Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Positive parenting improves multiple aspects of health and well-being in young adulthood

Nature Human Behaviour volume 3, pages 684–691 (2019)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Aspects of positive parenting have previously been linked to better offspring health and well-being1,2, though often, individual outcomes have been examined separately. Examining multiple outcomes simultaneously, over multiple aspects of parenting, may provide a more holistic picture of the parenting–health dynamics3,4. Methodological limitations such as reverse causation—good childhood outcomes that make parenting easier—also remain a concern in many previous observational studies5. Here we examined the associations between multiple aspects of parenting (including parent–child relationship satisfaction concerning love, parental authoritativeness and family dinner frequency) and various subsequent offspring psychosocial, mental, behavioural and physical health and well-being outcomes. We analysed longitudinal data from the Growing Up Today Study 1 (N = 8,476, mean baseline age = 12.78 years) and Growing Up Today Study 2 (N = 5,453, mean baseline age = 17.75 years). Both parenting and health outcomes were based on offspring self-reports. The results suggest that greater relationship satisfaction was associated with greater emotional well-being, lower risk of mental illness, eating disorders, overweight or obesity and marijuana use. To a lesser extent, greater parental authoritativeness and regular family dinner were also associated with greater offspring emotional well-being, fewer depressive symptoms, lower risk of overeating and certain sexual behaviours. This study strengthens the evidence for a public health focus on improving parenting to promote population health and well-being.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data of the NHSII and the GUTS are not publicly available. Further information including the procedures to obtain and access data from the NHSII and the GUTS is described at https://www.nurseshealthstudy.org/researchers (email: nhsaccess@channing.harvard.edu) and http://nhs2survey.org/gutswordpress/index.php/researchers/information-for-researchers/.

Code availability

All statistical analyses were performed in SAS 9.4. The code used to generate the results presented in the manuscript are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Davids, E. L., Roman, N. V. & Leach, L. The link between parenting approaches and health behavior: a systematic review. J. Hum. Behav. Soc. Environ. 27, 589–608 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yap, M. B. H., Pilkington, P. D., Ryan, S. M. & Jorm, A. F. Parental factors associated with depression and anxiety in young people: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Affect. Disord. 156, 8–23 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. VanderWeele, T. J. Outcome-wide epidemiology. Epidemiology 28, 399–402 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. VanderWeele, T. J., Mathur, M. B. & Chen, Y. Outcome-wide longitudinal designs for causal inference: a new template for empirical studies. Preprint at arXiv http://arxiv.org/abs/1810.10164 (2019).

  5. Ranson, K. E. & Urichuk, L. J. The effect of parent–child attachment relationships on child biopsychosocial outcomes: a review. Early Child Dev. Care 178, 129–152 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Becvar, R. J. & Becvar, D. S. Systems Theory and Family Therapy: A Primer 3rd edn (Rowman & Littlefield, 2017).

  7. Rhee, K. Childhood overweight and the relationship between parent behaviors, parenting style, and family functioning. Ann. Am. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. 615, 11–37 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Haines, J. et al. Family functioning and quality of parent–adolescent relationship: cross-sectional associations with adolescent weight-related behaviors and weight status. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 13, 68 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cerda, M. et al. Family ties: maternal–offspring attachment and young adult nonmedical prescription opioid use. Drug Alcohol Depend. 142, 231–238 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Holmes, J. John Bowlby and Attachment Theory 2nd edn (Routledge, 2014).

  11. Larzelere, R. E., Morris, A. S. & Harrist, A. W. E. Authoritative Parenting: Synthesizing Nurturance and Discipline for Optimal Child Development (American Psychological Association, 2013).

  12. Baumrind, D. Effects of authoritative parental control on child behavior. Child Dev. 37, 887–907 (1966).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pinquart, M. Associations of parenting dimensions and styles with internalizing symptoms in children and adolescents: a meta-analysis. Marriage Fam. Rev. 53, 613–640 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pinquart, M. Associations of parenting dimensions and styles with externalizing problems of children and adolescents: an updated meta-analysis. Dev. Psychol. 53, 873–932 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pinquart, M. Associations of parenting styles and dimensions with academic achievement in children and adolescents: a meta-analysis. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 28, 475–493 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fulkerson, J. A., Larson, N., Horning, M. & Neumark-Sztainer, D. A review of associations between family or shared meal frequency and dietary and weight status outcomes across the lifespan. J. Nutr. Educ. Behav. 46, 2–19 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Harrison, M. E. et al. Systematic review of the effects of family meal frequency on psychosocial outcomes in youth. Can. Fam. Physician 61, e96–e106 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Goldfarb, S. S., Tarver, W. L., Locher, J. L., Preskitt, J. & Sen, B. A systematic review of the association between family meals and adolescent risk outcomes. J. Adolesc. 44, 134–149 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Walton, K. et al. Secular trends in family dinner frequency among adolescents. BMC Res. Notes 9, 35 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sen, B. The relationship between frequency of family dinner and adolescent problem behaviors after adjusting for other family characteristics. J. Adolesc. 33, 187–196 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. VanderWeele, T. J. On the promotion of human flourishing. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 8148–8156 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ding, P. & VanderWeele, T. J. Sensitivity analysis without assumptions. Epidemiology 27, 368–377 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. VanderWeele, T. J. & Ding, P. Sensitivity analysis in observational research: introducing the E-value. Ann. Intern. Med. 167, 268–274 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mathur, M. B., Ding, P., Riddell, C. A. & VanderWeele, T. J. Web site and R package for computing E-values. Epidemiology 29, e45–e47 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kubzansky, L. D. et al. Positive psychological well-being and cardiovascular disease: JACC health promotion series. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 72, 1382–1396 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hammons, A. J. & Fiese, B. H. Is frequency of shared family meals related to the nutritional health of children and adolescents?. Pediatrics 127, e1565–e1574 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Swanson, S. A., Crow, S. J., Le Grange, D., Swendsen, J. & Merikangas, K. R. Prevalence and correlates of eating disorders in adolescents: results from the national comorbidity survey replication adolescent supplement. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 68, 714–723 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Miller, I. W., Ryan, C. E., Keitner, G. I., Bishop, D. S. & Epstein, N. B. The McMaster approach to families: theory, assessment, treatment and research. J. Fam. Ther. 22, 168–189 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Slinner, H. & Steinhauer, P. Family assessment measure and process model of family functioning. J. Fam. Ther. 22, 190–210 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Borawski, E. A., Ievers-Landis, C. E., Lovegreen, L. D. & Trapl, E. S. Parental monitoring, negotiated unsupervised time, and parental trust: the role of perceived parenting practices in adolescent health risk behaviors. J. Adolesc. Health 33, 60–70 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Preventing Tobacco Use Among Youth and Young Adults: A Report of the Surgeon General (US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health, 2012).

  32. Pinto, R., Correia, L. & Maia, Â. Assessing the reliability of retrospective reports of adverse childhood experiences among adolescents with documented childhood maltreatment. J. Fam. Violence 29, 431–438 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Patten, S. B. et al. Retrospective and prospectively assessed childhood adversity in association with major depression, alcohol consumption and painful conditions. Epidemiol. Psychiatr. Sci. 24, 158–165 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Field, A. E. et al. Overweight, weight concerns, and bulimic behaviors among girls and boys. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 38, 754–760 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Sanders, M. R., Kirby, J. N., Tellegen, C. L. & Day, J. J. The Triple P-Positive Parenting Program: a systematic review and meta-analysis of a multi-level system of parenting support. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 34, 337–357 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Sandler, I. N., Schoenfelder, E. N., Wolchik, S. A. & MacKinnon, D. P. Long-term impact of prevention programs to promote effective parenting: lasting effects but uncertain processes. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 62, 299–329 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Sandler, I., Ingram, A., Wolchik, S., Tein, J. Y. & Winslow, E. Long‐term effects of parenting‐focused preventive interventions to promote resilience of children and adolescents. Child Dev. Perspect. 9, 164–171 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Yap, M. B. H. et al. Parents in prevention: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of parenting interventions to prevent internalizing problems in children from birth to age 18. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 50, 138–158 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Preventing Violence through the Development of Safe, Stable and Nurturing Relationships between Children and Their Parents and Caregivers. Series of Briefings on Violence Prevention: the Evidence (WHO, 2009).

  40. Helping Parents in Developing Countries Improve Adolescents’ Health (WHO, 2007).

  41. Chu, J. T., Farruggia, S. P., Sanders, M. R. & Ralph, A. Towards a public health approach to parenting programmes for parents of adolescents. J. Public Health (Oxf.) 34, i41–i47 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Sterne, J. A. et al. Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: potential and pitfalls. BMJ 338, b2393 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Moons, K. G., Donders, R. A., Stijnen, T. & Harrell, F. E. Jr. Using the outcome for imputation of missing predictor values was preferred. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 59, 1092–1101 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Groenwold, R. H., Donders, A. R. T., Roes, K. C., Harrell, F. E. Jr & Moons, K. G. Dealing with missing outcome data in randomized trials and observational studies. Am. J. Epidemiol. 175, 210–217 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Jaccard, J., Dittus, P. J. & Gordon, V. V. Maternal correlates of adolescent sexual and contraceptive behavior. Fam. Plann. Perspect. 28, 159–185 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Kubzansky, L., Winning, A. & Kawachi, I. in Social Epidemiology: New Perspectives on Social Determinants of Global Population Health (eds Berkman, L. F. et al.) 320–364 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2014).

  47. Bun, J. R., Louiselle, P. A., Misukanis, T. M. & Mueller, R. A. Effects of parental authoritarianism and authoritativeness on self-esteem. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 14, 271–282 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Rasmussen, A. R. et al. Validity of self-assessment of pubertal maturation. Pediatrics 135, 86–93 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Giatti, L., Camelo Ldo, V., Rodrigues, J. F. & Barreto, S. M. Reliability of the MacArthur scale of subjective social status—Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil). BMC Public Health 12, 1096 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Pan, A. et al. Bidirectional association between depression and type 2 diabetes mellitus in women. Arch. Intern. Med. 170, 1884–1891 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Andresen, E. M., Malmgren, J. A., Carter, W. B. & Patrick, D. L. Screening for depression in well older adults: evaluation of a short form of the CES-D (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale). Am. J. Prev. Med. 10, 77–84 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Blakesley, R. E. et al. Comparisons of methods for multiple hypothesis testing in neuropsychological research. Neuropsychology 23, 255–264 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by funding from the Templeton Foundation (grant no. 52125 and no. 61075) and the US National Institutes of Health (grant CA222147) awarded to T.J.V. The National Institutes of Health supports the NHSII (grant UM1CA176726) and the GUTS1 and GUTS2 (grants R01HD066963, R01DA033974 and 2R01OH0098003CDC). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript. We thank the Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School for their support in conducting this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Human Flourishing Program, Institute for Quantitative Social Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA

    Ying Chen & Tyler J. VanderWeele

  2. Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA

    Ying Chen, Brittany M. Charlton & Tyler J. VanderWeele

  3. Department of Family Relations and Applied Nutrition, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada

    Jess Haines

  4. Division of Adolescent/Young Adult Medicine, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA

    Brittany M. Charlton

  5. Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

    Brittany M. Charlton

  6. Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA

    Brittany M. Charlton

Authors
  1. Ying Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jess Haines
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Brittany M. Charlton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Tyler J. VanderWeele
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

T.J.V. developed the study concept. Y.C., J.H., B.M.C. and T.J.V. contributed to the study design. Y.C. had full access to the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and accuracy of the data analysis. Y.C. drafted the manuscript. Y.C., J.H., B.M.C. and T.J.V. provided critical revisions and approved the final submitted version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ying Chen.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Methods, Supplementary Tables 1–20, and Supplementary References.

Reporting Summary

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, Y., Haines, J., Charlton, B.M. et al. Positive parenting improves multiple aspects of health and well-being in young adulthood. Nat Hum Behav 3, 684–691 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0602-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0602-x

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing