The compendium of self-enactable techniques to change and self-manage motivation and behaviour v.1.0

Abstract

Behaviour change techniques describe the content of behaviour change interventions, but do not adequately account for the actions that people must themselves undertake to successfully change or self-manage motivation or behaviour. This paper describes the development of a compendium of self-enactable techniques, combining behaviour- and motivation-regulation techniques across six existing classifications of behaviour change techniques and three scoping reviews. The compendium includes 123 techniques, each of which is labelled, defined and presented with instructive examples to facilitate self-enactment. Qualitative feedback was gathered from intervention developers and the general public to improve the utility, congruence and ease of self-enactability of the techniques. This integrative index of self-enactable techniques can assist intervention developers in selecting appropriate self-directed techniques to help people self-manage their motivation and behaviour. Future research with this compendium can expand on the number of behaviours covered by the instructive examples and link techniques with their potential impacts on factors that influence behaviours.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Outline of the compendium development process.
Fig. 2: Results of the expert review exercise.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article and its Supplementary Files. All supplementary files, including copies of the Supplementary Files 15 hosted by Nature Human Behaviour, are available via the Open Science Framework at https://osf.io/pqfjz/; Supplementary Files A–F are available only at https://osf.io/pqfjz/, where any future updates will also be made available.

References

  1. 1.

    Sheeran, P. et al. The impact of changing attitudes, norms, and self-efficacy on health-related intentions and behavior: a meta-analysis. Health Psychol. 35, 1178–1188 (2016).

  2. 2.

    Marcolino, M. S. et al. The impact of mHealth interventions: systematic review of systematic reviews. JMIR mHealth uHealth 6, e23 (2018).

  3. 3.

    Ahn, S., Smith, M. L., Altpeter, M., Post, L. & Ory, M. G. Healthcare cost savings estimator tool for chronic disease self-management program: a new tool for program administrators and decision makers. Front. Public Health 3, 42 (2015).

  4. 4.

    Riegel, B. et al. Self‐care for the prevention and management of cardiovascular disease and stroke. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 6, e006997 (2017).

  5. 5.

    Michie, S. et al. From theory-inspired to theory-based interventions: a protocol for developing and testing a methodology for linking behaviour change techniques to theoretical mechanisms of action. Ann. Behav. Med 52, 501–512 (2018).

  6. 6.

    Abraham, C. & Michie, S. A taxonomy of behavior change techniques used in interventions. Health Psychol. 27, 379–387 (2008).

  7. 7.

    Michie, S., Fixsen, D., Grimshaw, J. M. & Eccles, M. P. Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions: the need for a scientific method. Implement. Sci. 4, 40 (2009).

  8. 8.

    Michie, S., Johnston, M. & Carey, R. Behavior change techniques. in Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine (ed. Gellman, M.) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6439-6_1661-3 (Springer, 2019).

  9. 9.

    Michie, S. et al. Behaviour change techniques: the development and evaluation of a taxonomic method for reporting and describing behaviour change interventions (a suite of five studies involving consensus methods, randomised controlled trials and analysis of qualitative data). Health Technol. Assess. 19, 1–188 (2015).

  10. 10.

    Michie, S. et al. The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Ann. Behav. Med. 46, 81–95 (2013).

  11. 11.

    Kok, G. et al. A taxonomy of behaviour change methods: an Intervention Mapping approach. Health Psychol. Rev. 10, 297–312 (2016).

  12. 12.

    Hardcastle, S. J., Fortier, M., Blake, N. & Hagger, M. S. Identifying content-based and relational techniques to change behaviour in motivational interviewing. Health Psychol. Rev. 11, 1–16 (2017).

  13. 13.

    William, M. R. & Rollnick, S. Motivational Interviewing: Helping People Change 3rd edn (Guilford Press, 2012).

  14. 14.

    Hartmann‐Boyce, J., Aveyard, P., Koshiaris, C. & Jebb, S. A. Development of tools to study personal weight control strategies: OxFAB taxonomy. Obesity 24, 314–320 (2016).

  15. 15.

    Marques, M. M., Teixeira, P. J., Silva, M. S. & Hagger, M. S. Specifying the active components of self-determination theory-based change interventions in health contexts: an expert consensus study. Preprint at PsyArXiv https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/z9wqu (2019).

  16. 16.

    Maes, S. & Karoly, P. Self-regulation assessment and intervention in physical health and illness: a review. Appl. Psychol. 54, 267–299 (2005).

  17. 17.

    Hollands, G. J. et al. The TIPPME intervention typology for changing environments to change behaviour. Nat. Hum. Behav. 1, 0140 (2017).

  18. 18.

    Duckworth, A. L., Milkman, K. L. & Laibson, D. Beyond willpower: strategies for reducing failures of self-control. Psychol. Sci. Public Interest 19, 102–129 (2018).

  19. 19.

    Hankonen, N. Participants’ enactment of behavior change techniques: a call for increased focus on what people do to manage their motivation and behaviour. Preprint at PsyArXiv https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/pa4wg (2018).

  20. 20.

    Richardson, M. J., Dale, R. & Marsh, K. L. in Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology 2nd edn (eds Reis, H. T. & Judd, C. M.) 253–282 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).

  21. 21.

    Shiell, A., Hawe, P. & Gold, L. Complex interventions or complex systems? Implications for health economic evaluation. BMJ 336, 1281–1283 (2008).

  22. 22.

    Bellg, A. J. et al. Enhancing treatment fidelity in health behavior change studies: best practices and recommendations from the NIH Behavior Change Consortium. Health Psychol. 23, 443–451 (2004).

  23. 23.

    Knittle, K., De Gucht, V., Hurkmans, E., Vlieland, T. V. & Maes, S. Explaining physical activity maintenance after a theory-based intervention among patients with rheumatoid arthritis: process evaluation of a randomized controlled trial. Arthritis Care Res. 68, 203–210 (2016).

  24. 24.

    Hankonen, N. et al. Which behavior change techniques are associated with changes in physical activity, diet and body mass index in people with recently diagnosed diabetes? Ann. Behav. Med. 49, 7–17 (2015).

  25. 25.

    Burke, L. E., Wang, J. & Sevick, M. A. Self-monitoring in weight loss: a systematic review of the literature. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 111, 92–102 (2011).

  26. 26.

    Moore, G. F. et al. From complex social interventions to interventions in complex social systems: future directions and unresolved questions for intervention development and evaluation. Evaluation 25, 23–45 (2019).

  27. 27.

    Rickles, D., Hawe, P. & Shiell, A. A simple guide to chaos and complexity. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 61, 933–937 (2007).

  28. 28.

    Tims, M., Bakker, A. B. & Derks, D. The impact of job crafting on job demands, job resources, and well-being. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 18, 230–240 (2013).

  29. 29.

    Demerouti, E., Peeters, M. C. W. & van den Heuvel, M. in Positive Psychological Intervention Design and Protocols for Multi-Cultural Contexts (eds. Van Zyl, L. E. & Rothmann Sr., S.) 103–125 (Springer International Publishing, 2019).

  30. 30.

    Brick, N., MacIntyre, T. & Campbell, M. Attentional focus in endurance activity: new paradigms and future directions. Int. Rev. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 7, 106–134 (2014).

  31. 31.

    Van Raalte, J. L., Vincent, A. & Brewer, B. W. Self-talk: review and sport-specific model. Psychol. Sport Exerc. 22, 139–148 (2016).

  32. 32.

    Kim, T., Jimenez-Diaz, J. & Chen, J. The effect of attentional focus in balancing tasks: a systematic review with meta-analysis. J. Hum. Sport Exerc. 12, 463–479 (2017).

  33. 33.

    Bottiroli, S., Cavallini, E., Dunlosky, J., Vecchi, T. & Hertzog, C. Self-guided strategy-adaption training for older adults: transfer effects to everyday tasks. Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr. 72, 91–98 (2017).

  34. 34.

    Fleiss, J. L. Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychol. Bull. 76, 378–382 (1971).

  35. 35.

    Flesch, R. A new readability yardstick. J. Appl. Psychol. 32, 221–233 (1948).

  36. 36.

    Kincaid, J., Fishburne, R., Rogers, R. & Chissom, B. Derivation of New Readability Formulas (Automated Readability Index, Fog Count and Flesch Reading Ease Formula) for Navy Enlisted Personnel (Institute for Simulation and Training, 1975).

  37. 37.

    Lorencatto, F., West, R., Bruguera, C., Brose, L. S. & Michie, S. Assessing the quality of goal setting in behavioural support for smoking cessation and its association with outcomes. Ann. Behav. Med. 50, 310–318 (2016).

  38. 38.

    Black, N. et al. Enhancing behavior change technique coding methods: identifying behavioral targets and delivery styles in smoking cessation trials. Ann. Behav. Med. 53, 583–591 (2018).

  39. 39.

    Sekhon, M., Cartwright, M. & Francis, J. J. Acceptability of healthcare interventions: an overview of reviews and development of a theoretical framework. BMC Health Serv. Res. 17, 88 (2017).

  40. 40.

    Urrea, B. et al. Mobile health initiatives to improve outcomes in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Curr. Treat. Options Cardiovasc. Med. 17, 59 (2015).

  41. 41.

    Schroeder, J. & Fishbach, A. How to motivate yourself and others? Intended and unintended consequences. Res. Organ. Behav. 35, 123–141 (2015).

  42. 42.

    Guerdjikova, A. I., Mori, N., Casuto, L. S. & McElroy, S. L. Binge eating disorder. Psychiatr. Clin. 40, 255–266 (2017).

  43. 43.

    Michie, S. et al. A refined taxonomy of behaviour change techniques to help people change their physical activity and healthy eating behaviours: the CALO-RE taxonomy. Psychol. Health 26, 1479–1498 (2011).

  44. 44.

    Brabham, D. C. Crowdsourcing as a model for problem solving: an introduction and cases. Convergence 14, 75–90 (2008).

  45. 45.

    Carey, R. N. et al. Behavior change techniques and their mechanisms of action: a synthesis of links described in published intervention literature. Ann. Behav. Med. 53, 693–707 (2019).

  46. 46.

    Johnston, M. et al. Linking behavior change techniques and mechanisms of action: triangulation of findings from literature synthesis and expert consensus. Preprint at PsyArXiv https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ur6kz (2018).

  47. 47.

    Connell, L. E. et al. Links between behavior change techniques and mechanisms of action: an expert consensus study. Ann. Behav. Med. 53, 708–720 (2019).

  48. 48.

    The Theory and Techniques Tool. HumanBehaviourChange.org https://theoryandtechniquetool.humanbehaviourchange.org/ (Human Behaviour Change Project, 2019).

  49. 49.

    Greaves, C. J. Uptake of behavior change techniques – a key focus for process analysis and for intervention delivery: a comment on Hankonen et al. Ann. Behav. Med. 49, 1–2 (2015).

  50. 50.

    Bradbury, K., Watts, S., Arden-Close, E., Yardley, L. & Lewith, G. Developing digital interventions: a methodological guide. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat. Med. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/561320 (2014)

  51. 51.

    de Vries, H. & Brug, J. Computer-tailored interventions motivating people to adopt health promoting behaviours: introduction to a new approach. Patient Educ. Couns. 36, 99–105 (1999).

  52. 52.

    Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychol. Inq. 11, 227–268 (2000).

  53. 53.

    Hemingway Editor http://www.hemingwayapp.com/ (.38 Long, LLC, 2015).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The contributions of K.K., M.H., M.S. and M.B. to this work were funded by the Academy of Finland (project grant no. 295765 to N.H. as principal investigator). N.H.’s contribution was supported by Academy of Finland Research Fellowship (grant no. 285283). M.M.M. is funded by a Marie-Sklodowska-Curie Fellowship (Co-fund EDGE programme, grant agreement no. 713567). M.H.’s contribution was supported by a Finland Distinguished Professor (FiDiPro) award (Dnro 1801/31/2105) from Business Finland. These funders had no role in the conceptualization, design, data collection, analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript. We thank the following expert review participants, whose insights and feedback were vital in carrying out this work: R. Carey, T. Corbett, S. Dombrowski, L. Fleig, J. Inauen, D. Kwasnicka, J. McSharry, L. Morrison, E. Norris, H. Patrick, S. Pears, J. Presseau, A. Rodrigues, K. Sainsbury, M. Silva, J. Spook and L. Warner.

Author information

N.H. conceived the study and acquired funding. K.K., M.H., M.M.M., M.S., M.S.H., W.H. and N.H. contributed to its design. K.K., M.H., M.M.M., M.S., M.B., F.E. and N.H. acquired data. K.K., M.H., M.M.M., M.S., M.B., F.E. and N.H. analysed data. K.K., M.H., M.M.M., M.S., M.B., F.E., W.H. and N.H. interpreted data. K.K., M.H., M.M.M., M.S., M.B., F.E. and N.H. drafted the manuscript. All authors substantively revised the manuscript. All authors approved the submitted manuscript and any substantially modified version that involved the author’s contribution to the study. All authors agree both to be personally accountable for the author’s own contributions and to ensure that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work, even those in which the author was not personally involved, are appropriately investigated, resolved and the resolution documented in the literature.

Correspondence to Nelli Hankonen.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

M.S.H., W.H. and M.M.M. are co-authors of existing taxonomies of behaviour change techniques that have informed this work. The authors declare no other competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Primary handling editors: Mary Elizabeth Sutherland and Stavroula Kousta

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Results: list version of the compendium (Supplementary File 1) and plain-language introduction (Supplementary File 2).

Reporting Summary

Supplementary Data 1.

Supplementary Files 3, 4 and 5.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Knittle, K., Heino, M., Marques, M.M. et al. The compendium of self-enactable techniques to change and self-manage motivation and behaviour v.1.0. Nat Hum Behav 4, 215–223 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0798-9

Download citation

Further reading