Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Interparticle hydrogen bonding can elicit shear jamming in dense suspensions

Abstract

Dense suspensions of hard particles in a liquid can exhibit strikingly counter-intuitive behaviour, such as discontinuous shear thickening (DST)1,2,3,4,5,6,7 and reversible shear jamming (SJ) into a state where flow is arrested and the suspension is solid-like8,9,10,11,12. A stress-activated crossover from hydrodynamic interactions to frictional particle contacts is key for these behaviours2,3,4,6,7,9,13. However, in experiments, many suspensions show only DST, not SJ. Here we show that particle surface chemistry plays a central role in creating conditions that make SJ readily observable. We find the system’s ability to form interparticle hydrogen bonds when sheared into contact elicits SJ. We demonstrate this with charge-stabilized polymer microspheres and non-spherical cornstarch particles, controlling hydrogen bond formation with solvents. The propensity for SJ is quantified by tensile tests12 and linked to an enhanced friction by atomic force microscopy. Our results extend the fundamental understanding of the SJ mechanism and open avenues for designing strongly non-Newtonian fluids.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Particle characteristics and flow curves.
Fig. 2: Tensile testing for shear jamming.
Fig. 3: Shear jamming dependence on hydrogen bonding.
Fig. 4: The effect of aprotic solvents and ionic strength on shear jamming.
Fig. 5: Connecting particle surface chemistry and interparticle friction.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Barnes, H. A. Shear-thickening (‘dilatancy’) in suspensions of nonaggregating solid particles dispersed in Newtonian liquids. J. Rheol. 33, 329–367 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Seto, R., Mari, R., Morris, J. F. & Denn, M. M. Discontinuous shear thickening of frictional hard-sphere suspensions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 218301 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fernandez, N. et al. Microscopic mechanism for shear thickening of non-Brownian suspensions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 108301 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wyart, M. & Cates, M. Discontinuous shear thickening without inertia in dense non-Brownian suspensions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 098302 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Brown, E. & Jaeger, H. M. Shear thickening in concentrated suspensions: phenomenology, mechanisms and relations to jamming. Rep. Prog. Phys. 77, 046602 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mari, R., Seto, R., Morris, J. F. & Denn, M. M. Discontinuous shear thickening in Brownian suspensions by dynamic simulation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 15326–15330 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Royer, J. R., Blair, D. L. & Hudson, S. D. Rheological signature of frictional interactions in shear thickening suspensions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 188301 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Waitukaitis, S. R. & Jaeger, H. M. Impact-activated solidification of dense suspensions via dynamic jamming fronts. Nature 487, 205–209 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ness, C. & Sun, J. Shear thickening regimes of dense non-Brownian suspensions. Soft Matter 12, 914–924 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Peters, I. R., Majumdar, S. & Jaeger, H. M. Direct observation of dynamic shear jamming in dense suspensions. Nature 532, 214–217 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Han, E., Peters, I. & Jaeger, H. High-speed ultrasound imaging in dense suspensions reveals impact-activated solidification due to dynamic shear jamming. Nat. Commun. 7, 12243 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Majumdar, S., Peters, I. R., Han, E. & Jaeger, H. M. Dynamic shear jamming in dense granular suspensions under extension. Phys. Rev. E 95, 012603 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Guy, B. M., Hermes, M. & Poon, W. C. Towards a unified description of the rheology of hard-particle suspensions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 088304 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bi, D., Zhang, J., Chakraborty, B. & Behringer, R. Jamming by shear. Nature 480, 355–358 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Brown, E. et al. Generality of shear thickening in dense suspensions. Nat. Mater. 9, 220–224 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Appel, J., Akerboom, S., Fokkink, R. & Sprakel, J. Facile one-step synthesis of monodisperse micron-sized latex particles with highly carboxylated surfaces. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 34, 1284–1288 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Oyarte Galvez, L., de Beer, S., van der Meer, D. & Pons, A. Dramatic effect of fluid chemistry on cornstarch suspensions: linking particle interactions to macroscopic rheology. Phys. Rev. E 95, 030602 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fall, A. et al. Macroscopic discontinuous shear thickening versus local shear jamming in cornstarch. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 098301 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Jerome, J. J., Vandenberghe, N. & Forterre, Y. Unifying impacts in granular matter from quicksand to cornstarch. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 098003 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Smith, M. I., Besseling, R., Cates, M. E. & Bertola, V. Dilatancy in the flow and fracture of stretched colloidal suspensions. Nat. Commun. 1, 114 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Bischoff White, E. E., Chellamuthu, M. & Rothstein, J. P. Extensional rheology of a shear-thickening cornstarch and water suspension. Rheologica Acta 49, 119–129 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Singh, A., Mari, R., Denn, M. M. & Morris, J. F. A constitutive model for simple shear of dense frictional suspensions. J. Rheology 62, 457–468 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Qin, J., Zhang, G., Ma, Z., Zhou, L. & Shi, X. Effects of ionic structures on shear thickening fluids composed of ionic liquids and silica nanoparticles. RSC Advances 6, 81913–81923 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Warren, J. et al. Effect of temperature on the shear-thickening behavior of fumed silica suspensions. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7, 18650–18661 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Comtet, J. et al. Pairwise frictional profile between particles determines discontinuous shear thickening transition in non-colloidal suspensions. Nat. Commun. 8, 15633 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Boyer, F., Sandoval-Nava, E., Snoeijer, J. H., Dijksman, J. F. & Lohse, D. Drop impact of shear thickening liquids. Phys. Rev. Fluids 1, 013901 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Maharjan, R. & Brown, E. Giant deviation of a relaxation time from generalized Newtonian theory in discontinuous shear thickening suspensions. Phys. Rev. Fluids 2, 123301 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Han, E., Van Ha, N. & Jaeger, H. M. Measuring the porosity and compressibility of liquid-suspended porous particles using ultrasound. Soft Matter 13, 3506–3513 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank S. Majumdar, I. Peters and M. Lueckeheide for insightful discussions. This work was supported by the University of Chicago Women’s Board, and the US Army Research Office through grant W911NF-16-1-0078. Additional support was provided by the Chicago MRSEC, funded by the NSF through grant DMR-1420709. E.H. acknowledges support from the Center for Hierarchical Materials Design (CHiMaD).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

N.M.J. and H.M.J. conceived of the project and designed the experiments. N.M.J. synthesized and characterized particles, performed the tensile tests and rheological experiments, and analysed data. E.H. performed the ultrasound experiments, particle image velocimetry (PIV) analysis, fast tensile tests, and analysed rheology data to obtain the state diagram. R.L. performed AFM measurements and their analysis. J.J. assisted with AFM measurements and their analysis. N.M.J. and H.M.J wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heinrich M. Jaeger.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Video Legend 1, Supplementary Figures 1–6

Supplementary Video 1

Tensile test videos. Videos of the pull test experiment on each system described in Figure 2

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

James, N.M., Han, E., de la Cruz, R.A.L. et al. Interparticle hydrogen bonding can elicit shear jamming in dense suspensions. Nature Mater 17, 965–970 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-018-0175-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-018-0175-5

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing