Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Chimpanzee ethnography reveals unexpected cultural diversity

An Author Correction to this article was published on 23 June 2020

This article has been updated


Human ethnographic knowledge covers hundreds of societies, whereas chimpanzee ethnography encompasses at most 15 communities. Using termite fishing as a window into the richness of chimpanzee cultural diversity, we address a potential sampling bias with 39 additional communities across Africa. Previously, termite fishing was known from eight locations with two distinguishable techniques observed in only two communities. Here, we add nine termite-fishing communities not studied before, revealing 38 different technical elements, as well as community-specific combinations of three to seven elements. Thirty of those were not ecologically constrained, permitting the investigation of chimpanzee termite-fishing culture. The number and combination of elements shared among individuals were more similar within communities than between them, thus supporting community-majority conformity via social imitation. The variation in community-specific combinations of elements parallels cultural diversity in human greeting norms or chopstick etiquette. We suggest that termite fishing in wild chimpanzees shows some elements of cumulative cultural diversity.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type



Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Cultural diversity when fishing termites from aerial nests in six different chimpanzee communities.
Fig. 2: Cultural diversity when fishing termites from underground nests in six different chimpanzee communities.
Fig. 3: Occurrence of technical elements in ten different chimpanzee communities.
Fig. 4: Similarity (Sørensen’s similarity index) between combinations of putative social elements only.

Data availability

The data for this study are included in Supplementary Data 16.

Code availability

The custom codes used for all statistical analyses are included in Supplementary Data 7 and 8.

Change history


  1. Collard, I. & Foley, R. Latitudinal patterns and environmental determinants of recent human cultural diversity: do humans follow biogeographical rules? Evol. Ecol. Res. 4, 371–383 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Foley, R. & Lahr, M. On stony ground: lithic technology, human evolution, and the emergence of culture. Evol. Anthropol. 12, 109–122 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Whiten, A. et al. Cultures in chimpanzee. Nature 399, 682–685 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Boesch, C. Wild Cultures: A Comparison Between Chimpanzee and Human Cultures (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2012).

  5. Tomasello, M. The Cultural Origin of Human Cognition (Harvard Univ. Press,1999).

  6. Galef, B. Approaches to the study of traditional behaviors of free-living animals. Anim. Learn. Behav. 32, 53–61 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tennie, C., Call, J. & Tomasello, M. Ratcheting up the ratchet: on the evolution of cumulative culture. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 364, 2405–2415 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kühl, H. S. et al. Chimpanzee accumulative stone throwing. Sci. Rep. 6, 22219 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Boesch, C. et al. Chimpanzees routinely fish for algae with tools during the dry season in Bakoun, Guinea. Am. J. Primatol. 79, 1–7 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sanz, C., Morgan, D. & Gulick, S. New insights into chimpanzees, tools, and termites from the Congo Basin. Am. Nat. 164, 567–581 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lapuente, J., Hicks, C. & Linsenmair, E. Fluid dipping technology of chimpanzees in Comoé National Park, Ivory Coast. Am. J. Primatol. 79, e22628 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pruetz, J. Evidence of cave use by savanna chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus) at Fongoli, Senegal. Implications for thermoregulatory behavior. Primates 48, 316–319 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Luncz, L., Mundry, R. & Boesch, C. Evidence for cultural differences between neighboring chimpanzee communities. Curr. Biol. 22, 922–926 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Pascual-Garrido, A. Cultural variation between neighbouring communities of chimpanzees at Gombe, Tanzania. Sci. Rep. 9, 8260 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kühl, H. et al. Human impact erodes chimpanzee behavioral diversity. Science 363, 1453–1455 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Caldwell, C., Schillinger, K., Evans, C. & Hopper, C. End state copying by humans (Homo sapiens): implications for a comparative perspective on cumulative culture. J. Comp. Psychol. 126, 161–169 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Goodall, J. Behaviour of free-living chimpanzees of the Gombe Stream area. Anim. Behav. Monogr. 1, 163–311 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bell, A., Richerson, P. & McElreath, R. Culture rather than genes provides greater scope for the evolution of large-scale human prosociality. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 17671–17674 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mesoudi, A. & Thornton, A. What is cumulative cultural evolution? Proc. R. Soc. B 285, 20180712 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Dean, L., Vale, G., Laland., K., Flynn, E. & Kendal, R. Human cumulative culture: a comparative perspective. Biol. Rev. 89, 284–301 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Schofield, D., McGrew, W., Takahashi, A. & Hirata, S. Cumulative culture in nonhumans: overlooked findings from Japanese monkeys? Primates 59, 113–122 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hunt, G. & Gray, R. Diversification and cumulative evolution in New Caledonian crow tool manufacture. Proc. R. Soc. B 270, 867–874 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Korb, J. in Biology of Termites: A Modern Synthesis (eds Bignell, D. et al.) 349–373 (Springer, 2011).

  24. Korb, J. & Linsenmair, K. The effect of temperature on the architecture and distribution of Macrotermes bellicosus (Isoptera, Macrotermitinae) mounds in different habitats of a West African Guinea savanna. Insectes Sociaux 45, 51–65 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang, E. Q. Chopsticks: A Cultural and Culinary History (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2015).

  26. Firth, R. in The Interpretation of Ritual (ed. Fontaine, J.S.) 1–38 (Routledge Library Editions, 1972).

  27. Sanz, C., Deblauwe, I., Tagg, N. & Morgan, D. Insect prey characteristics affecting regional variation in chimpanzee tool use. J. Hum. Evol. 71, 28–37 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Siegel, S. & Castellan, N.J., Jr. Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences 2nd edn (McGraw-Hill, 1988).

  29. Baayen, R. H. Analyzing Linguistic Data (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2008).

  30. McCullagh, P. & Nelder, J. A. Generalized Linear Models (Chapman and Hall, 1989).

  31. Bolker, B. M. et al. Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24, 127–135 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Adams, D. C. & Anthony, C. D. Using randomisation techniques to analyse behavioural data. Anim. Behav. 51, 733–738 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2018).

  34. Bates, B., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. & Walker, S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Stat. Softw. 67, 1–48 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Sørensen, T. A method of establishing groups of equal amplitude in plant sociology based on similarity of species and its application to analyses of the vegetation on Danish commons. K. Dan. Vidensk. Selsk. 5, 1–34 (1948).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Sokal, R. R. & Rohlf, F. J. Biometry—The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research 3rd edn (Freeman & Co., 1995).

  37. Handley, C. & Mathew, S. Human large-scale cooperation as a product of competition between cultural groups. Nat. Commun. 11, 702 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Humle, T., Maisels, F., Oates, J. F., Plumptre, A. & Williamson, E. A. Pan troglodytes (errata version published in 2018). IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (IUCN, 2016);

Download references


We thank the Max Planck Society Innovation Fund and the Heinz L. Krekeler Foundation for financial support. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript. For facilitating fieldwork, we thank M. Ter Heegde, L. Tédonzong, N. Wangue Njomen, J. M. Linder, M. Ketchen Eyong, E. Terrade, A. Nzeheke and H. Eshuis, and the volunteers, for help with obtaining Dindefelo videos. We thank G. Bocksberger, V. Estienne, L. Samuni, L. Benoit and A. Preis for help with the analysis, I. Ordaz-Németh and J. Riedel for their assistance with interobserver reliability tests, A. Bell for advice on calculating cultural FST and the following wildlife and government authorities for permissions to conduct and host research sites in their countries: Ministère de la Recherche Scientifique et de l’Innovation and Ministère des Forêts et de la Faune, Cameroon; Agence Nationale des Parcs Nationaux, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique and Société Equatoriale d’Exploitation Forestière, Gabon; Ministère des Eaux et Forêts and Ministre de l’Environnement et de l’Assainissement et du Développement Durable, Mali; Ministère de l’Economie Forestière, Ministère de le Recherche Scientifique et Technologique and Agence Congolaise de la Faune et des Aires protégées, Republic of Congo; Direction des Eaux, Forêts et Chasses, Senegal; Tanzania Commission for Science and Technology and Tanzania Wildlife Research Institute, Tanzania.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



C.B., M.A. and H.S.K., designed the study and oversaw data collection. C.B., M.A. and P.D. compiled data for this study. C.B., R.M., S.P. and A.K.K. analysed the data. C.B., R.M. and A.K.K. prepared figures. C.B., A.K.K., M.A. and H.S.K. wrote the manuscript with input from all coauthors. E.A.A., A.B., C.C., V.E.E., M.E.-N., J.M.F., D.F., R.A.H.A., V.H., P.K., M.K., M.L., G.M., D.M., M.M., E.N., S.N., L.J.O., R.O., L.P., A.P., C.S., L.S., F. S., N.T., E.G.W. and J.W. collected data in the field.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christophe Boesch.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Editor recognition statement Primary Handling Editor: Charlotte Payne.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Tables 1–5.

Reporting Summary

Supplementary Data 1

All aerial termite fishing data.

Supplementary Data 2

All underground termite fishing data.

Supplementary Data 3

Aerial data in format for analyses.

Supplementary Data 4

Underground data in format for analyses.

Supplementary Data 5

Social or ecological technical element.

Supplementary Data 6

Data translation file for analyses.

Supplementary Data 7

Code needed to run all statistical analyses.

Supplementary Data 8

Custom written functions for all analyses and plotting.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Boesch, C., Kalan, A.K., Mundry, R. et al. Chimpanzee ethnography reveals unexpected cultural diversity. Nat Hum Behav 4, 910–916 (2020).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing