Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Correspondence
  • Published:

Improve academic search engines to reduce scholars’ biases

Nature Human Behaviour volume 7, pages 157–158 (2023)Cite this article

Subjects

It is tempting to lay the blame for unbalanced and outdated literature reviews entirely on human behaviour. Overwhelmed by the growing volume of research3, authors may succumb to confirmation bias or resort to the social-proof heuristic of citing what has been cited before. These biases and heuristics reinforce the ‘Matthew effect’ of giving outsized recognition to a small number of authors4 — often men5 at prestigious universities in the English-speaking world, especially the USA6.

But human behaviour may not be entirely to blame. Academic search engines, designed to help researchers to stay on top of the literature, may in some ways magnify our biases.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Littell, J. H. Child. Youth Serv. Rev. 30, 1299–1317 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. von Hippel, P. T. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 17, 1556–1565 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gusenbauer, M. Res. Synth. Methods 12, 684–691 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Perc, M. J. R. Soc. Interface 11, 20140378 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Dworkin, J. D. et al. Nat. Neurosci. 23, 918–926 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Leimu, R. & Koricheva, J. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20, 28–32 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Google. About Google Scholar. Google Scholar, https://scholar.google.com/intl/en/scholar/about.html (accessed 26 August 2021).

  8. Open Science Collaboration. Science 349, aac4716 (2015).

  9. Ioannidis, J. P. A. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 294, 218–228 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rovira, C., Codina, L., Guerrero-Solé, F. & Lopezosa, C. Future Internet 11, 202 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Herring, C. Am. Sociol. Rev. 74, 208–224 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Stojmenovska, D., Bol, T. & Leopold, T. Am. Sociol. Rev. 82, 857–867 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Herring, C. Am. Sociol. Rev. 82, 868–877 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Haddaway, N. R. & Gusenbauer, M. A broken system – why literature searching needs a FAIR revolution. Impact of Social Sciences, https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2020/02/03/a-broken-system-why-literature-searching-needs-a-fair-revolution/ (3 February 2020).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. LBJ School of Public Affairs, University of Texas, Austin, TX, USA

    Paul T. von Hippel

  2. Good Science Project, Houston, TX, USA

    Stuart Buck

Authors
  1. Paul T. von Hippel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stuart Buck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Paul T. von Hippel or Stuart Buck.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Human Behaviour thanks Alberto Martín-Martín and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

von Hippel, P.T., Buck, S. Improve academic search engines to reduce scholars’ biases. Nat Hum Behav 7, 157–158 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01518-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01518-0

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing