News & Views | Published:


Methodological triangulation

Nature Human Behaviourvolume 2pages806807 (2018) | Download Citation

A new study demonstrates a novel research strategy for studying juries, moving inquiry forward more rapidly and efficiently.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1.

    Avorn, J. Powerful Medicines: The Benefits, Risks, and Costs of Prescription Drugs (Knopf, New York, 2004).

  2. 2.

    Pearson, J. M. et al. Nat. Hum. Behav. (2018).

  3. 3.

    Bornstein, B. H. Law Hum. Behav. 23, 75–91 (1999).

  4. 4.

    Bornstein, B. H. et al. Law Hum. Behav. 41, 13–28 (2017).

  5. 5.

    Diamond, S. S. Law Hum. Behav. 41, 561–571 (1997).

  6. 6.

    Pezdek, K., Avila-Mora, E. & Sperry, K. App. Cog. Psych. 24, 673–690 (2010).

  7. 7.

    National Research Council Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward (National Academies Press, Washington DC, 2009).

  8. 8.

    Koehler, J. J., Schweitzer, N. J., Saks, M. J. & McQuiston, D. Psych. Public Policy Law 22, 401–413 (2016).

Download references

Author information


  1. Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, USA

    • Michael J. Saks


  1. Search for Michael J. Saks in:

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael J. Saks.

About this article

Publication history


Issue Date


Newsletter Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing