Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Matters Arising
  • Published:

Reply to: Four personality types may be neither robust nor exhaustive

The Original Article was published on 16 September 2019

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Unintuitive properties of the five-dimensional space of personality traits.

Data availability

Data are available from https://osf.io/tbmh5/.

Code availability

Code is available in a GitHub repository at https://github.com/amarallab/personality-types.

References

  1. Freudenstein, J.-P., Strauch, C., Mussel, P. & Ziegler, M. Four personality types may be neither robust nor exhaustive. Nat. Hum. Behav. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-019-0721-4 (2019).

  2. Gerlach, M., Farb, B., Revelle, W. & Amaral, L. A. N. A robust data-driven approach identifies four personality types across four large data sets. Nat. Hum. Behav. 2, 735–742 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Revelle, W., Wilt, J. & Condon, D. M. in The Wiley-Blackwell Handbook of Individual Differences (eds Chamorro-Premuzic, T. et al.) (Wiley-Blackwell, 2013).

  4. Revelle, W. & Condon, D. M. in The Wiley Handbook of Psychometric Testing: A Multidisciplinary Reference on Survey, Scale and Test Development (eds Irwing, P., Booth, T, & Hughes, D.J.) ch. 23 (Wiley, 2019).

  5. McCrae, R. R. & Costa, P. T. in The SAGE Handbook of Personality Theory and Assessment Vol. 1 (eds Boyle, G. J. et al.) 273–294 (SAGE, 2008).

Download references

Acknowledgements

L.A.N.A. acknowledges a John and Leslie McQuown Gift to NICO and support from the Department of Defense Army Research Office under grant number W911NF-14-1-0259. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

M.G., W.R. and L.A.N.A. designed research; M.G., W.R. and L.A.N.A. performed research; M.G. analysed data; M.G., W.R. and L.A.N.A. wrote the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luís A. Nunes Amaral.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gerlach, M., Revelle, W. & Amaral, L.A.N. Reply to: Four personality types may be neither robust nor exhaustive. Nat Hum Behav 3, 1047–1048 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0722-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0722-3

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing AI and Robotics

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: AI and Robotics newsletter — what matters in AI and robotics research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: AI and Robotics