This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Data availability
The normalized version of Klaeber’s Beowulf is available from the authors on request. All other datasets are freely and publicly available at https://github.com/qcrit.
Code availability
All custom code is freely and publicly available at https://github.com/qcrit.
References
Plecháč, P., Cooper, A., Nagy, B. & Šeļa, A. Beowulf single-authorship claim is unsupported. Nat. Hum. Behav. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01222-5 (2021).
Neidorf, L., Krieger, M., Yakubek, M., Chaudhuri, P. & Dexter, J. Large-scale quantitative profiling of the Old English verse tradition. Nat. Hum. Behav. 3, 560–567 (2019).
Sturluson, S. & Faulkes, A. Prose Edda (Everyman Classics, 1987).
Drout, M., Kisor, Y., Smith, L., Dennett, A. & Piirainen, N. Beowulf Unlocked: New Evidence from Lexomic Analysis (Palgrave Macmillan, 2016).
Drout, M. D., Kahn, M. J., LeBlanc, M. D. & Nelson, C. Of dendrogrammatology: lexomic methods for analyzing relationships among Old English poems. J. Engl. Germanic Philol. 110, 301–336 (2007).
Acknowledgements
We thank D. Donoghue for his contributions to the section on metre, especially in alerting us to the passage of S. Sturluson, and M. Drout for providing us with the normalized version of Klaeber’s Beowulf.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
M.S.K., P.C. and J.P.D. designed the study, performed the study, analysed the results and wrote the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Peer review information Nature Human Behaviour thanks Michael Drout and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Extended data
Extended Data Fig. 1 Ratio of intraline to total sense-pauses for the partition of Beowulf, the mean of all texts in the Old English verse corpus, some salient individual texts, and Homer’s Iliad and Odyssey.
The error bar for the corpus mean denotes one s.d. of the ratios for all of the texts. This figure is a replication of figure 2a in our original paper with the correct texts for Genesis A and Genesis B. Beo., Beowulf; Gen., Genesis; K&D, Krapp and Dobbie.
Extended Data Fig. 2 Histograms of fraction difference in slope for hapax compounds for 1,000 binary partitions of Beowulf and five other texts (Exodus, Elene, Juliana, Christ and Satan, and Andreas).
Note that the horizontal scale differs between histograms. Beowulf appears markedly more homogeneous than the comparison texts.
Extended Data Fig. 3 Sample data for the orthographic normalization of Beowulf.
A large number of alterations is needed to normalize spelling between the two scribal hands. The table shows the changes required for the first 100 lines of the poem; a complete list of changes is available from the authors on request.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Information.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Krieger, M.S., Chaudhuri, P. & Dexter, J.P. Reply to: Beowulf single-authorship claim is unsupported. Nat Hum Behav 5, 1484–1486 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01223-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01223-4