This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
Social sciences in crisis: on the proposed elimination of the discussion section
Synthese Open Access 09 August 2023
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Grcar, J. F. Am. Sci. 101, 16–18 (2013).
Krausman, P. R., Morgart, J. R. & Rosenstock, S. S. Wildlife Soc. B. 31, 208–211 (2003).
Mellers, B., Hertwig, R. & Kahneman, D. Psychol. Sci. 12, 269–275 (2001).
Rabagliati, H., Moors, P. & Heyman, T. Psychol. Sci. 31, 1200–1204 (2020).
Silberzahn, R. & Simonsohn, U. Psychol. Sci. 25, 1504–1505 (2014).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Heyman, T., Moors, P. & Rabagliati, H. The benefits of adversarial collaboration for commentaries. Nat Hum Behav 4, 1217 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-00978-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-00978-6