Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Research Briefing
  • Published:

A simple heuristic for distinguishing lie from truth

One of the reasons that people perform poorly when trying to detect deception is the difficulty of integrating multiple cues into a binary judgement. A simple heuristic of only judging the level of detail in the message consistently allowed people to discriminate lies from truths.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Evaluating a single cue helps participants to distinguish lies from truth.

References

  1. Bond, C. F. & DePaulo, B. M. Accuracy of deception judgments. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 10, 214–234 (2006). A review showing how people, including professionals such as police agents, struggle to tell lies from truth.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Luke, T. J. Lessons from Pinocchio: cues to deception may be highly exaggerated. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 14, 646–671 (2019). This paper critically examines the empirical evidence for cues to deception, arguing that poor research practices have led to inflated effect-size estimates and that only detailedness shows promise as a deception cue.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. DePaulo, B. M. et al. Cues to deception. Psychol. Bull. 129, 74–118 (2003). This meta-analysis shows that most cues to deception are weak.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gigerenzer, G. & Gaissmaier, W. Heuristic decision making. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 62, 451–482 (2011). A review that explains whether and when relying on heuristics can lead to good decisions.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This is a summary of: Verschuere, B. et al. The use-the-best heuristic facilitates deception detection. Nat. Hum. Behav. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01556-2 (2023).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

A simple heuristic for distinguishing lie from truth. Nat Hum Behav 7, 674–675 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01571-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01571-3

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing