Ultrasoft slip-mediated bending in few-layer graphene

Abstract

Continuum scaling laws often break down when materials approach atomic length scales, reflecting changes in their underlying physics and the opportunities to access unconventional properties. These continuum limits are evident in two-dimensional materials, where there is no consensus on their bending stiffnesses or how they scale with thickness. Through combined computational and electron microscopy experiments, we measure the bending stiffness of graphene, obtaining 1.2–1.7 eV for a monolayer. Moreover, we find that the bending stiffness of few-layer graphene decreases sharply as a function of bending angle, tuning by almost 400% for trilayer graphene. This softening results from shear, slip and the onset of superlubricity between the atomic layers and corresponds with a gradual change in scaling power from cubic to linear. Our results provide a unified model for bending in two-dimensional materials and show that their multilayers can be orders of magnitude softer than previously thought, among the most flexible electronic materials currently known.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Fabrication and STEM imaging of curved FLG on hBN steps.
Fig. 2: Measurement of bending stiffness from STEM images.
Fig. 3: DFT calculations of bending stiffness in FLG and comparison with experiment.
Fig. 4: Atomic-scale bending mechanisms in FLG.

Data availability

The data and findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request.

Change history

  • 06 December 2019

    An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper.

References

  1. 1.

    Lee, C., Wei, X., Kysar, J. W. & Hone, J. Measurement of the elastic properties and intrinsic strength of monolayer graphene. Science 321, 385–388 (2008).

  2. 2.

    Shen, Y. & Wu, H. Interlayer shear effect on multilayer graphene subjected to bending. Appl. Phys. Lett. 100, 101904–101909 (2012).

  3. 3.

    Song, Y. et al. Robust microscale superlubricity in graphite/hexagonal boron nitride layered heterojunctions. Nat. Mater. 17, 894–899 (2018).

  4. 4.

    Alden, J. S. et al. Strain solitons and topological defects in bilayer graphene. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 11256–11260 (2013).

  5. 5.

    Cumings, J. & Zettl, A. Low-friction nanoscale linear bearing realized from multiwall carbon nanotubes. Science 289, 602–604 (2000).

  6. 6.

    Yakobson, B. I., Samsonidze, G. & Samsonidze, G. G. Atomistic theory of mechanical relaxation in fullerene nanotubes. Carbon 38, 1675–1680 (2000).

  7. 7.

    Zang, J. et al. Multifunctionality and control of the crumpling and unfolding of large-area graphene. Nat. Mater. 12, 321–325 (2013).

  8. 8.

    Kang, P., Wang, M. C., Knapp, P. M. & Nam, S. Crumpled graphene photodetector with enhanced, strain-tunable, and wavelength-selective photoresponsivity. Adv. Mater. 28, 4639–4645 (2016).

  9. 9.

    Blees, M. K. et al. Graphene kirigami. Nature 524, 204–207 (2015).

  10. 10.

    Lee, W. et al. Two-dimensional materials in functional three-dimensional architectures with applications in photodetection and imaging. Nat. Commun. 9, 1417 (2018).

  11. 11.

    Miskin, M. Z. et al. Graphene-based bimorphs for micron-sized, autonomous origami machines. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 466–470 (2018).

  12. 12.

    Chen, X., Yi, C. & Ke, C. Bending stiffness and interlayer shear modulus of few-layer graphene. Appl. Phys. Lett. 106, 101907 (2015).

  13. 13.

    Bao, W. et al. Controlled ripple texturing of suspended graphene and ultrathin graphite membranes. Nat. Nanotechnol. 4, 562–566 (2009).

  14. 14.

    Brennan, C. J., Nguyen, J., Yu, E. T. & Lu, N. Interface adhesion between 2D materials and elastomers measured by buckle delaminations. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2, 1500176 (2015).

  15. 15.

    Jiang, T., Huang, R. & Zhu, Y. Interfacial sliding and buckling of monolayer graphene on a stretchable substrate. Adv. Funct. Mater. 24, 396–402 (2013).

  16. 16.

    Akinwande, D. et al. A review on mechanics and mechanical properties of 2D materials—graphene and beyond. Extreme Mech. Lett. 13, 42–77 (2017).

  17. 17.

    Zhang, D. B., Akatyeva, E. & Dumitrică, T. Bending ultrathin graphene at the margins of continuum mechanics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 3–6 (2011).

  18. 18.

    Koskinen, P. & Kit, O. O. Approximate modeling of spherical membranes. Phys. Rev. B 82, 1–5 (2010).

  19. 19.

    Bunch, J. S. et al. Impermeable atomic membranes from graphene sheets. Nano Lett. 8, 2458–2462 (2008).

  20. 20.

    Lopez-Polin, G. et al. Increasing the elastic modulus of graphene by controlled defect creation. Nat. Phys. 11, 26–31 (2014).

  21. 21.

    Tapasztó, L. et al. Breakdown of continuum mechanics for nanometre-wavelength rippling of graphene. Nat. Phys. 8, 739–742 (2012).

  22. 22.

    Nikiforov, I., Tang, D. M., Wei, X., Dumitrică, T. & Golberg, D. Nanoscale bending of multilayered boron nitride and graphene ribbons: experiment and objective molecular dynamics calculations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 1–5 (2012).

  23. 23.

    Yang, Z. et al. Mechanical properties of atomically thin boron nitride and the role of interlayer interactions. Nat. Commun. 8, 15815 (2017).

  24. 24.

    Rooney, A. P. et al. Anomalous twin boundaries in two dimensional materials. Nat. Commun. 9, 3597 (2018).

  25. 25.

    Poot, M. & van der Zant, H. S. J. Nanomechanical properties of few-layer graphene membranes. Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 063111 (2008).

  26. 26.

    Booth, T. J. et al. Macroscopic graphene membranes and their extraordinary stiffness. Nano Lett. 8, 2442–2446 (2008).

  27. 27.

    Lindahl, N. et al. Determination of the bending rigidity of graphene via electrostatic actuation of buckled membranes. Nano Lett. 12, 3526–3531 (2012).

  28. 28.

    Zhao, J. et al. Two-dimensional membrane as elastic shell with proof on the folds revealed by three-dimensional atomic mapping. Nat. Commun. 6, 8935 (2015).

  29. 29.

    Kvashnin, D. G. & Sorokin, P. B. Effect of ultrahigh stiffness of defective graphene from atomistic point of view. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 6, 2384–2387 (2015).

  30. 30.

    Ertekin, E., Chrzan, D. C. & Daw, M. S. Topological description of the Stone–Wales defect formation energy in carbon nanotubes and graphene. Phys. Rev. B 79, 155421 (2009).

  31. 31.

    Guo, Y., Qiu, J. & Guo, W. Mechanical and electronic coupling in few-layer graphene and hBN wrinkles: a first-principles study. Nanotechnology 27, 505702 (2016).

  32. 32.

    Wei, Y., Wang, B., Wu, J., Yang, R. & Dunn, M. L. Bending rigidity and Gaussian bending stiffness of single-layered graphene. Nano Lett. 13, 26–30 (2013).

  33. 33.

    Iijima, S., Brabec, C., Maiti, A. & Bernholc, J. Structural flexibility of carbon nanotubes. J. Chem. Phys. 104, 2089–2092 (1996).

  34. 34.

    Warner, J. H. et al. Dislocation-driven deformations in graphene. Science 337, 209–212 (2012).

  35. 35.

    Kim, K. et al. Ripping graphene: preferred directions. Nano Lett. 12, 293–297 (2012).

  36. 36.

    Casillas, G., Liao, Y., Jose-Yacaman, M. & Marks, L. D. Monolayer transfer layers during sliding at the atomic scale. Tribol. Lett. 59, 45 (2015).

  37. 37.

    Yakobson, B. I., Brabec, C. J. & Bernolc, J. Nanomechanics of carbon tubes: instabilities beyond linear response. Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 2511–2514 (1996).

  38. 38.

    Ru, C. Q. Effective bending stiffness of carbon nanotubes. Phys. Rev. B 62, 9973–9976 (2000).

  39. 39.

    Sanchez, D. A. et al. Mechanics of spontaneously formed nanoblisters trapped by transferred 2D crystals. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 7884–7889 (2018).

  40. 40.

    Woods, C. R. et al. Commensurate–incommensurate transition in graphene on hexagonal boron nitride. Nat. Phys. 10, 451–456 (2014).

  41. 41.

    Nicklow, R., Wakabayashi, N. & Smith, H. G. Lattice dynamics of pyrolytic graphite. Phys. Rev. B 5, 4951–4962 (1972).

  42. 42.

    Hohenberg, P. & Kohn, W. Inhomogeneous electron gas. Phys. Rev. B 136, 864–871 (1964).

  43. 43.

    Kohn, W. & Sham, L. J. Self-consistent equations including exchange and correlation effects. Phys. Rev. A 140, 1133–1138 (1965).

  44. 44.

    Nye, J. F. Some geometrical relations in dislocated crystals. Acta Metall. 1, 153–162 (1953).

  45. 45.

    Shinjo, K. & Hirano, M. Dynamics of friction: superlubric state. Surf. Sci. 293, 473–478 (1993).

  46. 46.

    Sangid, M. D., Ezaz, T., Sehitoglu, H. & Robertson, I. M. Energy of slip transmission and nucleation at grain boundaries. Acta Mater. 59, 283–296 (2011).

  47. 47.

    Son, J. et al. Atomically precise graphene etch stops for three dimensional integrated systems from two dimensional material heterostructures. Nat. Commun. 9, 3988 (2018).

  48. 48.

    Pizzocchero, F. et al. The hot pick-up technique for batch assembly of van der Waals heterostructures. Nat. Commun. 7, 11894 (2016).

  49. 49.

    Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput. Mater. Sci. 6, 15–50 (1996).

  50. 50.

    Blöchl, P. E. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953–17979 (1994).

  51. 51.

    Klimeš, J., Bowler, D. R. & Michaelides, A. Van der Waals density functionals applied to solids. Phys. Rev. B 83, 195131 (2011).

  52. 52.

    Brenner, D. W. et al. A second-generation reactive empirical bond order (REBO) potential energy expression for hydrocarbons. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 14, 783–802 (2002).

  53. 53.

    Kolmogorov, A. N. & Crespi, V. H. Registry-dependent interlayer potential for graphitic systems. Phys. Rev. B 71, 235415 (2005).

  54. 54.

    Ouyang, W., Mandelli, D., Urbakh, M. & Hod, O. Nanoserpents: graphene nanoribbon motion on two-dimensional hexagonal materials. Nano Lett. 18, 6009–6016 (2018).

  55. 55.

    Plimpton, S. Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 117, 1–19 (1995).

  56. 56.

    Bitzek, E., Koskinen, P., Gähler, F., Moseler, M. & Gumbsch, P. Structural relaxation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 170201 (2006).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in full by NSF-MRSEC award no. DMR-1720633. The work was carried out in part in the Micro and Nano Technology Laboratory and the Materials Research Laboratory Central Facilities at the University of Illinois, where electron microscopy support was provided by J. Mabon, C. Chen and H. Zhou. The authors acknowledge the use of facilities and instrumentation supported by the NSF through the University of Illinois Materials Research Science and Engineering Center (DMR-1720633). Computational resources were provided by the Blue Waters sustained petascale computing facilities and the Illinois Campus Computing Cluster. The authors acknowledge support from the Elemental Strategy Initiative conducted by the MEXT, Japan and the CREST (JPMJCR15F3), JST. The authors acknowledge helpful discussions with J. Krogstad, H. Johnson, S. Kim and B. Janicek. The authors also acknowledge B. Janicek for the design of Fig. 1a.

Author information

Under supervision by P.Y.H., E.H. performed TEM sample preparation, electron microscopy imaging and data analysis. Under supervision by P.Y.H. and A.M.v.d.Z., E.H. and J.Y. developed mechanics modelling and analysis. Under supervision by J.S. and A.M.v.d.Z., J.Y. and D.A.K. performed sample preparation and 2D heterostructure fabrication. Under supervision by E.E., J.Y. performed DFT calculations. Under supervision by E.E., E.A. performed simulations using classical force fields. K.W. and T.T. prepared high-quality hBN. All authors read and contributed to the manuscript.

Correspondence to Pinshane Y. Huang or Arend M. van der Zande.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–12, Methods and references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Han, E., Yu, J., Annevelink, E. et al. Ultrasoft slip-mediated bending in few-layer graphene. Nat. Mater. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-019-0529-7

Download citation