The harassment of researchers working in the social sciences—not rarely an organized effort targeting members of marginalized groups—is most alarming. Its implications reach from severe personal consequences to the risk of scientific self-censorship. We invite readers to engage in a much-needed discourse about this worrisome phenomenon.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Get just this article for as long as you need it
$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Cuevas, J. A. Academe 104, 24–28 (2018).
Hawkes, N. Br. Med. J. 342, d3780 (2011).
Kloß, S. T. Ethnography 18, 396–414 (2017).
Hanson, R. & Richards, P. Harassed (Univ. California Press, 2019).
Sharp, G. & Kremer, E. Sociol. Methodol. 36, 317–327 (2006).
Lapidot-Lefler, N. & Barak, A. Comput. Human Behav. 28, 434–443 (2012).
Del Vicario, M. et al. Sci. Rep. 6, 37825 (2016).
Chess, S. & Shaw, A. J. Broadcast Electron. 59, 208–220 (2015).
Massanari, A.L. Soc. Media Soc. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118768302 (2018).
Archer, L., Dewitt, J. & Osborne, J. Sci. Educ. 99, 199–237 (2015).
Clancy, K. B. H. & Davis, J. L. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 48, 169–186 (2019).
Jones, J. M. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 5, 700–707 (2010).
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J. & Norenzayan, A. Behav. Brain Sci. 33, 61–83 (2010).
Bell, R. E. & Koenig, L. S. Science 358, 1223 (2017).
Open Science Collaboration. Science 349, aac4716 (2015)..
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stein, JP., Appel, M. How to deal with researcher harassment in the social sciences. Nat Hum Behav 5, 178–180 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-01011-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-01011-6
This article is cited by
-
Academic freedom and the paradox of tolerance
Nature Human Behaviour (2021)