Production of stone artefacts using pyro-technology is known from the Middle and Upper Palaeolithic of Europe and the Levant, and the Middle Stone Age in Africa. However, determination of temperatures to which flint artefacts were exposed is impeded by the chemical and structural variability of flint. Here we combine Raman spectroscopy and machine learning to build temperature-estimation models to infer the degree of pyro-technological control effected by inhabitants of the late Lower Palaeolithic (Acheulo-Yabrudian) site of Qesem Cave, Israel. Temperature estimation shows that blades were heated at lower median temperatures (259 °C) compared to flakes (413 °C), whereas heat-induced structural flint damage (for example, pot-lids and microcracks) appears at 447 °C. These results are consistent with a differential behaviour for selective tool production that can be viewed as part of a plethora of innovative and adaptive behaviours of Levantine hominins >300,000 years ago.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Open Access articles citing this article.
The influence of smoke density on hearth location and activity areas at Lower Paleolithic Lazaret Cave, France
Scientific Reports Open Access 27 January 2022
Subscribe to Nature+
Get immediate online access to Nature and 55 other Nature journal
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $9.92 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
The raw UV Raman spectra are publicly available at https://github.com/fnatalio/QesemCave-UVRaman.
The custom code supporting the findings of this study is available from the corresponding author upon request.
Crabtree, D. E. & Butler, B. R. Notes on experiment in flint knapping: 1 heat treatment of silica materials. Tebiwa 7, 1–6 (1964).
Domanski, M. & Webb, J. A review of heat treatment research. Lithic. Technol. 32, 153–194 (2007).
Aldeias, V., Dibble, H. L., Sandgathe, D., Goldberg, P. & McPherron, S. J. P. How heat alters underlying deposits and implications for archaeological fire features: a controlled experiment. J. Archaeol. Sci. 67, 64–79 (2016).
Mercieca, A. & Hiscock, P. Experimental insights into alternative strategies of lithic heat treatment. J. Archaeol. Sci. 35, 2634–2639 (2008).
Hester, T. R. Ethnographic evidence for the thermal alteration of siliceous stone. Tebiwa 15, 63–65 (1972).
Beauchamp, E. K. & Purdy, B. A. Decrease in fracture toughness of chert by heat treatment. J. Mater. Sci. 21, 1963–1966 (1986).
Goren-Inbar, N. et al. Evidence of hominin control of fire at Gesher Benot Yaaqov, Israel. Science 304, 725–727 (2004).
Larrasoaña, J. C. et al. Magnetic properties of cherts from the Basque-Cantabrian basin and surrounding regions: archeological implications. Front. Earth Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2016.00035 (2016).
Domanski, M. & Webb, J. A. Effect of heat treatment on siliceous rocks used in prehistoric lithic technology. J. Archaeol. Sci. 19, 601–614 (1992).
Porat, N., Schwarcz, H. P., Valladas, H., Bar‐Yosef, O. & Vandermeersch, B. Electron spin resonance dating of burned flint from Kebara Cave, Israel. Geoarchaeology 9, 393–407 (1994).
Stahlschmidt, M. C. et al. On the evidence for human use and control of fire at Schöningen. J. Hum. Evol. 89, 181–201 (2015).
Göksu, H. Y., Fremlin, J. H., Irwin, H. T. & Fryxell, R. Age determination of burned flint by a thermoluminescent method. Am. Assoc. Adv. Sci. 183, 651–654 (1974).
Weiner, S., Brumfeld, V., Marder, O. & Barzilai, O. Heating of flint debitage from Upper Palaeolithic contexts at Manot Cave, Israel: changes in atomic organization due to heating using infrared spectroscopy. J. Archaeol. Sci. 54, 45–53 (2015).
Goder-Goldberger, M., Weiner, S., Barzilai, O. & Boaretto, E. Heating of flint artifacts from the site of Boker Tachtit (Israel) was not detected using FTIR peak broadening. J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 12, 173–182 (2017).
Schmidt, P., Lea, V., Sciau, P. & Fröhlich, F. Detecting and quantifying heat treatment of flint and other silica rocks: a new non‐destructive method applied to heat‐treated flint from the Neolithic Chassey culture, Southern France. Archaeometry 55, 794–805 (2013).
Rick, J. W. & Chappell, S. Thermal alteration of silica materials in technological and functional perspective. Lithic Technol. 12, 69–70 (1983).
Bachellerie, J., Renard, C. & Schmidt, P. Technical innovations during the recent Solutrean in the southwest of France: recognition of heat treatment of chert and estimation of heating temperatures based on the example of Le Piage (Lot, France). J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 27, 102001 (2019).
Shimelmitz, R., Barkai, R. & Gopher, A. Systematic blade production at Late Lower Paleolithic (400–200 kyr) Qesem Cave, Israel. J. Hum. Evol. 61, 458–479 (2011).
Zaidner, Y. & Weinstein-Evron, M. The end of the Lower Paleolithic in the Levant: the Acheulo-Yabrudian lithic technology at Misliya Cave, Israel. Quat. Int. 409, 9–22 (2016).
Lemorini, C., Stiner, M. C., Gopher, A., Shimelmitz, R. & Barkai, R. Use-wear analysis of an Amudian laminar assemblage from the Acheuleo-Yabrudian of Qesem Cave, Israel. J. Archaeol. Sci. 33, 921–934 (2006).
Shimelmitz, R. et al. ‘Fire at will’: the emergence of habitual fire use 350,000 years ago. J. Hum. Evol. 77, 196–203 (2014).
Boaretto, E. et al. Specialized flint procurement strategies for hand axes, scrapers and blades in the Late Lower Paleolithic: a10Be study at Qesem Cave, Israel. Human Evolution (Firenze) 24, 1–12 (2009).
Wilson, L., Agam, A., Barkai, R. & Gopher, A. Raw material choices in Amudian versus Yabrudian lithic assemblages at Qesem Cave: a preliminary evaluation. Quat. Int. 398, 61–69 (2016).
Stiner, M. C., Barkai, R. & Gopher, A. Cooperative hunting and meat sharing 400–200 kya at Qesem Cave, Israel. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 13207–13212 (2009).
Gopher, A. et al. The chronology of the late Lower Paleolithic in the Levant based on U–Th ages of speleothems from Qesem Cave, Israel. Quat. Geochronol. 5, 644–656 (2010).
Barkai, R., Rosell, J., Blasco, R. & Gopher, A. Fire for a reason: barbecue at Middle Pleistocene Qesem Cave, Israel. Curr. Anthropol. 58, S314–S328 (2017).
Karkanas, P. et al. Evidence for habitual use of fire at the end of the Lower Paleolithic: site-formation processes at Qesem Cave, Israel. J. Hum. Evol. 53, 197–212 (2007).
Purdy, B. A. & Brooks, H. K. Thermal alteration of silica minerals: an archeological approach. Science 173, 322–325 (1971).
Purdy, B. A. in Lithic Technology: Making and Using Stone Tools (ed. Swanson, E. H. Jr) 133–141 (Mouton, 1975).
Schmidt, P., Bellot-Gurlet, L., Slodczyk, A. & Fröhlich, F. A hitherto unrecognised band in the Raman spectra of silica rocks: influence of hydroxylated Si–O bonds (silanole) on the Raman moganite band in chalcedony and flint (SiO2). Phys. Chem. Miner. 39, 455–464 (2012).
Wadley, L., Luong, S., Sievers, C. & Prinsloo, L. Underground transfer of carbonised organic residues to lithics during preliminary fire experiments: implications for archaeology. Herit. Sci. 7, 59 (2019).
Barkai, R., Gopher, A., Lauritzen, S. E. & Frumkin, A. Uranium series dates from Qesem Cave, Israel, and the end of the Lower Palaeolithic. Nature 423, 977–979 (2003).
Berna, F. et al. Sediments exposed to high temperatures: reconstructing pyrotechnological processes in Late Bronze and Iron Age Strata at Tel Dor (Israel). J. Archaeol. Sci. 34, 358–373 (2007).
Weiner, S. & Bar-Yosef, O. States of preservation of bones from prehistoric sites in the Near East: a survey. J. Archaeol. Sci. 17, 187–196 (1990).
Regev, L., Poduska, K. M., Addadi, L., Weiner, S. & Boaretto, E. Distinguishing between calcites formed by different mechanisms using infrared spectrometry: archaeological applications. J. Archaeol. Sci. 37, 3022–3029 (2010).
Venditti, F., Nunziante-Cesaro, S., Parush, Y., Gopher, A. & Barkai, R. Recycling for a purpose in the Late Lower Paleolithic Levant: use-wear and residue analyses of small sharp flint items indicate a planned and integrated subsistence behavior at Qesem Cave (Israel). J. Hum. Evol. 131, 109–128 (2019).
Roebroeks, W. & Villa, P. On the earliest evidence for habitual use of fire in Europe. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 5209–5214 (2011).
Mourre, V., Villa, P. & Henshilwood, C. S. Early use of pressure flaking on lithic artifacts at Blombos Cave, South Africa. Science 330, 659–662 (2010).
Brown, K. S. et al. Fire as an engineering tool of early modern humans. Science 325, 859–862 (2009).
Díez-Pastor, J. F. et al. Machine learning algorithms applied to Raman spectra for the identification of variscite originating from the mining complex of Gavà. J. Raman Spectrosc. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrs.5509 (2018).
Eilers, P. H. C. A perfect smoother. Anal. Chem. 75, 3631–3636 (2003).
Eilers, P. H. C. & Boelens, H. F. M. Baseline correction with asymmetric least squares smoothing. Leiden-. Univ. Med. Cent. Rep. 1, 5 (2005).
Virtanen, P. et al. SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python. Nat. Methods 17, 261–272 (2020).
Le Losq, C. Rampy: a Python library for processing spectroscopic (IR, Raman, XAS) data. Zenodo https://zenodo.org/record/1168730#.X2RhemgzYuU (2018).
Pedregosa, F. et al. Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12, 2825–2830 (2011).
Chollet, F. Deep Learning mit Python und Keras: Das Praxis-Handbuch vom Entwickler der Keras-Bibliothek (MITP-Verlags, 2018).
Gulli, A. & Pal, S. Deep Learning with Keras (Packt Publishing, 2017).
McCullagh, P. Generalized Linear Models (Routledge, 2019).
Cortes, C. & Vapnik, V. Support-vector networks. Mach. Learn. 20, 273–297 (1995).
Gurney, K. An Introduction to Neural Networks (CRC Press, 2014).
Haykin, S. Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation (Prentice Hall, 1994).
Falguères, C. et al. New ESR/U-series dates in Yabrudian and Amudian layers at Qesem Cave, Israel. Quat. Int. 398, 6–12 (2016).
Parush, Y., Assaf, E., Slon, V., Gopher, A. & Barkai, R. Looking for sharp edges: modes of flint recycling at Middle Pleistocene Qesem Cave, Israel. Quat. Int. 361, 61–87 (2015).
We thank R. Barkai (Tel Aviv University, Israel) for his advice and help in conducting the blind flint knapping experiments. We thank V. Levy for her help in sample collection and Y. Avni (Geological Survey Israel) for his help in collecting flint from the Negev Desert. This work was supported by a research grant from the Benoziyo Endowment Fund for the Advancement of Science, Estate of Raymond Lapon and Estate of Olga Klein Astrachan and a research grant from the George Schwartzman Fund (Weizmann Institute of Science). I.P. is the incumbent of the Sharon Zuckerman Research Fellow Chair. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review information Primary handling editor: Charlotte Payne.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Map displaying the locations from where the raw flint was collected (red dots).
Photographic images of flint collected from different geological formations across Israel before and after heating to 275, 400, 500, 600, 700 and 800 °C for 3h. The samples were allowed to slowly cool down to room temperature. The samples were kept overnight inside the oven. Macroscopic visual evaluation of flint exposed to heat is not a reliable proxy for determining whether or not flint was heat-treated. Scale bar: 2 cm.
Unprocessed UV Raman spectrum taken from a flint surface collected from Mor formation (Sde Boker, Negev Desert, Israel) using 325 nm wavelength. The spectrum obtained using UV laser (325 nm) shows no intrinsic autofluorescence.
Photographic images of all the flakes used in this study.
Photographic images of all the blades used in this study.
Photographic images from a freshly exposed Qesem Cave ‘Deep Shelf’ cross-section. The blue tags (Sed 1–20) show the locations from which 20 samples of sediment were taken. The deeper sediments (including ‘Deep Shelf Unit I’) comprise in situ almost horizontal deposits.
FT-IR spectra of the sediments (N=20) collected from the freshly exposed Qesem Cave ‘Deep Shelf Unit I’ cross-section. The main clay peak centers around 1032 cm-1 with the 3695 and 3620 cm-1 (clay structural water) peaks indicating that the sediment from where the artefacts were taken was not exposed to temperatures exceeding 400 °C. In addition, FT-IR analysis of splitting factor of bone1,2 and the absence of pyrogenic calcite3,4 in all sediments samples show that the bones were not burnt (Supplementary Figs. 9 and 10), and the calcite falls on the grinding curves of chalk (Supplementary Fig. 11), respectively. Taken together, these sediments were not exposed to heat supporting the idea that the artefacts were intentionally burnt in a location different from where they were unearthed.
Average of the estimated temperatures of artefacts (both blades and flakes) by sub-squares (of 1x1m square) of Deep Shelf Unit I. The data show no temperature-based clustering.
About this article
Cite this article
Agam, A., Azuri, I., Pinkas, I. et al. Estimating temperatures of heated Lower Palaeolithic flint artefacts. Nat Hum Behav 5, 221–228 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-00955-z