Article | Published:

All-organic superhydrophobic coatings with mechanochemical robustness and liquid impalement resistance

Nature Materialsvolume 17pages355360 (2018) | Download Citation



Superhydrophobicity is a remarkable evolutionary adaption manifested by several natural surfaces. Artificial superhydrophobic coatings with good mechanical robustness, substrate adhesion and chemical robustness have been achieved separately. However, a simultaneous demonstration of these features along with resistance to liquid impalement via high-speed drop/jet impact is challenging. Here, we describe all-organic, flexible superhydrophobic nanocomposite coatings that demonstrate strong mechanical robustness under cyclic tape peels and Taber abrasion, sustain exposure to highly corrosive media, namely aqua regia and sodium hydroxide solutions, and can be applied to surfaces through scalable techniques such as spraying and brushing. In addition, the mechanical flexibility of our coatings enables impalement resistance to high-speed drops and turbulent jets at least up to ~35 m s−1 and a Weber number of ~43,000. With multifaceted robustness and scalability, these coatings should find potential usage in harsh chemical engineering as well as infrastructure, transport vehicles and communication equipment.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


  1. 1.

    Feng, X. J. & Jiang, L. Design and creation of superwetting/antiwetting surfaces. Adv. Mater. 18, 3063–3078 (2006).

  2. 2.

    Zheng, Y., Gao, X. & Jiang, L. Directional adhesion of superhydrophobic butterfly wings. Soft Matter 3, 178–182 (2007).

  3. 3.

    Blossey, R. Self-cleaning surfaces—virtual realities. Nat. Mater. 2, 301–306 (2003).

  4. 4.

    Jung, S., Tiwari, M. K., Doan, N. V. & Poulikakos, D. Mechanism of supercooled droplet freezing on surfaces. Nat. Commun. 3, 615 (2012).

  5. 5.

    Genzer, J. & Efimenko, K. Recent developments in superhydrophobic surfaces and their relevance to marinefouling: a review. Biofouling 22, 339–360 (2006).

  6. 6.

    Cottin-Bizonne, C., Barrat, J. L., Bocquet, L. & Charlaix, E. Low-friction flows of liquid at nanopatterned interfaces. Nat. Mater. 2, 237–240 (2003).

  7. 7.

    Xue, Z. et al. A novel superhydrophilic and underwater superoleophobic hydrogel-coated mesh for oil/water separation. Adv. Mater. 23, 4270–4273 (2011).

  8. 8.

    Darmanin, T., Taffin de Givenchy, E., Amigoni, S. & Guittard, F. Superhydrophobic surfaces by electrochemical processes. Adv. Mater. 25, 1378–1394 (2013).

  9. 9.

    Tesler, A. B. et al. Extremely durable biofouling-resistant metallic surfaces based on electrodeposited nanoporous tungstite films on steel. Nat. Commun. 6, 8649 (2015).

  10. 10.

    Mates, J. E., Bayer, I. S., Palumbo, J. M., Carroll, P. J. & Megaridis, C. M. Extremely stretchable and conductive water-repellent coatings for low-cost ultra-flexible electronics. Nat. Commun. 6, 8874 (2015).

  11. 11.

    Yang, H. et al. Lotus leaf inspired robust superhydrophobic coating from strawberry-like Janus particles. NPG Asia Mater. 7, e176 (2015).

  12. 12.

    Lu, Y. et al. Robust self-cleaning surfaces that function when exposed to either air or oil. Science 347, 1132–1135 (2015).

  13. 13.

    Steele, A., Bayer, I. & Loth, E. Adhesion strength and superhydrophobicity of polyurethane/organoclay nanocomposite coatings. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 125, E445–E452 (2012).

  14. 14.

    Deng, X., Mammen, L., Butt, H.-J. & Vollmer, D. Candle soot as a template for a transparent robust superamphiphobic coating. Science 335, 5 (2012).

  15. 15.

    Azimi, G., Dhiman, R., Kwon, H. M., Paxson, A. T. & Varanasi, K. K. Hydrophobicity of rare-earth oxide ceramics. Nat. Mater. 12, 315–320 (2013).

  16. 16.

    Feng, L. et al. Superhydrophobicity of nanostructured carbon films in a wide range of pH values. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 115, 4217–4220 (2003).

  17. 17.

    Wang, C.-F. et al. Stable superhydrophobic polybenzoxazine surfaces over a wide pH range. Langmuir 22, 8289–8292 (2006).

  18. 18.

    Lafuma, A. & Quere, D. Superhydrophobic states. Nat. Mater. 2, 457–460 (2003).

  19. 19.

    Tiwari, M. K., Bayer, I. S., Jursich, G. M., Schutzius, T. M. & Megaridis, C. M. Highly liquid-repellent, large-area, nanostructured poly(vinylidene fluoride)/poly(ethyl 2-cyanoacrylate) composite coatings: particle filler effects. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 2, 1114–1119 (2010).

  20. 20.

    Neinhuis, C., Koch, K. & Barthlott, W. Movement and regeneration of epicuticular waxes through plant cuticles. Planta 213, 427–434 (2001).

  21. 21.

    Li, Y., Li, L. & Sun, J. Q. Bioinspired self-healing superhydrophobic coatings. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 49, 6129–6133 (2010).

  22. 22.

    Ahn, B. K., Lee, D. W., Israelachvili, J. N. & Waite, J. H. Surface-initiated self-healing of polymers in aqueous media. Nat. Mater. 13, 867–872 (2014).

  23. 23.

    Asthana, A., Maitra, T., Buchel, R., Tiwari, M. K. & Poulikakos, D. Multifunctional superhydrophobic polymer/carbon nanocomposites: graphene, carbon nanotubes, or carbon black? ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 6, 8859–8867 (2014).

  24. 24.

    Das, I. & De, G. Zirconia based superhydrophobic coatings on cotton fabrics exhibiting excellent durability for versatile use. Sci. Rep. 5, 18503 (2015).

  25. 25.

    Bird, J. C., Dhiman, R., Kwon, H. M. & Varanasi, K. K. Reducing the contact time of a bouncing drop. Nature 503, 385–388 (2013).

  26. 26.

    Liu, Y. H. et al. Pancake bouncing on superhydrophobic surfaces. Nat. Phys. 10, 515–519 (2014).

  27. 27.

    Richard, D., Clanet, C. & Quere, D. Surface phenomena: Contact time of a bouncing drop. Nature 417, 811–811 (2002).

  28. 28.

    Tsai, P. C., van der Veen, R. C. A., van de Raa, M. & Lohse, D. How micropatterns and air pressure affect splashing on surfaces. Langmuir 26, 16090–16095 (2010).

  29. 29.

    Maitra, T. et al. On the nanoengineering of superhydrophobic and impalement resistant surface textures below the freezing temperature. Nano Lett. 14, 172–182 (2014).

  30. 30.

    Ellinas, K., Chatzipetrou, M., Zergioti, I., Tserepi, A. & Gogolides, E. Superamphiphobic polymeric surfaces sustaining ultrahigh impact pressures of aqueous high- and low-surface-tension mixtures, tested with laser-induced forward transfer of drops. Adv. Mater. 27, 2231–2235 (2015).

  31. 31.

    Maitra, T. et al. Superhydrophobicity vs. ice adhesion: The quandary of robust icephobic surface design. Adv. Mater. Inter. 2, 330–330 (2015).

  32. 32.

    Wong, T. S. et al. Bioinspired self-repairing slippery surfaces with pressure-stable omniphobicity. Nature 477, 443–447 (2011).

  33. 33.

    Smith, J. D. et al Droplet mobility on lubricant-impregnated surfaces. Soft Matter 9, 1772–1780 (2013).

Download references


The work was partially supported by M.K.T.’s EPSRC First Grant (EP/N006577/1) and from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Uninon's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement no. 714712. The authors also thank D. Cripps from Blade Dynamic Company (UK) for supplying the carbon fibre fabrics and epoxy resin. We also acknowledge helpful discussions with F. Fang, S. Zhang and P. Kelly in setting up the wettability experiments; J. Davy for scanning electron microscopy and P. Hayes for Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy measurements.

Author information


  1. Nanoengineered Systems Laboratory, UCL Mechanical Engineering, University College London, London, UK

    • Chaoyi Peng
    • , Zhuyang Chen
    •  & Manish K. Tiwari
  2. Department of Material Science and Engineering, College of Aerospace Science and Engineering, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha, China

    • Chaoyi Peng
  3. Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London, London, UK

    • Manish K. Tiwari


  1. Search for Chaoyi Peng in:

  2. Search for Zhuyang Chen in:

  3. Search for Manish K. Tiwari in:


C.P. and M.K.T. conceived the idea of the robust superhydrophobic coatings presented. M.K.T. guided the work. C.P. and M.K.T. planned the experiments. C.P. executed all of the experiments, with support from Z.C. on paper revision experiments, jet impact and contact angle measurements and scanning electron microscopy. C.P. and M.K.T. wrote the paper and interpreted the results, with comments from all authors.

Competing interests

M.K.T. is involved in commercialization efforts for advanced-materials-based coatings that are being explored by UCL Business.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manish K. Tiwari.

Supplementary information

  1. Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Movies 1–8 legends, Supplementary Methods, Supplementary Figures 1–14, Supplementary Notes 1–8, Supplementary References.

  2. Supplementary Movie 1

    Water droplets bouncing off the PKFE coating at different velocities. At higher speed, the water droplets atomize upon impact and spend much less time on the substrate compared to the drops impacting at lower speed

  3. Supplementary Movie 2

    Fine water jets (diameter ~0.25 mm) impacting on the PKFE coating vertically with different speeds. The videos show the corresponding jet velocities, and the Weber numbers for liquid (Wel=ρlV2d/γLG) and gas (Weg=ρgV2d/γLG). The jets are indicated as laminar, transitional and turbulent jets based on standard jet atomization thresholds1. At low speed we observe a liquid accumulation at the point of impact, without any impalement. At high speeds (> 10 m s–1) the jets atomize upon impacting the substrate

  4. Supplementary Movie 3

    Thick water jets (diameter ~2.5 mm) impacting on the PKFE coating vertically with different speeds. The videos show the corresponding jet velocities, and the Weber numbers for liquid (Wel=ρlV2d/γLG) and gas (Weg=ρgV2d/γLG). The jets are indicated as laminar, transitional and turbulent jets based on standard jet atomization thresholds1. These thick jets do not show atomization at the point of substrate impact, rather a stagnation point flow characterised by axisymmetric bending of incoming jet is observed. However, the liquid did not impale into the coating texture (tested by drop contact and sliding angle measurements at the point of impact) right after jet impact tests

  5. Supplementary Movie 4

    Fine water jets (diameter ~0.25 mm) impacting at different speeds on the PKFE coating inclined at 45°

  6. Supplementary Movie 5

    Thick water jets (diameter ~2.5 mm) impacting at different speeds on the PKFE coating inclined at 45°

  7. Supplementary Movie 6

    A turbulent water jet impacting on the PKFE coating with ~35 m s–1, corresponding to a Wel ~43,000. The video demonstrates the excellent impalement resistance of the nanocomposite coating and its ability to sustain high speed liquid impact. After jet impact test, the left over water droplets from the nozzle bounced or rolled right off from the impact spot. This substantiates the fact that the PKFE coating retains superhydrophobicity after high speed jet impact

  8. Supplementary Movie 7

    Demonstration of good adhesion and mechanical flexibility of the PKFE coatings. PKFE coating on A4 paper maintains superhydrophobicity after rolling, folding and crumpling randomly. Minimum bending radius was less than 2 mm

  9. Supplementary Movie 8

    Water droplets roll-off much faster on the PKFE coating than on the Krytox oil infused PKFE nanocomposite. The mechanical flexibility and low water adhesion are key novel features of our PKFE coatings underpinning their excellent water impalement resistance during high speed impacts

About this article

Publication history




Issue Date


Further reading