Can a publication format shape qualities of published research? Higgs and Gelman discuss a new study comparing peer-reviewers’ perceptions of Registered Reports to those of standard research articles. The authors conclude the registered publications were at least as good on the qualities measured, and they discuss challenges of doing research on research.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 /Â 30Â days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Soderberg, C. K., et al. Nat. Hum. Behav. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01142-4 (2021).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Higgs, M.D., Gelman, A. Research on registered report research. Nat Hum Behav 5, 978–979 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01148-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01148-y
