Research over the last fifty years has suggested that political attitudes and values around the globe are shaped by two ideological dimensions, often referred to as economic and social conservatism. However, it remains unclear why this ideological structure exists. Here we highlight the striking concordance between these dual dimensions of ideology and independent convergent evidence for two key shifts in the evolution of human group living. First, humans began to cooperate more and across wider interdependent networks. Second, humans became more group-minded, conforming to social norms in culturally marked groups and punishing norm-violators. We propose that fitness trade-offs and behavioural plasticity have maintained functional variation in willingness to cooperate and conform within modern human groups, naturally giving rise to the two dimensions of political ideology. Supported by evidence from across the behavioural sciences, this evolutionary framework provides insight into the biological and cultural basis of political ideology.
Your institute does not have access to this article
Open Access articles citing this article.
Scientific Reports Open Access 26 July 2022
Verständigungsbarrieren zwischen kulturalistischen Sozialwissenschaften und evolutionärer Anthropologie: Ursachen, Argumente und Auswege
KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie Open Access 15 March 2021
Subscribe to Nature+
Get immediate online access to the entire Nature family of 50+ journals
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $9.92 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Jost, J. T., Federico, C. M. & Napier, J. L. Political ideology: its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 60, 307–337 (2009).
Converse, P.E. The nature of belief systems in mass publics. in Ideology and Discontent (ed. Apter, D. E.) 206–261 (Free Press of Glencoe, 1964).
Zaller, J.R. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. (Cambridge University Press, 1992).
Jost, J. T. The end of the end of ideology. Am. Psychol. 61, 651–670 (2006).
Adorno, T., Frenkel-Brunswick, E., Levinson, D. & Sanford, R. The Authoritarian Personality. (Harper, 1950).
Treier, S. & Hillygus, D. S. The nature of political ideology in the contemporary electorate. Public Opin. Q. 73, 679–703 (2009).
Claassen, C., Tucker, P. & Smith, S. S. Ideological labels in America. Polit. Behav. 37, 253–278 (2015).
Altemeyer, B. Right-Wing Authoritarianism. (University of Manitoba Press, 1981).
Duckitt, J. & Sibley, C. G. A dual-process motivational model of ideology, politics, and prejudice. Psychol. Inq. 20, 98–109 (2009).
Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W. & Sulloway, F. J. Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychol. Bull. 129, 339–375 (2003).
Feldman, S. & Johnston, C. Understanding the determinants of political ideology: implications of structural complexity. Polit. Psychol. 35, 337–358 (2014).
Schwartz, S.H. Universals in the content and structure of values: theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 25, 1–65 (Elsevier, 1992).
Saucier, G. Isms and the structure of social attitudes. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 78, 366–385 (2000).
Graham, J., Haidt, J. & Nosek, B. A. Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 96, 1029–1046 (2009).
Ashton, M.C. et al. Two dimensions of political attitudes and their individual difference correlates: a cross-cultural perspective. In Culture and Social Behavior: The Ontario Symposium vol. 10 (eds Sorrentino, R. M. Cohen, D., Olson, J. M. & Zanna, M. P.) 1–29 (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2005).
Campbell, A., Converse, P.E., Miller, W.E. & Stokes, D.E. The American Voter. (Wiley, 1960).
Hatemi, P. K. et al. A genome-wide analysis of liberal and conservative political attitudes. J. Polit. 73, 271–285 (2011).
Hatemi, P. K., Medland, S. E., Morley, K. I., Heath, A. C. & Martin, N. G. The genetics of voting: an Australian twin study. Behav. Genet. 37, 435–448 (2007).
Kandler, C., Bell, E. & Riemann, R. The structure and sources of right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation. Eur. J. Pers. 30, 406–420 (2016).
Verhulst, B., Hatemi, P. K. & Eaves, L. J. Disentangling the importance of psychological predispositions and social constructions in the organization of American political ideology. Polit. Psychol. 3, 375–393 (2012).
Alford, J. R., Funk, C. L. & Hibbing, J. R. Are political orientations genetically transmitted? Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 99, 153–167 (2005).
Lewis, G. J. & Bates, T. C. Common heritable effects underpin concerns over norm maintenance and in-group favoritism: evidence from genetic analyses of right-wing authoritarianism and traditionalism. J. Pers. 82, 297–309 (2014).
