Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Intimate partner violence and female property rights

Abstract

Intimate partner violence (IPV) affects 30% of ever-partnered women worldwide. This study demonstrates how stronger female marital property rights can lead to lower levels of IPV. If women are financially protected outside of marriage, they in turn experience lower levels of violence inside marriage. Using a natural experiment from the colonization of Sub-Saharan Africa, this study aims to isolate the direct effect of large-scale changes to women’s property rights from other IPV risk factors. The findings show that more equitable marital property rights could both reduce the incidence of IPV and also increase women’s own condemnation of the violence. The empirical estimates suggest that legal property reform could render at least 12 million women less vulnerable to IPV across Sub-Saharan Africa.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Split ethnic groups and legal systems.
Fig. 2: IPV experience by ethnicity.
Fig. 3: IPV experience and beliefs.

Data Availability

Replication data are available on the author’s website:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1jYMALcPdqU6ZB0FXzXdonMoFuJc1p-MG/view. Source data are provided with this paper.

Code Availability

Replication code is available on the authors website:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1jYMALcPdqU6ZB0FXzXdonMoFuJc1p-MG/view. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. 1.

    Violence against women. World Health Organization (2017); https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/violence-against-women

  2. 2.

    Heise, L. L. What works to prevent partner violence? An evidence overview. Strive http://strive.lshtm.ac.uk/resources/what-works-prevent-partner-violence-evidence-overview (LSHTM, 2011).

  3. 3.

    World Bank Group. Women, Business and the Law Database (2021); https://wbl.worldbank.org/

  4. 4.

    Quisumbing, A. R. & Maluccio, J. A. Resources at marriage and intrahousehold allocation: evidence from Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Indonesia, and South Africa. Oxf. Bull. Econ. Stat. 65, 283–327 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Anderson, S. Legal origins and female HIV. Am. Econ. Rev. 108, 1407–1439 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F. & Shleifer, A. The economic consequences of legal origins. J. Econ. Lit. 46, 285–332 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Glendon, M. A. The Transformation of Family Law: State, Law, and Family in the United States and Western Europe (Univ. Chicago Press, 1989).

  8. 8.

    Htun, M. & Weldon, L. Sex equality and family law: historical legacies, feminist activism, and religious power in 70 countries. World Development Report Background Paper https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/9204 (2012).

  9. 9.

    Nunn, N. in Africa’s Development in Historical Perspective (eds Akyeampong, E., Bates, R. et al.) 489–512 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).

  10. 10.

    Asiwaju, A. I. Partitioned Africa: Ethnic Relations across Africa’s International Boundaries, 1884–1984 (St. Martin Press, 1985).

  11. 11.

    Michalopoulos, S. & Papaioannou, E. The long-run effects of the Scramble for Africa. Am. Econ. Rev. 106, 1802–1848 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Uthman, O. A., Lawoko, S. & Moradi, T. Factors associated with attitudes towards intimate partner violence against women: a comparative analysis of 17 sub-Saharan countries. BMC Int. Health Human Rights 9, 14 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Rani, M. & Diop-Sidibe, N. An empirical investigation of attitudes towards wife-beating among men and women in seven sub-Saharan African countries. Afr. J. Reprod. Health 8, 116–136 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Kishor, S. & Johnson, K. Profiling domestic violence: a multi-country study. ORC Macro https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/OD31/OD31.pdf (2004)

  15. 15.

    Nunn, N. & Wantchekon, L. The slave trade and the origins of mistrust in Africa. Am. Econ. Rev. 101, 3221–3252 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Michalopoulos, S. & Papaioannou, E. Pre-colonial ethnic institutions and contemporary african development. Econometrica 81, 113–152 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Moscona, J., Nunn, N. & Robinson, J. A. Segmentary lineage organization and conflict in Sub-Saharan Africa. Econometrica 88, 1999–2036 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Cameron, C., Gelbach, J. & Miller, D. Robust inference with multiway clustering. J. Bus. Econ. Stat. 29, 238–249 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author received no specific funding for this work.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

S.A. conceived the research, put together the data, conducted the analyses and wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Siwan Anderson.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information: Nature Human Behaviour thanks Lori Heise, Nathan Nunn and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Primary Handling Editor: Aisha Bradshaw.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information

Supplementary Results: Supplementary Tables 1−5, Supplementary Methods and Supplementary References.

Reporting summary

Peer review information.

Source data

Source Data Fig. 1

Statistical Source Data

Source Data Fig. 2

Statistical Source Data

Source Data Fig. 3

Statistical Source Data

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Anderson, S. Intimate partner violence and female property rights. Nat Hum Behav (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01077-w

Download citation

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing