Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

How we can make the trophy hunting debate less fraught

Nature Human Behaviour volume 7, pages 6–8 (2023)Cite this article

Subjects

Trophy hunting remains a high-octane debate for scholars and actors at various levels, including governments, lobbies, supranational bodies, local communities and broader publics. These actors are often driven by a range of competing interests. Bridging the divides will require collaboration and a focus on shared goals.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Nelson, M. P., Bruskotter, J. T., Vucetich, J. A. & Chapron, G. Conserv. Lett. 9, 302–306 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Macdonald, D. W., Jacobsen, K. S., Burnham, D., Johnson, P. J. & Loveridge, A. J. Animals 6, 26 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dickman, A. et al. Science 365, 874 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mkono, M. J. Sustain. Tour. 27, 689–704 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mbaiwa, J. E. & Hambira, W. L. J. Sustain. Tour. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2021.1973483 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mkono, M. J. Sustain. Tour. 26, 1608–1624 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bauer, H., Chardonnet, B., Jones, M. & Sillero-Zubiri, C. Science 366, 433–434 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. van Houdt, S. et al. Conserv. Lett. 14, e12840 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dube, N. Ecol. Econ. 159, 335–343 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ghasemi, B. People & Nature 3, 77–87 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Angula, H. N. et al. Biol. Conserv. 218, 26–31 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Koot, S., Hebinck, P. & Sullivan, S. Soc. Nat. Resour. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2020.1762953 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lindsey, P. A., Balme, A., Funston, P. J., Henschel, P. H. & Hunter, L. T. Conserv. Lett. 9, 296–301 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Makuyana, P. G. J. Sustain. Dev. Law Policy 9, 133–167 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Nowak, K. et al. Science 366, 434–435 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

    Mucha Mkono

Authors
  1. Mucha Mkono
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mucha Mkono.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mkono, M. How we can make the trophy hunting debate less fraught. Nat Hum Behav 7, 6–8 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01488-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01488-3

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing