Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Anti-resonance features of destructive quantum interference in single-molecule thiophene junctions achieved by electrochemical gating


Controlling the electrical conductance and in particular the occurrence of quantum interference in single-molecule junctions through gating effects has potential for the realization of high-performance functional molecular devices. In this work we used an electrochemically gated, mechanically controllable break junction technique to tune the electronic behaviour of thiophene-based molecular junctions that show destructive quantum interference features. By varying the voltage applied to the electrochemical gate at room temperature, we reached a conductance minimum that provides direct evidence of charge transport controlled by an anti-resonance arising from destructive quantum interference. Our molecular system enables conductance tuning close to two orders of magnitude within the non-faradaic potential region, which is significantly higher than that achieved with molecules not showing destructive quantum interference. Our experimental results, interpreted using quantum transport theory, demonstrate that electrochemical gating is a promising strategy for obtaining improved in situ control over the electrical performance of interference-based molecular devices.

This is a preview of subscription content

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Electrochemical gating of 2,4-TP-SAc molecular junctions.
Fig. 2: Conductance–electrode potential and current/conductance–voltage measurements of 2,4-TP-SAc and 2,5-TP-SAc molecular junctions.
Fig. 3: Transport characteristics of 2,4-TP-SMe and 2,5-TP-SMe molecular junctions.
Fig. 4: Transport properties of thiophene core molecular junctions in the absence and presence of HMIPF6.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


  1. 1.

    Guedon, C. M. et al. Observation of quantum interference in molecular charge transport. Nat. Nanotech. 7, 305–309 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Lambert, C. J. Basic concepts of quantum interference and electron transport in single-molecule electronics. Chem. Soc. Rev. 44, 875–888 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Garner, M. H. et al. Comprehensive suppression of single-molecule conductance using destructive σ-interference. Nature 558, 415–419 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Frisenda, R., Janssen, V. A. E. C., Grozema, F. C., van der Zant, H. S. J. & Renaud, N. Mechanically controlled quantum interference in individual π-stacked dimers. Nat. Chem. 8, 1099 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Baer, R. & Neuhauser, D. Phase coherent electronics: a molecular switch based on quantum interference. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124, 4200–4201 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Hsu, L. Y. & Rabitz, H. Single-molecule phenyl-acetylene-macrocycle-based optoelectronic switch functioning as a quantum-interference-effect transistor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 186801 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Bergfield, J. P., Solomon, G. C., Stafford, C. A. & Ratner, M. A. Novel quantum interference effects in transport through molecular radicals. Nano Lett. 11, 2759–2764 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Manrique, D. Z. et al. A quantum circuit rule for interference effects in single-molecule electrical junctions. Nat. Commun. 6, 6389 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Sangtarash, S. et al. Searching the hearts of graphene-like molecules for simplicity, sensitivity, and logic. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 11425–11431 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Liu, X. S. et al. Gating of quantum interference in molecular junctions by heteroatom substitution. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56, 173–176 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Huang, C. et al. Single-molecule detection of dihydroazulene photo-thermal reaction using break junction technique. Nat. Commun. 8, 15436 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Song, H. et al. Observation of molecular orbital gating. Nature 462, 1039–1043 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Perrin, M. L. et al. Large tunable image-charge effects in single-molecule junctions. Nat. Nanotech. 8, 282 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Huang, C., Rudnev, A. V., Hong, W. & Wandlowski, T. Break junction under electrochemical gating: testbed for single-molecule electronics. Chem. Soc. Rev. 44, 889–901 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Nichols, R. J. & Higgins, S. J. Single molecule nanoelectrochemistry in electrical junctions. Acc. Chem. Res. 49, 2640–2648 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Capozzi, B. et al. Tunable charge transport in single-molecule junctions via electrolytic gating. Nano Lett. 14, 1400–1404 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Xiang, L. et al. Gate-controlled conductance switching in DNA. Nat. Commun. 8, 14471 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Baghernejad, M. et al. Highly-effective gating of single-molecule junctions: an electrochemical approach. Chem. Commun. 50, 15975–15978 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Brooke, R. J. et al. Single-molecule electrochemical transistor utilizing a nickel-pyridyl spinterface. Nano Lett. 15, 275–280 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Kay, N. J. et al. Single-molecule electrochemical gating in ionic liquids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 16817–16826 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Ruiz, M. P. et al. Bioengineering a single-protein junction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 15337–15346 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Ting, T.-C. et al. Energy-level alignment for single-molecule conductance of extended metal-atom chains. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 15734–15738 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Capozzi, B. et al. Mapping the transmission functions of single-molecule junctions. Nano Lett. 16, 3949–3954 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Hong, W. et al. Single molecular conductance of tolanes: experimental and theoretical study on the junction evolution dependent on the anchoring group. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 2292–2304 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Li, J., Shen, Y., Zhang, Y. & Liu, Y. Room-temperature ionic liquids as media to enhance the electrochemical stability of self-assembled monolayers of alkanethiols on gold electrodes. Chem. Commun. 2005, 360–362 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Guo, S., Hihath, J., Díez-Pérez, I. & Tao, N. Measurement and statistical analysis of single-molecule current–voltage characteristics, transition voltage spectroscopy, and tunneling barrier height. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 19189–19197 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Leary, E. et al. Detecting mechanochemical atropisomerization within an STM break junction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 710–718 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Sadeghi, H. Theory of electron, phonon and spin transport in nanoscale quantum devices. Nanotechnology 29, 373001 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Ferrer, J. et al. Gollum: a next-generation simulation tool for electron, thermal and spin transport. New J. Phys. 16, 093029 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Shitanda, I., Kiryu, H. & Itagaki, M. Improvement in the long-term stability of screen-printed planar type solid-state Ag/AgCl reference electrode by introducing poly(dimethylsiloxane) liquid junction. Electrochim. Acta 58, 528–531 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Meszaros, G., Li, C., Pobelov, I. & Wandlowski, T. Current measurements in a wide dynamic range—applications in electrochemical nanotechnology. Nanotechnology 18, 424004 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Hong, W. et al. An MCBJ case study: the influence of π-conjugation on the single-molecule conductance at a solid/liquid interface. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2, 699–713 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    José, M. S. et al. The SIESTA method for ab initio order-N materials simulation. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 14, 2745–2779 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This research was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFA0204902), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21722305, 21673195, 21503179 and 21703188), the Program for Professor of Special Appointment (Eastern Scholar) at Shanghai Institutions of Higher Learning, the Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (17ZR1447100), the Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (14DZ2261000) and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2017M622060) for funding work in Xiamen. It was also supported by EU Horizon 2020 project QuIET under grant agreement no. 767187 and UK EPSRC grants EP/N017188/1 and EP/M014452/1 and Leverhulme Trust (Leverhulme Early Career Fellowships no. ECF-2017-186 and ECF-2018-375) for funding instrumentation used in Lancaster. It was also supported by Hungarian and Czech Academies of Sciences (P2015-107) andHungarian Research Foundation (OTKA 112034) for funding instrumentation used in Hungary. The authors thank Z.-Q. Tian and B.-W. Mao, Xiamen University, for useful discussions.

Author information




W.H. and J.B. conceived the idea and designed the experiments. W.H., C.L. and W.C. co-supervised the project. J.B., W.H., A.D. and S.S. wrote the manuscript with input from all authors. J.B., X.L. and X.H. carried out the break junction experiments and analysed the data. Q.Z. and W.C. synthesized and provided the structural characterization of the molecules. J.B. and S.L. performed the cyclic voltammetry measurements. Y.T., G.M., J.S. and W.H. built the electrical measurement instrument and wrote the software to control the break junction set-up. A.D., S.S., C.L. and H.S. performed the theoretical modelling. Z.T., J.L. and Y.Y. revised the manuscript. All authors discussed the experiments.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Wenbo Chen, Colin Lambert or Wenjing Hong.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Sections 1–5, Supplementary Figures 1–10, Supplementary References 1–21

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bai, J., Daaoub, A., Sangtarash, S. et al. Anti-resonance features of destructive quantum interference in single-molecule thiophene junctions achieved by electrochemical gating. Nat. Mater. 18, 364–369 (2019).

Download citation

Further reading


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing