Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Local economic benefits increase positivity toward foreigners


Can exposure to discernible economic benefits associated with the presence of a high-socioeconomic status immigrant group reduce xenophobic and antiforeigner attitudes? We explore this question using the case of Chinese internationals in the United States and an exogenous influx of foreign capital associated with their presence. Using a difference-in-differences design with panel data, along with analyses of pooled cross-sectional data, we find that immigration attitudes, as well as views towards China, became more positive over time among Americans residing in locales whose economies were stimulated by Chinese foreign investments. Our findings have implications for research on public attitudes towards immigration in an era of growing flows of high-socioeconomic status immigrants to the United States and other immigrant-receiving nations.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type



Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: The effect of Chinese FREI exposure on individual attitudes.
Fig. 2: Potential mechanisms: substantive effects of Chinese FREI exposure.
Fig. 3: Predicted perception of China threat.
Fig. 4: The effect of Chinese FREI exposure on home prices in US ZIP codes.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Replication data are available on the Harvard Dataverse at:

Code availability

Replication code is available on the Harvard Dataverse at:


  1. Bansak, K., Hainmueller, J. & Hangartner, D. How economic, humanitarian, and religious concerns shape European attitudes toward asylum seekers. Science 354, aag2147 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hainmueller, J. & Hopkins, D. J. The hidden American immigration consensus: a conjoint analysis of attitudes toward immigrants. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 59, 529–548 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Newman, B. J. & Malhotra, N. Economic reasoning with a racial hue: is the immigration consensus purely race neutral? J. Politics 81, 153–166 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Liao, S. Chinese Foreign Real Estate Investment and Voting in U.S. Presidential Elections (SSRN, 2019).

  5. Campbell, J. Y. & Cocco, J. F. How do house prices affect consumption? Evidence from micro data. J. Monet. Econ. 54, 591–621 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mian, A., Rao, K. & Sufi, A. Household balance sheets, consumption, and the economic slump. Q. J. Econ. 128, 1687–1726 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Berger, D., Guerrieri, V., Lorenzoni, G. & Vavra, J. House prices and consumer spending. Rev. Econ. Stud. 85, 1502–1542 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chaney, T., Sraer, D. & Thesmar, D. The collateral channel: how real estate shocks affect corporate investment. Am. Econ. Rev. 102, 2381–2409 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Charles, K. K., Hurst, E. & Notowidigdo, M. J. The masking of the decline in manufacturing employment by the housing bubble. J. Econ. Perspect. 30, 179–200 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Miller, N., Peng, L. & Sklarz, M. House prices and economic growth. J. Real Estate Financ. 42, 522–541 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zonta, M. & Edelman, S. The Uneven Housing Recovery (Center for American Progress, 2015).

  12. Searcey, D. & Bradsher, K. Chinese cash floods U.S. real estate market. The New York Times (29 November 2015).

  13. College towns: a roaring trade. The Economist (18 June 2016).

  14. Kaushal, N. & Fix, M. The Contributions of High-Skilled Immigrants (Migration Policy Institute, 2016).

  15. Hainmueller, J. & Hopkins, D. J. Public attitudes toward immigration. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 17, 225–249 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hangartner, D., Dinas, E., Marbach, M., Matakos, K. & Dimitrios, X. Does exposure to the refugee crisis make natives more hostile? Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 113, 442–455 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Phillips, T. ‘This is just the start’: China’s passion for foreign property. The Guardian (29 September 2016).

  18. Rosen, K., Margon, A., Sakamoto, R. & Taylor, J. Breaking Ground: Chinese Investment in U.S. Real Estate (Asia Society, 2016).

  19. Citrin, J., Reingold, B. & Green, D. P. American identity and the politics of ethnic change. J. Politics 52, 1124–1154 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ha, S. E. The consequences of multiracial contexts on public attitudes toward immigration. Polit. Res. Q. 63, 29–42 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hood, M. III & Morris, I. L. Brother, can you spare a dime? Racial/ethnic context and the Anglo vote on proposition 187. Social Sci. Q. 81, 194–206 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hood, M. III & Morris, I. L. ‘Amigo o enemigo’: context, attitudes, and Anglo public opinion toward immigration. Social Sci. Q. 78, 309–323 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hanson, G. H., Scheve, K. & Slaughter, M. J. Public finance and individual preferences over globalization strategies. Econ. Politics 19, 1–33 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Dancygier, R. M. Immigration and Conflict in Europe (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2010).

  25. Lopez, M. H., Passel, J. & Rohal, M. Modern Immigration Wave Brings 59 Million to US, Driving Population Growth and Change Through 2065 (Pew Research Center, 2015).

  26. Liu, Y.-L. China’s Nouveau Riche Have Landed on America’s Campuses (Foreign Policy, 2015).

  27. Green, D. P., Ha, S. E. & Bullock, J. G. Enough already about black box experiments: studying mediation is more difficult than most scholars suppose. Ann. Am. Acad. Pol. Soc. Sci. 628, 200–208 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hankinson, M. When do renters behave like homeowners? High rent, price anxiety, and NIMBYism. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 112, 473–493 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Newman, B. J. Acculturating contexts and Anglo opposition to immigration in the United States. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 57, 374–390 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Tingley, D., Xu, C., Chilton, A. & Milner, H. V. The political economy of inward FDI: opposition to Chinese mergers and acquisitions. Chin. J. Int. Polit. 8, 27–57 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Enos, R. D. Causal effect of intergroup contact on exclusionary attitudes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 3699–3704 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Malhotra, N., Margalit, Y. & Mo, C. H. Economic explanations for opposition to immigration: distinguishing between prevalence and conditional impact. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 57, 391–410 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Pardos-Prado, S. & Xena, C. Skill specificity and attitudes toward immigration. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 63, 286–304 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Citrin, J., Green, D. P., Muste, C. & Wong, C. Public opinion toward immigration reform: the role of economic motivations. J. Politics 59, 858–881 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Pérez, E. O. Explicit evidence on the import of implicit attitudes: the IAT and immigration policy judgments. Polit. Behav. 32, 517–545 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Wright, M., Levy, M. & Citrin, J. Public attitudes toward immigration policy across the legal/illegal divide: the role of categorical and attribute-based decision-making. Polit. Behav. 38, 229–253 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Mansfield, E. D. & Mutz, D. C. Support for free trade: self-interest, sociotropic politics, and out-group anxiety. Int. Organ. 63, 425–457 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Page, B. I. & Xie, T. Living with the Dragon: How the American Public Views the Rise of China (Columbia Univ. Press, 2010).

  39. Newman, B. J., Shah, S. & Collingwood, L. Race, place, and building a base: Latino population growth and the nascent Trump campaign for president. Public Opin. Q. 82, 122–134 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Stokes, B. Republicans, Especially Trump Supporters, See Free Trade Deals as Bad for U.S. (Pew Research Center, 2016).

  41. Partisans Have Starkly Different Opinions About How the World Views the U.S. (Pew Research Center, 2017).

  42. Conflicting Partisan Priorities for U.S. Foreign Policy (Pew Research Center, 2018).

  43. The Pew Research Center for the People & the Press Poll Database (Pew Research Center, 2018).

  44. 2016 Profile of International Activity in U.S. Residential Real Estate (National Association of Realtors, 2016).

  45. Leng, S. & Wertime, D. China’s Anti-Corruption Campaign Ensnares Tens of Thousands More (Foreign Policy, 2015).

  46. Visualizing China’s Anti-Corruption Campaign (ChinaFile, 2017).

  47. Prasad, E. S. Gaining Currency: The Rise of the Renminbi (Oxford Univ. Press, 2016).

  48. U.S. Targets Money Laundering in All-Cash Home Sales in Miami, Manhattan (Reuters, 2016).

  49. Wilcox-Archuleta, B. The treatment works: revisiting a key link in contextual theories of political behavior. Res. Politics 5, (2018).

  50. Ansolabehere, S. & Schaffner, B. F. Does survey mode still matter? Findings from a 2010 multi-mode comparison. Polit. Anal. 22, 285–303 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


S.L. received funding from the Hellman Foundation for this work. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



S.L., N.M. and B.J.N. conceived the research, designed the analyses, conducted the analyses and wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Neil Malhotra.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Primary Handling Editor: Aisha Bradshaw.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Fig. 1 and Supplementary Tables 1–14.

Reporting Summary

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liao, S., Malhotra, N. & Newman, B.J. Local economic benefits increase positivity toward foreigners. Nat Hum Behav 4, 481–488 (2020).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing