Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Atomic and electronic reconstruction at the van der Waals interface in twisted bilayer graphene

Nature Materials volume 18, pages 448–453 (2019)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Control of the interlayer twist angle in two-dimensional van der Waals (vdW) heterostructures enables one to engineer a quasiperiodic moiré superlattice of tunable length scale1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8. In twisted bilayer graphene, the simple moiré superlattice band description suggests that the electronic bandwidth can be tuned to be comparable to the vdW interlayer interaction at a ‘magic angle’9, exhibiting strongly correlated behaviour. However, the vdW interlayer interaction can also cause significant structural reconstruction at the interface by favouring interlayer commensurability, which competes with the intralayer lattice distortion10,11,12,13,14,15,16. Here we report atomic-scale reconstruction in twisted bilayer graphene and its effect on the electronic structure. We find a gradual transition from an incommensurate moiré structure to an array of commensurate domains with soliton boundaries as we decrease the twist angle across the characteristic crossover angle, θc ≈ 1°. In the solitonic regime (θ < θc) where the atomic and electronic reconstruction become significant, a simple moiré band description breaks down and the secondary Dirac bands appear. On applying a transverse electric field, we observe electronic transport along the network of one-dimensional topological channels that surround the alternating triangular gapped domains. Atomic and electronic reconstruction at the vdW interface provide a new pathway to engineer the system with continuous tunability.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Atomic-scale reconstruction in TBG with a controlled twist angle.
Fig. 2: Electronic reconstruction in TBG.
Fig. 3: Transport properties of BLG with a controlled twist angle.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Li, G. et al. Observation of Van Hove singularities in twisted graphene layers. Nat. Phys. 6, 109–113 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ponomarenko, L. et al. Cloning of Dirac fermions in graphene superlattices. Nature 497, 594–597 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Dean, C. R. et al. Hofstadter’s butterfly and the fractal quantum Hall effect in moiré superlattices. Nature 497, 598–602 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hunt, B. et al. Massive Dirac fermions and Hofstadter butterfly in a van der Waals heterostructure. Science 340, 1427–1430 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cao, Y. et al. Superlattice-induced insulating states and valley-protected orbits in twisted bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 116804 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kim, K. et al. Tunable moiré bands and strong correlations in small-twist-angle bilayer graphene. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 3364–3369 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cao, Y. et al. Unconventional superconductivity in magic-angle graphene superlattices. Nature 556, 43–50 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cao, Y. et al. Correlated insulator behaviour at half-filling in magic-angle graphene superlattices. Nature 556, 80–84 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bistritzer, R. & MacDonald, A. H. Moiré bands in twisted double-layer graphene. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 12233–12237 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Woods, C. et al. Commensurate–incommensurate transition in graphene on hexagonal boron nitride. Nat. Phys. 10, 451–456 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim, N. Y. et al. Evidence of local commensurate state with lattice match of graphene on hexagonal boron nitride. ACS Nano 11, 7084–7090 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Van Wijk, M., Schuring, A., Katsnelson, M. & Fasolino, A. Relaxation of moiré patterns for slightly misaligned identical lattices: graphene on graphite. 2D Materials 2, 034010 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dai, S., Xiang, Y. & Srolovitz, D. J. Twisted bilayer graphene: moiré with a twist. Nano Lett. 16, 5923–5927 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Nam, N. N. T. & Koshino, M. Lattice relaxation and energy band modulation in twisted bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. B 96, 075311 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gargiulo, F. & Yazyev, O. V. Structural and electronic transformation in low-angle twisted bilayer graphene. 2D Materials 5, 015019 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang, K. & Tadmor, E. B. Structural and electron diffraction scaling of twisted graphene bilayers. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 112, 225–238 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Koma, A. Van der Waals epitaxy—a new epitaxial growth method for a highly lattice-mismatched system. Thin Solid Films 216, 72–76 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Alden, J. S. et al. Strain solitons and topological defects in bilayer graphene. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 11256–11260 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lin, J. et al. AC/AB stacking boundaries in bilayer graphene. Nano Lett. 13, 3262–3268 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Butz, B. et al. Dislocations in bilayer graphene. Nature 505, 533–537 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Yuk, J. M. et al. Superstructural defects and superlattice domains in stacked graphene. Carbon 80, 755–761 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang, F., MacDonald, A. H. & Mele, E. J. Valley Chern numbers and boundary modes in gapped bilayer graphene. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 10546–10551 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Vaezi, A., Liang, Y., Ngai, D. H., Yang, L. & Kim, E.-A. Topological edge states at a tilt boundary in gated multilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. X 3, 021018 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ju, L. et al. Topological valley transport at bilayer graphene domain walls. Nature 520, 650–655 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Huang, S. et al. Topologically protected helical states in minimally twisted bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 037702 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. San-Jose, P. & Prada, E. Helical networks in twisted bilayer graphene under interlayer bias. Phys. Rev. B 88, 121408 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Anđelković, M., Covaci, L. & Peeters, F. M. DC conductivity of twisted bilayer graphene: Angle-dependent transport properties and effects of disorder. Phys. Rev. Mater. 2, 034004 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Li, J. et al. Gate-controlled topological conducting channels in bilayer graphene. Nat. Nanotechnol. 11, 1060–1065 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Rickhaus, P. et al. Transport through a network of topological channels in twisted bilayer graphene. Nano Lett. 18, 6725–6730 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. McCann, E. Asymmetry gap in the electronic band structure of bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. B 74, 161403 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Castro, E. V. et al. Biased bilayer graphene: semiconductor with a gap tunable by the electric field effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 216802 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Oostinga, J. B., Heersche, H. B., Liu, X., Morpurgo, A. F. & Vandersypen, L. M. Gate-induced insulating state in bilayer graphene devices. Nat. Mater. 7, 151–157 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Dos Santos, J. L., Peres, N. & Neto, A. C. Graphene bilayer with a twist: Electronic structure. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 256802 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Sanchez-Yamagishi, J. D. et al. Quantum Hall effect, screening, and layer-polarized insulating states in twisted bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 076601 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Hofstadter, D. R. Energy levels and wave functions of Bloch electrons in rational and irrational magnetic fields. Phys. Rev. B 14, 2239–2249 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Brown, L. et al. Twinning and twisting of tri- and bilayer graphene. Nano Lett. 12, 1609–1615 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhang, K. & Tadmor, E. B. Energy and moiré patterns in 2D bilayers in translation and rotation: A study using an efficient discrete-continuum interlayer potential. Extreme Mech. Lett. 14, 16–22 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Zhang, K. & Arroyo, M. Understanding and strain-engineering wrinkle networks in supported graphene through simulations. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 72, 61–74 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Zhang, K. & Arroyo, M. Coexistence of wrinkles and blisters in supported graphene. Extreme Mech. Lett. 14, 23–30 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Kolmogorov, A. N. & Crespi, V. H. Registry-dependent interlayer potential for graphitic systems. Phys. Rev. B 71, 235415 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Fang, S. & Kaxiras, E. Electronic structure theory of weakly interacting bilayers. Phys. Rev. B 93, 235153 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Carr, S., Fang, S., Jarillo-Herrero, P. & Kaxiras, E. Pressure dependence of the magic twist angle in graphene superlattices. Phys. Rev. B 98, 085144 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Massatt, D., Carr, S., Luskin, M. & Ortner, C. Incommensurate heterostructures in momentum space. Multiscale Model. Simul. 16, 429–451 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Lehmann, G. & Taut, M. On the numerical calculation of the density of states and related properties. Phys. Status Solidi b 54, 469–477 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Carr, S. et al. Relaxation and domain formation in incommensurate two-dimensional heterostructures. Phys. Rev. B 98, 224102 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Zhou, S., Han, J., Dai, S., Sun, J. & Srolovitz, D. J. van der Waals bilayer energetics: Generalized stacking-fault energy of graphene, boron nitride, and graphene/boron nitride bilayers. Phys. Rev. B 92, 155438 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Wang, L. et al. One-dimensional electrical contact to a two-dimensional material. Science 342, 614–617 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Y. Cao and P. Jarillo-Herrero for important discussions. The authors acknowledge the support of the Army Research Office (W911NF-14-1-0247) under the MURI programme. Part of the TEM analysis was supported by the Global Research Laboratory Program (2015K1A1A2033332) through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF). P.K. acknowledges partial support from the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation’s EPiQS Initiative through grant GBMF4543 and the Lloyd Foundation. R.E. acknowledges support from the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship under grant no. DGE1745303. P.C. acknowledges support from the National Science Foundation under grant no. DMS-1819220. K.W. and T.T. acknowledge support from the Elemental Strategy Initiative conducted by the MEXT, Japan and the CREST (JPMJCR15F3), JST. Nanofabrication was performed at the Center for Nanoscale Systems at Harvard, supported in part by NSF NNIN award ECS-00335765.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Physics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA

    Hyobin Yoo, Rebecca Engelke, Stephen Carr, Shiang Fang, Efthimios Kaxiras & Philip Kim

  2. Aerospace Engineering and Mechanics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA

    Kuan Zhang & Ellad B. Tadmor

  3. Department of Mathematics, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA

    Paul Cazeaux

  4. Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

    Suk Hyun Sung & Robert Hovden

  5. Institute for Quantum Computing and Department of Chemistry, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada

    Adam W. Tsen

  6. National Institute for Materials Science, Ibaraki, Japan

    Takashi Taniguchi & Kenji Watanabe

  7. Department of Physics and Astronomy, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea

    Gyu-Chul Yi

  8. Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea

    Miyoung Kim

  9. School of Mathematics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA

    Mitchell Luskin

  10. John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA

    Efthimios Kaxiras

Authors
  1. Hyobin Yoo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rebecca Engelke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Stephen Carr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shiang Fang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Kuan Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Paul Cazeaux
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Suk Hyun Sung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Robert Hovden
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Adam W. Tsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Takashi Taniguchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Kenji Watanabe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Gyu-Chul Yi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Miyoung Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Mitchell Luskin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Ellad B. Tadmor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Efthimios Kaxiras
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Philip Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

H.Y. and P.K. conceived the experiments. H.Y. and R.E. performed the experiments and analysed the data. S.C., S.F. and E.K. performed the density functional theory calculation. K.Z. and E.B.T. conceived and performed the theoretical and FEM analyses. P.C. and M.L. performed mathematical modelling analysis. S.H.S., R.H., A.W.T., G.-C.Y. and M.K. performed TEM data analysis. K.W. and T.T. provided bulk hBN crystals. H.Y., R.E. and P.K. wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to the overall scientific interpretation and edited the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philip Kim.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figures 1–10, Supplementary References 1–19

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yoo, H., Engelke, R., Carr, S. et al. Atomic and electronic reconstruction at the van der Waals interface in twisted bilayer graphene. Nat. Mater. 18, 448–453 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-019-0346-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-019-0346-z

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing