Social uncertainty is heterogeneous and sometimes valuable

Article metrics

To win friends, help the needy, avoid exploitation or influence strangers, people must make decisions that are inherently uncertain. In their compelling and insightful perspective on resolving social uncertainty1, FeldmanHall and Shenhav (henceforth F&S) join a growing movement combining computational approaches with social psychological theory2. F&S identify a range of negative and positive aspects of social uncertainty. Here we offer additional ways to think about social uncertainty and suggest potential avenues for future research.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1.

    FeldmanHall, O. & Shenhav, A. Nat. Hum. Behav. 3, 426–435 (2019).

  2. 2.

    Cushman, F. & Gershman, S. Top. Cogn. Sci. 11, 281–298 (2019).

  3. 3.

    Dana, J., Weber, R. A. & Kuang, J. X. Econ. Theory 33, 67–80 (2007).

  4. 4.

    Kappes, A. et al. Nat. Hum. Behav. 2, 573–580 (2018).

  5. 5.

    Ülkümen, G., Fox, C. R. & Malle, B. F. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 145, 1280–1297 (2016).

  6. 6.

    Behrens, T. E. J., Hunt, L. T., Woolrich, M. W. & Rushworth, M. F. S. Nature 456, 245–249 (2008).

  7. 7.

    Diaconescu, A. O. et al. PLoS Comput. Biol. 10, e1003810 (2014).

  8. 8.

    Siegel, J. Z. et al. Nat. Hum. Behav. 2, 750–756 (2018).

  9. 9.

    Huys, Q. J., Guitart-Masip, M., Dolan, R. J. & Dayan, P. Clin. Psychol. Sci. 3, 400–421 (2015).

  10. 10.

    Haisley, E. C. & Weber, R. A. Games Econ. Behav. 68, 614–625 (2010).

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Molly J. Crockett.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark