Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Evidence for prereg posters as a platform for preregistration

Prereg posters are conference posters that present planned scientific projects. We provide preliminary evidence for their value in receiving constructive feedback, promoting open science and supporting early-career researchers.

Your institute does not have access to this article

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Kinds of feedback received for posters.
Fig. 2: Indications of presenters’ career stage.


  1. Baker, M. Nature 533, 452–454 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Munafò, M. R. Nicotine Tob. Res. 19, 773–773 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Munafò, M. R. et al. Nat. Hum. Behav. 1, 21 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chambers, C. D. Cortex 49, 609–610 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chambers, C. D., Dienes, Z., McIntosh, R. D., Rotshtein, P. & Willmes, K. Cortex 66, A1–A2 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. The COS Team. Registered reports. Center for Open Science (2013)

  7. Rosenthal, R. Psychol. Bull. 86, 638–641 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nosek, B. A. et al. Science 348, 1422–1425 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Claesen, A., Gomes, S.L.B.T., Tuerlinckx, F. & Vanpaemel, W. Preprint at PsyArXiv (2019).

  10. Tibon, R., Open Science Committee, C. & Henson, R., CBU Open Science Committee. Trends Cogn. Sci. 22, 271–274 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


K.B. and A.C. are/were employed by the British Neuroscience Association (BNA) and its Credibility in Neuroscience programme, supported by the Gatsby Charitable Foundation (GAT3674), and played a key role in the design, conceptualization, data collection, analysis and preparation of this manuscript. The BNA further provided the venue for data collection (at the BNA2019 Neuroscience Festival). Other funders contributed to the time of the authors, namely a British Academy Postdoctoral Fellowship (SUAI/028 RG94188) to R.T., UK Medical Research Council grant (SUAG/010 RG91365) to R.H. and ERC Consolidator grant (647893-CCT) to C.D.C., but had no role in the conceptualization, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



K.B. designed, planned, and carried out the survey; collected the data; and provided input on the paper. A.C. conceived the idea; designed and planned the survey; and provided input on the paper. C.D.C. provided input on the paper. R.H. directed the project together with R.T.; commented on structure and analysis approach since early drafts; and provided input on the paper. R.T. directed the project together with R.H.; analysed the data; wrote the paper with input from all authors; and shared the data on OSF.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roni Tibon.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brouwers, K., Cooke, A., Chambers, C.D. et al. Evidence for prereg posters as a platform for preregistration. Nat Hum Behav 4, 884–886 (2020).

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

Further reading


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing