Non-monetary incentives that encourage pro-environmental behaviour can contribute to combating climate change. Here, we investigated the effect of green energy defaults in the household and business sectors. In two large-scale field studies in Switzerland of over 200,000 households and 8,000 enterprises, we found that presenting renewable energy to existing customers as the standard option led to around 80% of the household and business sector customers staying with the green default, and the effects were largely stable over a time span of at least four years. Electricity consumption had only a weak effect on default acceptance. Our data do not indicate moral licensing: accepting the green default did not lead to a disproportionate increase in electricity consumption. Compared with men, women in both the household and business sectors were slightly more likely to accept the green default. Overall, non-monetary incentives can be highly effective in both the household and business sectors.
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $8.25 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
The data were obtained by two Swiss electricity companies and are anonymized and part of non-disclosure agreements. Upon request and depending on consent from the companies, the data can be made available for replication. Replication data and code for the population survey will be made available using a data repository.
The code used in this study is available from the authors upon request.
Dietz, T., Ostrom, E. & Stern, P. The struggle to govern the commons. Science 302, 1907–1912 (2003).
Hardin, G. The tragedy of the commons. Science 162, 1243–1248 (1968).
Franzen, A. & Meyer, R. Environmental attitudes in cross-national perspective: a multilevel analysis of the ISSP 1993 and 2000. Eur. Sociol. Rev. 26, 219–234 (2010).
Kvaloy, B., Finseraas, H. & Listhaug, O. The publics’ concern for global warming: a cross-national study of 47 countries. J. Peace Res. 49, 11–22 (2012).
Wiedmann, T., Minx, J., Barrett, J. & Wackernagel, M. Allocating ecological footprints to final consumption categories with input–output analysis. Ecol. Econ. 56, 28–48 (2006).
Caviglia-Harris, J., Chambers, D. & Kahn, J. Taking the ‘U’ out of Kuznets. A comprehensive analysis of the EKC and environmental degradation. Ecol. Econ. 68, 1149–1159 (2009).
Destek, M. & Aslan, A. Disaggregated renewable energy consumption and environmental pollution nexus in G-7 countries. Renew. Energy 151, 1298–1306 (2020).
Thaler, R. H. & Sunstein, C. R. Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth and Happiness (Penguin Books Ltd, 2009).
Liebe, U., Gewinner, J. & Diekmann, A. What is missing in research on non-monetary incentives in the household energy sector? Energy Policy 123, 180–183 (2018).
Chassot, S., Wüstenhagen, R., Fahr, N. & Graf, P. in Marketing Renewable Energy, Management for Professionals (eds C. Herbes & C. Friege) Ch. 6 (Springer Nature, 2017).
Allcott, H. & Mullainathan, S. Behavior and energy policy. Science 327, 1204–1205 (2010).
Ebeling, F. & Lotz, S. Domestic uptake of green energy promoted by opt-out tariffs. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 868–86 (2015).
Egebark, J. & Ekstrom, M. Can indifference make the world greener? J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 76, 1–13 (2016).
Altmann, S. & Traxler, C. Nudges at the dentist. Eur. Econ. Rev. 72, 19–38 (2014).
Pichert, D. & Katsikopoulos, K. Green defaults: information presentation and pro-environmental behaviour. J. Environ. Psychol. 28, 63–73, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.09.004 (2008).
Johnson, E. & Goldstein, D. Do defaults save lives? Science 302, 1338–1339 (2003).
Samuelson, W. & Zeckhauser, R. Status quo bias in decision making. J. Risk. Uncertain. 1, 7–59 (1988).
Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211, 453–458 (1981).
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. & Thaler, R. Anomalies: the endowment effect, loss aversion, and status-quo bias. J. Econ. Perspect. 5, 193–206 (1991).
Sunstein, C. & Reisch, L. Automatically green: behavioral economics and environmental protection. Harv. Environ. Law Rev. 38, 127–158 (2014).
Momsen, K. & Stoerk, T. From intention to action: can nudges help consumers to choose renewable energy? Energy Policy 74, 376–382 (2014).
Hedlin, S. & Sunstein, C. Does active choosing promote green energy use? Experimental evidence. Ecol. Law Q. 43, 107–141 (2016).
Kaiser, M., Bernauer, M., Sunstein, C. R. & Reisch, L. A. The power of green defaults: the impact of regional variation of opt-out tariffs on green energy demand in Germany. Ecol. Econ. 174, 106685 (2020).
Marwell, G. & Ames, R. Economists free ride, does anyone else? Experiments on the provision of public goods. J. Public Econ. 15, 295–310 (1981).
Carter, J. & Irons, M. Are economists different, and if so, why?. J. Econ. Perspect. 5, 171–177 (1991).
Caplan, B. Systematically biased beliefs about economics: robust evidence of judgemental anomalies from the survey of Americans and economists on the economy. Econ. J. 112, 433–458 (2002).
Weitzel, U., Urbig, D., Desai, S., Sanders, M. & Acs, Z. The good, the bad, and the talented: entrepreneurial talent and selfish behavior. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 76, 64–81 (2010).
Koudstaal, M., Sloof, R. & van Praag, M. Risk, uncertainty, and entrepreneurship: evidence from a lab-in-the-field experiment. Manag. Sci. 62, 2897–2915 (2016).
Heslin, P. & Ochoa, J. Understanding and developing strategic corporate social responsibility. Organ. Dyn. 37, 125–144 (2008).
Vogel, D. The Market for Virtue: The Potential and Limits of Corporate Social Responsibility (Brookings Inst. Press, 2005).
Abrahamse, W., Steg, L., Vlek, C. & Rothengatter, T. A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation. J. Environ. Psychol. 25, 273–291 (2005).
Abrahamse, W. & Steg, L. Social influence approaches to encourage resource conservation: a meta-analysis. Glob. Environ. Change Hum. Policy Dimens. 23, 1773–1785 (2013).
Khan, U. & Dhar, R. Licensing effect in consumer choice. J. Mark. Res. 43, 259–266 (2006).
Hofmann, W., Wisneski, D., Brandt, M. & Skitka, L. Morality in everyday life. Science 345, 1340–1343 (2014).
Zizzo, D. Experimenter demand effects in economic experiments. Exp. Econ. 13, 75–98 (2010).
Schwartz, D., Fischhoff, B., Krishnamurti, T. & Sowell, F. The Hawthorne effect and energy awareness. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 15242–15246 (2013).
Energie, B. F. Schweizerische Elektrizitätsstatistik 2019 (Bundesamt für Energie 2019).
Strom- und Biogasprodukte. Der Markt für erneuerbare Energieprodukte 2016 (Verein für umweltgerechte Energie VUE, 2018).
Strom- und Biogasprodukte. Der Markt für erneuerbare Energieprodukte 2018 (Verein für umweltgerechte Energie VUE, 2020).
Chan, H. W., Pong, V. & Tam, K. P. Cross-national variation of gender differences in environmental concern: testing the sociocultural hindrance hypothesis. Environ. Behav. 51, 81–108 (2019).
Buis, M. L. Direct and indirect effects in a logit model. Stata J. 10, 11–29 (2010).
Erikson, R., Goldthorpe, J. H., Jackson, M., Yaish, M. & Cox, D. R. On class differentials in educational attainment. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 9730–9733 (2005).
Ghesla, C. Defaults in green electricity markets: preference match not guaranteed. J. Assoc. Environ. Resour. Econ. 4, S37–S84 (2017).
Ghesla, C., Grieder, M. & Schubert, R. Nudging the poor and the rich—a field study on the distributional effects of green electricity defaults. Energy Econ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.104616 (2020).
Reisch, L. & Sunstein, C. Do Europeans like nudges? Judgm. Decis. Mak. 11, 310–325 (2016).
Sunstein, C. The ethics of nudging. Yale J. Regul. 32, 413–450 (2015).
Sunstein, C., Reisch, L. & Kaiser, M. Trusting nudges? Lessons from an international survey. J. Eur. Public Policy 26, 1417–1443 (2019).
Sunstein, C. R. & Reisch, L. Trusting Nudges: Toward a Bill of Rights for Nudging (Routledge, 2019).
Sunstein, C., Reisch, L. & Rauber, J. A worldwide consensus on nudging? Not quite, but almost. Regul. Gov. 12, 3–22 (2018).
Abramson, P. R. & Inglehart, R. Value Change in Global Perspective (Univ. of Michigan Press, 1995).
Avoided Emissions Calculator (IRENA, 2019); https://www.irena.org/climatechange/Avoided-Emissions-Calculator
Icha, P. & Kuhs, G. Entwicklung der spezifischen Kohlendioxid-Emissionen des deutschen Strommix in den Jahren 1990 – 2019 Climate Change 13 (Umweltbundesamt, 2020).
Allcott, H. Social norms and energy conservation. J. Public Econ. 95, 1082–1095 (2011).
Bolderdijk, J., Steg, L. & Postmes, T. Fostering support for work floor energy conservation policies: accounting for privacy concerns. J. Organ. Behav. 34, 195–210 (2013).
Asensio, O. & Delmas, M. Nonprice incentives and energy conservation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, E510–E515 (2015).
Goldstein, D. Nudge your customers toward better choices. Harv. Bus. Rev. 86, 99–105 (2008).
Kristal, A. & Whillans, A. What we can learn from five naturalistic field experiments that failed to shift commuter behaviour. Nat. Hum. Behav. 4, 169–176 (2020).
Nisa, C. F., Belanger, J. J., Schumpe, B. M. & Faller, D. G. Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials testing behavioural interventions to promote household action on climate change. Nat. Commun. 10, 4545 (2019).
Regional Portraits and Key Figures (Federal Statistical Office, 2020); https://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/en/home/statistics/regional-statistics/regional-portraits-key-figures.html
Diekmann, A. & Preisendorfer, P. Green and greenback: the behavioral effects of environmental attitudes in low-cost and high-cost situations. Ration. Soc. 15, 441–472 (2003).
U.L. and A.D. acknowledge support from the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) within the National Research Programme ‘Managing Energy Consumption’ (NRP71), project no. 407140_153715. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review information Nature Human Behaviour thanks Micha Kaiser, Yasuko Kameyama, Lucia Reisch and Cass Sunstein for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Liebe, U., Gewinner, J. & Diekmann, A. Large and persistent effects of green energy defaults in the household and business sectors. Nat Hum Behav (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01070-3
Nature Human Behaviour (2021)