Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

What we should learn from pandemic publishing

Authors of COVID-19 papers produced during the pandemic were overwhelmingly not subject matter experts. Such a massive inflow of scholars from different expertise areas is both an asset and a potential problem. Domain-informed scientific collaboration is the key to preparing for future crises.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: The COVID-19 research landscape.

Data availability

All data, code and materials used in the analysis are hosted on OSF. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. Weingart, P., Joubert, M. & Connoway, K. PLoS ONE 16, e0254201 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Callaway, E. Nature 582, 167–168 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Majumder, M. S. & Mandl, K. D. Lancet Glob. Health 8, E627–E630 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Duan, D. & Xia, Q. Learn. Publ. 34, 429–441 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Sikdar, S. et al. OSF https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/KC2PN (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Van Noorden, R. Nature 624, 479–481 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Baer, J. Roeper Rev. 37, 165–178 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Palayew, A. et al. Nat. Hum. Behav. 4, 666–669 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sun, Y., Livan, G., Ma, A. & Latora, V. Commun. Phys. 4, 263 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Baker, M. Nature 533, 452–454 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported in part by Lilly Endowment, Inc., through its support for the Indiana University Pervasive Technology Institute. The authors were supported in part by the following grants. S.S.: no. FA9550-19-1-0354, US Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR); S.V.: no. 1927425, no. 1927418, US National Science Foundation (NSF); S.K.: no. SES2200228 (NSF); S.F.: no. 1927425 (NSF), no. 1927418 (NSF) and no. FA9550-19-1-0354 (AFOSR); M.S.M.: no. R35GM146974, National Institute of General Medical Sciences, National Institutes of Health. M.C. was supported by a doctoral fellowship from the Eric & Wendy Schmidt Center of the MIT-Harvard Broad Institute.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Santo Fortunato or Maimuna S. Majumder.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figures 1-3, Supplementary Tables 1-2, Supplementary Sections 1-3 on Dataset, Field of Origin Analysis, and Comparison with other health emergencies.

Source data

Source Data Fig. 1

Data for Fig 1 panels (a) and (b) are in separate sheets. Raw counts are also reported separately.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sikdar, S., Venturini, S., Charpignon, ML. et al. What we should learn from pandemic publishing. Nat Hum Behav 8, 1631–1634 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-01969-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-01969-7

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing