent samples). Statistical significance and P values are determined by two-sided Student t-test; *** p ≤ 0.001; **** p ≤ 0.0001. Source data
Representative immunohistochemistry images of CD3, CD68, Collagen-I, and α-SMA for gold electrode with and without the e-bioadhesive interface after rat subcutaneous implantation for 14 days, respectively. 5 independent experiments were conducted with similar results.
Conductivity, impedance, and interfacial toughness of two gold electrodes adhered by the e-bioadhesive interface after 1 day and 14 days of incubation in PBS, and 14 days of in vivo implantation in rat dorsal subcutaneous pockets. Values represent the mean and the standard deviation (n = 3 independent samples). Statistical significance and P values are determined by two-sided Student t-test; ns, not significant. Source data
Supplementary Figs. 1–11, discussion and Table 1.
Application of LED circuits with and without the e-bioadhesive interface on an ex vivo porcine heart.
About this article
Cite this article
Deng, J., Yuk, H., Wu, J. et al. Electrical bioadhesive interface for bioelectronics. Nat. Mater. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-020-00814-2