Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Discussion points for Bayesian inference

Why is there no consensual way of conducting Bayesian analyses? We present a summary of agreements and disagreements of the authors on several discussion points regarding Bayesian inference. We also provide a thinking guideline to assist researchers in conducting Bayesian inference in the social and behavioural sciences.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type



Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout


  1. Gigerenzer, G. J. Socio-Econ. 33, 587–606 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gigerenzer, G. Adv. Methods Pract. Psychol. Sci. 1, 198–218 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. van Ravenzwaaij, D., Cassey, P. & Brown, S. D. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 25, 143–154 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fisher, R. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 17, 69–78 (1955).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dienes, Z. Understanding Psychology as a Science: An Introduction to Scientific and Statistical Inference. (Palgrave Macmillan, 2008).

  6. Etz, A. & Vandekerckhove, J. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 25, 5–34 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kruschke, J. Doing Bayesian Data Analysis: A Tutorial with R, JAGS, and Stan. (Academic Press, 2014).

  8. Wagenmakers, E.-J. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 14, 779–804 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Haaf, J. M., Ly, A. & Wagenmakers, E.-J. Nature 567, 461 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fisher, R.A. Statistical Methods for Research Workers, 2nd ed. (Oliver Boyd, 1928).

  11. Jeffreys, H. Theory of Probability. Section 3.23 (Clarendon Press, 1948).

  12. Gronau, Q.F., Ly, A. & Wagenmakers, E.-J. Am. Stat. (2019).

  13. Wagenmakers, E.-J. et al. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 25, 58–76 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Matzke, D., Boehm, U. & Vandekerckhove, J. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 25, 77–101 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. van Doorn, J. et al. The JASP guidelines for conducting and reporting a Bayesian analysis. Preprint at PsyArXiv (2019).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



B.A., R.H., and D.v.R. conceptualized the project, conducted the study survey and wrote the manuscript. A.G., E-J.W., I.G.K., J. N.R., J.V., M.D.L., R.D.M., W.V. and Z.D. contributed to the summary of this review and added suggestions to the manuscript. The authorship order follows the alphabetical order of their first names. All authors reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Balazs Aczel.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aczel, B., Hoekstra, R., Gelman, A. et al. Discussion points for Bayesian inference. Nat Hum Behav 4, 561–563 (2020).

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing