Racial minorities vary in their sociopolitical views, as figures such as Barack Obama and Ted Cruz often demonstrate. Here, I examine the implications for interracial behaviour, proposing that Black and Latinx conservatives—specifically, those who are more supportive of hierarchy—upshift competence relative to liberals in mostly white settings, distancing themselves from stereotypes. Analysing 250,000 Congressional remarks and 1 million tweets revealed that Black and Latinx conservatives (determined by voting behaviour) referenced high power and ability more than liberals. No such pattern emerged for white politicians. A meta-analysis of four experiments further revealed that Black conservatives (determined by social dominance orientation) referenced high status more than liberals when responding to a white (but not Black) partner. This was robust to controls and unique to hierarchy-based conservatism. Finally, analysing 18,000 editorials suggested the following implications: the more minority conservatives referenced power in Congress, the more journalists referenced power in editorials about them. The findings highlight the diverse ideology of racial minorities, as well as the behavioural implications.
This is a preview of subscription content
Subscribe to Nature+
Get immediate online access to the entire Nature family of 50+ journals
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $9.92 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
All data supporting the findings in this manuscript are available at the Open Science Foundation (https://osf.io/cwnj8/).
All code for analyses supporting the findings in this manuscript are available at the Open Science Foundation (https://osf.io/6cg2j/).
Vespa, J., Medina, L., & Amstrong, D. M. Demographic Turning Points for the United States: Population Projections for 2020 to 2060 (US Census Bureau, 2018).
Bailik, K. For the Fifth Time in a Row, the New Congress is the Most Racially and Ethnically Diverse Ever (Pew Research Center, 2019); https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/02/08/for-the-fifth-time-in-a-row-the-new-congress-is-the-most-racially-and-ethnically-diverse-ever/
Burns, C., Barton, K., & Kerby, S. The State of Diversity in Today’s Workforce: As Our Nation Becomes More Diverse So Too Does Our Work Force (Center for American Progress, 2012); https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/economy/reports/2012/07/12/11938/the-state-of-diversity-in-todays-workforce/
Leary, M. R. Self-presentation: Impression Management and Interpersonal Behavior (Westview Press, 1995).
Roberts, S. O. et al. Racial inequality in psychological research: trends of the past and recommendations for the future. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 15, 1295–1309 (2020).
Dupree, C. H., Torrez, B., Obioha, O. & Fiske, S. T. Race-status associations: distinct effects of three novel measures among White and Black perceivers. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 120, 601–625 (2021).
Vorauer, J. D., Hunter, A. J., Main, K. J. & Roy, S. A. Meta-stereotype activation: evidence from indirect measures for specific evaluative concerns experienced by members of dominant groups in interethnic interaction. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 78, 690–707 (2000).
Zou, L. & Cheryan, S. Two axes of subordination: a new model of racial position. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 112, 696–717 (2017).
Bergsieker, H. B., Shelton, J. N. & Richeson, J. A. To be liked versus respected: divergent goals in interracial interactions. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 99, 248–26 (2010).
Dupree, C. H. & Fiske, S. T. Self-presentation in interracial settings: the competence downshift by white liberals. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 117, 579–604 (2019).
White, I. K., & Laird, C. H. Steadfast Democrats: How Social Forces Shape Black Political Behavior (Princeton Univ. Press, 2020).
Jefferson, H. The curious case of Black conservatives: construct validity and the 7-point liberal-conservative scale. Preprint at SSRN https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3602209 (2020).
Dawson, M. C. Black Visions: The Roots of Contemporary African American Political Ideologies (Univ. Chicago Press, 2001).
Philpot, T. Conservative, But Not Republican (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2017).
Bejarano, C. E. The Latino Gender Gap in U.S. Politics. (Routledge, 2013).
Donato, K. M. & Perez, S. L. A different hue of the gender gap: Latino immigrants and political conservatism in the United States. Russe. Sage J. Soc. Sci. 2, 98–124 (2016).
Ho, A. K. et al. The nature of social dominance orientation: theorizing and measuring preferences for intergroup inequality using the new SDO7 scale. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 109, 1003–1028 (2015).
Stern, C. & Axt, J. R. Group status modulates the associative strength between status quo supporting beliefs and anti-Black attitudes. Soc. Psychol. Pers. Sci. 10, 946–956 (2018).
Jost, J. T. & Thompson, E. P. Group-based dominance and opposition to equality as independent predictors of self-esteem, ethnocentrism, and social policy attitudes among African Americans and European Americans. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 36, 209–232 (2000).
Eastwick, P. W., Richeson, J. A., Son, D. & Finkel, E. J. Is love colorblind? Political orientation and interracial romantic desire. Pers. Soc. Psychol. B. 35, 1258–1268 (2009).
Ayala, M. I. The rationalization of college attainment through a color-blind lens among Latino(a) students. J. Lat. Educ. 19, 107–119 (2020).
Claessens, S. et al. The dual evolutionary foundations of political ideology. Nat. Hum. Behav. 4, 336–345 (2020).
Kteily, N. S., Rocklage, M. D., McClanahan, K. & Ho, A. K. Political ideology shapes the amplification of the accomplishments of disadvantaged vs. advantaged group members. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 1559–1568 (2019).
Poole, K. T. & Rosenthal, H. A spatial model for legislative roll call analysis. Am. Jour. Polit. Sci. 29, 357–384 (1985).
Poole, K. T. & Rosenthal, H. D-Nominate after 10 years: a comparative update to Congress: a political-economic history of roll-call voting. Legis. Stud. Quart. 26, 5–29 (2001).
Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M. & Malle, B. F. Social dominance orientation: a personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 67, 741–763 (1994).
Altemeyer, B. Right-Wing Authoritarianism (Univ. Manitoba Press, 1981).
Duckitt, J. & Sibley, C. G. A dual-process motivational model of ideology, politics, and prejudice. Psychol. Inq. 20, 98–109 (2009).
Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C. & Glick, P. Universal dimensions of social cognition: warmth and competence. Trends Cog. Sci. 11, 77–83 (2007).
Anderson, C., Hildreth, J. A. D. & Howland, L. Is the desire for status a fundamental human motive? A review of the empirical literature. Psychol. Bull. 141, 574–601 (2015).
Abele, A. E. et al. Facets of the fundamental content dimensions: agency with competence and assertiveness—communion with warmth and morality. Front. Psychol. 7, 1810 (2016).
Keltner, D., Van Kleef, G. A., Chen, S. & Kraus, M. W. A reciprocal influence model of social power: emerging principles and lines of inquiry. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 40, 151–192 (2008).
Adams, J. S. Inequity in social exchange. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 62, 335–343 (1965).
Fast, N. J. & Chen, S. When the boss feels inadequate power, incompetence, and aggression. Psychol. Sci. 20, 1406–1413 (2009).
Utz, S. The potential benefits of campaigning via social network sites. J. Comput. Mediat. Commun. 14, 221–243 (2009).
Cohen, J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (Erlbaum, 1988).
Lakens, D. Equivalence tests: a practical primer for t tests, correlations, and meta-analyses. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 8, 355–362 (2017).
Rosnow, R. L. & Rosenthal, R. Statistical procedures and the justification of knowledge in psychological science. Am. Psychol. 44, 1276–1284 (1989).
Goh, J. X., Hall, J. & Rosenthal, R. Mini meta-analysis of your own studies: some arguments on why and a primer on how. Soc. Pers. Psychol. Comp. 10, 535–549 (2016).
Lewis, A. Conservatism in the Black Community (Routledge, 2013).
Devine, P. G. & Elliot, A. J. Are racial stereotypes really fading? The Princeton trilogy revisited. Pers. Soc. Psychol. B 21, 1139–1150 (1995).
Ambady, N., Bernieri, F. & Richeson, J. A. Toward a histology of social behavior: judgmental accuracy from thin slices of the behavioral stream. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 32, 201–271 (2000).
Kraus, M. W., Torrez, B., Park, J. W. L. & Ghayebi, F. The reproduction of social class in brief speech. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 22998–23003 (2019).
Frimer, J. A. et al. A decline in prosocial language helps explain public disapproval of the U.S. Congress. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 6591–6594 (2015).
Grieco, E. Newsroom Employees are Less Diverse than U.S. Workers Overall (Pew Research Center, 2018); https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/11/02/newsroom-employees-are-less-diverse-than-u-s-workers-overall/
Hayes, A. F. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-based Approach. (Guilford, 2013).
AlShebli, B. K., Rahwan, T. & Woon, W. L. The preeminence of ethnic diversity in scientific collaboration. Nat. Commun. 9, 51–63 (2018).
Richeson, J. A. & Shelton, J. N. Negotiating interracial interactions: costs, consequences, and possibilities. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 16, 316–320 (2007).
Voigt, R. et al. Language from police body camera footage shows racial disparities in officer respect. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 6521–6526 (2017).
Lucas, B. J. & Kteily, N. S. (Anti-)egalitarianism differentially predicts empathy for members of advantaged versus disadvantaged groups. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 114, 665–692 (2018).
Bastian, B. & Haslam, N. Psychological essentialism and stereotype endorsement. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 42, 228–235 (2006).
Lakoff, G. Moral Politics (Univ. Chicago Press, 1996).
Gallois, C., Ogay, T., & Giles, H. in Theorizing about Intercultural Communication (ed. Gudykunst, W. B.) 121–148 (Sage, 2005).
Gaither, S., Cohen-Goldberg, A., Gidney, C. L. & Maddox, K. Sounding Black or White: priming identity and biracial speech. Front. Psychol. 6, 457 (2015).
Yu, B. Language and gender in Congressional speech. Lit. Linguist. Comput. 29, 118–132 (2014).
Barberá, P. et al. Tweeting from left to right: is online political communication more than an echo chamber? Psychol. Sci. 26, 1531–1542 (2015).
Clinton, J. S., Jackman, S. & Rivers, D. The statistical analysis of roll call data. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 98, 355–370 (2004).
Lewis, J. B. et al. Voteview: Congressional roll-call votes database (Voteview, 2020); https://voteview.com/
McCarty, N., Poole, K. T. & Rosenthal, H. The hunt for party discipline in congress. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 95, 673–687 (2001).
Silverman, D. Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analyzing Talk, Text and Interaction (Sage, 1993).
Nicolas, G., Bai, B. & Fiske, S. Automated dictionary creation for analyzing text: an illustration from stereotype content. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 51, 178–196 (2021).
Fellbaum, C. WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database (MIT Press, 1998).
Lakens, D., Scheel, A. M. & Isager, P. M. Equivalence testing for psychological research: a tutorial. Adv. Methods Pract. Psych. Sci. 1, 259–269 (2018).
Peer, E., Brandimarte, L., Samat, S. & Acquisti, A. Beyond the Turk: alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 70, 153–163 (2017).
Bonilla-Silva, E. Racism without Racists: Color-Blind Racism and the Persistence of Racial Inequality in the United States 5th edn (Rowman & Littlefield, 2017).
Saini, A. Superior: The Return of Race Science (Beacon Press, 2019).
Ridings, C. M. & Gefen, D. Virtual community attraction: why people hang out online. J. Comput. Mediat. Commun. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2004.tb00229.x (2004).
Dino, A., Reysen, S. & Branscombe, N. R. Online interactions between group members differing in status. J. Lang. Soc. Psychol. 28, 85–93 (2009).
Walther, J. B. Computer-mediated communication: impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Commun. Res 23, 3–43 (1996).
Horton, J. J., Rand, D. G. & Zeckhauser, R. J. The online laboratory: conducting experiments in a real labor market. Exp. Econ. 14, 399–425 (2011).
Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D. & Simonsohn, U. False-positive psychology: undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychol. Sci. 22, 1359–1366 (2011).
Zakrisson, I. Construction of a short version of the right-wing authoritarianism (RWA) scale. Pers. Indiv. Diff. 39, 863–872 (2005).
Wilson, D. B. Meta-analysis stuff (2005); http://mason.gmu.edu/~dwilsonb/ma.html
Hedges, L. V. & Vevea, J. L. Fixed- and random-effects models in meta-analysis. Psychol. Methods 3, 486–504 (1998).
Cohn, L. D. & Becker, B. J. How meta-analysis increases statistical power. Psychol. Methods 8, 243–253 (2003).
I thank F. Ghayebi and T. Demeke, who provided assistance with data collection; and S. Fiske, M. Kraus and members of the Contending with Social Inequality laboratory for their feedback on early versions of this paper. The author received no specific funding for this work.
The author declares no competing interests.
Peer review information Nature Human Behaviour thanks Ivy Onyeador, Eyal Sagi and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Dupree, C.H. Black and Latinx conservatives upshift competence relative to liberals in mostly white settings. Nat Hum Behav 5, 1652–1662 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01167-9