Correspondence | Published:

Analytic atheism revisited

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    Camerer, C. F. et al. Nat. Hum. Behav. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0399-z (2018).

  2. 2.

    Gervais, W. M. & Norenzayan, A. Science 336, 493–496 (2012).

  3. 3.

    Sanchez, C., Sundermeier, B., Gray, K. & Calin-Jageman, R. J. PLoS ONE 12, e0172636 (2017).

  4. 4.

    Gervais, W. M. Post publication peer review. Will Gervais http://willgervais.com/blog/2017/3/2/post-publication-peer-review (2017).

  5. 5.

    Shenhav, A., Rand, D. G. & Greene, J. D. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 141, 423–428 (2012).

  6. 6.

    Yilmaz, O., Karadöller, D. Z. & Sofuoglu, G. Int. J. Psychol. Relig. 26, 360–369 (2016).

  7. 7.

    Pennycook, G., Cheyne, J. A., Seli, P., Koehler, D. J. & Fugelsang, J. A. Cognition 123, 335–346 (2012).

  8. 8.

    Pennycook, G., Ross, R. M., Koehler, D. J. & Fugelsang, J. A. PLoS ONE 11, e0153039 (2016).

  9. 9.

    Saribay, S. A. & Yilmaz, O. Pers. Individ. Dif. 114, 24–29 (2017).

  10. 10.

    Gervais, W. M. et al. Judgm. Decis. Mak. 13, 268–274 (2018).

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Will M. Gervais.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Further reading