Article | Published:

Optical creation of a supercrystal with three-dimensional nanoscale periodicity

Abstract

Stimulation with ultrafast light pulses can realize and manipulate states of matter with emergent structural, electronic and magnetic phenomena. However, these non-equilibrium phases are often transient and the challenge is to stabilize them as persistent states. Here, we show that atomic-scale PbTiO3/SrTiO3 superlattices, counterpoising strain and polarization states in alternate layers, are converted by sub-picosecond optical pulses to a supercrystal phase. This phase persists indefinitely under ambient conditions, has not been created via equilibrium routes, and can be erased by heating. X-ray scattering and microscopy show this unusual phase consists of a coherent three-dimensional structure with polar, strain and charge-ordering periodicities of up to 30 nm. By adjusting only dielectric properties, the phase-field model describes this emergent phase as a photo-induced charge-stabilized supercrystal formed from a two-phase equilibrium state. Our results demonstrate opportunities for light-activated pathways to thermally inaccessible and emergent metastable states.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Data availability

Raw data from the Advanced Photon Source and phase field results are available upon reasonable request. The X-ray diffraction reciprocal space volumes generated with rsMap3D for figures both in the main text and supplementary information are available at https://anl.box.com/s/mdjujuby4dqf122bhb9a6vbev8qeubqf together with Python notebooks for interacting with the datasets. For non-Python users, the data can be viewed with the ParaView application available at www.paraview.org.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.

    Basov, D., Averitt, R. D., van der Marel, D., Dressel, M. & Haule, K. Electrodynamics of correlated electron materials. Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 471–541 (2011).

  2. 2.

    Zhang, J. & Averitt, R. D. Dynamics and control in complex transition metal oxides. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 44, 19–43 (2014).

  3. 3.

    Giannetti, C. et al. Ultrafast optical spectroscopy of strongly correlated materials and high-temperature superconductors: a non-equilibrium approach. Adv. Phys. 65, 58–238 (2016).

  4. 4.

    Kirilyuk, A., Kimel, A. V. & Rasing, T. Ultrafast optical manipulation of magnetic order. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 2731–2784 (2010).

  5. 5.

    Fausti, D. et al. Light-induced superconductivity in a stripe-ordered cuprate. Science 331, 189–191 (2011).

  6. 6.

    Torchinsky, D. H., Mahmood, F., Bollinger, A. T., Bozovic, I. & Gedik, N. Fluctuating charge-density waves in a cuprate superconductor. Nat. Mater. 12, 387–391 (2013).

  7. 7.

    Kim, K. W. et al. Ultrafast transient generation of spin-density-wave order in the normal state of BaFe2As2 driven by coherent lattice vibrations. Nat. Mater. 11, 497–501 (2012).

  8. 8.

    Wuttig, M. & Yamada, N. Phase-change materials for rewriteable data storage. Nat. Mater. 6, 824–832 (2007).

  9. 9.

    Ichikawa, H. et al. Transient photoinduced ‘hidden’ phase in a manganite. Nat. Mater. 10, 101–105 (2011).

  10. 10.

    Tao, Z. et al. The nature of photoinduced phase transition and metastable states in vanadium dioxide. Sci. Rep. 6, 38514 (2016).

  11. 11.

    Stojchevska, L. et al. Ultrafast switching to a stable hidden quantum state in an electronic crystal. Science 344, 177–180 (2014).

  12. 12.

    Zhang, J. et al. Cooperative photoinduced metastable phase control in strained manganite films. Nat. Mater. 15, 956–960 (2016).

  13. 13.

    Aguado-Puente, P. & Junquera, J. Structural and energetic properties of domains in PbTiO3/SrTiO3 superlattices from first principles. Phys. Rev. B 85, 184105 (2012).

  14. 14.

    Yadav, A. K. et al. Observation of polar vortices in oxide superlattices. Nature 530, 198–201 (2016).

  15. 15.

    Hong, Z. et al. Stability of polar vortex lattice in ferroelectric superlattices. Nano Lett. 17, 2246–2252 (2017).

  16. 16.

    Damodaran, A. R. et al. Phase coexistence and electric-field control of toroidal order in oxide superlattices. Nat. Mater. 16, 1003–1009 (2017).

  17. 17.

    Lu, L. et al. Topological defects with distinct dipole configurations in PbTiO3–SrTiO3 multilayer films. Phys. Rev. Lett. 12, 177601 (2018).

  18. 18.

    Laanait, N. et al. Full-field X-ray reflection microscopy of epitaxial thin-films. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 21, 1252–1261 (2014).

  19. 19.

    Laanait, N., Zhang, Z. & Schlepütz, C. M. Imaging nanoscale lattice variations by machine learning of X-ray diffraction microscopy data. Nanotechnology 27, 374002 (2016).

  20. 20.

    Zelezny, V. et al. The variation of PbTiO3 bandgap at ferroelectric phase transition. J. Phys.-Condens. Matter 28, 025501 (2016).

  21. 21.

    Daranciang, D. et al. Ultrafast photovoltaic response in ferroelectric nanolayers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 087601 (2012).

  22. 22.

    Ahn, Y. et al. Photoinduced domain pattern transformation in ferroelectric–dielectric superlattices. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 057601 (2017).

  23. 23.

    Schafranek, R., Li, S., Chen, F., Wu, W. & Klein, A. PbTiO3/SrTiO3 interface: Energy band alignment and its relation to the limits of Fermi level variation. Phys. Rev. B 84, 045317 (2011).

  24. 24.

    Torres-Pardo, A. et al. Spectroscopic mapping of local structural distortions in ferroelectric PbTiO3/SrTiO3 superlattices at the unit-cell scale. Phys. Rev. B 84, 220102 (2011).

  25. 25.

    Hasegawa, T., Mouri, S.-I., Yamada, Y. & Tanaka, K. Giant photo-induced dielectricity in SrTiO3. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn 72, 41–44 (2003).

  26. 26.

    Nasu, K. Photogeneration of superparaelectric large polarons in dielectrics with soft anharmonic T1u phonons. Phys. Rev. B 67, 174111 (2003).

  27. 27.

    Mehta, R. R., Silverman, B. D. & Jacobs, J. T. Depolarization fields in thin ferroelectric films. J. Appl. Phys. 44, 3379–3385 (2003).

  28. 28.

    Kim, D.-J. et al. Polarization relaxation induced by a depolarization field in ultrathin ferroelectric BaTiO3 capacitors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 237602 (2005).

  29. 29.

    Chen, L.-Q. Phase-field method of phase transitions/domain structures in ferroelectric thin films: A review. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 91, 1835–1844 (2008).

Download references

Acknowledgements

V.A.S., Y.Y., L.W.M., C.D., L.-Q.C., H.W., V.G. and J.W.F. acknowledge support from the US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, under Award Number DE-SC-0012375 for the development of the materials and ultrafast experiments. Z.H., S.L. and G.A.S acknowledge support from the National Science Foundation (DMR-1210588) and National Science Foundation Center for Nanoscale Science grant number DMR-1420620. L.-Q. C. also acknowledges support from NSF DMR-1744213. Use of the Advanced Photon Source was supported by the US Department of Energy, Office of Science, under contract no. DE-AC02–06CH11357. PFM data were collected at PSU, University of California, Berkeley, and at the Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences, a DOE Office of Science User Facility at ORNL. N.L. acknowledges support from the Eugene P. Wigner Fellowship at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), a US Department of Energy (DOE) facility managed by UT-Battelle, LLC for US DOE Office of Science under contract no. DE-AC05–00OR22725. R.R. and L.W.M. acknowledge funding from the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation’s EPiQS Initiative, under grant GBMF5307. NL acknowledges use of the Compute and Data Environment for Science (CADES) at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory. V.A.S. would like to thank C.M. Schlepütz and J. Hammonds for their development of rsMap3D, valuable discussions with H. Zhou, S Kalinin, Q. Li, Y. Ren, J. Tischler and D.D. Fong, and C.A. Kurtz for technical support.

Author information

V.A.S. conceived of the central concepts and designed the experiments. V.A.S., together with H.W., J.W.F., N.L., Y.Y., Z.Z., M.R.M, D.A.W., A.R.D., J.K. and X.Z., conducted the synchrotron-based X-ray diffraction studies. M.R.M., A.Y., S.D., R.R. and L.W.M. synthesized the materials. C.D., Z.H. and L.-Q.C. conducted the phase-field modelling and analysis in collaboration with V.A.S. N.L., S.L., A.R.D. and V.A.S. conducted the scanning probe-based PFM measurements. Y.Y. and V.A.S. conducted the SHG measurements. G.A.S. measured TEM to confirm sample quality. V.A.S., V.G. and J.W.F. wrote the manuscript with contributions from all authors. All authors discussed the results and implications of the work, and read, edited and commented on the manuscript at all stages.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Correspondence to V. Gopalan or J. W. Freeland.

Supplementary information

  1. Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Figures 1–12

Rights and permissions

To obtain permission to re-use content from this article visit RightsLink.

About this article

Further reading

Fig. 1: Summary of supercrystal formation.
Fig. 2: Supercrystal observation by X-ray diffraction and microscopy.
Fig. 3: Reversible control of supercrystal phase formation.
Fig. 4: Phase-field model prediction of the supercrystal phase.
Fig. 5: Interplay between order parameters within the supercrystal phase captured by the phase-field model.