Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Matters Arising
  • Published:

Reply to: Strength of evidence for five happiness strategies

The Original Article was published on 12 August 2024

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Folk, D. & Dunn, E. A systematic review of the strength of evidence for the most commonly recommended happiness strategies in mainstream media. Nat. Hum. Behav. 7, 1697–1707 (2023).

  2. Diener, E. Subjective well-being. Psychol. Bull. 95, 542–575 (1984).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Diener, E., Oishi, S. & Tay, L. Advances in subjective well-being research. Nat. Hum. Behav. 2, 253–260 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sheldon, K. M. in Handbook of Eudaimonic Well-Being (ed. Vittersø, J.) 531–541 (Springer, 2016).

  5. Tudor, K. Mental Health Promotion: Paradigms and Practice (Routledge, 2013).

  6. Park, C. L. et al. Emotional well-being: what it is and why it matters. Affect. Sci. 4, 10–20 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lucas, R. E. & Oishi, S. Describing broad categories with narrow terms: the problems with emotional well-being. Affect. Sci. 4, 29–31 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ong, A. & Wilcox, K. T. Leveraging integrative analyses to advance the science of happiness. Preprint at PsyArXiv https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/kxb54 (2023).

  9. Brodeur, A., Cook, N., Hartley, J. & Heyes, A. Do pre-registration and pre-analysis plans reduce p-hacking and publication bias? Preprint at SSRN https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4180594 (2022).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

D.F. and E.D. wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dunigan Folk.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Human Behaviour thanks Christian Gluud and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Folk, D., Dunn, E. Reply to: Strength of evidence for five happiness strategies. Nat Hum Behav 8, 1658–1659 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-01955-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-01955-z

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing