Fatigue of graphene


Materials can suffer mechanical fatigue when subjected to cyclic loading at stress levels much lower than the ultimate tensile strength, and understanding this behaviour is critical to evaluating long-term dynamic reliability. The fatigue life and damage mechanisms of two-dimensional (2D) materials, of interest for mechanical and electronic applications, are currently unknown. Here, we present a fatigue study of freestanding 2D materials, specifically graphene and graphene oxide (GO). Using atomic force microscopy, monolayer and few-layer graphene were found to exhibit a fatigue life of more than 109 cycles at a mean stress of 71 GPa and a stress range of 5.6 GPa, higher than any material reported so far. Fatigue failure in monolayer graphene is global and catastrophic without progressive damage, while molecular dynamics simulations reveal this is preceded by stress-mediated bond reconfigurations near defective sites. Conversely, functional groups in GO impart a local and progressive fatigue damage mechanism. This study not only provides fundamental insights into the fatigue enhancement behaviour of graphene-embedded nanocomposites, but also serves as a starting point for the dynamic reliability evaluation of other 2D materials.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Fatigue testing of 2D materials.
Fig. 2: Fatigue of graphene.
Fig. 3: Fatigue of GO.
Fig. 4: Fatigue fracture morphology.
Fig. 5: MD fatigue simulations of graphene and GO.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the authors on reasonable request.

Code availability

The codes used for the fatigue data analysis in this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.


  1. 1.

    Suresh, S. Fatigue of Materials 2nd edn (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1998).

  2. 2.

    Schijve, J. Fatigue of structures and materials in the 20th century and the state of the art. Int. J. Fatigue 25, 679–702 (2003).

  3. 3.

    Ramanathan, T. et al. Functionalized graphene sheets for polymer nanocomposites. Nat. Nanotechnol. 3, 327–331 (2008).

  4. 4.

    Chen, C. et al. Graphene mechanical oscillators with tunable frequency. Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 923–927 (2013).

  5. 5.

    Wang, Y. et al. Wearable and highly sensitive graphene strain sensors for human motion monitoring. Adv. Funct. Mater. 24, 4666–4670 (2014).

  6. 6.

    Yin, B. et al. Highly stretchable, ultrasensitive and wearable strain sensors based on facilely prepared reduced graphene oxide woven fabrics in an ethanol flame. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9, 32054–32064 (2017).

  7. 7.

    Liu, N. et al. Ultratransparent and stretchable graphene electrodes. Sci. Adv. 3, e1700159 (2017).

  8. 8.

    Kim, K. S. et al. Large-scale pattern growth of graphene films for stretchable transparent electrodes. Nature 457, 706–710 (2009).

  9. 9.

    Yavari, F., Rafiee, M. A., Rafiee, J., Yu, Z. Z. & Koratkar, N. Dramatic increase in fatigue life in hierarchical graphene composites. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2, 2738–2743 (2010).

  10. 10.

    Bortz, D. R., Heras, E. G. & Martin-Gullon, I. Impressive fatigue life and fracture toughness improvements in graphene oxide/epoxy composites. Macromolecules 45, 238–245 (2012).

  11. 11.

    Rafiee, M. A. et al. Fracture and fatigue in graphene nanocomposites. Small 6, 179–183 (2010).

  12. 12.

    Lee, C., Wei, X., Kysar, J. W. & Hone, J. Measurement of the elastic properties and intrinsic strength of monolayer graphene. Science 321, 385–388 (2008).

  13. 13.

    Lee, G.-H. et al. High-strength chemical-vapor-deposited graphene and grain boundaries. Science 340, 1073–1076 (2013).

  14. 14.

    Wei, X. et al. Plasticity and ductility in graphene oxide through a mechanochemically induced damage tolerance mechanism. Nat. Commun. 6, 8029 (2015).

  15. 15.

    Cui, T. et al. Effect of lattice stacking orientation and local thickness variation on the mechanical behavior of few layer graphene oxide. Carbon 136, 168–175 (2018).

  16. 16.

    Pyttel, B., Schwerdt, D. & Berger, C. Very high cycle fatigue—is there a fatigue limit? Int. J. Fatigue 33, 49–58 (2011).

  17. 17.

    Dursun, T. & Soutis, C. Recent developments in advanced aircraft aluminium alloys. Mater. Des. 56, 862–871 (2014).

  18. 18.

    Jiang, C., Zhang, H., Song, J. & Lu, Y. Digital micromirror device (DMD)-based high-cycle tensile fatigue testing of 1D nanomaterials. Extreme Mech. Lett. 18, 79–85 (2018).

  19. 19.

    Zhang, H., Jiang, C. & Lu, Y. Low-cycle fatigue testing of Ni nanowires based on a micro-mechanical device. Exp. Mech. 57, 495–500 (2017).

  20. 20.

    Li, P. et al. In situ transmission electron microscopy investigation on fatigue behavior of single ZnO wires under high-cycle strain. Nano Lett. 14, 480–485 (2014).

  21. 21.

    Gao, Z., Ding, Y., Lin, S., Hao, Y. & Wang, Z. L. Dynamic fatigue studies of ZnO nanowires by in-situ transmission electron microscopy. Phys. Status Solidi Rapid Res. Lett. 3, 260–262 (2009).

  22. 22.

    Zhang, J. Y. et al. Length scale dependent yield strength and fatigue behavior of nanocrystalline Cu thin films. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 528, 7774–7780 (2011).

  23. 23.

    Hosseinian, E. & Pierron, O. N. Quantitative in situ TEM tensile fatigue testing on nanocrystalline metallic ultrathin films. Nanoscale 5, 12532–12541 (2013).

  24. 24.

    Luo, X., Zhu, X. & Zhang, G. Nanotwin-assisted grain growth in nanocrystalline gold films under cyclic loading. Nat. Commun. 5, 3021 (2014).

  25. 25.

    Sundararajan, S. & Bhushan, B. Development of AFM-based techniques to measure mechanical properties of nanoscale structures. Sens. Actuat. A 101, 338–351 (2002).

  26. 26.

    Namazu, T. & Isono, Y. Fatigue life prediction citerion for micro-nanoscale single-crystal silicon structures. J. Microelectromech. Syst. 18, 129–137 (2009).

  27. 27.

    Mayer, H. & Papakyriacou, M. Fatigue behaviour of graphite and interpenetrating graphite–aluminium composite up to 109 load cycles. Carbon 44, 1801–1807 (2006).

  28. 28.

    Davies, A. R., Field, J. E., Takahashi, K. & Hada, K. Tensile and fatigue strength of free-standing CVD diamond. Diam. Relat. Mater. 14, 6–10 (2005).

  29. 29.

    Banerjee, A. et al. Ultralarge elastic deformation of nanoscale diamond. Science 360, 300–302 (2018).

  30. 30.

    Lee, C. et al. Elastic and frictional properties of graphene. Phys. Status Solidi 246, 2562–2567 (2009).

  31. 31.

    Sakin, R. & Ay, I. Statistical analysis of bending fatigue life data using Weibull distribution in glass-fiber reinforced polyester composites. Mater. Des. 29, 1170–1181 (2008).

  32. 32.

    Selmy, A. I., Azab, N. A. & Abd El-Baky, M. A. Flexural fatigue characteristics of two different types of glass fiber/epoxy polymeric composite laminates with statistical analysis. Compos. B Eng. 45, 518–527 (2013).

  33. 33.

    Zhurkov, S. N. Kinetic concept of the strength of solids. Int. J. Fract. 26, 295–307 (1984).

  34. 34.

    Tsivinsky, S. V. Thermal fluctuation theory of durability of solids. Mater. Sci. Eng. 26, 13–22 (1976).

  35. 35.

    Santucci, S., Vanel, L., Guarino, A., Scorretti, R. & Ciliberto, S. Thermal activation of rupture and slow crack growth. Europhys. Lett. 62, 320–326 (2003).

  36. 36.

    Phoenix, S. L. & Tierney, L. J. A statistical model for the time dependent failure of unidirectional composite materials under local elastic load-sharing among fibers. Eng. Fract. Mech. 18, 193–215 (1983).

  37. 37.

    Cao, C. et al. Nonlinear fracture toughness measurement and crack propagation resistance of functionalized graphene multilayers. Sci. Adv. 4, eaao7202 (2018).

  38. 38.

    Zandiatashbar, A. et al. Effect of defects on the intrinsic strength and stiffness of graphene. Nat. Commun. 5, 3186 (2014).

  39. 39.

    Yoon, K. et al. Atomistic-scale simulations of defect formation in graphene under noble gas ion irradiation. ACS Nano 10, 8376–8384 (2016).

  40. 40.

    Yang, Z., Huang, Y., Bao, H., Xu, K. & Ma, F. Synergistic effects of grain boundaries and edges on fatigue deformations of sub-5 nm graphene nanoribbons. J. Mater. Sci. 52, 10871–10878 (2017).

  41. 41.

    Cao, C., Daly, M., Singh, C. V., Sun, Y. & Filleter, T. High strength measurement of monolayer graphene oxide. Carbon 81, 497–504 (2015).

  42. 42.

    Huang, Y. et al. Reliable exfoliation of large-area high-quality flakes of graphene and other two-dimensional materials. ACS Nano 9, 10612–10620 (2015).

  43. 43.

    Marcano, D. C. et al. Improved synthesis of graphene oxide. ACS Nano 4, 4806–4814 (2010).

  44. 44.

    Giannozzi, P. et al. QUANTUM ESPRESSO: a modular and open-source software project for quantum simulations of materials. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 21, 395502 (2009).

  45. 45.

    Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).

  46. 46.

    Hendrik, J. Monkhorst. Special points for Brillouin-zone integretions. Phys. Rev. B 13, 5188–5192 (1976).

  47. 47.

    Plimpton, S. Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 117, 1–19 (1995).

  48. 48.

    Chenoweth, K., Van Duin, A. C. T. & Goddard, W. A. ReaxFF reactive force field for molecular dynamics simulations of hydrocarbon oxidation. J. Phys. Chem. A 112, 1040–1053 (2008).

  49. 49.

    Medhekar, N. V., Ramasubramaniam, A., Ruoff, R. S. & Shenoy, V. B. Hydrogen bond networks in graphene oxide composite paper: structure and mechanical properties. ACS Nano 4, 2300–2306 (2010).

  50. 50.

    Stukowski, A. Visualization and analysis of atomistic simulation data with OVITO—the open visualization tool. Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 18, 015012 (2010).

Download references


We acknowledge financial support from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), the Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI), the Erwin Edward Hart Professorship, the Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation Early Career Researcher Award, the Canada Research Chairs Program and the Ontario Research Funds—Research Excellence programme. SEM and TEM measurements were performed at the Ontario Centre for the Characterization of Advanced Materials (OCCAM). MD simulations were performed at the SciNet and Calculquebec consortia. SciNet is funded by the Canada Foundation for Innovation under the auspices of Compute Canada, the Government of Ontario, Ontario Research Fund-Research Excellence and the University of Toronto. We thank J. Li at Asylum Research for technical assistance with experiments.

Author information

T.C. conceived the idea. T.F. and Y.S. supervised T.C. on the sample preparation and all the fatigue experiments. C.V.S. supervised S.M. on the MD and DFT simulations. F.N. and T.C. performed FEA. P.M.A. directed P.M.S. on GO synthesis. G.C. programmed the code for data analysis. J.T. conducted the TEM measurements. T.C. and S.M. wrote the manuscript. All authors discussed the results and analysis, and reviewed and revised the final manuscript.

Correspondence to Chandra Veer Singh or Yu Sun or Tobin Filleter.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary discussion and methods, Figs. 1–16, Table 1 and references.

Supplementary Video 1

Cyclic loading of graphene showing bond reconfiguration and catastrophic failure—1.

Supplementary Video 2

Cyclic loading of graphene showing bond reconfiguration and catastrophic failure—2.

Supplementary Video 3

Static loading of graphene oxide at a strain rate of 108/s.

Supplementary Video 4

Static loading of graphene oxide at a strain rate of 109/s.

Supplementary Video 5

Static loading of graphene oxide at a strain rate of 1010/s.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cui, T., Mukherjee, S., Sudeep, P.M. et al. Fatigue of graphene. Nat. Mater. 19, 405–411 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-019-0586-y

Download citation