Batrićević, N. & Littvay, L. A genetic basis of economic egalitarianism. Soc. Justice Res. 30, 408–437 (2017).
Alford, J. R. & Hibbing, J. R. The origin of politics: an evolutionary theory of political behavior. Perspect. Polit. 2, 707–723 (2004).
Block, J. & Block, J. H. Nursery school personality and political orientation two decades later. J. Res. Pers. 40, 734–749 (2006).
Dodd, M. D. et al. The political left rolls with the good and the political right confronts the bad: connecting physiology and cognition to preferences. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 367, 640–649 (2012).
Smith, K. B., Oxley, D., Hibbing, M. V., Alford, J. R. & Hibbing, J. R. Disgust sensitivity and the neurophysiology of left-right political orientations. PLoS ONE 6, e25552 (2011).
Shook, N. J. & Fazio, R. H. Political ideology, exploration of novel stimuli, and attitude formation. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 45, 995–998 (2009).
Oosterhoff, B., Shook, N. J. & Ford, C. Is that disgust I see? Political ideology and biased visual attention. Behav. Brain Res. 336, 227–235 (2018).
Oxley, D. R. et al. Political attitudes vary with physiological traits. Science 321, 1667–1670 (2008).
Fodor, E. M., Wick, D. P., Hartsen, K. M. & Preve, R. M. Right-wing authoritarianism in relation to proposed judicial action, electromyographic response, and affective attitudes toward a schizophrenic mother. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 38, 215–233 (2008).
Hibbing, J. R., Smith, K. B. & Alford, J. R. Differences in negativity bias underlie variations in political ideology. Behav. Brain Sci. 37, 297–307 (2014).
Fiagbenu, M.E., Proch, J. & Kessler, T. Of deadly beans and risky stocks: Political ideology and attitude formation via exploration depend on the nature of the attitude stimuli. Br. J. Psychol. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12430 (2019).
Bakker, B. N., Schumacher, G., Gothreau, C. & Arceneaux, K. Conservatives and liberals have similar physiological responses to threats. Nat. Hum. Behav. 4, 823 (2020).
Osmundsen, M., Hendry, D.J., Lautsen, L., Smith, K.B. & Petersen, M.B. The Psychophysiology of political ideology: replications, reanalysis and recommendations. Preprint at PsyArXiv https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/49hfg (2019).
Duriez, B., Van Hiel, A. & Kossowska, M. Authoritarianism and social dominance in Western and Eastern Europe: the importance of the sociopolitical context and of political interest and involvement. Polit. Psychol. 26, 299–320 (2005).
Pratto, F. et al. Social dominance in context and in individuals: contextual moderation of robust effects of social dominance orientation in 15 languages and 20 countries. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 4, 587–599 (2013).
Tybur, J. M. et al. Parasite stress and pathogen avoidance relate to distinct dimensions of political ideology across 30 nations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 12408–12413 (2016).
Kessler, T. & Cohrs, J. C. The evolution of authoritarian processes: fostering cooperation in large-scale groups. Group Dyn. 12, 73–84 (2008).
Petersen, M. B. & Laustsen, L. Upper-body strength and political egalitarianism: twelve conceptual replications. Polit. Psychol. 40, 375–394 (2019).
Petersen, M.B. Evolutionary political psychology. in The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology (ed. Buss, D. M.) 1–19 (Wiley, 2015).
Haidt, J. The Righteous Mind: Why Good People are Divided by Politics and Religion. (Pantheon Books, 2012).
Hibbing, J.R., Smith, K.B. & Alford, J.R. Predisposed: Liberals, Conservatives, and the Biology of Political Differences. (Routledge, 2013).
de Waal, F.B.M. Chimpanzee Politics: Power and Sex Among Apes. (Johns Hopkins University Press, 1982).
Foerster, S. et al. Chimpanzee females queue but males compete for social status. Sci. Rep. 6, 35404 (2016).
Watts, D. P. & Mitani, J. C. Boundary patrols and intergroup encounters in wild chimpanzees. Behaviour 138, 299–327 (2001).
Lee, R. B. !Kung spatial organization: an ecological and historical perspective. Hum. Ecol. 1, 125–147 (1972).
Hill, K. R. et al. Co-residence patterns in hunter-gatherer societies show unique human social structure. Science 331, 1286–1289 (2011).
Bird, D. W., Bird, R. B., Codding, B. F. & Zeanah, D. W. Variability in the organization and size of hunter-gatherer groups: Foragers do not live in small-scale societies. J. Hum. Evol. 131, 96–108 (2019).
Boehm, C. Egalitarian behavior and reverse dominance hierarchy. Curr. Anthropol. 34, 227–254 (1993).
Henrich, J. The Secret of Our Success: How Culture Is Driving Human Evolution, Domesticating Our Species, and Making Us Smarter. (Princeton University Press, 2015).
Tomasello, M., Melis, A. P., Tennie, C., Wyman, E. & Herrmann, E. Two key steps in the evolution of human cooperation: the interdependence hypothesis. Curr. Anthropol. 53, 673–692 (2012).
Tomasello, M. & Vaish, A. Origins of human cooperation and morality. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 64, 231–255 (2013).
Jensen, K., Vaish, A. & Schmidt, M. F. H. The emergence of human prosociality: aligning with others through feelings, concerns, and norms. Front. Psychol. 5, 822 (2014).
Sterelny, K. Social intelligence, human intelligence and niche construction. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 362, 719–730 (2007).
Tomasello, M. A Natural History of Human Morality. (Harvard University Press, 2016).
Sterelny, K. Cooperation, culture, and conflict. Br. J. Philos. Sci. 67, 31–58 (2016).
Aktipis, A. et al. Understanding cooperation through fitness interdependence. Nat. Hum. Behav. 2, 429–431 (2018).
Gurven, M. To give and to give not: the behavioral ecology of human food transfers. Behav. Brain Sci. 27, 543–559 (2004).
Warneken, F., Chen, F. & Tomasello, M. Cooperative activities in young children and chimpanzees. Child Dev. 77, 640–663 (2006).
Silk, J. B. et al. Chimpanzees are indifferent to the welfare of unrelated group members. Nature 437, 1357–1359 (2005).
Krupenye, C. & Hare, B. Bonobos prefer individuals that hinder others over those that help. Curr. Biol. 28, 280–286.e5 (2018).
Warneken, F. & Tomasello, M. Altruistic helping in human infants and young chimpanzees. Science 311, 1301–1303 (2006).
Koomen, R. & Herrmann, E. An investigation of children’s strategies for overcoming the tragedy of the commons. Nat. Hum. Behav. 2, 348–355 (2018).
Cooper, R., DeJong, D. V., Forsythe, R. & Ross, T. W. Communication in coordination games. Q. J. Econ. 107, 739–771 (1992).
Hamann, K., Warneken, F., Greenberg, J. R. & Tomasello, M. Collaboration encourages equal sharing in children but not in chimpanzees. Nature 476, 328–331 (2011).
Hamlin, J. K., Wynn, K. & Bloom, P. Social evaluation by preverbal infants. Nature 450, 557–559 (2007).
Cronk, L. & Leech, B.L. Meeting at Grand Central: Understanding the Social and Evolutionary Roots of Cooperation. (Princeton University Press, 2013).
Mathew, S. & Boyd, R. Punishment sustains large-scale cooperation in prestate warfare. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 11375–11380 (2011).
Vaish, A., Carpenter, M. & Tomasello, M. Young children’s responses to guilt displays. Dev. Psychol. 47, 1248–1262 (2011).
Burkart, J. M., Brügger, R. K. & van Schaik, C. P. Evolutionary origins of morality: insights from non-human primates. Front. Sociol. 3, 17 (2018).
Riedl, K., Jensen, K., Call, J. & Tomasello, M. No third-party punishment in chimpanzees. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 14824–14829 (2012).
Claidière, N. & Whiten, A. Integrating the study of conformity and culture in humans and nonhuman animals. Psychol. Bull. 138, 126–145 (2012).
Fehr, E. & Fischbacher, U. Third-party punishment and social norms. Evol. Hum. Behav. 25, 63–87 (2004).
Galen, L. W., Smith, C. M., Knapp, N. & Wyngarden, N. Perceptions of religious and nonreligious targets: exploring the effects of perceivers’ religious fundamentalism. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 41, 2123–2143 (2011).
Kinzler, K. D. & Dautel, J. B. Children’s essentialist reasoning about language and race. Dev. Sci. 15, 131–138 (2012).
Kinzler, K. D., Corriveau, K. H. & Harris, P. L. Children’s selective trust in native-accented speakers. Dev. Sci. 14, 106–111 (2011).
Buss, D. M. How can evolutionary psychology successfully explain personality and individual differences? Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 4, 359–366 (2009).
Nettle, D. The evolution of personality variation in humans and other animals. Am. Psychol. 61, 622–631 (2006).
Wolf, M., van Doorn, G. S., Leimar, O. & Weissing, F. J. Life-history trade-offs favour the evolution of animal personalities. Nature 447, 581–584 (2007).
Nettle, D. An evolutionary approach to the extraversion continuum. Evol. Hum. Behav. 26, 363–373 (2005).
van den Berg, P. & Wenseleers, T. Uncertainty about social interactions leads to the evolution of social heuristics. Nat. Commun. 9, 2151 (2018).
Delton, A. W., Krasnow, M. M., Cosmides, L. & Tooby, J. Evolution of direct reciprocity under uncertainty can explain human generosity in one-shot encounters. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 13335–13340 (2011).
Krasnow, M. M., Delton, A. W., Tooby, J. & Cosmides, L. Meeting now suggests we will meet again: implications for debates on the evolution of cooperation. Sci. Rep. 3, 1747 (2013).
Bear, A. & Rand, D. G. Intuition, deliberation, and the evolution of cooperation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 936–941 (2016).
Richerson, P.J. & Boyd, R. Not by Genes Alone: How Culture Transformed Human Evolution. (University of Chicago Press, 2005).
Gigerenzer, G. Why heuristics work. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 3, 20–29 (2008).
Rogers, A. R. Does biology constrain culture? Am. Anthropol. 90, 819–831 (1988).
Cesarini, D. et al. Heritability of cooperative behavior in the trust game. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 3721–3726 (2008).
Carlsson, F., Johansson-Stenman, O. & Nam, P. K. Social preferences are stable over long periods of time. J. Public Econ. 117, 104–114 (2014).
McAuliffe, W. H. B., Forster, D. E., Pedersen, E. J. & McCullough, M. E. Does cooperation in the laboratory reflect the operation of a broad trait? Eur. J. Pers. 33, 89–103 (2019).
Peysakhovich, A., Nowak, M. A. & Rand, D. G. Humans display a ‘cooperative phenotype’ that is domain general and temporally stable. Nat. Commun. 5, 4939 (2014).
Yamagishi, T. et al. Is behavioral pro-sociality game-specific? Pro-social preference and expectations of pro-sociality. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 120, 260–271 (2013).
Johansson-Stenman, O., Mahmud, M. & Martinsson, P. Trust, trust games and stated trust: evidence from rural Bangladesh. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 95, 286–298 (2013).
Rustagi, D., Engel, S. & Kosfeld, M. Conditional cooperation and costly monitoring explain success in forest commons management. Science 330, 961–965 (2010).
Benz, M. & Meier, S. Do people behave in experiments as in the field? - evidence from donations. Exp. Econ. 11, 268–281 (2008).
Wallace, B., Cesarini, D., Lichtenstein, P. & Johannesson, M. Heritability of ultimatum game responder behavior. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 15631–15634 (2007).
Kimbrough, E. O. & Vostroknutov, A. Norms make preferences social. J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. 14, 608–638 (2016).
Snell-Rood, E. C. An overview of the evolutionary causes and consequences of behavioural plasticity. Anim. Behav. 85, 1004–1011 (2013).
Delton, A. W. & Robertson, T. E. How the mind makes welfare tradeoffs: evolution, computation, and emotion. Curr. Opin. Psychol. 7, 12–16 (2016).
Cronin, K. A., van Leeuwen, E. J. C., Vreeman, V. & Haun, D. B. M. Population-level variability in the social climates of four chimpanzee societies. Evol. Hum. Behav. 35, 389–396 (2014).
Cronin, K. A., Acheson, D. J., Hernández, P. & Sánchez, A. Hierarchy is detrimental for human cooperation. Sci. Rep. 5, 18634 (2015).
van Bergen, Y., Coolen, I. & Laland, K. N. Nine-spined sticklebacks exploit the most reliable source when public and private information conflict. Proc. Biol. Sci. 271, 957–962 (2004).
Galef, B. G. Jr., Dudley, K. E. & Whiskin, E. E. Social learning of food preferences in ‘dissatisfied’ and ‘uncertain’ Norway rats. Anim. Behav. 75, 631–637 (2008).
Morgan, T. J. H., Rendell, L. E., Ehn, M., Hoppitt, W. & Laland, K. N. The evolutionary basis of human social learning. Proc. Biol. Sci. 279, 653–662 (2012).
Murray, D. R. & Schaller, M. Threat(s) and conformity deconstructed: perceived threat of infectious disease and its implications for conformist attitudes and behavior. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 42, 180–188 (2012).
Wu, B. P. & Chang, L. The social impact of pathogen threat: how disease salience influences conformity. Pers. Individ. Dif. 53, 50–54 (2012).
Griskevicius, V., Goldstein, N. J., Mortensen, C. R., Cialdini, R. B. & Kenrick, D. T. Going along versus going alone: when fundamental motives facilitate strategic (non)conformity. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 91, 281–294 (2006).
Henrich, J., Bauer, M., Cassar, A., Chytilová, J. & Purzycki, B. G. War increases religiosity. Nat. Hum. Behav. 3, 129–135 (2019).
Gneezy, A. & Fessler, D. M. T. Conflict, sticks and carrots: war increases prosocial punishments and rewards. Proc. Biol. Sci. 279, 219–223 (2012).
Stenner, K. The Authoritarian Dynamic. (Cambridge University Press, 2005).
Petersen, M. B., Sznycer, D., Cosmides, L. & Tooby, J. Who deserves help? Evolutionary psychology, social emotions, and public opinion about welfare. Polit. Psychol. 33, 395–418 (2012).
Henrich, J. Cultural group selection, coevolutionary processes and large-scale cooperation. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 53, 3–35 (2004).
Van Lange, P. A. M., Joireman, J., Parks, C. D. & Van Dijk, E. The psychology of social dilemmas: a review. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 120, 125–141 (2013).
Capps, J. S. Explaining punitiveness: right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance. N. Am. J. Psychol. 4, 263–278 (2002).
Feather, N. T. Reactions to penalties for an offense in relation to authoritarianism, values, perceived responsibility, perceived seriousness, and deservingness. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 71, 571–587 (1996).
Durkheim, É. The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life. (George Allen & Unwin Ltd., 1915).
Norenzayan, A. et al. The cultural evolution of prosocial religions. Behav. Brain Sci. 39, e1 (2016).
Thomsen, L., Green, E. G. T. & Sidanius, J. We will hunt them down: how social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism fuel ethnic persecution of immigrants in fundamentally different ways. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 44, 1455–1464 (2008).
Henley, J. Denmark’s centre-left set to win election with anti-immigration shift. The Guardian https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/jun/04/denmark-centre-left-predicted-win-election-social-democrats-anti-immigration-policies (4 June, 2019).
Malka, A., Lelkes, Y. & Soto, C. J. Are cultural and economic conservatism positively correlated? A large-scale cross-national test. Br. J. Polit. Sci. 49, 1045–1069 (2019).
Bayer, L. The new communists. Politico https://www.politico.eu/article/new-communists-hungary-poland-viktor-orban-jaroslaw-kaczynski/ (2018).
Johnston, C. D. Authoritarianism, affective polarization, and economic ideology. Polit. Psychol. 39, 219–238 (2018).
Halali, E., Dorfman, A., Jun, S. & Halevy, N. More for us or more for me? Social dominance as parochial egoism. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 9, 254–262 (2018).
Haesevoets, T., Folmer, C. R. & Van Hiel, A. Cooperation in mixed-motive games: the role of individual differences in selfish and social orientation. Eur. J. Pers. 29, 445–458 (2015).
Thielmann, I., Spadaro, G. & Balliet, D. Personality and prosocial behavior: A theoretical framework and meta-analysis. Psychol. Bull. 146, 30–90 (2020).
Heaven, P. C. L. & Bucci, S. Right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and personality: an analysis using the IPIP measure. Eur. J. Pers. 15, 49–56 (2001).
Balliet, D., Tybur, J. M., Wu, J., Antonellis, C. & Van Lange, P. A. M. Political ideology, trust, and cooperation: in-group favoritism among Republicans and Democrats during a US national election. J. Conflict Resolut. 62, 797–818 (2018).
Jones, D. N. & Figueredo, A. J. The core of darkness: uncovering the heart of the Dark Triad. Eur. J. Pers. 27, 521–531 (2013).
Duckitt, J. & Sibley, C. G. Personality, ideology, prejudice, and politics: a dual-process motivational model. J. Pers. 78, 1861–1893 (2010).
Chiao, J. Y., Mathur, V. A., Harada, T. & Lipke, T. Neural basis of preference for human social hierarchy versus egalitarianism. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1167, 174–181 (2009).
Geniole, S. N., MacDonell, E. T. & McCormick, C. M. The threat premium in economic bargaining. Evol. Hum. Behav. 38, 572–582 (2017).
Sinn, J. S. & Hayes, M. W. Replacing the moral foundations: an evolutionary-coalitional theory of liberal-conservative differences. Polit. Psychol. 38, 1043–1064 (2017).
Tuschman, A. Our Political Nature: The Evolutionary Origins of What Divides Us. (Prometheus Books, 2013).
Iyer, R., Koleva, S., Graham, J., Ditto, P. & Haidt, J. Understanding libertarian morality: the psychological dispositions of self-identified libertarians. PLoS ONE 7, e42366 (2012).
Curry, O. S., Jones Chesters, M. & Van Lissa, C. J. Mapping morality with a compass: testing the theory of ‘morality-as-cooperation’ with a new questionnaire. J. Res. Pers. 78, 106–124 (2019).
Glover, R. J. et al. Moral rationality and intuition: an exploration of relationships between the Defining Issues Test and the Moral Foundations Questionnaire. J. Moral Educ. 43, 395–412 (2014).
Federico, C. M., Weber, C. R., Ergun, D. & Hunt, C. Mapping the connections between politics and morality: the multiple sociopolitical orientations involved in moral intuition. Polit. Psychol. 34, 589–610 (2013).
Ho, A. K. et al. The nature of social dominance orientation: Theorizing and measuring preferences for intergroup inequality using the new SDO7 scale. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 109, 1003–1028 (2015).
Duckitt, J., Bizumic, B., Krauss, S. W. & Heled, E. A tripartite approach to right-wing authoritarianism: the authoritarianism-conservatism-traditionalism model. Polit. Psychol. 31, 685–715 (2010).
Weeden, J. & Kurzban, R. The Hidden Agenda of the Political Mind: How Self-Interest Shapes Our Opinions and Why We Won’t Admit It. (Princeton University Press, 2014).
Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M. & Malle, B. F. Social dominance orientation: a personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 67, 741–763 (1994).
Brandt, M. J., Reyna, C., Chambers, J. R., Crawford, J. T. & Wetherell, G. The ideological-conflict hypothesis: intolerance among both liberals and conservatives. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 23, 27–34 (2014).
Czarnek, G., Szwed, P. & Kossowska, M. Right- and left-wing prejudice toward dissimilar groups in cultural and economic domains. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 49, 807–823 (2019).
Crawford, J. T., Brandt, M. J., Inbar, Y., Chambers, J. R. & Motyl, M. Social and economic ideologies differentially predict prejudice across the political spectrum, but social issues are most divisive. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 112, 383–412 (2017).
Decety, J., Jackson, P. L., Sommerville, J. A., Chaminade, T. & Meltzoff, A. N. The neural bases of cooperation and competition: an fMRI investigation. Neuroimage 23, 744–751 (2004).
Dawes, C. T. et al. Neural basis of egalitarian behavior. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 6479–6483 (2012).
De Dreu, C. K. W. et al. The neuropeptide oxytocin regulates parochial altruism in intergroup conflict among humans. Science 328, 1408–1411 (2010).
Stallen, M., De Dreu, C. K. W., Shalvi, S., Smidts, A. & Sanfey, A. G. The herding hormone: oxytocin stimulates in-group conformity. Psychol. Sci. 23, 1288–1292 (2012).
Nail, P. R. & McGregor, I. Conservative shift among liberals and conservatives following 9/11/01. Soc. Justice Res. 22, 231–240 (2009).
Alesina, A. & Giuliano, P. Preferences for redistribution. Handbook of Social Economics 1, 93–131 (2011).
Bauer, M., Cassar, A., Chytilová, J. & Henrich, J. War’s enduring effects on the development of egalitarian motivations and in-group biases. Psychol. Sci. 25, 47–57 (2014).
Schulz, J. F., Bahrami-Rad, D., Beauchamp, J. P. & Henrich, J. The Church, intensive kinship, and global psychological variation. Science 366, eaau5141 (2019).
Talhelm, T. et al. Large-scale psychological differences within China explained by rice versus wheat agriculture. Science 344, 603–608 (2014).
Matthews, L. J., Passmore, S., Richard, P. M., Gray, R. D. & Atkinson, Q. D. Shared cultural history as a predictor of political and economic changes among nation states. PLoS ONE 11, e0152979 (2016).
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J. & Norenzayan, A. The weirdest people in the world? Behav. Brain Sci. 33, 61–83 (2010). discussion 83–135.
Hughes, A. Psychology and the Political Experience. (Cambridge University Press, 1975).
Eysenck, H. The Psychology of Politics. (Routledge and Keagan Paul, 1954).
Tomkins, S. The Polarity Scale. (Springer, 1964).
Rokeach, M. The Nature of Human Values. (Free Press, 1973).
Hofstede, G. Culture’s Consequences (Sage, 1980).
Kerlinger, F.N. Liberalism and Conservatism: The Nature and Structure of Social Attitudes. (Erlbaum, 1984).
Forsyth, D. R. A taxonomy of ethical ideologies. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 39, 175–184 (1980).
Katz, I. & Hass, R. G. Racial ambivalence and American value conflict: correlational and priming studies of dual cognitive structures. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 55, 893–905 (1988).
Middendorp, C. Ideology in Dutch Politics. (Van G. Corcum, 1991).
Trompenaars, F. Riding the Waves of Culture. (Brealey, 1993).
Braithwaite, V. Beyond Rokeach’s equality‐freedom model: two‐dimensional values in a one‐dimensional world. J. Soc. Issues 50, 67–94 (1994).
Schwartz, S.H. Value priorities and behavior: applying a theory of integrated value systems. in The Psychology of Values: The Ontario Symposium (eds. Seligman, C., Olson, J. M. & Zanna, M. P.) 1–24 (Erlbaum, 1996).
Triandis, H. C. & Gelfand, M. J. Converging measurement of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 74, 118–128 (1998).
Stangor, C. & Leary, M. Intergroup beliefs: investigations from the social side. in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (ed. Zanna, M.) 38, 243–281 (Academic, 2006).
Ferguson, L. W. Primary social attitudes. J. Psychol. 8, 217–223 (1939).
Boski, P. Socio-political value orientations among Poles in Presidential ‘90 and Parliamentary ’91 elections. Pol. Psychol. Bull. 24, 151–170 (1993).
We wish to thank A. Aktipis and members of the Language, Cognition, and Culture Lab at the University of Auckland for helpful comments on preliminary versions of this manuscript. This work was supported by a Royal Society of New Zealand Marsden Fund grant (#17-UOA-074) and a Rutherford Discovery Fellowship (#11-UOA-019) to Q.D.A. The funders had no role in the preparation of the manuscript or the decision to publish.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review information Primary handling editor: Aisha Bradshaw
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Claessens, S., Fischer, K., Chaudhuri, A. et al. The dual evolutionary foundations of political ideology. Nat Hum Behav 4, 336–345 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0850-9
Nature Reviews Psychology (2022)
Scientific Reports (2022)
Political ideologies as social strategies: does ideological variation predict behavioral variation in cooperative dilemmas?
Current Psychology (2022)
Nature Human Behaviour (2021)
Verständigungsbarrieren zwischen kulturalistischen Sozialwissenschaften und evolutionärer Anthropologie: Ursachen, Argumente und Auswege
KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie (2021)