Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Public-health communication should be more transparent

Nature Human Behaviour volume 7, pages 662–664 (2023)Cite this article

Subjects

An analysis of 2,500 public-health claims reveals that organizations rarely communicate uncertainties around the benefits of behavioural change. To be ethical, public-health communication should be accurate and transparent.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Health claims are common but effect sizes are rare.

References

  1. Fagerlin, A. & Peters, E. in Communicating Risks and Benefits: An Evidence Based User’s Guide (eds Fischoff, B. et al.) 53–64 (2012).

  2. Neuberger, L., Hale, L. & Kerr, L. Montgomery (Appellant) V Lanarkshire Health board (Respondent)(Scotland) (2015).

  3. Rossi, J. & Yudell, M. Public Health Ethics 5, 192–205 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sprenger, J. & Stegenga, J. Philos. Sci. 84, 840–852 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. De Barra, M. & Brown, R. C. H. Assessing honesty in online public health communication. osf.io, https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/FNKUZ (2023).

  6. Caverly, T. J. et al. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 108, djv436 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. NHS. Benefits of exercise. nhs.uk, https://web.archive.org/web/20200611065548/https://www.nhs.uk/live-well/exercise/exercise-health-benefits/ (2020).

  8. Blastland, M., Freeman, A. L., van der Linden, S., Marteau, T. M. & Spiegelhalter, D. Nature 587, 362–364 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Brick, C., McDowell, M. & Freeman, A. L. J. R. Soc. Open Sci. 7, 190876 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Davison, C., Smith, G. D. & Frankel, S. Sociol. Health Illn. 13, 1–19 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. O’Neill, O. Int. J. Philos. Stud. 26, 293–300 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Culture and Evolution, Brunel University London, Uxbridge, UK

    Mícheál de Barra

  2. Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

    Rebecca C. H. Brown

Authors
  1. Mícheál de Barra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rebecca C. H. Brown
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rebecca C. H. Brown.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de Barra, M., Brown, R.C.H. Public-health communication should be more transparent. Nat Hum Behav 7, 662–664 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01574-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01574-0

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing