Ansel Adams said, “There are no rules for good photographs, there are only good photographs.” Is it possible to predict our fickle and subjective appraisal of ‘aesthetically pleasing’ visual art? Iigaya et al. used an artificial intelligence approach to show how human aesthetic preference can be partially explained as an integration of hierarchical constituent image features.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Kant, I. & Bernard, J. H. Kant’s Critique of Judgement. 2d ed. (Macmillan, 1931).
Kong, S., Shen, X., Lin, Z., Mech, R. & Fowlkes, C. Photo aesthetics ranking network with attributes and content adaptation. in European Conference on Computer Vision (eds Leibe B., Matas J., Sebe N. & Welling M.) 662–679 (2016).
Iigaya, K., Yi, S., Wahle, I., Tanwisuth, K. & O’Doherty, J. Aesthetic preference for art can be predicted from a mixture of low- and high-level visual features Nat. Hum. Behav. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01124-6 (2021).
Simonyan, K. & Zisserman, A. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. Preprint at arXiv https://arxiv.org/abs/1409.1556 (2015).
Kreiman, G. Biological and Computer Vision (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2021).
Russakovsky, O., Li, L.-J. & Li, F.-F. in Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2121–2131 (Computer Vision Foundation, 2014).
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, M., Kreiman, G. Beauty is in the eye of the machine. Nat Hum Behav 5, 675–676 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01125-5